Correlation of tumor-associated macrophages with clinicopathologic factors and angiogenesis in gastric cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 54-54
Author(s):  
Sung-Jig Lim ◽  
Sung Il Choi ◽  
Jae Park

54 Background: Tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) are major components of tumor environment, and polarized into M1 and M2 type. M1 has been known as antitumorigenic, whereas M2 as protumorigenic. M2 have a significant role in tumor progression by promoting tumor cell invasion, migration and angiogenesis. We evaluated the M2 macrophages to investigate its importance in predicting clinical outcome or prognosis, and the relationship between M2 and angiogenesis in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks were obtained from the 88 patients with gastric cancer. CD163+ TAMs and CD105+ vessels were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining and the extent of CD163+ TAMs in tumor were divided into three groups: (A) infiltrated TAMs in cancer cell nest (nest TAMs); (B) infiltrated TAMs in tumor stroma (stroma TAMs); and (C) infiltrated TAMs along the invasive margin of a tumor (margin TAMs). Results: The increased stroma and margin TAMs (>72 and >102, respectively) were closely correlated with lymph node metastasis, TNM stage and lymphatic invasion (p<0.05 in 3 factors) and positive correlation existed between the stroma and margin TAMs (p<0.001). Disease-free survival rate analyzed using the Kaplan– Meier method was significantly lower in patient with high stroma and margin TMAs than patient with low stroma and margin TAMs (p=0.0039 and 0.0499, respectively). CD105+ vessels showed significant correlation with lymph node metastasis and lymphatic invasion.(p=0.006 and p<0.0001, respectively) Stromal, marginal and nest TAMs were positively correlated with CD105+ vessels (p=0.001). Conclusions: M2 infiltration in tumor stroma and tumor margin in gastric cancer showed relationship with aggressive phenotypes such as lymph node metastasis, TNM stage and lymphatic invasion and was correlated with angiogenesis. This study supports the view that the adverse prognostic impact of M2 involves tumor angiogenesis in gastric cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 4419-4424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Won Park ◽  
Sangjeong Ahn ◽  
Hyuk Lee ◽  
Byung-Hoon Min ◽  
Jun Haeng Lee ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuo-Hung Huang ◽  
Yuan-Tzu Lan ◽  
Wen-Liang Fang ◽  
Jen-Hao Chen ◽  
Su-Shun Lo ◽  
...  

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) in gastric cancer is associated with higher rate of cancer recurrence and poor prognosis. As a result, a reliable biomarker for the prediction of LNM is important and would be valuable in the clinical practice. MiRNA microarray revealed that ten miRNAs were expressed significantly different among patients with or without LNM. A total of 46 gastric cancer patients were enrolled and divided into two groups (23 in each group) according to the presence or absence of LNM. RT-PCR of these 10 miRNAs was investigated and compared between the two groups. MiR-1207-5p was significantly upregulated in gastric cancer patients without LNM compared with those with LNM. Patients with upregulated miR-1207-5p had less scirrhous stromal reaction, less lymphovascular invasion, and earlier pathological T category, N category, and TNM stage, compared with those with downregulated or unchanged miR-1207-5p. Multivariate analysis showed that stromal reaction type, lymphovascular invasion, pathological T category and TNM stage, and expression of miR-1207-5p were independent risk factors of LNM. MiR-1207-5p could serve as a useful biomarker in the prediction of LNM in gastric cancer.


2005 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken-ichi Teramoto ◽  
Mitsuhiro Tada ◽  
Eiji Tamoto ◽  
Motoki Abe ◽  
Akiko Kawakami ◽  
...  

Surgery Today ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 484-489
Author(s):  
Shizuki Sugita ◽  
Takahiro Kinoshita ◽  
Takeshi Kuwata ◽  
Masanori Tokunaga ◽  
Akio Kaito ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 95 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.S. Zhai ◽  
J.G. Song ◽  
C.H. Zhu ◽  
K. Wu ◽  
Y. Yao ◽  
...  

Background Although appl1 is overexpressed in many cancers, its status in gastric cancer (gc) is not known. In the present study, we used relevant pathologic and clinical data to investigate appl1 expression in patients with gc.Methods In 47 gc and 27 non-gc surgical specimens, immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of appl1, and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rt-pcr) was used to detect messenger rna (mrna). A scatterplot visualized the relationship between survival time and mrna expression in gc patients. The log-rank test and other survival statistics were used to determine the association of appl1 expression with the pathologic features of the cancer and clinical outcomes.Results In gc, appl1 was expressed in 28 of 47 specimens (59.6%), and in non-gc, it was expressed in 7 of 23 specimens (30.4%, p < 0.05). The expression of mrna in gc was 0.82 [95% confidence interval (ci): 0.78 to 0.86], and in non-gc, it was 0.73 (95% ci: 0.69 to 0.77; p < 0.05). Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that, in gc, appl1 expression was correlated with depth of infiltration (p = 0.005), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.017), and TNM stage (p = 0.022), but not with pathologic type (p = 0.41). Testing by rt-pcr demonstrated that, in gc, appl1 mrna expression was correlated with depth of infiltration (p = 0.042), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.031), and TNM stage (p = 0.04), but again, not with pathologic type (p = 0.98). The correlation coefficient between survival time and mrna expression was –0.83 (p < 0.01). Overexpression of appl1 protein (hazard ratio: 3.88; 95% ci: 1.07 to 14.09) and mrna (hazard ratio: 4.23; 95% ci: 3.09 to 15.11) was a risk factor for death in patients with gc.Conclusions Expression of appl1 is increased in gc. Overexpression is prognostic for a lethal outcome.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Luo ◽  
Yuanzhi Zhu ◽  
Ying Long ◽  
Fei Huang ◽  
Xiaozou Luo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Many cancer researchers have investigated the prognostic significance of LASP1 for survival of patients with various types of cancer. Nevertheless, the role LASP1 palyed in cancer prognosis remains unknown. In consequence, we carried out this study in order to comprehensively analyze the prognostic value of LASP1 in cancer patients. Methods A systematical research was conducted in electronic databases, such as PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Eighteen studies meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and various clinicopathological parameters were used as the endpoints in this study. Results A total of 2023 cancer patients from eighteen studies were finally enrolled into our meta-analysis. The results revealed that the cancer patients with high expression of LASP1 exhibited shorter OS (HR = 2.04, 95%CI = 1.77–2.34, P < 0.01) and RFS (HR = 2.11, 95%CI = 1.51–2.95, P < 0.01) than those with low expression of LASP1, and patients whose tumors expressed high LASP1 had shorter OS in lung cancer (HR = 2.20, 95%CI = 1.45–3.36, P < 0.01) and gastric cancer (HR = 1.64, 95%CI = 1.14–2.36, P < 0.01) respectively. Furthermore, the cancer patients whose tumors expressed high LASP1 were apparently associated with advanced TNM stage (OR = 2.92, 2.27–3.76, P < 0.01), earlier lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.69, 1.62–4.45, P < 0.01), advanced T classification (OR = 2.17, 1.48–3.18, P < 0.01) and earlier distant metastasis (OR = 2.56, 1.03–6.35, P = 0.04) when compared to those whose tumors expressed low LASP1. Conclusions Our study showed that the high LASP1 expression might be an undesirable predictor for patients with various types of cancers in the aspect of OS, RFS, TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, T classification and distant metastasis, and the high LASP1 expression might be an undesirable predictor for lung cancer patients and gastric cancer patients. Therefore, the expression of LASP1 might be utilized as a novel indicator in judging the prognosis of cancer patients, especially in lung cancer and gastric cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document