A phase Ib dose-escalation study of TRC105 (anti-endoglin antibody) in combination with capecitabine for advanced solid tumors (including patients with progressive or recurrent HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3057-3057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellis Glenn Levine ◽  
Andres Forero ◽  
Tracy O'Connor ◽  
Ben K. Seon ◽  
Manoj A Jivani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Grade 3

3057 Background: CD105 (endoglin) is an endothelial cell membrane receptor highly expressed on angiogenic tumor vessels that is essential for angiogenesis and upregulated by hypoxia and VEGF inhibition. TRC105 is an anti-CD105 monoclonal antibody being studied in phase II trials that potentiates chemotherapy in preclinical models. Methods: Pts with advanced solid tumors (for purposes of dose escalation) or pts with metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer (following completion of dose escalation), ECOG PS 0-1, and normal organ function were treated with intravenously administered TRC105 wkly plus capecitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 BID for 14 of every 21 days, and assessed for safety, PK, and response. Results: Fourteen patients (median age = 52; M:F 4:10; median of 3 prior regimens; 10 with breast and 4 with colorectal cancer) were enrolled. Dose escalation proceeded from 7.5 mg/kg TRC105 to the recommended single agent phase II dose of 10 mg/kg of TRC105 in combination with capecitabine, without development of dose limiting toxicity. Fourteen pts were treated at 7.5 mg/kg (n=4) or 10 mg/kg (n=10) TRC105 wkly + 1,000 mg/m2 BID/14d capecitabine of repeating 21 day cycles. Patients experienced expected TRC105 related adverse events of grade 1 or grade 2 infusion reaction, epistaxis, gingival bleeding, telangiectasia, headache, rash, and fatigue. Grade 3 headache and grade 3 vomiting were each seen in one patient. Adverse events characteristic of each individual drug were not increased in frequency or severity when the two drugs were administered together. Mucocutaneous telangiectasia, a marker of TRC105 target modulation, was observed at both dose levels. A heavily pretreated male breast cancer patient remained on study for 9 months with a RECIST-defined partial response. Stable disease beyond 9 weeks was observed in three patients. Conclusions: The recommended single agent phase II dose of 10 mg/kg TRC105 wkly was well tolerated in combination with capecitabine. The combination treatment could be advanced in HER2-negative breast or colorectal cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01326481.

Phase I study of topotecan and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2743-2750 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Miller ◽  
J B Hargis ◽  
R C Lilenbaum ◽  
S Z Fields ◽  
G L Rosner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan combined with cisplatin, to define the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) of the combination without and with the use of filgrastim, and to define recommended doses for phase II trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced solid tumors were eligible if they had normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function and had not previously been treated with platinum compounds. Topotecan was administered intravenously on days 1 through 5 and cisplatin was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The topotecan dose was fixed at 1.0 mg/m2/d on the first four dose levels, and cisplatin was escalated in 25-mg/m2 increments from 25 to 100 mg/m2 without filgrastim. After encountering DLT, the dose of cisplatin was decreased by one level and topotecan dose escalation was attempted. After defining the MTD without growth factor, the study proceeded with escalating cisplatin doses to define the MTD with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously (SC) daily starting on day 6 of treatment. Priming with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg SC on days -6 to -2 before the first course was explored last. RESULTS Of 38 patients entered, 37 were eligible, 35 assessable for toxicity in the first course, and 28 assessable for response. The principal toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia, which had to last more than 7 days to be considered dose-limiting. No DLT was observed at the starting cisplatin dose of 25 mg/m2 (dose level 1). On level 2 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2, one patient had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 renal toxicity. On level 3 (cisplatin 75 mg/m2), two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia. Therefore, cisplatin dose escalation was stopped. On dose level 5 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 1.25 mg/m2/d), one patient had grade 4 neutropenia that lasted more than 7 days and one patient died of neutropenic sepsis. The remaining dose levels used topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (level 6) and 100 mg/m2 (levels 7 and 8) with filgrastim. No DLT was observed on level 6. On level 7, two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia. Priming with filgrastim on level 8 demonstrated no obvious advantage over level 7, and one patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia that lasted more than 7 days. Three patients with non-small-cell lung cancer achieved a partial response and one patient with breast cancer had a complete response. CONCLUSION Topotecan and cisplatin in combination cause more neutropenia than expected from either drug given alone at the same dosage. The recommended phase II doses are topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d for 5 days in combination with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 without filgrastim or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 with filgrastim support.

