The prognostic role of androgen receptor in early-stage breast cancer patients: A meta-analysis.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 528-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Bozovic-Spasojevic ◽  
Dimitrios Zardavas ◽  
Evandro De Azambuja ◽  
Lieveke Ameye ◽  
Christos Sotiriou ◽  
...  

528 Background: Androgen receptor (AR) expression has been observed in ~70% of breast cancer (BC) patients, but its prognostic role is not established yet. To assess this we performed a meta-analysis of studies that evaluated the impact of AR on disease free survival (DFS) and/or on overall survival (OS) in early stage BC. Methods: Published studies were identified by an electronic search on PubMed using the MeSH terms "breast neoplasm" and "androgen receptor" (up to June 2012). Identified studies were assessed against the following criteria for inclusion in the analysis: early stage BC and reported results of AR status in correlation with clinical outcome. We report combined HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using AR negative patients as reference. Results: Twenty studies were eligible for the meta-analysis out of 493 initially identified and 12 among them, including 6,525 patients, were considered as evaluable (i.e., reporting enough information to allow aggregation of results). AR positivity was associated with lower risk of relapse in all breast cancer patients, and better overall survival in both univariate (U) and multivariate (M) analysis. AR prognostic impact in different subtypes was also assessed (see Table). Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrated that AR delivers prognostic information overall, serving as a positive prognostic factor in early stage BC. Further studies are needed to delineate its prognostic impact within the different subtypes of the disease. [Table: see text]

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaewon Yang ◽  
Ahrum Min ◽  
Kyung-Hun Lee ◽  
Han Suk Ryu ◽  
Tae-Yong Kim ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kejia Hu ◽  
David Frederick Callen ◽  
Jiayuan Li ◽  
Hong Zheng

Studies have shown that vitamin D could have a role in breast cancer survival; however, the evidence of the relationship between patients’ vitamin D levels and their survival has been inconsistent. This meta-analysis explores possible dose-response relationships between vitamin D levels and overall survival by allowing for differences in vitamin D levels among populations of the various studies. Studies relating vitamin D (25-OH-D [25-hydroxyvitamin D]) levels in breast cancer patients with their survival were identified by searching PubMed and Embase. A pooled HR (hazard ratio) comparing the highest with the lowest category of circulating 25-OH-D levels were synthesized using the Mantel-Haenszel method under a fixed-effects model. A two-stage fixed-effects dose-response model including both linear (a log-linear dose-response regression) and nonlinear (a restricted cubic spline regression) models were used to further explore possible dose-response relationships. Six studies with a total number of 5984 patients were identified. A pooled HR comparing the highest with the lowest category of circulating 25-OH-D levels under a fixed-effects model was 0.67 (95% confidence interval = 0.56-0.79, P < .001). Utilizing a dose-response meta-analysis, the pooled HR for overall survival in breast cancer patients was 0.994 (per 1 nmol/L), Pfor linear trend < .001. At or above a 23.3 nmol/L threshold, for a 10 nmol/L, 20 nmol/L, or 25 nmol/L increment in circulating 25-OH-D levels, the risk of breast cancer overall mortality decreased by 6%, 12%, and 14%, respectively. There was no significant nonlinearity in the relationship between overall survival and circulating 25-OH-D levels. Our findings suggest that there is a highly significant linear dose-response relationship between circulating 25-OH-D levels and overall survival in patients with breast cancer. However, better designed prospective cohort studies and clinical trials are needed to further confirm these findings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12520-e12520
Author(s):  
Keerthi Tamragouri ◽  
Ethan M. Ritz ◽  
Ruta D. Rao ◽  
Cristina O'Donoghue

