The effect of gaps in chemotherapy on survival in patients with high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 180-180
Author(s):  
Yvonne Sada ◽  
Zhigang Duan ◽  
Hashem El-Serag ◽  
Jessica Davila
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Clinical Factors ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Multivariable Regression ◽  
The Impact

180 Background: Current guidelines recommend six months of chemotherapy (CT) for stage III colon cancer and consideration for high-risk stage II colon cancer. No previous studies have examined the impact of CT gaps on survival. This retrospective study examines determinants of CT gaps and the effect of gaps on survival. Methods: Using national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry-Medicare linked data, high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer patients diagnosed between 2000-2007 who received surgery and CT were identified. CT duration and gaps were calculated. CT gap was defined as 30 to 90 days between two CT claims. Data on demographics, clinical factors (comorbidity, tumor grade), and treatment factors (time to CT initiation, toxicity, hospitalization) were collected. Multivariable regression was used to examine factors associated with gaps. Cox proportional hazards analysis examined the effect of gaps on risk of mortality. Results: 7,371 patients were identified. Median age was 75 (IQR: 71-79); 47% were male. Among all patients, 1,803 (24%) had a gap. 2,674 patients (36%) received 5 to 7 months of CT, of which 469 (18%) had a gap. Multivariable regression analysis showed that patients who were black (OR 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.7), stage III (1.2, 1.0-1.3), had toxicity (1.3, 1.1-1.4), or had 3 to 4 months of CT (vs. 5-7 months, 2.6, 2.3-3.0) were more likely to have a gap, while patients with a more recent diagnosis in 2007(vs. 2000, 0.6, 0.5-0.8) were less likely to have a gap. 3-year cancer-specific survival was the same in all patients with CT gaps compared with no gaps (80%, 95% CI: 78%-82% vs. 81%, 95% CI: 80%-82%). Cox proportional hazard models showed that patients with gaps did not have increased risk of mortality (HR 0.99, 0.89-1.1) adjusting for patient and clinical factors. Among those who received 5 to 7 months of CT, 3-year survival was 8% lower in patients with gaps compared to those with no gaps (80%, 95% CI: 75%-83% vs. 88%, 95% CI: 87%-90%). Conclusions: Nearly 25% of high-risk stage II and III patients who received CT had a gap. CT gaps were associated with worse survival in patients who received 5 to 7 months of CT. Interventions to improve CT toxicity management and reduce gaps are needed to maximize the benefit of CT.

scholarly journals Review: Combination therapy in high-risk stage II or stage III colon cancer: current practice and future prospects

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diogo Assed Bastos ◽  
Suilane Coelho Ribeiro ◽  
Daniela de Freitas ◽  
Paulo M. Hoff
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Future Prospects ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer

scholarly journals Predictive potential of tumour-stroma ratio on benefit from adjuvant bevacizumab in high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. v168-v169
Author(s):  
S. Zunder ◽  
G. van Pelt ◽  
H. Gelderblom ◽  
R. Tollenaar ◽  
C. Mancao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Tumour Stroma ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer

VEGF and VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR2) gene polymorphisms predict tumor recurrence in stage II and III colon cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4004-4004 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Lurje ◽  
A. M. Schultheis ◽  
A. E. Hendifar ◽  
S. Ashouri ◽  
W. Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Vegf Receptor ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk

