Combination of a MEK inhibitor, pimasertib (MSC1936369B), and a PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, SAR245409, in patients with advanced solid tumors: Results of a phase Ib dose-escalation trial.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2530-2530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Suk Heist ◽  
Leena Gandhi ◽  
Geoffrey Shapiro ◽  
Naiyer A. Rizvi ◽  
Howard A. Burris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Skin Rash ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Mtor Inhibitor ◽  
Mapk Signaling ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Phase Ib

2530 Background: PI3K/mTOR and MAPK signaling pathways are often deregulated in tumors. Simultaneous inhibition of these pathways with the MEK1/2 inhibitor, pimasertib, plus the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, SAR245409, (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01390818) was investigated. Methods: This was a phase Ib, modified 3+3, dose-escalation trial in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Pts received pimasertib and SAR245409 at the following dose levels (DLs): DL1, 15/30; DL2a, 30/30; DL2b, 15/50; DL3, 30/50; DL4a, 60/50; DL4b, 30/70; DL5, 60/70; DL6a, 90/70; DL6b 60/90 and DL7, 90/90 mg (once-daily, qd). After the qd maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was established, twice-daily (bid) dosing was tested: DL1a, 60/30; DL1b, 45/50 and DL2 60/50 mg bid. A recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was determined. Enrollment continued at the RP2D in four expansion cohorts (18 pts each): dual KRAS/PIK3CA mutated (mt) colorectal cancer (CRC), triple-negative breast cancer, KRAS mt non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and BRAFmt melanoma. Results: 53 pts were treated qd and 7 pts bid. The most common tumors were CRC (n=16), NSCLC (n=8), ovarian and pancreatic (n=7, each). At DL6b 2/3 pts had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; both grade [Gr] 3 nausea/vomiting). DL6a was confirmed as the MTD for the qd schedule. At bid DL1a 2/4 pts (both Gr 3 skin rash) and at DL1b 2/3 pts (Gr 3 skin rash and Gr 3 asthenia) had DLTs. DL5 was the RP2D based on tolerability after prolonged exposure. The most common adverse events in qd schedule were: rash (62%, 13% Gr 3), diarrhea (56%, 4% Gr 3), fatigue (51%, 2% Gr 3), nausea (49%, 2% Gr 3), vomiting (45%, 2% Gr 3), peripheral edema and pyrexia (34%, each) and visual impairment with underlying serous retinal detachment (21%). Preliminary pharmacokinetic results suggest no drug-drug interaction. There were 4 partial responses: KRAS mt CRC (n=1) and low-grade ovarian cancer (n=3, 1 KRAS mt/PIK3CA mt and 2 wild-type). Enrollment in expansion cohorts at DL5 is ongoing. Conclusions: Continuousqd dosing of pimasertib and SAR245409 is tolerated and has shown signs of activity. Phase II trials are being planned. Clinical trial information: NCT01390818.

Phase I study of topotecan and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2743-2750 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Miller ◽  
J B Hargis ◽  
R C Lilenbaum ◽  
S Z Fields ◽  
G L Rosner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan combined with cisplatin, to define the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) of the combination without and with the use of filgrastim, and to define recommended doses for phase II trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced solid tumors were eligible if they had normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function and had not previously been treated with platinum compounds. Topotecan was administered intravenously on days 1 through 5 and cisplatin was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The topotecan dose was fixed at 1.0 mg/m2/d on the first four dose levels, and cisplatin was escalated in 25-mg/m2 increments from 25 to 100 mg/m2 without filgrastim. After encountering DLT, the dose of cisplatin was decreased by one level and topotecan dose escalation was attempted. After defining the MTD without growth factor, the study proceeded with escalating cisplatin doses to define the MTD with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously (SC) daily starting on day 6 of treatment. Priming with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg SC on days -6 to -2 before the first course was explored last. RESULTS Of 38 patients entered, 37 were eligible, 35 assessable for toxicity in the first course, and 28 assessable for response. The principal toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia, which had to last more than 7 days to be considered dose-limiting. No DLT was observed at the starting cisplatin dose of 25 mg/m2 (dose level 1). On level 2 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2, one patient had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 renal toxicity. On level 3 (cisplatin 75 mg/m2), two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia. Therefore, cisplatin dose escalation was stopped. On dose level 5 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 1.25 mg/m2/d), one patient had grade 4 neutropenia that lasted more than 7 days and one patient died of neutropenic sepsis. The remaining dose levels used topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (level 6) and 100 mg/m2 (levels 7 and 8) with filgrastim. No DLT was observed on level 6. On level 7, two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia. Priming with filgrastim on level 8 demonstrated no obvious advantage over level 7, and one patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia that lasted more than 7 days. Three patients with non-small-cell lung cancer achieved a partial response and one patient with breast cancer had a complete response. CONCLUSION Topotecan and cisplatin in combination cause more neutropenia than expected from either drug given alone at the same dosage. The recommended phase II doses are topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d for 5 days in combination with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 without filgrastim or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 with filgrastim support.

A phase Ib dose-escalation study of TRC105 (anti-endoglin antibody) in combination with bevacizumab (BEV) for advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3059-3059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee S. Rosen ◽  
Francisco Robert ◽  
Daniela Matei ◽  
Jonathan Wade Goldman ◽  
David S. Mendelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Vegf Receptor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials

3059 Background: CD105 (endoglin) is an endothelial cell membrane receptor highly expressed on angiogenic tumor vessels that is essential for angiogenesis and upregulated by hypoxia and VEGF inhibition. TRC105 is an anti-CD105 monoclonal antibody that potentiates VEGF inhibitors in preclinical models. This study assessed safety, PK and preliminary efficacy of TRC105 in combination with BEV. Methods: Pts with advanced solid tumors, ECOG PS 0-1, and normal organ function were treated with escalating doses of IV TRC105 (3, 6, 8 or 10 mg/kg/wk) plus bevacizumab (BEV) at 15 mg/kg q3wk or 10 mg/kg q2wk. Results: Thirty one pts (median age = 62; M:F 14:17; median 4 prior regimens; primarily metastatic colorectal or ovarian cancer) were treated with TRC105 wkly + BEV. TRC105 3 mg/kg wkly + 15 mg/kg q3wk BEV was well tolerated. Concurrent administration of TRC105 6 mg/kg wkly + 15 mg/kg BEV q3wk resulted in headaches in 4 of 5 pts on cycle 1 day 1 (two grade 3). Dose escalation to the recommended single-agent phase II dose of 10 mg/kg TRC105 weekly + BEV (10 mg/kg q2wk) was tolerated when the initial TRC105 dose was introduced one week after BEV dosing and administered over 2 days. Headache was the only serious adverse drug reaction observed. Adverse events characteristic of each individual drug were not increased in frequency or severity. Target TRC105 serum concentrations were achieved at 6 mg/kg. Mucocutaneous telangiectasia, a marker of TRC105 target modulation, was observed beginning at 6 mg/kg and was dose proportional. Five of 19 heavily pretreated, BEV or VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) refractory pts with colorectal and ovarian cancer, each with marked tumor burden, experienced radiographic reductions in tumor volume (10-17%). Three of these patients remained on study longer than the prior VEGF inhibitor treatment and two are ongoing. Seven ongoing patients have been treated for 2-8 months. Conclusions: TRC105 10 mg/kg wkly was well tolerated with BEV 10 mg/kg q2wk. The combination demonstrated activity in BEV and VEGF TKI refractory pts. Randomized phase II trials of BEV +/- TRC105 have commenced in renal cell cancer and glioblastoma. Clinical trial information: NCT01332721.

A phase Ib dose-escalation study of TRC105 (anti-endoglin antibody) in combination with capecitabine for advanced solid tumors (including patients with progressive or recurrent HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3057-3057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellis Glenn Levine ◽  
Andres Forero ◽  
Tracy O'Connor ◽  
Ben K. Seon ◽  
Manoj A Jivani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Grade 3