A phase Ib dose-escalation study of TRC105 (anti-endoglin antibody) in combination with bevacizumab (BEV) for advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3059-3059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee S. Rosen ◽  
Francisco Robert ◽  
Daniela Matei ◽  
Jonathan Wade Goldman ◽  
David S. Mendelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Vegf Receptor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials

3059 Background: CD105 (endoglin) is an endothelial cell membrane receptor highly expressed on angiogenic tumor vessels that is essential for angiogenesis and upregulated by hypoxia and VEGF inhibition. TRC105 is an anti-CD105 monoclonal antibody that potentiates VEGF inhibitors in preclinical models. This study assessed safety, PK and preliminary efficacy of TRC105 in combination with BEV. Methods: Pts with advanced solid tumors, ECOG PS 0-1, and normal organ function were treated with escalating doses of IV TRC105 (3, 6, 8 or 10 mg/kg/wk) plus bevacizumab (BEV) at 15 mg/kg q3wk or 10 mg/kg q2wk. Results: Thirty one pts (median age = 62; M:F 14:17; median 4 prior regimens; primarily metastatic colorectal or ovarian cancer) were treated with TRC105 wkly + BEV. TRC105 3 mg/kg wkly + 15 mg/kg q3wk BEV was well tolerated. Concurrent administration of TRC105 6 mg/kg wkly + 15 mg/kg BEV q3wk resulted in headaches in 4 of 5 pts on cycle 1 day 1 (two grade 3). Dose escalation to the recommended single-agent phase II dose of 10 mg/kg TRC105 weekly + BEV (10 mg/kg q2wk) was tolerated when the initial TRC105 dose was introduced one week after BEV dosing and administered over 2 days. Headache was the only serious adverse drug reaction observed. Adverse events characteristic of each individual drug were not increased in frequency or severity. Target TRC105 serum concentrations were achieved at 6 mg/kg. Mucocutaneous telangiectasia, a marker of TRC105 target modulation, was observed beginning at 6 mg/kg and was dose proportional. Five of 19 heavily pretreated, BEV or VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) refractory pts with colorectal and ovarian cancer, each with marked tumor burden, experienced radiographic reductions in tumor volume (10-17%). Three of these patients remained on study longer than the prior VEGF inhibitor treatment and two are ongoing. Seven ongoing patients have been treated for 2-8 months. Conclusions: TRC105 10 mg/kg wkly was well tolerated with BEV 10 mg/kg q2wk. The combination demonstrated activity in BEV and VEGF TKI refractory pts. Randomized phase II trials of BEV +/- TRC105 have commenced in renal cell cancer and glioblastoma. Clinical trial information: NCT01332721.

A phase 1b, open-label, dose-escalation study to evaluate camidanlumab tesirine (Cami) as monotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2556-2556
Author(s):  
Igor Puzanov ◽  
Patricia LoRusso ◽  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
Christopher T. Chen ◽  
Yvan LeBruchec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Treatment Withdrawal ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3

2556 Background: Depletion of tumor-infiltrating CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), which inhibit tumor-specific immune responses, could contribute to tumor eradication. Cami (ADCT-301), an anti-CD25, pyrrolobenzodiazepine-based antibody-drug conjugate, targets CD25+ Tregs. A mouse surrogate has shown potent antitumor activity in solid tumor models. Here we report preliminary data from the monotherapy arm of a phase 1b trial of Cami in pts with selected advanced solid tumors. Methods: The monotherapy dose-escalation part of this open-label study enrolled pts (aged ≥18 years) with selected advanced solid tumors and no suitable existing therapy. The primary objective was to characterize safety and tolerability, and to identify the recommended phase 2 dose of Cami monotherapy. Secondary and exploratory objectives included evaluation of preliminary antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity. Pts received Cami every 3 weeks (1 cycle) with dose escalation per a 3+3 design. Disease control rate (DCR) was assessed (complete and partial responses [CR, PR] and stable disease). Results: At data cut-off (Dec 17, 2020), 44 pts were enrolled, with primary tumor types (stage IVA/B: 27 pts; 61.4%) of colorectal (15 pts; 34.1%), pancreatic (14 pts; 31.8%), head and neck, ovarian/fallopian tube, and renal cell carcinoma (all 3 pts; 6.8%), non-small cell lung cancer (2 pts; 4.5%), gastric, esophageal/GEJ, melanoma, and triple-negative breast cancer (each 1 pt; 2.3%). Median (range) age was 60.5 (33–82) years; median (range) number of prior systemic therapies was 4 (1–9). Pts received a median (range) of 2 (1–6) Cami cycles at doses of 20–150 µg/kg. Median (range) treatment duration was 22 (1–178) days. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. All-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in ≥20% pts were nausea (18 pts; 40.9%), decreased appetite and fatigue (each 16 pts; 36.4%), constipation (13 pts; 29.5%), abdominal pain (11 pts; 25%), and rash (10 pts; 22.7%). The only Grade ≥3 TEAE in ≥10% pts was anemia (5 pts; 11.4%). Grade 3 autoimmune AEs (colitis, immune-mediated AE, systemic inflammatory response syndrome) and neurologic AEs (dysphagia and asthenia, but not GBS) were reported in 3 (6.8%) and 2 (4.5%) pts, respectively. 1 (2.3%) Cami-related TEAE led to treatment withdrawal; no Cami-related TEAEs were fatal. DCR was 25% (95% CI: 11.1, 34.7); 11/44 pts attained stable disease. No pts had CR or PR. Conclusions: Dose escalation of Cami monotherapy is complete. The safety profile is encouraging and MTD was not reached. PK/PD data will be presented. 150 µg/kg is the highest dose investigated for single-agent Cami and the highest to be investigated combined with pembrolizumab in selected advanced solid tumors in the current protocol. Funding: ADC Therapeutics SA NCT03621982. Clinical trial information: NCT03621982.

