Differences in psychosocial factors among diverse women enrolled in a phase III cooperative group metastatic breast cancer trial (CALGB 40502/Alliance).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9581-9581
Author(s):  
Blase N. Polite ◽  
Jacob B Allred ◽  
Hope S. Rugo ◽  
Toni Marie Cipriano ◽  
Constance Cirrincione ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Social Support ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cooperative Group ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Trial ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
The Impact

9581 Background: Previous metastatic breast cancer trials have shown lower overall survival among African American (AA) women. Studies have also shown links between higher comorbidities and lower levels of social support and survival. Whether these factors differ by race and ethnicity is not known. Methods: Breast cancer patients enrolling in a phase III cooperative group metastatic breast cancer trial completed a self-administered survey measuring psychosocial and socio-demographic factors and comorbidities. Results were analyzed by self-identified race/ethnicity and evaluated by other measured variables. Results: 703 out of 799 patients completed the survey (88%). Questions were answered by greater than 95% of participants. The table shows differences broken down by Race/Ethnicity. AA and Hispanic (H) patients were more likely to have trouble paying for medications and have incomes less than 15K per year. AA were less likely to be married, and had lower levels of social support. Differences in income did not mediate these social support differences. Marital status did not mediate lower social support for AA (p=0.79) but did so for whites (p<0.001) Conclusions: Compliance with the questionnaire was quite high. Differences in social support by race were apparent and were mediated by different factors according to race. Future efforts will analyze the impact of these factors on survival and as mediators for potential racial and ethnic differences in survival. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Impact of Pharmaceutical Prophylaxis on Radiation-Induced Liver Disease Following Radioembolization

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1992
Author(s):  
Max Seidensticker ◽  
Matthias Philipp Fabritius ◽  
Jannik Beller ◽  
Ricarda Seidensticker ◽  
Andrei Todica ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Normal Liver ◽  
Liver Parenchyma ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
The Impact

Background: Radioembolization (RE) with yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres yields heterogeneous response rates in with primary or secondary liver cancer. Radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) is a potentially life-threatening complication with higher prevalence in cirrhotics or patients exposed to previous chemotherapies. Advances in RILD prevention may help increasing tolerable radiation doses to improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of post-therapeutic RILD-prophylaxis in a cohort of intensely pretreated liver metastatic breast cancer patients; Methods: Ninety-three patients with liver metastases of breast cancer received RE between 2007 and 2016. All Patients received RILD prophylaxis for 8 weeks post-RE. From January 2014, RILD prophylaxis was changed from ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and prednisolone (standard prophylaxis [SP]; n = 59) to pentoxifylline (PTX), UDCA and low-dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (modified prophylaxis (MP); n = 34). The primary endpoint was toxicity including symptoms of RILD; Results: Dose exposure of normal liver parenchyma was higher in the modified vs. standard prophylaxis group (47.2 Gy (17.8–86.8) vs. 40.2 Gy (12.5–83.5), p = 0.017). All grade RILD events (mild: bilirubin ≥ 21 µmol/L (but <30 μmol/L); severe: (bilirubin ≥ 30 µmol/L and ascites)) were observed more frequently in the SP group than in the MP group, albeit without significance (7/59 vs. 1/34; p = 0.140). Severe RILD occurred in the SP group only (n = 2; p > 0.1). ALBI grade increased in 16.7% patients in the MP and in 27.1% patients in the SP group, respectively (group difference not significant); Conclusions: At established dose levels, mild or severe RILD events proved rare in our cohort. RILD prophylaxis with PTX, UDCA and LMWH appears to have an independent positive impact on OS in patients with metastatic breast cancer and may reduce the frequency and severity of RILD. Results of this study as well as pathophysiological considerations warrant further investigations of RILD prophylaxis presumably targeting combinations of anticoagulation (MP) and antiinflammation (SP) to increase dose prescriptions in radioembolization.

Time to Progression in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Epirubicin Is Not Improved by the Addition of Either Cisplatin or Lonidamine: Final Results of a Phase III Study With a Factorial Design

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (20) ◽  
pp. 4150-4159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Berruti ◽  
Raffaella Bitossi ◽  
Gabriella Gorzegno ◽  
Alberto Bottini ◽  
Palmiro Alquati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Factorial Design ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Phase Iii Study

PURPOSE: To investigate the value of the addition of either cisplatin (CDDP) or lonidamine (LND) to epirubicin (EPI) in the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventy-one metastatic breast cancer patients with no prior systemic chemotherapy for advanced disease were randomized to receive either EPI alone (60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 every 21 days), EPI and CDDP (30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 every 21 days), EPI and LND (450 mg orally daily, given continuously), or EPI, CDDP, and LND. Time to progression, response rates, side effects, and survival were compared according to the 2 × 2 factorial design of this study. RESULTS: The groups were well balanced with respect to prognostic factors. Time to progression did not differ in the comparison between CDDP arms and non-CDDP arms (median, 10.9 months v 9.4 months, respectively; P = .10) or between that of LND arms and non-LND arms (median, 10.8 months v 9.9 months, respectively; P = .47), nor did overall survival. The response rate did not significantly differ in the comparison between LND arms and non-LND arms (62.9% v 54.0%, P = .08). No difference in treatment activity was observed between CDDP arms and non-CDDP arms. Toxicity was significantly higher in the CDDP arms, leading to CDDP dose adjustment in 40% of cases. The most frequent side effects were of a hematologic and gastrointestinal nature. The addition of LND produced more myalgias and fatigue. CONCLUSION: Neither CDDP nor LND was able to significantly improve the time to progression obtained by EPI. CDDP, however, significantly worsened the drug’s tolerability.