4004 Background: Despite recent advances in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, tailoring adjuvant treatment of stage II and III colon cancer patients remains controversial. Identifying a reliable panel of prognostic and predictive markers for tumor recurrence is critical in selecting an individualized and tailored chemotherapy. Tumor angiogenesis plays an important role in tumor development, progression and metastasis. In this retrospective study, we tested whether a specific pattern of 40 functionally significant polymorphisms in 37 genes involved in angiogenesis and tumor microenvironment will predict the risk of tumor recurrence in stage II and III colon cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Between 1999 and 2006 blood specimens from 140 patients (69 females and 71 males with a median age of 59 years; range=28–86) were obtained at the University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center (USC/NCCC). Sixty-three patients had stage II and 77 had stage III colon cancer. The median follow-up was 5.4 years (range=2.0–16.8). 51 of 140 patients (36.4%) developed tumor recurrence with a 5-year probability of 0.28 ± 0.06 for stage II and 0.40 ± 0.06 for stage III colon cancer patients. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood and genotypes were determined using PCR based RFLP. Results: Polymorphisms in VEGF (C936T; p=0.009, log-rank) and VEGFR2 (+4422 AC- repeat; p=0.04, log-rank and +1416 T/A; p=0.0009, log-rank) were associated with risk of tumor recurrence in stage III colon cancer patients (n=77). VEGFR2 AC-repeat polymorphisms were additionally associated with risk of recurrence in Stage II colon cancer patients (n=63, p=0.02, log-rank). Conclusion: VEGF C936T and VEGFR2 (+4422 AC-repeat and +1416 T/A) polymorphisms may help to identify Stage II and III colon cancer patients who are at increased risk for developing tumor recurrence. Angiogenesis seems to play a crucial role in tumor recurrence, thus targeting VEGF and VEGFR2 may be of clinical benefit for stage II and stage III colon cancer patients. Large prospective trials are needed to validate these preliminary data. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy for stages II and III colon cancer after complete resection: a clinical practice guideline

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 418 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.M. Meyers ◽  
R. Cosby ◽  
F. Quereshy ◽  
D. Jonker
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Practice Guideline ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Resected Stage ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

Background Updated practice guidelines on adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected colon cancer are lacking. In 2008, Cancer Care Ontario’s Program in Evidence-Based Care developed a guideline on adjuvant therapy for stages ii and iii colon cancer. With newer regimens being assessed in this patient population and older agents being either abandoned because of non-effectiveness or replaced by agents that are more efficacious, a full update of the original guideline was undertaken.Methods Literature searches (January 1987 to August 2015) of medline, embase, and the Cochrane Library were conducted; in addition, abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology, and the European Cancer Congress were reviewed (the latter for January 2007 to August 2015). A practice guideline was drafted that was then scrutinized by internal and external reviewers whose comments were incorporated into the final guideline.Results Twenty-six unique reports of eighteen randomized controlled trials and thirteen unique reports of twelve meta-analyses or pooled analyses were included in the evidence base. The 5 recommendations developed included 3 for stage ii colon cancer and 2 for stage iii colon cancer.Conclusions Patients with completely resected stage iii colon cancer should be offered adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5fu)–based chemotherapy with or without oxaliplatin (based on definitive data for improvements in survival and disease-free survival). Patients with resected stage ii colon cancer without “high-risk” features should not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with “high-risk” features, 5fu-based chemotherapy with or without oxaliplatin should be offered, although no clinical trials have been conducted to conclusively demonstrate the same benefits seen in stage iii colon cancer.

scholarly journals Predictive potential of tumour-stroma ratio on benefit from adjuvant bevacizumab in high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphanie M. Zunder ◽  
Gabi W. van Pelt ◽  
Hans J. Gelderblom ◽  
Christoph Mancao ◽  
Hein Putter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Tumour Stroma ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence risk in stage II colon cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 533-533
Author(s):  
Taiwo Adesoye ◽  
Chung-Yuan Hu ◽  
Amanda Cuddy ◽  
Amanda B. Francescatti ◽  
Jessica R. Schumacher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
The Impact

533 Background: Although clinical guidelines recommend consideration of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage II colon cancer, the impact on recurrence risk and cancer related survival is unclear. Furthermore, among Medicare patients, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival. We examine the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence risk and overall survival in a diverse cohort. Methods: 6,095 patients who underwent surgery for stage II-III colon cancer (2006-2007) were randomly selected from facilities reporting to the National Cancer Data Base for additional abstraction of tumor information, 5 year recurrence and survival. Death or second cancer within 6 months were excluded. Patients were classified as high or low risk using standard pathologic factors. Multivariate Cox regression with propensity score weighting was performed to compare recurrence risk and overall survival. Results: Of 3,423 patients with stage II colon cancer, 26.9% (n = 883) received chemotherapy compared to 76.2% (n = 1,839) of stage III patients. Among stage II patients, 47.8% (n = 1,636) had at least one high risk feature and 30.8% (n = 481) of these received chemotherapy. Five year recurrence rate in stage II patients was 13% (n = 392), greater in high risk compared to non-high risk patients (13.3% vs 9.3% p < 0.0001) and 24.4% (n = 874) in stage III patients. Chemotherapy did not improve recurrence risk in stage II patients regardless of risk status (High risk: hazard ratio [HR] 1.37; 95% CI 0.96 - 1.97; Non-high risk: HR 1.39; 95% CI 0.91 - 2.11). Chemotherapy was associated with a significant improvement in recurrence risk in stage III patients (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.63 - 0.96). However, chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival in both high (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.51 - 0.92) and non-high risk stage II patients (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.55 - 1.04), and also in stage III patients (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.41 - 0.54). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with a lower recurrence rate among stage II colon cancer patients. The observed survival benefit associated with chemotherapy is likely attributable to non-oncologic factors such as patient selection. Decision-making regarding chemotherapy use in this cohort should be carefully approached.