A phase II study of GW786034 (pazopanib) in patients with recurrent or metastatic invasive breast carcinoma: Results after completion of stage I: A trial of the Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1133-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Taylor ◽  
S. Chia ◽  
S. Dent ◽  
M. Clemons ◽  
P. Grenci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Grade 3

1133 Background: Pazopanib, an oral small molecule inhibitor of VEGFR, PDGFR, and KIT, has demonstrated activity in phase I, with a recommended phase II dose of 800 mg/d (Hurwitz H et al, J Clin Oncol. 2005;23[16 suppl]:3012.1). We evaluated the activity of single agent pazopanib in recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: In this 2-stage design, patients with recurrent or MBC received pazopanib 800 mg/d. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) of 20%. Response in 3 out of 18 patients was required to go to stage 2. Treatment was continued until progression. Results: 21 patients entered stage 1; 67% were ER positive and all were HER-2-negative. Prior lines of chemotherapy were 1 in 76% and 2 in 14%. Of the 19 evaluable patients, 2 patients remain on treatment. 14 (74%) stopped due to progressive disease, 2 (10%) due to adverse events, and 1 (5%) due to patient request. Best response was partial response (PR) in 1 (5%), stable disease (SD) in 11 (58%), and progressive disease in 7 (37%). Clinical benefit rate (CR, PR, or SD for ≥ 6 months) was 26%. Median time to progression (TTP) was 3.7 months (95% C.I. 1.7 months - not reached). 9 out of 18 patients (50%) with measurable target lesions had some decrease in target lesion size. Estimated progression-free survival at 3 months was 55%, and 28% at 6 months. Adverse events were grade 3/4 elevations in AST (14%) and ALT (10%), and grade 3 hypertension and neutropenia (14% each). Other common events were grade 1/2 lymphopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, fatigue, skin hypopigmentation, hypertension, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and headache. Conclusions: Pazopanib is well tolerated and demonstrates activity in pretreated breast cancer. While the target ORR of 20% has not been met, rates of SD and TTP are comparable to other active agents in this setting, and therefore pazopanib may be an interesting agent for future studies in breast cancer. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and everolimus in advanced solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 490-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima A. Rangwala ◽  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Mark Kozloff ◽  
Christy Arrowood ◽  
Jennifer Meadows ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Rectovaginal Fistula ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3

