EPIC: A phase III randomized, open-label study of ponatinib versus imatinib in adult patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS7129-TPS7129
Author(s):  
Jeffrey H. Lipton ◽  
Michael W. N. Deininger ◽  
Stephanie Lustgarten ◽  
Christopher D. Turner ◽  
Victor M. Rivera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Dropout Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Absolute Increase ◽  
Once Daily

TPS7129 Background: The hallmark genetic abnormality of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), known as the Philadelphia chromosome, generates the BCR-ABL fusion gene; expression of BCR-ABL in hematopoietic stem cells gives rise to CML. Ponatinib is a potent oral pan–BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that is active against native and mutated forms of BCR-ABL, including the T315I gatekeeper mutant. Results from the phase 1 and phase 2 studies of ponatinib demonstrated that ponatinib is generally well tolerated and has substantial anti-leukemic activity in patients with CML who are resistant or intolerant to prior TKI therapy, regardless of baseline mutation status. In addition, multivariate analyses suggest that ponatinib has greater activity in younger patients who are less heavily pretreated and have a shorter time since diagnosis. The phase 3 EPIC (Evaluation of Ponatinib vs Imatinib in CML) study is testing the hypothesis that ponatinib is an effective treatment for newly diagnosed chronic phase (CP) CML patients when compared with standard imatinib therapy. Methods: EPIC is a multicenter, international, phase 3, two-arm, open-label trial of ponatinib (45 mg once daily) versus imatinib (400 mg once daily) in patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML. Patients ≥18 years of age with CP-CML (diagnosed within 6 months prior to study entry) and adequate renal, hepatic, and pancreatic function are eligible for enrollment. Enrolled patients are assigned to receive ponatinib or imatinib in a 1:1 fashion, stratified by Sokal Risk score (low vs intermediate vs high). The primary efficacy endpoint for this trial is major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months. Secondary endpoints include MMR rate at 5 years, BCR-ABLIS<10% rate at 3 months, CCyR rate at 12 months, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. A sample size consisting of 480 patients will provide 90% power to detect a 15% absolute increase in MMR rate at 12 months using an unstratified Fisher exact 2-sided test at an alpha level of 0.05. Assuming a 10% dropout rate, approximately 528 patients will be enrolled. The first patient was enrolled in August 2012. Clinical trial information: NCT01650805.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety Of Dasatinib For Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase In Japan

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1493-1493
Author(s):  
Kohei Yamaguchi ◽  
Kazunori Murai ◽  
Shigeki Ito ◽  
Tomoaki Akagi ◽  
Kazuei Ogawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Once Daily

Abstract Background Dasatinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL inhibitor that has a 325-fold higher potency than imatinib and a 16-fold higher potency than nilotinib in vitro. The previous report from the global DASISION trial showed dasatinib resulted in significantly higher and faster rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) compared with imatinib. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in Japan. Methods Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were include in this study. Patients received dasatinib 100mg once daily. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months. MMR defined as a BCR-ABL transcript level of 0.1% or lower on the International scale by means of a real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in peripheral blood. Secondary end points were the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) by 12 months, the rate of MR4.5 (either (i) detectable disease with <0.0032% BCR-ABL1 IS or (ii) undetectable disease in cDNA with >32,000 ABL1 transcripts in the same volume of cDNA used to test for BCR-ABL1) by 12 months and adverse events of dasatinib (UMIN #000006358). Results Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were included in this study. All except one patient administered dasatinib 100 mg once daily. One patient was withdrawal before administration of dasatinib. So far, there were 71 patients with 6 months follow-up and 51 patients with 12 months follow-up. The estimated MMR rates were 69.5 % (95%CI, 58.7-80.3 %) by 6 months and 82.7% (95%CI, 73.0-92.4 %) by 12 months. The estimated MR4.5 rates were 27.1 % (95%CI, 16.7-37.5 %) by 6 months and 48.9% (95%CI, 36.0-61.7 %) by 12 months. Only 6 patients were withdrawal because of adverse event (5 patients) and ineffectiveness (1 patient). Conclusion Dasatinib treatment results in higher rates of molecular responses in newly diagnosed CML-CP patients in Japan. Dasatinib as the first-line agent might be acceptable for CML-CP patients because of better clinical efficacy and less toxicity. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Velocity of Early BCR-ABL Transcript Elimination As an Optimized Predictor of Deep Molecular Response in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Chronic Phase on Treatment with Dasatinib

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4052-4052
Author(s):  
Kazunori Murai ◽  
Kohei Yamaguchi ◽  
Shigeki Ito ◽  
Tomoaki Akagi ◽  
Kazuei Ogawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Roc Analysis ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Similar Data ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Deep Molecular Response

