Toxicity study of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab followed by 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 337-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davendra Sohal ◽  
James M. Metz ◽  
Weijing Sun ◽  
Kathleen Harlacker ◽  
Bruce J. Giantonio ◽  
...  

337 Background: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer experience higher response rates (though not always improved survival) with combinations of either platinum compounds or bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine. In patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, improved response affects local control and surgical options. Methods: We piloted a three-drug combination of gemcitabine/oxaliplatin/5-FU/bevacizumab Q2w for four cycles, followed by oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2/q2w) and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg q2w) added to infusional 5-FU and radiation, in patients with pancreatic cancer that was unresectable or borderline resectable. Results: Nineteen patients have been treated, of whom 17 received the entire treatment. Median age was 60, with 12 women and 7 men. Stages were: one IIA, one IIB, and 17 III. Sixteen were unresectable and 3 borderline resectable by protocol-specified criteria. Major toxicities during chemotherapy were: grade 3 neutropenia (5/19); grade 2 neutropenia (7/19), anemia (2/19), thrombocytopenia (2/19). During chemoradiation major toxicities were: grade 3 nausea (3/19), vomiting (3/19), leukopenia (2/19); grade 2 nausea (5/19), leukopenia (4/19). One patient had grade 3 pulmonary embolism that led to withdrawal from the study. One patient had progressive pain early on; no other disease progression was noted during treatment. Five patients (3 inoperable, 2 borderline) went on to have surgery. Median survival was 14 months (range 3 to 40+). For the 5 patients who had surgery, median survival was 17.1 months (range 9.5 to 40+). Conclusions: We conclude that this regimen is well-tolerated by patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, and that the therapeutic results support further evaluation. Additional correlative studies are underway to identify characteristics associated with a favorable outcome.

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. 32-33
Author(s):  
Jacob Ezra Shabason ◽  
Jerry Chen ◽  
Smith Apisarnthanarax ◽  
Nevena Damjanov ◽  
Bruce Giantonio ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer typically have poor outcomes, with a median survival of ~16 months. Novel methods to improve local control are needed. Nab-paclitaxel (abraxane) has shown efficacy in pancreatic cancer and is FDA approved for metastatic disease in combination with gemcitabine. Nab-paclitaxel is also a promising radiosensitizer based on laboratory studies, but it has never been clinically tested with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced disease. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We performed a phase 1 study using a 3+3 dose-escalation strategy to determine the safety and tolerability of dose escalated nab-paclitaxel with fractionated radiotherapy for patients with unresectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Following induction chemotherapy with 2 cycles of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine, patients were treated with weekly nab-paclitaxel and daily radiotherapy to a dose of 52.5 Gy in 25 fractions. Final dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) determination was performed at day 65 after the start of radiotherapy. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Nine patients received nab-paclitaxel at a dose level of either 100 mg/m2 (n=3) or 125 mg/m2 (n=6). One DLT (grade 3 neuropathy) was observed in a patient who received 125 mg/m2 of nab-paclitaxel. Other grade 3 toxicities included fatigue (11%), anemia (11%), and neutropenia (11%). No grade 4 toxicities were observed. With a median follow-up of 8 months (range 5–28 months), median survival was 19 months and median progression-free survival was 10 months. Following chemoradiation, 3 patients underwent surgical resection, all with negative margins and limited tumor viability. Of the 3 patients, 2 initially had borderline resectable tumors and 1 had an unresectable tumor. Tumor (SMAD-4, Caveolin-1) and peripheral (circulating tumor cells and microvesicles) biomarkers were collected and are being analyzed. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The combination of fractionated radiation and weekly nab-paclitaxel was safe and well tolerated. This regimen represents a potentially promising therapy for patients with unresectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and warrants further investigation.


Author(s):  
Amit Dang ◽  
Surendar Chidirala ◽  
Prashanth Veeranki ◽  
BN Vallish

Background: We performed a critical overview of published systematic reviews (SRs) of chemotherapy for advanced and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, and evaluated their quality using AMSTAR2 and ROBIS tools. Materials and Methods: PubMed and Cochrane Central Library were searched for SRs on 13th June 2020. SRs with metaanalysis which included only randomized controlled trials and that had assessed chemotherapy as one of the treatment arms were included. The outcome measures, which were looked into, were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or above. Two reviewers independently assessed all the SRs with both ROBIS and AMSTAR2. Results: Out of the 1,879 identified records, 26 SRs were included for the overview. Most SRs had concluded that gemcitabine-based combination regimes, prolonged OS and PFS, but increased the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities, when compared to gemcitabine monotherapy, but survival benefits were not consistent when gemcitabine was combined with molecular targeted agents. As per ROBIS, 24/26 SRs had high risk of bias, with only 1/26 SR having low risk of bias. As per AMSTAR2, 25/26 SRs had critically low, and 1/26 SR had low, confidence in the results. The study which scored ‘low’ risk of bias in ROBIS scored ‘low confidence in results’ in AMSTAR2. The inter-rater reliability for scoring the overall confidence in the SRs with AMSTAR2 and the overall domain in ROBIS was substantial; ROBIS: kappa=0.785, SEM=0.207, p<0.001; AMSTAR2: kappa=0.649, SEM=0.323, p<0.001. Conclusion: Gemcitabine-based combination regimens can prolong OS and PFS but also worsen AEs when compared to gemcitabine monotherapy. The included SRs have an overall low methodological quality and high risk of bias as per AMSTAR2 and ROBIS respectively.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 201-203
Author(s):  
Hans-Rudolf Raab

<b>Background:</b> One critical step in the therapy of patients with localized pancreatic cancer is the determination of local resectability. The decision between primary surgery versus upfront local or systemic cancer therapy seems especially to differ between pancreatic cancer centers. In our cohort study, we analyzed the independent judgement of resectability of five experienced high volume pancreatic surgeons in 200 consecutive patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. <b>Methods:</b> Pretherapeutic CT or MRI scans of 200 consecutive patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer were evaluated by 5 independent pancreatic surgeons. Resectability and the degree of abutment of the tumor to the venous and arterial structures adjacent to the pancreas were reported. Interrater reliability and dispersion indices were compared. <b>Results:</b> One hundred ninety-four CT scans and 6 MRI scans were evaluated and all parameters were evaluated by all surgeons in 133 (66.5%) cases. Low agreement was observed for tumor infiltration of venous structures (κ = 0.265 and κ = 0.285) while good agreement was achieved for the abutment of the tumor to arterial structures (interrater reliability celiac trunk κ = 0.708 P &#x3c; 0.001). In patients with vascular tumor contact indicating locally advanced disease, surgeons highly agreed on unresectability, but in patients with vascular tumor abutment consistent with borderline resectable disease, the judgement of resectability was less uniform (dispersion index locally advanced vs. borderline resectable p &#x3c; 0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Excellent agreement between surgeons exists in determining the presence of arterial abutment and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The determination of resectability in borderline resectable patients is influenced by additional subjective factors. <b>Trial registration:</b> EudraCT: 2009–014476–21 (2013–02–22) and NCT01827553 (2013–04–09).


Pancreatology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. S45
Author(s):  
Hideyuki Yoshitomi ◽  
Hiroaki Shimizu ◽  
Masayuki Otsuka ◽  
Atsushi Kato ◽  
Katsunori Furukawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document