A phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ganitumab or placebo in combination with gemcitabine (G) as first-line therapy for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: The GAMMA trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4135-TPS4135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Fuchs ◽  
Sergio Jobim Azevedo ◽  
Alfredo Carrato ◽  
Vincent Haddad ◽  
Lara Rachel Lipton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Data Monitoring Committee ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Metastatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Adenocarcinoma Of The Pancreas

TPS4135 Background: Ganitumab (AMG 479) is an investigational, fully human, monoclonal antibody inhibitor of the IGF1R. In a randomized phase II study in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, addition of ganitumab 12 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W) to G prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (Kindler. Ann Onc. 2010;21:741P). Exposure-efficacy analysis showed that patients with higher ganitumab exposure levels (AUCss at or above median) had longer PFS and OS (Lu. JCO. 2011;29:4049). Methods: In this phase III study, patients are randomized 2:2:1 to placebo + G, ganitumab 12 mg/kg + G, or ganitumab 20 mg/kg + G. Patients receive ganitumab or placebo IV days (D) 1 and 15 and G 1000 mg/m2 IV D 1, 8, and 15 every 28 D. Patients receiving 20 mg/kg ganitumab are expected to achieve ganitumab levels above the median in phase 2. Key eligibility criteria: untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas; ECOG score 0 or 1; ≥ 18 years old; adequate organ function; and fasting (or non-fasting) glucose ≤ 160 mg/dL. The primary endpoint is OS. A log-rank test stratified by ECOG, presence of liver metastases, and geographic region will compare OS independently for each ganitumab arm at an overall one-sided 2.5% significance level for declaring superiority of ganitumab + G vs placebo + G. Key secondary endpoints include PFS, objective response, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. An additional objective is to define a subpopulation with improved OS based upon baseline levels of circulating biomarkers. Enrollment began in April 2011. As of January 23, 2012, 463 of 825 patients have been enrolled. The study is overseen by an independent data monitoring committee. Status: open. Supported by Amgen Inc. in collaboration with Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01231347.

RILOMET-1: An international phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of rilotumumab plus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (ECX) as first-line therapy in patients with advanced MET-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4153-TPS4153 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Cunningham ◽  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran ◽  
Irina Davidenko ◽  
David H. Ilson ◽  
André M. Murad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Data Monitoring Committee ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Disease Extent

TPS4153 Background: Rilotumumab is an investigational, fully human monoclonal antibody to hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor that inhibits signaling through the MET receptor. In a randomized phase II study in patients with advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, addition of rilotumumab every 3 weeks (Q3W) to ECX showed trends toward improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with ECX alone. In patients with high tumor MET expression and high rilotumumab exposure, the treatment effect of rilotumumab combined with ECX was significantly enhanced. Methods: In this phase III study, patients (planned N=450) are randomized 1:1 to ECX (intravenous [IV] epirubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, IV cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, and oral capecitabine 625 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1−21) plus double-blind rilotumumab 15 mg/kg or placebo IV Q3W. Randomization is stratified by disease extent (locally advanced vs metastatic) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (0 vs 1). Key eligibility criteria include previously untreated, pathologically confirmed unresectable locally advanced or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma; ECOG score 0 or 1; ≥18 years old; MET-positive by centralized immunohistochemistry; HER2-negative; adequate organ function; and ≥6 months since neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint is OS. Key secondary endpoints include PFS, 12-month survival rate, objective response, OS in MET expression tertiles, safety, and pharmacokinetics. An exploratory objective is to assess associations between outcomes and tumor and circulating biomarkers. Enrollment began in November 2012, and the trial continues to accrue. An independent data monitoring committee will conduct planned interim reviews for safety and efficacy. Status: recruiting participants. Sponsored by Amgen Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT01697072.

A phase III trial of ganitumab (GAN, AMG 479) with gemcitabine (G) as first-line treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC): An analysis of safety from the GAMMA trial (GEM and AMG 479 in Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4042-4042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Fuchs ◽  
Masafumi Ikeda ◽  
Gyorgy Bodoky ◽  
Takuji Okusaka ◽  
Shinichi Ohkawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Data Monitoring Committee ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