490 Background: Everolimus (E), an oral rapamycin analogue, is a potent mTOR inhibitor. Combined inhibition of VEGF and mTOR pathways may increase anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor activity. We evaluated E in combination with capecitabine (C), oxaliplatin (O), and bevacizumab (B) in a phase I dose escalation study. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had advanced solid tumors, adequate organ function and no increased risk for class-related toxicities. B and O were given intravenously; C and E were orally administered. Cycle length was 21 days. Doses for level 1: C 850 mg/m2 on days 1-14; O 130 mg/m2 on day one; B 7.5 mg/kg on day one; and E 5 mg three times a week. Doses for level -1: C 680 mg/m2, O100mg/m2. An intermediate dose level (-1b) of E escalated to 5 mg five times weekly was added to maximize dose intensity. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was assessed in cycle 1. Concomitant administration of CYP3A4 substrates, inhibitors or inducers was prohibited. Results: Dose escalation is complete with 27 pts evaluable for toxicity and 24 evaluable for efficacy. Two DLTs (grade 2 intolerable fatigue, anorexia, vomiting and grade 3 diarrhea) were observed in 6 pts in cohort 1. No DLTs were observed in cohort -1; one DLT (rectovaginal fistula) was observed in the -1b cohort. Possible grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events any time on study (n=1 except as indicated) included diarrhea (n=2), intestinal perforation/fistula, rectovaginal fistula, hypertriglyceridemia (n=3), hyperglycemia, hypoalbuminemia, hyponatremia, peripheral neuropathy, neutropenia (n=2), lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, hypertension (n=3), deep vein thrombosis, and arterial thrombosis. Adverse events were consistent with known class-related toxicities. For efficacy, 10 pts had a partial response (PR); 10 had stable disease as best response. Of 13 pts with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), 5 had a PR. Of 8 pts with chemonaive mCRC, 5 had a PR. Conclusions: E in combination with full dose C, O and B was associated with unacceptable toxicity, primarily GI toxicity. E at 5mg five times weekly, C at 680 mg/m2 on days 1-14, O at 100 mg/m2 and B at 7.5 mg/kg on day one appears well tolerated. Activity was noted in chemorefractory and chemonaive mCRC patients.

Combination of a MEK inhibitor, pimasertib (MSC1936369B), and a PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, SAR245409, in patients with advanced solid tumors: Results of a phase Ib dose-escalation trial.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2530-2530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Suk Heist ◽  
Leena Gandhi ◽  
Geoffrey Shapiro ◽  
Naiyer A. Rizvi ◽  
Howard A. Burris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Skin Rash ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Mtor Inhibitor ◽  
Mapk Signaling ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Phase Ib

2530 Background: PI3K/mTOR and MAPK signaling pathways are often deregulated in tumors. Simultaneous inhibition of these pathways with the MEK1/2 inhibitor, pimasertib, plus the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, SAR245409, (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01390818) was investigated. Methods: This was a phase Ib, modified 3+3, dose-escalation trial in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Pts received pimasertib and SAR245409 at the following dose levels (DLs): DL1, 15/30; DL2a, 30/30; DL2b, 15/50; DL3, 30/50; DL4a, 60/50; DL4b, 30/70; DL5, 60/70; DL6a, 90/70; DL6b 60/90 and DL7, 90/90 mg (once-daily, qd). After the qd maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was established, twice-daily (bid) dosing was tested: DL1a, 60/30; DL1b, 45/50 and DL2 60/50 mg bid. A recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was determined. Enrollment continued at the RP2D in four expansion cohorts (18 pts each): dual KRAS/PIK3CA mutated (mt) colorectal cancer (CRC), triple-negative breast cancer, KRAS mt non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and BRAFmt melanoma. Results: 53 pts were treated qd and 7 pts bid. The most common tumors were CRC (n=16), NSCLC (n=8), ovarian and pancreatic (n=7, each). At DL6b 2/3 pts had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; both grade [Gr] 3 nausea/vomiting). DL6a was confirmed as the MTD for the qd schedule. At bid DL1a 2/4 pts (both Gr 3 skin rash) and at DL1b 2/3 pts (Gr 3 skin rash and Gr 3 asthenia) had DLTs. DL5 was the RP2D based on tolerability after prolonged exposure. The most common adverse events in qd schedule were: rash (62%, 13% Gr 3), diarrhea (56%, 4% Gr 3), fatigue (51%, 2% Gr 3), nausea (49%, 2% Gr 3), vomiting (45%, 2% Gr 3), peripheral edema and pyrexia (34%, each) and visual impairment with underlying serous retinal detachment (21%). Preliminary pharmacokinetic results suggest no drug-drug interaction. There were 4 partial responses: KRAS mt CRC (n=1) and low-grade ovarian cancer (n=3, 1 KRAS mt/PIK3CA mt and 2 wild-type). Enrollment in expansion cohorts at DL5 is ongoing. Conclusions: Continuousqd dosing of pimasertib and SAR245409 is tolerated and has shown signs of activity. Phase II trials are being planned. Clinical trial information: NCT01390818.