Abstract Background: We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in Japan (IMIDAS PART2 study; UMIN000006358). Several groups reported that some of CML patients who achieved stable deep molecular response (DMR) level or deeper could stop Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) and approximately 40% of these patients could keep therapy free survival by cessation of TKI. Discontinuation of TKI has emerged as a new goal of treatment in CML. Achievement of DMR is necessary for discontinuation of TKI. The aim of the present study was to analyze the prognostic significance of (i) BCR-ABL transcript International Scale (BCR-ABL IS) levels, (ii) the halving time and (iii) velocity of BCR-ABL transcript elimination using an optimized cutoff according to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Methods: Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were included in this study. Patients received dasatinib 100mg once daily. Treatment has continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Clinical efficacy and safety was partially reported in 55th ASH Meeting. We sought to investigate the impacts of above 3 parameters within the initial 1 or 3 months of therapy. Halving time was calculated by the method, described by Branford et al. Velocity of BCR-ABL transcript elimination at 1 or 3 months (V-BCR-ABL1m or 3m respectively) was calculated as BCR-ABL IS at 1 or 3 months (BCR-ABL IS1m or 3m respectively) divided by that at diagnosis. Results: One patient was withdrawal before administration of dasatinib. Seventy-nine patients administered dasatinib 100 mg once daily. The estimated MMR and DMR rates were 92.1 % (95%CI, 76.8-97.3 %) and 60.9% (95%CI; 42.3-73.4 %) by 12 months respectively. The patients who had already achieved DMR at 3 months were excluded from landmark analysis. The cut off values for prediction of DMR at 12 months were obtained by ROC analysis. Those of BCR-ABL IS1m and BCR-ABL IS3m were 11.7% and 0.284% respectively. Those of halving times on 0-1 month and 0-3months (halving time1m and 3m) were 17.8 and 13.6 days respectively. Those of V-BCR-ABL1m and V-BCR-ABL3m were 0.321 and 0.018 respectively. The estimated DMR at 12 months, 95% CI and probability (P), obtained by Kaplan-Myer analysis, were shown in Figure 1. Odd' ratio, obtained by Chi-square test, was shown in Table 1. The patients with less than 0.321 at V-BCR-ABL1m showed the highest DMR at 12 months (80%), the least probability (P=0.009) and the least odd' ratio (0.175). At 3 months, there were similar data in these parameters among BCR-ABL IS3m, halving time3m and V-BCR-ABL3m. Figure 1 showed the cumulative DMR rate according to the cutoff values in V-BCR-ABL1m and V-BCR-ABL3m. V-BCR-ABL1m 0.321 and V-BCR-ABL3m 0.018 separated best. Conclusion: These data strongly suggested that V-BCR-ABL1m,3m would be a significant landmark to predict DMR at 12 months as well as BCR-ABL IS1m,3m, halving time1m,3m. Among them, less than 0.321 in V-BCR-ABL1m was identified as an optimized predictive cutoff value of DMR at 12 months. Disclosures Ishida: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria.

Frontline flumatinib versus imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: Results from the China randomized phase III study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7004-7004
Author(s):  
Zhang Li ◽  
Li Meng ◽  
Yanli Zhang ◽  
Huanling Zhu ◽  
Jiuwei Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Frontline Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii Study

7004 Background: Flumatinib (FM), a derivative of imatinib (IM), is a novel BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The aim of this open-label phase III study was to validate the efficacy and safety of FM in comparison with IM as frontline treatment in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome–positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CML-CP). Methods: Randomization was stratified by Sokal score with a 1:1 allocation to each arm. Primary endpoints were major molecular response (MMR = BCR-ABL IS≤0.1%) rates at 6 and 12 months. Molecular responses were assessed at a central laboratory blinded to treatment allocations during the study. Efficacy endpoints were analyzed for the intention-to-treat populations. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02204644. Results: 400 eligible patients were randomized and patient characteristics at baseline were similar in each arm. The full analysis set (FAS) consisted of 393 patients who received FM 600 mg (n = 196) or IM 400 mg (n = 197) tablets once daily. Compared with IM, FM resulted significantly higher induction of MMR rate (%; 95%CI) at 6 month (33.7; 27.06-40.29 vs 18.3; 12.88-23.67; P = 0.0005) and 12 month (48.5; 41.47-55.47 vs 33.0; 26.43-39.56; P = 0.0021) and also at 3 month (8.2; 4.33- 12.00 vs 2.0; 0.06-4.00; P = 0.0058). Significantly more patients in the FM than in the IM arm achieved a complete molecular response (BCR-ABL IS≤0.0032%) at 12 months. Early molecular response (BCR-ABL IS ≤ 10%) at 3 months and early CCyR at 6 months were also significantly higher with FM than IM (82.1; 76.78-87.50 vs 53.3; 46.33-60.27; P < 0.0001 and 60.71; 53.88-67.55 vs 49.75, 42.76, 56.73; P = 0.0332). FM has a safety profile similar to IM. The rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs of FM were similar to IM, 56.57% (112 of 198) vs 41.38% (87 of 196). However, the frequencies of some nonhematological and hematological adverse events were significantly lower in the FM than in the IM arm, such as rash (4.59% vs 12.63%, P = 0.0064) and eyelid edema (0.51 vs 14.65, P < 0.0001); leukopenia (30.61 vs 62.63, P < 0.0001) and neutropenia (30.10 vs 59.60, P < 0.0001). No specific TEAE was identified in each arm. Conclusions: This phase III study met its primary endpoints. Our study results suggest that FM is comparable to IM in its safety and superior in its efficacy profile at 3, 6 and 12 month time points. These results support FM as a frontline treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Clinical trial information: NCT02204644.

scholarly journals Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Daily Imatinib Mesylate 400 mg Versus 800 mg in Patients With Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase Using Molecular End Points: Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Optimization and Selectivity Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 424-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
François Guilhot ◽  
Brian J. Druker ◽  
Susan Branford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Imatinib Mesylate ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Gastrointestinal Problems

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of initial treatment with imatinib mesylate 800 mg/d (400 mg twice daily) versus 400 mg/d in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase.Patients and MethodsA total of 476 patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to imatinib 800 mg (n = 319) or 400 mg (n = 157) daily. The primary end point was the major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months.ResultsAt 12 months, differences in MMR and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rates were not statistically significant (MMR, 46% v 40%; P = .2035; CCyR, 70% v 66%; P = .3470). However, MMR occurred faster among patients randomly assigned to imatinib 800 mg/d, who had higher rates of MMR at 3 and 6 months compared with those in the imatinib 400-mg/d arm (P = .0035 by log-rank test). CCyR also occurred faster in the 800-mg/d arm (CCyR at 6 months, 57% v 45%; P = .0146). The most common adverse events were edema, gastrointestinal problems, and rash, and all were more common in patients in the 800-mg/d arm. Grades 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity also occurred more frequently in patients receiving imatinib 800 mg/d.ConclusionMMR rates at 1 year were similar with imatinib 800 mg/d and 400 mg/d, but MMR and CCyR occurred earlier in patients treated with 800 mg/d. Continued follow-up is needed to determine the clinical significance of earlier responses on high-dose imatinib.

scholarly journals Bosutinib Versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results From the BELA Trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (28) ◽  
pp. 3486-3492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Tim H. Brümmendorf ◽  
Irina Dyagil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Blast Phase ◽  
End Point

Purpose Bosutinib is an oral Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The phase III Bosutinib Efficacy and Safety in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (BELA) trial compared bosutinib with imatinib in newly diagnosed, chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients and Methods A total of 502 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to bosutinib 500 mg per day or imatinib 400 mg per day. Results The complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate at 12 months was not different for bosutinib (70%; 95% CI, 64% to 76%) versus imatinib (68%; 95% CI, 62% to 74%; two-sided P = .601); therefore, the study did not achieve its primary end point. The major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months was higher with bosutinib (41%; 95% CI, 35% to 47%) compared with imatinib (27%; 95% CI, 22% to 33%; two-sided P < .001). Time to CCyR and MMR was faster with bosutinib compared with imatinib (two-sided P < .001 for both). On-treatment transformation to accelerated/blast phase occurred in four patients (2%) on bosutinib compared with 10 patients (4%) on imatinib. A total of three CML-related deaths occurred on the bosutinib arm compared with eight on the imatinib arm. The safety profiles of bosutinib and imatinib were distinct; GI and liver-related events were more frequent with bosutinib, whereas neutropenia, musculoskeletal disorders, and edema were more frequent with imatinib. Conclusion This ongoing trial did not meet its primary end point of CCyR at 12 months, despite the observed higher MMR rate at 12 months, faster times to CCyR and MMR, fewer on-treatment transformations to accelerated/blast phase, and fewer CML-related deaths with bosutinib compared with imatinib. Each drug had a distinct safety profile.

scholarly journals Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 1123-1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Neil P. Shah ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
Mohan B. Agarwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Dasatinib is a highly potent BCR-ABL inhibitor with established efficacy and safety in imatinib-resistant/-intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In the phase 3 DASISION trial, patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase (CP) CML were randomized to receive dasatinib 100 mg (n = 259) or imatinib 400 mg (n = 260) once daily. Primary data showed superior efficacy for dasatinib compared with imatinib after 12 months, including significantly higher rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), confirmed CCyR (primary end point), and major molecular response (MMR). Here, 24-month data are presented. Cumulative response rates by 24 months in dasatinib and imatinib arms were: CCyR in 86% versus 82%, MMR in 64% versus 46%, and BCR-ABL reduction to ≤ 0.0032% (4.5-log reduction) in 17% versus 8%. Transformation to accelerated-/ blast-phase CML on study occurred in 2.3% with dasatinib versus 5.0% with imatinib. BCR-ABL mutations, assessed after discontinuation, were detected in 10 patients in each arm. In safety analyses, fluid retention, superficial edema, myalgia, vomiting, and rash were less frequent with dasatinib compared with imatinib, whereas pleural effusion and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia were more frequent with dasatinib. Overall, dasatinib continues to show faster and deeper responses compared with imatinib, supporting first-line use of dasatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00481247.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document