4042 Background: GAN is an investigational, fully human, monoclonal antibody inhibitor of IGF1R. GAMMA is assessing the safety and efficacy of GAN plus G as first-line tx in MPC pts (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01231347). Methods: This is an ongoing, global, phase III, double-blind study. Pts are randomized 2:2:1 to receive placebo, GAN 12 mg/kg, or GAN 20 mg/kg (IV; days 1 and 15 Q28D) with G 1000 mg/m2 (IV; days 1, 8, and 15 Q28D). The planned sample size is 825. Primary endpoint: overall survival. Key secondary endpoints: progression-free survival, 1-year survival rate, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. This study includes multiple planned safety analyses conducted by an independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC). The current predefined safety analyses occurred when 150pts received ≥ 1 cycle of tx. Results: As of Sep 16, 2011, 207 pts are included in this aggregate analysis: 50% male; median age, 63 yrs (range 36-83); ECOG PS 0/1, 50%/50%. Of the 207 pts, 204 pts received study tx, and 61 pts ended study tx. Most frequent adverse events (AE) are shown (table). Ten pts (5%) died during or within 30 days of the end of tx. Seven events were attributed to or associated with disease progression. One event of cardiac failure was reported to be possibly tx related. Pulmonary embolism was suspected but not confirmed. Conclusions: The GAMMA study continues per protocol. The only grade 3/4 AE occurring in more than 5% of patients to date is neutropenia. [Table: see text]

A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of rilotumumab in combination with cisplatin and capecitabine (CX) as first-line therapy for Asian patients (pts) with advanced MET-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma: The RILOMET-2 trial.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS226-TPS226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshihiko Doi ◽  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Kei Muro ◽  
Yizhou Jiang ◽  
Rajul K. Jain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Data Monitoring Committee ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind

TPS226 Background: Rilotumumab is an investigational, fully human monoclonal antibody to hepatocyte growth factor, the only known ligand of the MET receptor. In a phase 2 study, trends toward improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were seen with rilotumumab plus epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) vs ECX alone in pts with G/GEJ cancer; the treatment effect of rilotumumab was enhanced in MET-positive pts (Iveson et al. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:1007). In a phase 1/1b study, rilotumumab plus CX had manageable toxicities and a favorable pharmacokinetic (PK) profile in Japanese pts with MET-positive G/GEJ cancer (Doi et al. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:5s,abstract 4051). Methods: In this phase 3 study, 450 pts from Asian countries are randomized 1:1 to CX (intravenous [IV] cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1−14) plus double-blind rilotumumab 15 mg/kg or placebo IV on day 1 every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. After cycle 6, pts will receive capecitabine plus rilotumumab or placebo. Randomization is stratified by disease extent (locally advanced vs metastatic), prior surgery for G/GEJ or esophageal cancer (yes vs no), and country (China vs other). Key eligibility criteria include previously untreated, pathologically confirmed unresectable locally advanced or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, ≥20 years, ECOG score ≤1, MET-positive by centralized immunohistochemistry, HER2-negative, adequate organ function, and ≥6 months since neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoints are PFS and OS. A log-rank test stratified by the randomization factors will compare PFS and OS between arms. Key secondary endpoints include 12-month survival rate, time to progression, objective response and disease control rates, duration of/time to response, safety, and PK. Enrollment began in July 2014, and the trial continues to recruit participants. The study is overseen by an independent data monitoring committee. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02137343. Sponsor: Amgen Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT02137343.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase III study of ramucirumab (IMC-1121B; RAM) and best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo (PBO) and BSC as second-line treatment in patients (pts) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following first-line therapy with sorafenib (SOR).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4146-TPS4146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew X. Zhu ◽  
Ian Chau ◽  
Jean-Frédéric Blanc ◽  
Takuji Okusaka ◽  
Maria Rojas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Vegf Receptor ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Patient Reported

TPS4146 Background: Blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling in HCC has been shown in preclinical models with monoclonal antibodies and small molecule multikinase inhibitors, and in clinical trials with SOR, to have anti-tumor activity and improve survival. RAM, a fully human monoclonal antibody, binds to the VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), potently blocks the binding of the VEGF ligand to VEGFR-2, inhibits VEGF-stimulated activation of VEGFR-2, and neutralizes VEGF-induced mitogenesis of human endothelial cells. In a single-arm, Phase 2 study of RAM as 1st-line monotherapy in 42 pts with advanced HCC (Zhu, ILCA 2010, abstr. O-033), preliminary results included median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4 months (m), time to progression (TTP) of 4.2 m, overall survival (OS) of 12 m and disease control rate of 70% (best overall response: 10% partial response, 60% stable disease). Methods: Pts with HCC with disease progression during or following 1st-line therapy with SOR (or who were intolerant to SOR) are randomized 1:1 to receive RAM (8 mg/kg) or PBO once every 2 weeks, with BSC, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Eligibility includes prior SOR as 1st-line systemic treatment for HCC, Child-Pugh A, B7 or 8 cirrhosis, ECOG PS 0-1, bilirubin < 3 mg/dL, transaminases ≤ 5 × upper limit of normal (ULN), creatinine ≤ 1.2 × ULN, and platelets ≥ 75×103/µL. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include PFS, best objective response rate, TTP, patient-reported outcome measures of disease-specific symptoms and health-related quality of life, safety, and RAM pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity. With 544 patients, this study is designed to detect an increase in OS (median 6 m with PBO to 8 m with RAM; 1-sided α= 2.5%, 85% power). As of 18 January 2012, approximately 52% of planned pts have been randomized. The IDMC reviewed this study on 21 June and 3 November 2011 and recommended the study to continue unmodified.