Duration of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer with deficient DNA mismatch repair.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4075-4075
Author(s):  
Zehua Wu ◽  
Huabin Hu ◽  
Chao Wang ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
Yanhong Deng
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Dna Mismatch Repair ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer

4075 Background: In the IDEA collaboration, noninferiority was not confirmed for 3 months versus 6 months of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy among patients with high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer (CC). Patients with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) have a good prognosis, but for whom, whether limiting the duration of adjuvant therapy will compromise oncologic outcomes remains undefined. We evaluated the impact of 3 months of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone in comparison with 6 months of FOLFOX on disease-free survival (DFS) in dMMR CC patients. Methods: This retrospective study included all consecutive patients who underwent curative surgical resection for high-risk stage II or III dMMR CC between May, 2011 and July, 2019. Prognostic factors were analyzed using Cox models, and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: A total of 242 dMMR CC patients were included (43.4% high-risk stage II, 56.6% stage III). The patients received 6 months of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 66; median cycles [rang] = 12 [10-12]), 3 months of FOLFOX (n = 87; median cycles [rang] = 6 [4-8]), or surgery alone (n = 89). Three groups were generally well balanced, although more patients with stage III were in the 6-month therapy group (74.2%), compared with the 3-month therapy group (57.5%) and the surgery alone group (42.7%). As compared with 6 months of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy in the overall population, 3 months therapy reduced DFS in multivariable analysis (HR, 2.78; 95CI, 1.18 to 6.47; P = 0.02), similar to surgery alone (HR, 2.30; 95CI, 0.99 to 5.38; P = 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, a therapy duration of 6 months was statistically superior to a duration of 3 months only in the patients with stage III, with a 3-year rate of DFS of 86.2% versus 70.8% (HR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.14 to 8.19; P = 0.026). Conclusions: This study supports the 6-month duration of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III dMMR CC.

scholarly journals Adherence to Stage-Specific Treatment Guidelines for Patients With Colon Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 972-979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryaz Chagpar ◽  
Yan Xing ◽  
Yi-Ju Chiang ◽  
Barry W. Feig ◽  
George J. Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Adherence to evidence-based treatment guidelines has been proposed as a measure of cancer care quality. We sought to determine rates of and factors associated with adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) treatment guidelines for colon cancer. Patients and Methods Patients within the National Cancer Data Base treated for colon adenocarcinoma (2003 to 2007) were identified. Adherence to stage-specific NCCN guidelines was determined based on disease stage. Hierarchical regression analyses were performed to identify factors predictive of adherence, overtreatment, and undertreatment. Results A total of 173,243 patients were included in the final cohort, 123,953 (71%) of whom were treated according to NCCN guidelines. Patients with stage I disease were more likely to receive guideline-based treatment (96%) than patients with stage II (low risk, 66%; high risk, 36%), III (71%), or IV (73%) disease (P < .001). Adherence to consensus-based guidelines increased over time. Factors associated with adherence across all stages included age, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index score, later year of diagnosis, and insurance status. Among patients with high-risk stage II or stage III disease, older patients with pre-existing comorbidities and patients with lower socioeconomic status were less likely to be offered adjuvant chemotherapy. Among patients with stage I and II disease, young, healthy patients were more likely to be recommended chemotherapy, in discordance with NCCN guidelines. Conclusion Significant variation exists in the treatment of colon cancer, particularly in treatment of high-risk stage II and stage III disease. The impact of nonadherence to guidelines on patient outcomes needs to be further elucidated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document