scholarly journals Relationship of Serum HER-2/neu and Serum CA 15-3 in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 1314-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suhail M Ali ◽  
Kim Leitzel ◽  
Vernon M Chinchilli ◽  
Linda Engle ◽  
Laurence Demers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Normal Serum ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Her 2

Abstract Background: Serum HER-2/neu antigen concentrations have been reported to correlate with increased tumor volume in patients with breast cancer. We measured serum CA 15-3, a surrogate marker of disease burden, and correlated serum CA 15-3 with serum HER-2/neu and analyzed the association of both markers with clinical outcomes. Methods: Pretreatment serum samples from 566 patients were retrospectively analyzed from 2 phase III clinical trials of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), ER−/progesterone receptor-positive, or ER status unknown metastatic breast cancer patients randomized in two similar studies to receive second-line hormone therapy with either megestrol acetate or an aromatase inhibitor (fadrozole). The extracellular domain of the HER-2/neu (c-erbB-2) oncogene and serum CA 15-3 were measured by ELISA on the Bayer Immuno 1. Results: Serum HER-2/neu protein was increased in 168 patients (30%), and CA 15-3 was increased in 337 (60%) patients. Serum CA 15-3 and HER-2/neu were weakly correlated (r = 0.39; P &lt;0.0001). The clinical benefit (complete responses plus partial responses plus stable disease) of endocrine therapy was significantly lower in patients with increased serum HER-2/neu. When adjusted for serum HER-2/neu, serum CA 15-3 was not predictive of response rates. The median time to progression was shorter in patients with increased serum HER-2/neu (89 days) compared with patients with normal serum HER-2/neu (176 days). Survival was significantly shorter in patients with increased serum HER-2/neu (513 vs 869 days; P &lt;0.0001) or increased serum CA 15-3 (689 vs 939 days; P &lt;0.0001). This observation was confirmed by multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Serum HER-2/neu is a significant independent predictive and prognostic factor in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer, even when adjusted for tumor burden as measured by CA 15-3. The combination of increased serum HER-2/neu and increased serum CA 15-3 predicts a worse prognosis than does increased CA 15-3 alone.

BOLERO-2: Health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with everolimus and exemestane versus exemestane.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 125-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hope S. Rugo ◽  
J. Thaddeus Beck ◽  
José Baselga ◽  
Shinzaburo Noguchi ◽  
Michael Gnant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

125 Background: BOLERO-2, a phase III study, randomized 724 patients with hormone-receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer, who had recurrence or progression on/after prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy, to everolimus (EVE) + exemestane (EXE) or EXE + placebo. A preplanned 12-mo median time interim analysis demonstrated that EVE + EXE significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs EXE + placebo, but EVE + EXE resulted in a higher rate of grade 3-4 toxicity. Per-protocol patients reported HRQoL data are limited; here we report on additional post hoc analyses of these outcomes. Methods: Using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, HRQoL was assessed at baseline and every 6 weeks thereafter until progression. QLQ-C30 consists of 30 items combined into 15 subscales, including a Global Health Status (GHS), where higher scores (range, 0-100) indicate better HRQoL. Analysis included a protocol-specified time to definitive deterioration (TTD) analysis at a 5% decrease in QoL relative to baseline, with no subsequent increase above this threshold. We report additional sensitivity analyses using 10-point minimally important difference (MID) decreases in QLQ-C30 score relative to baseline. Treatment arms were compared using a stratified log-rank test and a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for trial stratum (visceral metastases and previous hormone sensitivity), age, sex, race, baseline score, ECOG performance status, prognostic risk factors, and treatment history. Results: Baseline QLQ-C30 GHS scores were not statistically significantly different across treatment groups (64.7 vs 65.3; difference –0.7 [95% CI, –4.3-3.0]). Median TTD in HRQoL was 7.0 mo (95% CI, 5.6-8.3) for EVE + EXE vs 5.6 (95% CI, 4.2-7.0) for EXE (p = .0792). Adjusted HR (0.80) approached significance (95% CI, 0.63-1.02). At the 10-point MID, median TTD for EVE + EXE was 9.7 mo (95% CI, 8.3-11.2) vs 8.4 mo (95% CI, 6.3-12.5) for EXE. Adjusted HR was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.69-1.18). Conclusions: These additional analyses from the BOLERO-2 study demonstrate that in addition to significantly improving PFS, EVE + EXE does not compromise HRQoL.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document