Brivanib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Who Were Intolerant to Sorafenib or for Whom Sorafenib Failed: Results From the Randomized Phase III BRISK-PS Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (28) ◽  
pp. 3509-3516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep M. Llovet ◽  
Thomas Decaens ◽  
Jean-Luc Raoul ◽  
Eveline Boucher ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Dual Inhibitor

Purpose Brivanib is a selective dual inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor receptors implicated in tumorigenesis and angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). An unmet medical need persists for patients with HCC whose tumors do not respond to sorafenib or who cannot tolerate it. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessed brivanib in patients with HCC who had been treated with sorafenib. Patients and Methods In all, 395 patients with advanced HCC who progressed on/after or were intolerant to sorafenib were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive brivanib 800 mg orally once per day plus best supportive care (BSC) or placebo plus BSC. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included time to progression (TTP), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and safety. Results Median OS was 9.4 months for brivanib and 8.2 months for placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95.8% CI, 0.69 to 1.15; P = .3307). Adjusting treatment effect for baseline prognostic factors yielded an OS HR of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.04; P = .1044). Exploratory analyses showed a median time to progression of 4.2 months for brivanib and 2.7 months for placebo (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.76; P < .001), and an mRECIST ORR of 10% for brivanib and 2% for placebo (odds ratio, 5.72). Study discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 61 brivanib patients (23%) and nine placebo patients (7%). The most frequent treatment-related grade 3 to 4 AEs for brivanib included hypertension (17%), fatigue (13%), hyponatremia (11%), and decreased appetite (10%). Conclusion In patients with HCC who had been treated with sorafenib, brivanib did not significantly improve OS. The observed benefit in the secondary outcomes of TTP and ORR warrants further investigation.

scholarly journals Results and lessons learnt from a randomized controlled trial: prophylactic treatment of vestibular migraine with metoprolol (PROVEMIG)

Trials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Otmar Bayer ◽  
◽  
Christine Adrion ◽  
Amani Al Tawil ◽  
Ulrich Mansmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Vestibular Migraine ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Benefit ◽  
Episodic Vertigo ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background Vestibular migraine (VM) is the most frequent cause of recurrent spontaneous attacks of vertigo causally related to migraine. The objective of the Prophylactic treatment of vestibular migraine with metoprolol (PROVEMIG) trial was to demonstrate that metoprolol succinate is superior to placebo in the prevention of episodic vertigo- and migraine-related symptoms in patients with VM. Methods This phase III, two-arm, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial was designed to be conducted at tertiary referral centres at neurology and ear, nose and throat departments of eight German university hospitals. The planned sample size was a total of 266 patients to be allocated. Adults aged 18 years or above diagnosed with probable or definitive VM according to the Neuhauser criteria 2001 were randomly assigned 1:1 to 6 months blinded metoprolol (maintenance dosage of 95 mg daily) or placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the self-reported number of vertiginous attacks per 30 days documented by means of a paper-based daily symptom diary. The pre-specified time period of primary interest was defined as months 4 to 6. Secondary outcomes included the patient-reported number of migraine days and vertigo days, the Dizziness Handicap Inventory, and clinical assessments. Adverse events were reported throughout the whole 9-month study period. Results At the time of trial termination, no evidence for a difference in the incidence of vertiginous attacks between groups was detected. For the full analysis set, the incidence rate ratio was 0.983 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.902–1.071) for metoprolol versus placebo. In both groups, there was a significant decline over time in the overall monthly vertigo attacks by a factor of 0.830 (95% CI 0.776–0.887). Results were consistent for all subjective and objective key measures of efficacy. The treatment was well tolerated with no unexpected safety findings. Conclusions After randomizing 130 patients PROVEMIG had to be discontinued because of poor participant accrual not related to the tolerability of the study medication or safety concerns; no treatment benefit of metoprolol over placebo could be established. Additional preparatory work is much needed in the development, psychometric evaluation and interpretation of clinically meaningful end points in trials on episodic syndromes like VM taking into consideration the complexity of this disease entity comprising two domains (vertigo- and headache-related disability). Trial registration EudraCT, 2009-013701-34. Prospectively registered on 8 April 2011.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of abatacept in active primary Sjögren’s syndrome: results of a phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

2020 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2020-218599
Author(s):  
Alan N Baer ◽  
Jacques-Eric Gottenberg ◽  
E William St Clair ◽  
Takayuki Sumida ◽  
Tsutomu Takeuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sjögren’S Syndrome ◽  
Sjögren's Syndrome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Sjogren’S Syndrome ◽  
Sjogren's Syndrome ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Sjögren‘S Syndrome