e12520 Background: Oncotype Dx (ODX) is a commercial diagnostic test primarily used to predict the likely benefit from chemotherapy in ER+, HER2-, and node negative breast cancer. The prognostic value (recurrence risk) has also been demonstrated to apply to early stage lymph node positive (LN+) disease in a number of retrospective and prospective studies. The ongoing RxPONDER trial aims to clarify the predictive value of RS in LN+ population. In light of the initial results, we analyzed the practice patterns and outcomes for HR+/Her2 -/node positive breast cancer patients receiving ODX testing in the years from 2010-2017 with RS 14-25 in a retrospective observational study of the NCDB. Methods: Women with HR+/Her2 -/node positive breast cancer receiving ODX testing from 2010-2017 were identified in the NCDB using TAILORx and RxPONDER patients’ inclusion criteria: ages 18-75, 6-50mm invasive tumors, N1, M0, ER+/HER2 -. The impact of ODX results in the high-intermediate range (14-25) and other clinico-pathologic variables on the receipt of chemotherapy were compared. Additionally, we examined the impact of chemotherapy on overall survival (OS). Frequencies, Kaplain-Meier analysis, and changepoint analysis using the Contal and O’Quigley method were utilized. Results: There were 109,652 T1-2 and N1 patients of whom 32,506 (29.6%) received ODX testing. 13,461 (41.4%%) women had scores in the high-intermediate (14-25) range. The majority tended to have only 1 LN involved (1LN: 77.2%, 2LNs: 17.5%, 3LNs: 5.3%), had a mean age of 57.8y, were Caucasian (86.4%), and were preferentially tested at academic or comprehensive community cancer programs (79.2%). 6,610 (49.3%) patients were recommended chemotherapy, the median ODX score for all women who were recommended chemotherapy was 20 compared to 17 for those whom chemotherapy was not recommended. 5,068 (76.7%) women had documentation of receiving chemotherapy which correlated with improved OS regardless of age. Conclusions: In the group of women with HR+/Her2 -/node positive breast cancer, clinicians appear to utilize ODX testing in less than one-third of patients, possibly finding RS to be most useful in guiding adjuvant therapy recommendations when only 1LN is involved. Both the recommendation and receipt of chemotherapy correlated linearly with increasing RS, as expected based on the current NCCN guideline recommendations. We identified an OS benefit when chemotherapy was administered, regardless of patient age. Long-term follow-up in the RxPONDER trial will likely continue to clarify the predictive value of RS < 25 in the ER+/HER2-/node positive breast cancer population.


2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Ziegler ◽  
Ronald Grossarth-Maticek

Mistletoe preparations such as Iscador are in common use as complementary/anthroposophic medications for many cancer indications, particularly for solid cancers. The efficacy is still discussed controversially. This paper presents an individual patient data meta-analysis of all published prospective matched-pair studies with breast cancer patients concerned with long-term application of a complementary/anthroposophic therapy with the mistletoe preparation Iscador. Six sets of data were available for individual patient meta-analysis of breast cancer patients, matched according to prognostic factors into pairs with and without mistletoe (Iscador) therapy. The main outcome measures were overall survival and psychosomatic self-regulation. Overall survival was almost significant in favor of the Iscador group in the combined data set of the randomized studies: estimate of the hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval 0.59 (0.34, 1.02). Overall survival was highly significant in the combined data set of the non-randomized studies: 0.43 (0.34, 0.56). In the combined analysis of the randomized studies, improvement of psychosomatic self-regulation, as a measure of autonomous coping with the disease, was highly significant in favor of the Iscador group: estimate of the median difference 0.45 (0.15, 0.80),P= 0.0051. The analyzed studies show that therapy with Iscador might prolong overall survival and improve psychosomatic self-regulation of breast cancer patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (03) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona McNally ◽  
Paul H. Shepherd ◽  
Terri Flood

AbstractPurposeTo evaluate the use of exercise in managing fatigue in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy. To explore the effectiveness of different exercise practices and explore how optimum management of fatigue might be achieved.MethodA CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) database search of literature was undertaken and publications screened for retrieval with 24 qualifying for inclusion in the review.ResultsThere is evidence to support various forms of exercise including aerobic, resistance, alternative and combination exercise in the management of fatigue in early stage breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy. The benefits of exercise for patients with later stage and metastatic disease is less clear and there is a lack of published research related to this category of patient.ConclusionExercise is considered a safe, non-pharmacological intervention for early stage breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. Further investigation is required into optimum exercise interventions and the effectiveness and viability of supervised and unsupervised models. Patient centred tailored advice and guidance needs to be developed and effectively promoted by therapeutic radiographers in order for patients to fully realise the benefit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document