Recurrence rates for ductal carcinoma in situ: Analysis of 2,996 patients treated with breast-conserving surgery over 30 years.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 32-32
Author(s):  
Kimberly J. Van Zee ◽  
Preeti Subhedar ◽  
Cristina Olcese ◽  
Sujata Patil ◽  
Monica Morrow
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Period ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard ◽  
Pathologic Assessment ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard Models ◽  
History Presentation

32 Background: Randomized trials of radiation after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for DCIS found substantial rates of recurrence, with half of recurrences invasive. Decreasing local recurrence rates for invasive breast carcinoma have been observed, and are largely attributed to systemic therapy improvements. Here we examine recurrence rates after BCS for DCIS over 3 decades at one institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained database of DCIS patients undergoing BCS from 1978–2010. Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate the association between treatment period and recurrence, controlling for other variables. Results: 363 (12%) recurrences among 2996 cases were observed. Median follow-up for patients without recurrence was 75 months (range 0–30 years); 732 were followed for ≥ 10 years. The 5-year recurrence rate for 1978–1998 was 13.6% versus 6.6% for 1999–2010 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, p < 0.0001). After controlling for age, family history, presentation (radiologic vs clinical), nuclear grade (non-high vs. high grade), necrosis, number of excisions ( ≤ 2 vs ≥ 3), margin status (positive/close vs negative), radiation, and endocrine therapy, treatment period remained significantly associated with recurrence, with later years associated with a lower HR (0.74, p = 0.02) compared to earlier. After stratification by radiation use, and adjustment for 7 other factors, the decrease in recurrence rates was limited to those without radiation (HR 0.62, p = 0.003); there was no decline in recurrence rates among those receiving radiation (HR 1.13, p = 0.6). Conclusions: Recurrence rates for DCIS have fallen over time. Increases in screen-detection, negative margins, and use of adjuvant therapies only partially explain the decrease. The unexplained decline is limited to women not receiving radiation, suggesting it is not due to changes in radiation efficacy, but may be due to improvements in radiologic detection and pathologic assessment. The lower recurrence risk observed for DCIS patients treated in more recent years is important for patient education, especially in view of the widely reported recent increase in use of mastectomy.

Association of MRI and locoregional recurrence (LRR) rates in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients treated with or without radiation therapy (RT).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 57-57
Author(s):  
Melissa Louise Pilewskie ◽  
Cristina Olcese ◽  
Anne Eaton ◽  
Sujata Patil ◽  
Elizabeth Ann Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
History Of ◽  
History Presentation

57 Background: Perioperative MRI is frequently obtained in women with breast cancer; however, studies have not shown decreased rates of re-excision, and some report unnecessary increases in mastectomy rates. We examined LRR rates among women with DCIS who underwent perioperative MRI as compared to those who did not. Methods: All women who underwent breast-conserving surgery for DCIS in 1997-2010 were included from a prospectively maintained database. Patient characteristics and rates of LRR were compared in women with and without an MRI. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Analysis was repeated in the subset of women who did not receive RT. Results: 2,321 cases were identified; 596 had MRI and 1,725 did not. Women who had MRI were younger, more likely to be premenopausal, have a family history of breast cancer, have a clinical presentation, receive RT and endocrine therapy, be treated in later years, and had fewer close/positive margins. At median follow-up of 57 months there were 184 IBTRs; 5-year LRR rates were 8.5% (MRI) and 7.2% (no MRI) (p = 0.52), and 8-year rates were 14.6% and 10.2%, respectively. MRI was not associated with lower LRR rates after adjustment for age, menopausal status, family history, presentation, adjuvant therapy, margin status, number of excisions, and year of surgery in both the entire cohort and in the subgroup who did not receive RT. