Chemoradiation (CRT) followed by surgery and adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) compared with induction CAPOX followed by concomitant CRT and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer: Results of the Spanish GCR-3 randomized phase II trial after a median follow-up of 5 years.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 383-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Fernandez-Martos ◽  
Carles Pericay ◽  
Jorge Aparicio ◽  
Maria Jose Safont ◽  
Antonia Salud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Rectal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Local Relapse ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii

383 Background: In locally advanced rectal cancer in contrast with the conventional approach the administration of chemotherapy prior to chemoradiation (CRT) and surgery allow most patients receive planned treatment with better toxicity profile without compromising the pCR and complete resection rates, as we previously demonstrated. (J Clin Oncol 28:859-865, 2010). We now report on the 5-year outcomes of this randomized trial. Methods: Patients with distal or middle third, T3-T4 and/or N+ rectal adenocarcinoma selected by Magnetic Resonance +/- endorectal ultrasound, were randomly assigned to arm A—preoperative CRT followed by surgery and four cycles of postoperative adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX)—or arm B— four cycles of CAPOX followed by CRT and surgery. The following five-year outcomes were assessed: the cumulative incidence of local-regional (LRF) and distance failure (DF), disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 108 patients accrued, 52 were randomly assigned to arm A and 56 to arm B. According to intention-to-treat analysis with a median follow-up time of 69.5 months, the 5-years DFS rates were 64.3% (95% CI, 49% to 76%) in arm A and 60.7% (95 CI, 46% to 72%) in arm B (P=0.73). The 5-year cumulative incidences of local relapse were 1.9 % and 7.1% in A and B arms respectively (P= 0.36). No significant differences were detected for 5-year cumulative incidence of distant metastases (21.1% and 23.2%; P = 0.80) and 5-years overall survival (77.9% and 74.7%; P= 0.64). Conclusions: Both approaches yield similar 5-y outcomes. Because of the associated acute toxicity sparing and better compliance with induction CT compared with adjuvant CT, integrating effective systemic therapy prior to CRT and surgery may well be the next step in phase III testing versus the standard strategy to capture meaningful differences in DFS.

Preoperative Versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 Randomized Phase III Trial After a Median Follow-Up of 11 Years

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (16) ◽  
pp. 1926-1933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf Sauer ◽  
Torsten Liersch ◽  
Susanne Merkel ◽  
Rainer Fietkau ◽  
Werner Hohenberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Purpose Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been established as standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer after first results of the CAO/ARO/AIO-94 [Working Group of Surgical Oncology/Working Group of Radiation Oncology/Working Group of Medical Oncology of the Germany Cancer Society] trial, published in 2004, showed an improved local control rate. However, after a median follow-up of 46 months, no survival benefit could be shown. Here, we report long-term results with a median follow-up of 134 months. Patients and Methods A total of 823 patients with stage II to III rectal cancer were randomly assigned to preoperative CRT with fluorouracil (FU), total mesorectal excision surgery, and adjuvant FU chemotherapy, or the same schedule of CRT used postoperatively. The study was designed to have 80% power to detect a difference of 10% in 5-year overall survival as the primary end point. Secondary end points included the cumulative incidence of local and distant relapses and disease-free survival. Results Of 799 eligible patients, 404 were randomly assigned to preoperative and 395 to postoperative CRT. According to intention-to-treat analysis, overall survival at 10 years was 59.6% in the preoperative arm and 59.9% in the postoperative arm (P = .85). The 10-year cumulative incidence of local relapse was 7.1% and 10.1% in the pre- and postoperative arms, respectively (P = .048). No significant differences were detected for 10-year cumulative incidence of distant metastases (29.8% and 29.6%; P = .9) and disease-free survival. Conclusion There is a persisting significant improvement of pre- versus postoperative CRT on local control; however, there was no effect on overall survival. Integrating more effective systemic treatment into the multimodal therapy has been adopted in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial to possibly reduce distant metastases and improve survival.

Nomograms for Predicting Local Recurrence, Distant Metastases, and Overall Survival for Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer on the Basis of European Randomized Clinical Trials

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (23) ◽  
pp. 3163-3172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Valentini ◽  
Ruud G.P.M. van Stiphout ◽  
Guido Lammering ◽  
Maria Antonietta Gambacorta ◽  
Maria Cristina Barba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Purpose The purpose of this study was to develop accurate models and nomograms to predict local recurrence, distant metastases, and survival for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery and to allow for a selection of patients who may benefit most from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and close follow-up. Patients and Methods All data (N = 2,795) from five major European clinical trials for rectal cancer were pooled and used to perform an extensive survival analysis and to develop multivariate nomograms based on Cox regression. Data from one trial was used as an external validation set. The variables used in the analysis were sex, age, clinical tumor stage stage, tumor location, radiotherapy dose, concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery procedure, and pTNM stage. Model performance was evaluated by the concordance index (c-index). Risk group stratification was proposed for the nomograms. Results The nomograms are able to predict events with a c-index for external validation of local recurrence (LR; 0.68), distant metastases (DM; 0.73), and overall survival (OS; 0.70). Pathologic staging is essential for accurate prediction of long-term outcome. Both preoperative CRT and adjuvant chemotherapy have an added value when predicting LR, DM, and OS rates. The stratification in risk groups allows significant distinction between Kaplan-Meier curves for outcome. Conclusion The easy-to-use nomograms can predict LR, DM, and OS over a 5-year period after surgery. They may be used as decision support tools in future trials by using the three defined risk groups to select patients for postoperative chemotherapy and close follow-up ( http://www.predictcancer.org ).

A multicenter randomized phase III trial of capecitabine with or without irinotecan driven by UGT1A1 in neoadjuvant chemoradiation of locally advanced rectal cancer (CinClare).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3510-3510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Zhang ◽  
Xinchen Sun ◽  
Anwen Liu ◽  
Yuan Zhu ◽  
Yaqun Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Rectal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Preoperative Treatment ◽  
Pelvic Radiation ◽  
Irinotecan Dose ◽  
Ugt1a1 Genotype

3510 Background: Our phase I/II study identified irinotecan dose differentiated by UGT1A1 genotype in the neoadjuvant CRT and showed improved pCR. The objective of this phase III study was to further investigate irinotecan combined with capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy as preoperative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: We underwent a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 trial in China from Nov.2015 to Dec.2017. Eligible patients with clinical stage T3-4 and/or N+ rectal adenocarcinoma were randomly allocated to two arms. The approach in control arm (Arm A, n = 180) was pelvic radiation of 50 Gy/25 fractions with concurrent capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily 5 days per week, followed by a cycle of XELOX two weeks after the end of CRT. The experimental arm (Arm B, n = 180) was pelvic radiation with capecitabine 625 mg/m2 twice daily 5 days per week and combined with weekly irinotecan. The irinotecan dose was used based on UGT1A1 genotype of 80mg/m2 for UGT1A1*1*1 or 65mg/m2 for UGT1A1*1*28 weekly, followed by a cycle of XELIRI. The primary endpoint is pathological complete response (pCR). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02605265. Results: Surgery was performed in 86.5% and 88.2% of patients in two groups, with 38.9% and 30.5% of patients got abdominoperineal resection respectively. The pCR rate was 17.5% in Arm A and 33.8% in Arm B (P = 0.001). Four and 6 patients maintained a complete clinical response status at least 12 months and were marked as cCR. The CR rate, including pCR and cCR, was 17.4% in Arm A and 33.1% in Arm B (P = 0.001). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events during preoperative treatment were leucopenia (3.4% vs. 25.3%), neutropenia (1.7% vs. 19.7%) and diarrhea (1.7% vs. 13.5%) in two arms. The overall rate of surgical complications were not significantly different between arms (11.0% vs. 14.6%). Conclusions: Adding irinotecan guided by UGT1A1 to capecitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy significantly increases complete tumor response. The treatment toxicities were increased but tolerable. This treatment can be as an option for ‘watch and wait’ approach. Clinical trial information: NCT02605265.

A multicenter phase Ib/II study of DNA-PK inhibitor peposertib (M3814) in combination with capecitabine and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS144-TPS144
Author(s):  
Paul Bernard Romesser ◽  
Emma B. Holliday ◽  
Tony Philip ◽  
Rocio Garcia-Carbonero ◽  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Rectal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ib

TPS144 Background: Perioperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, followed by total mesorectal excision, is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, 1/3 of these patients still develop distant metastases, indicating the need for more effective therapies. In addition, strategies that increase pathological complete response rates are needed to enable non-surgical management of LARC. DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) regulates a key DNA damage repair pathway for double-strand break repair. Peposertib (M3814), a potent, selective, orally administered DNA-PK inhibitor, has been shown to potentiate the effect of ionizing radiation in a human colon cancer xenograft model and several colon cancer cell lines. Peposertib is being investigated in several different trials across multiple indications. This Phase Ib/II study (NCT03770689) aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of the neoadjuvant treatment combination of peposertib, capecitabine, and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with LARC. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed and resectable Stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma are eligible. Induction chemotherapy is permitted, but residual disease must first be documented by MRI, digital rectal examination and endoscopy. Patients who received other anticancer therapies or those with prior pelvic RT are excluded. At open-label Phase Ib (open), 18–30 patients (n = 3 per cohort) will receive peposertib + capecitabine (orally, 825 mg/m2 twice daily [BID]) + RT (45–50.4 Gy), 5 days/week. Peposertib 50 mg once daily (QD) was the starting dose. Additional dose levels will range between 100─800 mg QD. Dose escalation is determined by the safety monitoring committee and guided by a Bayesian 2-parameter logistic regression model. At Phase II (planned), 150 patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive oral capecitabine (825 mg/m2 BID) + RT (45–50 Gy), with either oral peposertib (recommended phase II dose [RP2D] or placebo, QD for 5 days/week. Primary objectives are to define a maximum tolerated dose and RP2D (Phase Ib), and to evaluate the efficacy of peposertib + capecitabine + RT in terms of pathological/clinical complete response (Phase II). Secondary objectives include assessment of antitumor activity (Phase Ib), quality of life outcomes (Phase II), and PK of peposertib, and the safety and tolerability of the combination therapy (both phases). To date, one patient has received peposertib 50 mg QD, six patients peposertib 100 mg QD, three patients peposertib 150 mg QD, and three patients peposertib 250 mg QD. Clinical trial information: NCT03770689.

scholarly journals Delta Radiomics Can Predict Distant Metastasis in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: The Challenge to Personalize the Cure

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuditta Chiloiro ◽  
Pablo Rodriguez-Carnero ◽  
Jacopo Lenkowicz ◽  
Calogero Casà ◽  
Carlotta Masciocchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Confusion Matrix ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Features Selection ◽  
Testing Data

PurposeDistant metastases are currently the main cause of treatment failure in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. The aim of this research is to investigate a correlation between the variation of radiomics features using pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with 2 years distant metastasis (2yDM) rate in LARC patients.Methods and MaterialsDiagnostic pre- and post- nCRT MRI of LARC patients, treated in a single institution from May 2008 to June 2015 with an adequate follow-up time, were retrospectively collected. Gross tumor volumes (GTV) were contoured by an abdominal radiologist and blindly reviewed by a radiation oncologist expert in rectal cancer. The dataset was firstly randomly split into 90% training data, for features selection, and 10% testing data, for the validation. The final set of features after the selection was used to train 15 different classifiers using accuracy as target metric. The models’ performance was then assessed on the testing data and the best performing classifier was then selected, maximising the confusion matrix balanced accuracy (BA).ResultsData regarding 213 LARC patients (36% female, 64% male) were collected. Overall 2yDM was 17%. A total of 2,606 features extracted from the pre- and post- nCRT GTV were tested and 4 features were selected after features selection process. Among the 15 tested classifiers, logistic regression proved to be the best performing one with a testing set BA, sensitivity and specificity of 78.5%, 71.4% and 85.7%, respectively.ConclusionsThis study supports a possible role of delta radiomics in predicting following occurrence of distant metastasis. Further studies including a consistent external validation are needed to confirm these results and allows to translate radiomics model in clinical practice. Future integration with clinical and molecular data will be mandatory to fully personalized treatment and follow-up approaches.

Primary Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiation With or Without Oxaliplatin in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Pathologic Results of the STAR-01 Randomized Phase III Trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (20) ◽  
pp. 2773-2780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Aschele ◽  
Luca Cionini ◽  
Sara Lonardi ◽  
Carmine Pinto ◽  
Stefano Cordio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Muscularis Propria ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Preoperative Treatment ◽  
The Impact

Purpose To investigate oxaliplatin combined with fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy as preoperative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients and Methods Seven hundred forty-seven patients with resectable, locally advanced (cT3-4 and/or cN1-2) adenocarcinoma of the mid-low rectum were randomly assigned to receive pelvic radiation (50.4 Gy in 28 daily fractions) and concomitant infused fluorouracil (225 mg/m2/d) either alone (arm A, n = 379) or combined with oxaliplatin (60 mg/m2 weekly × 6; arm B, n = 368). Overall survival is the primary end point. A protocol-planned analysis of response to preoperative treatment is reported here. Results Grade 3 to 4 adverse events during preoperative treatment were more frequent with oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil and radiation than with radiation and fluorouracil alone (24% v 8% of treated patients; P < .001). In arm B, 83% of the patients treated with oxaliplatin had five or more weekly administrations. Ninety-one percent, compared with 97% in the control arm, received ≥ 45 Gy (P < .001). Ninety-six percent versus 95% of patients underwent surgery with similar rates of abdominoperineal resections (20% v 18%, arm A v arm B). The rate of pathologic complete responses was 16% in both arms (odds ratio = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.44; P = .904). Twenty-six percent versus 29% of patients had pathologically positive lymph nodes (arm A v arm B; P = .447), 46% versus 44% had tumor infiltration beyond the muscularis propria (P = .701), and 7% versus 4% had positive circumferential resection margins (P = .239). Intra-abdominal metastases were found at surgery in 2.9% versus 0.5% of patients (arm A v arm B; P = .014). Conclusion Adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy significantly increases toxicity without affecting primary tumor response. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact on efficacy end points.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document