Laparoscopic D2 distal gastrectomy versus conventional open surgery for advanced gastric cancer: The safety analysis from a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial in China (CLASS-01 Trial).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4032-4032
Author(s):  
Yanfeng Hu ◽  
Changming Huang ◽  
Yihong Sun ◽  
Xiangqian Su ◽  
Ziyu Li ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 1350-1357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanfeng Hu ◽  
Changming Huang ◽  
Yihong Sun ◽  
Xiangqian Su ◽  
Hui Cao ◽  
...  

Purpose The safety and efficacy of radical laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LG) with D2 lymphadenectomy for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remain controversial. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare laparoscopic and conventional open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissections for AGC. Patients and Methods Between September 2012 and December 2014, 1,056 patients with clinical stage T2-4aN0-3M0 gastric cancer were eligible for inclusion. They were randomly assigned to either the LG with D2 lymphadenectomy group (n = 528) or the open gastrectomy (OG) with D2 lymphadenectomy group (n = 528). Fifteen experienced surgeons from 14 institutions in China participated in the study. The morbidity and mortality within 30 days after surgery between the LG (n = 519) and the OG (n = 520) groups were compared on the basis of the modified intention-to-treat principle. Postoperative complications were stratified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results The compliance rates of D2 lymphadenectomy were similar between the LG and OG groups (99.4% v 99.6%; P = .845). The postoperative morbidity was 15.2% in the LG group and 12.9% in OG group with no significant difference (difference, 2.3%; 95% CI, –1.9 to 6.6; P = .285). The mortality rate was 0.4% for the LG group and zero for the OG group (difference, 0.4%; 95% CI, –0.4 to 1.4; P = .249). The distribution of severity was similar between the two groups (P = .314). Conclusion Experienced surgeons can safely perform LG with D2 lymphadenectomy for AGC.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 122-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanfeng Hu ◽  
Changming Huang ◽  
Yihong Sun ◽  
Xiangqian Su ◽  
Ziyu Li ◽  
...  

122 Background: The efficacy of laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with curative intent is still controversial. Thus, the Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) group conducted a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial, aiming to evaluate the surgical safety and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy compared with conventional open surgery for AGC. (NCT01609309) Methods: The patients with tumor located at distal stomach at clinical T2-4a, N0-3, M0 stage were eligible for enrollment, treated by either laparoscopic D2 distal subtotal gastrectomy (LG) or open D2 gastrectomy (OG) after randomization. Seventeen institutions currently participated in the study. The morbidity and mortality within postoperative 30 days were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 607 consecutive eligible patients were randomly assigned to either LG group (n=308) or OG group (n=299) between September 2012 and January 2014. The compliance rates of D2 lymphadenectomy in the LG group and OG group were similar (97.4% vs. 98.3%; P=0.591). Open conversion rate was 4.5%. There was no significant differences between the LG group and OG group in the incidence of intraoperative complication (5.8% vs. 4.3%; P=0.402), postoperative morbidity (18.8% vs. 14.7%; P=0.175), and mortality (0.6% vs. 0; P=0.499). The severity grade pattern was also similar according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (P=0.372). Conclusions: Laparoscopic D2 distal subtotal gastrectomy for AGC could be safely performed by experienced surgeons. Thus, our multicenter prospective study on long-term outcomes can be ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01609309.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document