Adjuvant chemotherapy for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of available studies.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 330-330
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Leow ◽  
Steven L. Chang ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Joaquim Bellmunt

330 Background: Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for less than 5% of all urothelial cancers. Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for UTUC may improve survival outcomes, but currently available evidence is limited. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify all studies comparing AC with control for patients with UTUC. The search included the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings up to June 2013. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Results: A total of 9 retrospective cohort studies were identified (Table). For disease-specific survival, 6 studies had sufficient data (AC: n=406, control: n=1,227), with a pooled hazard ratio of 0.64 in favor of AC over control (95% CI: 0.41 to 0.99; p=0.047). Between-trial heterogeneity was not significant based on the Cochran Q statistic (p=0.14) and I2 = 40% (95% CI=0-76). Four studies had sufficient data for overall survival (AC: n=228, control: n=685), with a pooled hazard ratio of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.52 to 2.13; p=0.88). Between-trial heterogeneity was observed based on the Cochran Q statistic (p=0.03) and I2(68%, 95% CI: 7-89). There were no randomized trials investigating the role of AC for UTUC. Conclusions: There appears to be a significant benefit in disease-specific survival, but not overall survival, for AC in UTUC. While limited by the retrospective nature of studies and relatively small sample size, this analysis may be helpful in guiding the oncologic management of UTUC. [Table: see text]

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Soo Choo ◽  
Sangjun Yoo ◽  
Hyeong Dong Yuk ◽  
Chang Wook Jeong ◽  
Min Chul Cho ◽  
...  

The role of lymph node dissection (LND) is still controversial for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and there are no guidelines regarding its use. This study was conducted to find a higher level of evidence for the survival benefits based on the number of LNs removed during radical nephroureterectomy (RNUx) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We included studies comparing patients who underwent LND during RNUx for UTUC. We searched the major electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase®, and Scopus®) and conducted manual searches of the electronically available abstracts of the major international urology cancer meetings [American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), American Urological Association (AUA), and Eropean Association of Urology (EAU)] prior to April 2019 using grouped terms of nephroureterectomy (nephroureterectom*) and lymph node excision (lymphadenectomy; lymph + node*; lymph* + metasta*) with variations in the terms. Study selection, data collection, and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent authors (A and B). Six retrospective case-control studies included a total of 33,944 patients who underwent RNUx for UTUC, 5071 of whom underwent LND and were finally included in the meta-analysis. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) in these studies revealed that an increased number of LNs removed during RNUx was associated with improved cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with UTUC (HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91–0.99; p = 0.07). In addition, increased numbers of LNs removed were associated with improved overall survival (OS) in pN0 patients. However, in pN+ patients, the number of LNs removed showed no survival benefit on CSS, overall survival (OS), or progression-free survival (PFS). Higher numbers of LNs removed during RNUx were associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with UTUC. This study confirmed that LND also has oncological benefits in UTUC patients. Although still a controversial topic, meticulous LND must be considered, and efforts should be made to eliminate as many LNs as possible when administering RNUx for UTUC, especially in patients without clear evidence of LN metastasis.


2014 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 529-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Leow ◽  
William Martin-Doyle ◽  
André P. Fay ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Steven L. Chang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (05) ◽  
pp. 404-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
M B Asik ◽  
B Satar ◽  
M Serdar

AbstractObjectiveTo assess published reports of oncological surgical success rates in patients who underwent transoral laser supraglottic surgery and robotic surgery for supraglottic cancer.MethodsA systematic review of the literature was conducted and a meta-analysis of published data was performed. PubMed, Sage, Medline and Cochrane data sources were investigated. Overall survival rates, disease-specific survival rates, additional treatments and recurrence rates were investigated to determine the success of the surgical procedures.ResultsThe meta-analysis included 24 studies; 1617 studies were excluded. There were no statistically significant differences between the transoral laser supraglottic surgery and transoral robotic supraglottic surgery groups in terms of overall survival (77.0 per cent and 82.4 per cent respectively) and disease-specific survival (75.8 per cent and 87.0 per cent respectively). There was recurrence in 164 out of 832 patients (19.7 per cent) in the transoral laser supraglottic surgery group and in only 6 out of 66 patients (9 per cent) in the transoral robotic supraglottic surgery group.ConclusionTransoral laser surgery and robotic surgery appear to have comparable and acceptable oncological success rates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document