ObjectivesTo evaluate efficacy and safety of abatacept in adults with active primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) in a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.MethodsEligible patients (moderate-to-severe pSS [2016 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria], EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index [ESSDAI] ≥5, anti-SS-related antigen A/anti-Ro antibody positive) received weekly subcutaneous abatacept 125 mg or placebo for 169 days followed by an open-label extension to day 365. Primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in ESSDAI at day 169. Key secondary endpoints were mean change from baseline in EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) and stimulated whole salivary flow (SWSF) at day 169. Other secondary clinical endpoints included glandular functions and patient-reported outcomes. Selected biomarkers and immune cell phenotypes were examined. Safety was monitored.ResultsOf 187 patients randomised, 168 completed double-blind period and 165 continued into open-label period. Mean (SD) baseline ESSDAI and ESSPRI total scores were 9.4 (4.3) and 6.5 (2.0), respectively. Statistical significance was not reached for primary (ESSDAI −3.2 abatacept vs −3.7 placebo, p=0.442) or key secondary endpoints (ESSPRI, p=0.337; SWSF, p=0.584). No clinical benefit of abatacept over placebo at day 169 was seen with other clinical and PRO endpoints. Relative to baseline, abatacept was associated with significant differences vs placebo in some disease-relevant biomarkers (including IgG, IgA, IgM-rheumatoid factor) and pathogenic cell subpopulations (post hoc analyses). No new safety signals were identified.ConclusionsAbatacept treatment did not result in significant clinical efficacy compared with placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe pSS, despite evidence of biological activity.

scholarly journals A Phase III open-label trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of CPI-613 plus modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) versus FOLFIRINOX (FFX) in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (28) ◽  
pp. 3189-3196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip A Philip ◽  
Marc E Buyse ◽  
Angela T Alistar ◽  
Caio MSPR Lima ◽  
Sanjeev Luther ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Metastatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Entry Points ◽  
Adenocarcinoma Of The Pancreas

Devimistat (CPI-613®) is a novel lipoate analog that inhibits the tricarboxcylic acid cycle at two key carbon entry points. Through its inhibition of pyruvate dehydrogenase and a-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complexes, devimistat inhibits the entry of glucose and glutamine derived carbons, respectively. Pancreatic cancer is dependent on mitochondrial function for enhanced survival and aggressiveness. In a Phase I study of modified FOLFIRINOX, in combination with devimistat for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, there was a 61% objective response rate including a 17% complete response rate. This report outlines the rationale and design of the AVENGER 500 study, a Phase III clinical trial of devimistat in combination with modified FOLFIRINOX compared with FOLFIRINOX alone for patients with previously untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Clinical trial registration: NCT03504423

An international, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III study (MONET1) of motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/P) in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA7512-LBA7512 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Scagliotti ◽  
I. Vynnychenko ◽  
Y. Ichinose ◽  
K. Park ◽  
K. Kubota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Model ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Nonsquamous Nsclc

LBA7512 Background: This study evaluated whether motesanib (a selective oral inhibitor of VEGFR 1, 2 and 3; PDGFR and Kit) plus C/P improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo + C/P in patients (pts) with nonsquamous NSCLC and in a subset of pts with adenocarcinoma. Methods: Pts had stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC and no prior systemic therapy for advanced NSCLC. The study initially enrolled all histologies but was amended to exclude pts with squamous NSCLC owing to a high rate of hemoptysis. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive up to six 3-wk cycles of C (AUC 6 mg/mL·min) and P (200 mg/m2) with either motesanib 125 mg QD (Arm A) or placebo QD (Arm B) orally continuously. The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR) and association between placental growth factor (PLGF) change and OS. OS was evaluated using a stratified Cox model and 2-sided log-rank test (α=0.03 for nonsquamous pts and α=0.02 for adenocarcinoma pts). Results: 1090 pts with nonsquamous NSCLC were randomized (Arm A/B, n=541/549); 890 had adenocarcinoma (n=448/442). 61% were men; median age was 60 years (range 21–87); 83% had stage IV disease. At the time of analysis, 753 pts had died (608 pts with adenocarcinoma). Median follow-up was 10.6 mo. OS was not significantly improved in Arm A compared with Arm B (Table). In Arm A, PLGF analysis did not show an association with OS. The incidence of grade ≥3 AEs in Arms A/B was 73/59%. Grade ≥3 AEs occurring more frequently in Arm A than B included neutropenia (22/15%), diarrhea (9/1%), hypertension (7/1%) and cholecystitis (3/0%). The incidence of grade 5 AEs was 14/9% in Arms A/B. Conclusions: In pts with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, treatment with motesanib + C/P did not significantly improve OS compared with C/P alone. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document