Clinical and analytical performance of non-small cell lung cancer biomarkers.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11070-11070
Author(s):  
Steven M. Anderson ◽  
Li Cai ◽  
James H. Tepperberg ◽  
Hawazin Faruki

11070 Background: A variety of biomarkers are currently used to help guide treatment decisions for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These include mutation analysis for the EGFR and KRAS genes, along with gene rearrangement analysis for the ALK and ROS1 loci. In this study we have evaluated the clinical and analytical performance features of these assays in a series of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples. Methods: FFPE samples submitted for analysis of the EGFR, KRAS, ALK and ROS1 genes were evaluated using molecular and FISH assays. EGFR mutation analysis was performed using Sanger nucleic acid sequencing methods for exons 18-21. KRAS mutations were detected using allele specific PCR or pyrosequencing methods. Rearrangements involving the ALK gene were detected using break-apart FISH probes (Abbott Molecular). Genetic alterations involving the ROS1 gene were determined using FISH probes (Kreatech Diagnostics). Over 6,200 test results for these 4 markers are included in this analysis. Results: Mutations in the EGFR gene were detected in 10.1% of samples evaluated (n=3,872). A slightly higher percentage of samples from female patients (13%) had a detectable mutation compared to samples from males (7%) (chi-square p<0.0001). Deletions in exon 19 (51%) were the most common alterations detected, followed by point mutations in exon 21 (35%). KRAS mutations were detected in approximately 22% of specimens. ALK gene rearrangements were observed in 3.1% of samples (n=1,524). Specimens from individuals <50y of age were more likely to provide a positive result (11%) compared to samples from individuals >50y of age (2.5%) (chi-square p<0.0001). Gene amplification for the ALK gene was a common finding in the NSCLC samples evaluated. ROS1 alterations were detected in 2.8% of the specimens. In this cohort, no specimens were positive for both an EGFR mutation and an ALK gene rearrangement. Conclusions: Biomarker testing is well established in clinical practice for NSCLC, with results from the tests used to guide important therapy decisions. Assays for biomarkers such as EGFR, KRAS, ALK and ROS1 are robust, allowing for the analysis of multiple analytes in FFPE samples, even when the amount of tissue may be limiting.

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7176-7176 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Sakai ◽  
K. Akagi ◽  
J. Sudoh ◽  
S. Yoneda ◽  
H. Komagata ◽  
...  

7176 Background: Recent studies have suggested that EGFR mutations can be used to predict tumor sensitivity to gefitinib (epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Most previous studies of EGFR mutations have used direct sequencing to analyze surgically resected specimens. More rapid, accurate, and simple techniques for analysis of EGFR mutations in histologic or cytologic specimens (i.e., transbronchial biopsy, bronchial washing, pleural effusion, lymph node aspiration) are needed to improve outcomes. Methods: DNA was extracted from histologic or cytologic specimens of NSCLC obtained from March through October 2005. The major mutations of the EGFR gene (exons 18–21) were analyzed by our original technique for fragment analysis and polymerase-chain-reaction-restriction-fragment-length polymorphism analysis. Results: About 2 days were required for mutation analysis. Pathological analysis indicated that 64 (5 histologic and 59 cytologic specimens) of 90 specimens (11 histologic and 79 cytologic specimens) were adenocarcinomas. EGFR mutations were found in 22 of these specimens (2 histologic and 20 cytologic specimens; ex19:del 13, ex19:ins 2, ex21:L858R 7). An EGFR mutation (ex19:del) was also found in a patient with large cell carcinoma. Conclusions: Our method can efficiently detect EGFR mutations in small samples of lung cancer cells obtained from histologic or cytologic specimens. This method is useful for the identification of EGFR mutations in patients with unresectable NSCLC in whom sufficient tissue specimens are difficult to obtain. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Lung Cancer ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiromasa Yamamoto ◽  
Shinichi Toyooka ◽  
Tetsuya Mitsudomi

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mónica Macías ◽  
Estibaliz Alegre ◽  
Gorka Alkorta-Aranburu ◽  
Ana Patiño-García ◽  
Beatriz Mateos ◽  
...  

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutational testing in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is usually performed in tumor tissue, although cfDNA (cell-free DNA) could be an alternative. We evaluated EGFR mutations in cfDNA as a complementary tool in patients, who had already known EGFR mutations in tumor tissue and were treated with either EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or chemotherapy. We obtained plasma samples from 21 advanced NSCLC patients with known EGFR tumor mutations, before and during therapy with EGFR-TKIs and/or chemotherapy. cfDNA was isolated and EGFR mutations were analyzed with the multiple targeted cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2. EGFR mutations were detected at baseline in cfDNA from 57% of patients. The semiquantitative index (SQI) significantly decreased from the baseline (median=11, IQR=9.5-13) to the best response (median=0, IQR=0-0, p<0.01), followed by a significant increase at progression (median=11, IQR=11-15, p<0.01) in patients treated with either EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy. The SQI obtained with the cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 did not correlate with the concentration in copies/mL determined by droplet digital PCR. Resistance mutation p.T790M was observed at progression in patients with either type of treatment. In conclusion, cfDNA multiple targeted EGFR mutation analysis is useful for treatment monitoring in tissue of EGFR-positive NSCLC patients independently of the drug received.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 856-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae-Ok Kim ◽  
In-Jae Oh ◽  
Bo Gun Kho ◽  
Ha Young Park ◽  
Jin Sun Chang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document