Antitumor activity of trabectedin and lurbinectedin in germline BRCA2 carriers with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) as compared to BRCA1 carriers: Analysis of two phase II trials.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 574-574
Author(s):  
Judith Balmana Gelpi ◽  
Jan Antoni Lubinski ◽  
Banu Arun ◽  
Tomasz Byrski ◽  
Melinda L. Telli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Brca 1 ◽  
Brca 2 ◽  
Grade 3

574 Background: BRCA 1/2-associated breast cancer share homologous recombination deficiency, but also have independent and potentially actionable roles. Novel drugs with innovative mechanism of action, lacking cross-resistance with other used agents are needed for BRCA 1/2 MBC. Trabectedin (TR) and its analog, lurbinectedin (L), have shown to be active in BRCA 1/2 MBC. This study was sought to determine if there was a difference in activity of these agents between BRCA1 and 2 carriers. Methods: Safety and efficacy in MBC BRCA 1/2 were analyzed in 2 separate phase II trials of single agent TR and L. Results: 88 patients were evaluated: 34 with TR, 54 with L. Median age: 46 and 43, respectively. Median (range) prior chemotherapy lines: TR, 4 (1-10); L, 2 (0-5). Clinical responses were seen in the 2 trials (see table) and were higher in BRCA2 than in BRCA1 (33% vs 9% with TR and 61% vs 26% with L). Main adverse event was myelosuppression (grade 3-4 neutropenia / thrombocytopenia / febrile neutropenia: TR, 62.1%/24.3%/10.8% L, 66.7%/20.4%/20.4%). Non-hematological toxicity was mostly grade 1-2: fatigue, nausea/vomiting and high transaminases (grade 3/4 TR, 40.5%, L 18.5%). Conclusions: Remarkable activity of trabectedin and lurbinectedin as single agents was observed in BRCA 2 associated MBC. This finding warrants further investigation. One potential mechanistic rationale is the role of both lurbinectedin and BRCA 2 in transcription. Safety was acceptable and manageable in both studies. Clinical trial information: NCT01525589. [Table: see text]

Efficacy of HX008 in high microsatellite instability/mismatch repair–defificient (MSI-H/dMMR) solid tumors: Results from a multicenter phase II open-label study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2572-2572
Author(s):  
Jing Huang ◽  
Yan Song ◽  
Suxia Luo ◽  
Xianli Yin ◽  
Enxiao LI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Subsequent Treatment ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

2572 Background: The subsequent treatment choices are limited for the patients with advanced solid tumors who had failed the standard therapies. PD-1 blockade monotherapy demonstrated robust antitumor activity in patients with MSI-H/dMMR. The aim of this study is to identify the efficacy and safety of HX008, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors. Methods: Eligible patients were age ≥18 years with histologically/cytologically confirmed advanced MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors, who have failed at least one line of standard systemic therapy. MSI-H/dMMR status was assessed centrally. Patients received HX008 200 mg once every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. Radiologic imaging was performed 9 weeks after the first treatment, then every 6 weeks for the first year of therapy, and every 12 weeks thereafter. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST1.1. Results: One hundred patients were enrolled from October 2018 to December 2020, with a median age of 53 (range 20-74) years. All of the patients were ≥ second-line patients. The most common cancer types were colorectal cancer (N=74) and gastric cancer (N=10). Median follow-up is 8.97 (range 0.03-25.53) months at the time of data cutoff. Among 86 patients who had reached the initial response evaluation, there were 8 CR, 33 PR, 24 SD, 17 PD and 4 NE. ORR was 47.67% (95%CI 36.79%-58.73%), and DCR was 75.58% (95%CI 65.13%-84.20%). ORR and DCR for the 66 colorectal cancer patients were 50% (95%CI 37.43-62.57%) and 75.76% (95%CI 63.64-85.46%). Median PFS was not reached (95%CI 6.18-NR) for all enrolled patients, while the 6-month and 12-month PFS rates were 62.66% (95%CI 50.98%-72.31%) and 52.70% (95%CI 39.96%-63.94%), respectively. Median OS was not reached. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 77 patients (77%). Twelve patients (12%) had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events and there were no grade 5 treatment-related adverse events. The grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events with incidence >1% included anemia (2%) and leukopenia (2%). Immune-related adverse events were observed in 15 patients (15%), including hypothyroidism in 9 patients (all were grade 1-2), and hepatitis, hyperglycemia, myocarditis, creatin kinase/creatin kinase MB increased, hypopigmentation of the vulva, rash, each in 1 patient. Conclusions: HX008 as a ≥second-line therapy showed promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with MSI-H/dMMR advanced solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT03704246.