3057 Background: CD105 (endoglin) is an endothelial cell membrane receptor highly expressed on angiogenic tumor vessels that is essential for angiogenesis and upregulated by hypoxia and VEGF inhibition. TRC105 is an anti-CD105 monoclonal antibody being studied in phase II trials that potentiates chemotherapy in preclinical models. Methods: Pts with advanced solid tumors (for purposes of dose escalation) or pts with metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer (following completion of dose escalation), ECOG PS 0-1, and normal organ function were treated with intravenously administered TRC105 wkly plus capecitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 BID for 14 of every 21 days, and assessed for safety, PK, and response. Results: Fourteen patients (median age = 52; M:F 4:10; median of 3 prior regimens; 10 with breast and 4 with colorectal cancer) were enrolled. Dose escalation proceeded from 7.5 mg/kg TRC105 to the recommended single agent phase II dose of 10 mg/kg of TRC105 in combination with capecitabine, without development of dose limiting toxicity. Fourteen pts were treated at 7.5 mg/kg (n=4) or 10 mg/kg (n=10) TRC105 wkly + 1,000 mg/m2 BID/14d capecitabine of repeating 21 day cycles. Patients experienced expected TRC105 related adverse events of grade 1 or grade 2 infusion reaction, epistaxis, gingival bleeding, telangiectasia, headache, rash, and fatigue. Grade 3 headache and grade 3 vomiting were each seen in one patient. Adverse events characteristic of each individual drug were not increased in frequency or severity when the two drugs were administered together. Mucocutaneous telangiectasia, a marker of TRC105 target modulation, was observed at both dose levels. A heavily pretreated male breast cancer patient remained on study for 9 months with a RECIST-defined partial response. Stable disease beyond 9 weeks was observed in three patients. Conclusions: The recommended single agent phase II dose of 10 mg/kg TRC105 wkly was well tolerated in combination with capecitabine. The combination treatment could be advanced in HER2-negative breast or colorectal cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01326481.

scholarly journals Phase IB Dose-Escalation Study of BEZ235 or BKM120 in Combination with Paclitaxel (PTX) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. ix157-ix158
Author(s):  
L. Dirix ◽  
M. Schuler ◽  
J. Machiels ◽  
D. Hess ◽  
A. Awada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Phase Ib

Results of two phase I dose escalation studies of the oral heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor SNX-5422.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2617-2617
Author(s):  
Todd Michael Bauer ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Ramesh K. Ramanathan ◽  
Glen Weiss ◽  
Jasgit C. Sachdev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Hsp90 Inhibitor ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Blurry Vision

2617 Background: SNX-5422 is a prodrug of SNX-2112, a highly potent, non-geldanamycin analog, HSP90 inhibitor with preclinical anti-tumor activity in multiple tumor models. These phase 1 studies were designed to evaluate safety and tolerability, determine dose limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), and describe pharmacokinetics of SNX-2112 and SNX-5422. Methods: Two phase 1, open-label, 3 + 3 dose-escalation studies evaluated SNX-5422 when given daily (QD) or every-other-day (QOD) during the first 30 days of treatment in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Plasma concentrations of SNX-2112 and SNX-5422 were measured after the first and 11th (steady state) doses. Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks. Results: In both studies, pts received SNX-5422 QOD, 3 wks on/1 wk off, with doses ranging from 4 to 133 mg/m2 QOD. In one study, pts also received QD doses from 50 to 89 mg/m2, 3 wks on/1 wk off, and 50 mg/m2 QD continuously. Fifty-six pts (34M/22F; mean age 62 years) were enrolled. Treatment-related adverse events were mainly low grade (G), including diarrhea (64%), nausea (39%), vomiting (29%), fatigue (27%), abdominal pain (14%), and anorexia (14%). Reversible G 1 blurry vision, and G 1-2 blurry vision/vision darkening were reported by 1 pt on 100 mg/m2 QOD, and 4 pts treated with 50 to 89 mg/m2 QD. G 3 diarrhea was dose limiting in 2 of 3 pts (89 mg/m2 QD; 133 mg/m2 QOD). MTDs for the QOD and QD schedules were declared at100 mg/m2 and 67 mg/m2, respectively. The QD schedule was associated with higher incidences of treatment related adverse events. 38 pts were evaluable for response including 1 confirmed durable complete response, 1 unconfirmed partial response, and 17 with stable disease. Activity was seen in adrenal, lung, liver, neuroendocrine, GIST, and prostate. All but 2 were seen with the QOD schedule. Conclusions: SNX-5422 mono-therapy was generally well tolerated and showed promising signs of efficacy in pts with advanced solid tumors. Given the superior benefit-risk profile of QOD dosing over QD dosing based on these preliminary clinical findings, 100 mg/m2 QOD has been selected for further clinical testing. Clinical trial information: NCT00506805 and NCT01611623.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document