A first-in-human phase dose-escalation study of YH002, a recombinant humanized agonistic anti-OX40 IgG1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14501-e14501
Author(s):  
Vinod Ganju ◽  
Adam Cooper ◽  
Kate Wilkinson ◽  
John J. Park
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Cancer Breast ◽  
Dose Levels

e14501 Background: YH002 is a recombinant humanized IgG1 antibody that targets the human OX40 receptor. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the specificity, potency, and anti-cancer efficacy of YH002 in a comprehensive panel. The totality of nonclinical data supports progression of YH002 into clinical studies in adult patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This is an ongoing phase 1 dose-escalation study. Patients with advanced or metastatic refractory solid tumors received YH002 as single agent by IV administration at 0.01 to12.0 mg/kg dose levels every 21 days (Q3W), to evaluate the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy. An accelerated titration dose escalation design followed by a traditional 3+3 dose algorithm were utilized to assess dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and identify MTD and/or RP2D. Tumor assessments were performed per RECIST v1.1 every 9 weeks. Results: By December 31 2020, six patients were enrolled and treated at escalating dose levels of 0.01 (n=1), 0.03 (n=1), 0.1 (n=1) and 0.3mg/kg (n=3), with tumor types including colon cancer, thymic cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer and bladder cancer. Median treatment duration was 10.2 weeks (range 2 – 18). The median age of patients was 67 years old (range 47-78). These patients had progressed after a median of 2 prior lines of available standard therapy. As of data cutoff, no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), no Grade (G) 3 or above adverse events (AE) or AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were reported. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were all G1/2 events and occurred in 4 patients, including 8 G1 AEs (pneumonitis, rash, pruritus, arthralgia, myalgia, fatigue, lethargy, rash pruritic) and 3 G2 AEs (1 pneumonitis and 2 fatigue). Out of 5 patients having tumor assessment by RECIST, one pt with Thymic SCC at 0.3 mg/kg had best response of stable disease at week 9, one pt with prostate cancer at 0.1 mg/kg experienced Non-CR/Non-PD, and rest of 3 pts experienced progressive disease. Conclusions: These preliminary results demonstrate that YH002 was safe and tolerable up to 0.3mg/kg. Updated safety and antitumor activity will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT04353102.

scholarly journals Phase 2 Study of TAS-117 in Advanced Solid Tumors Harboring Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/v-akt Murine Thymoma Viral Oncogene Homolog Gene Aberrations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jii Bum Lee ◽  
Minkyu Jung ◽  
Seung Hoon Beom ◽  
Gun Min Kim ◽  
Hye Ryun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phosphatidylinositol 3 Kinase ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Viral Oncogene Homolog

Abstract Background: TAS-117 is a highly potent and selective allosteric pan-v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog (Akt) inhibitor. We conducted a single-arm, single-center, phase 2 study of TAS-117 in heavily treated patients with multiple tumors refractory to systemic chemotherapy harboring phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt mutations using a basket trial design.Methods: Patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers were orally administered 16 mg of TAS-117 daily and those with non-GI tumors were administered 24 mg of TAS-117, 4 days on/3-days off. The study was conducted over 21-day treatment cycles. Tumors were assessed by imaging every 6 weeks until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), PFS ratio, and safety and tolerability of TAS-117. Results: Thirteen patients were enrolled; eight with non-GI cancer (breast cancer (31%), ovarian cancer (15%), endometrial cancer (8%), and non-small cell lung cancer (8%)) and five with GI cancer (colon cancer (15%), rectal cancer (8%), gastric cancer (8%), and gallbladder cancer (8%)). The median age was 53 years. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 in eight patients; ten patients were treated with TAS-117 after >4 lines of therapy. Twelve patients showed mutations in PIK3 catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA): E542K (15%), E545A (8%), E545K (31%), H1047R (31%), and Q546K (8%). One patient harbored an Akt1E17K mutation. The median treatment duration was 1.4 months; the median number of treatment cycles was 2. The ORR was 8%, and the DCR was 23%. The median PFS and OS were 1.4 and 4.8 months, respectively. Nine patients had disease progression, two experienced adverse events, one withdrew, and one discontinued treatment on the physician’s recommendation. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 85% of patients, and 27% experienced grade 3–4 AEs (grade 3 anorexia, 9%) and hyperglycemia (grade 3, 9%; grade 4, 9%). Conclusions: TAS-117 showed limited antitumor activity and manageable toxicity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clinical efficacy was observed in patients with ovarian cancer harboring PIK3CA E545K mutations and in those with breast cancer harboring PIK3CA H1047R and Akt1E17K mutations. Trial registration: This study was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT03017521 in January 11, 2017.).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document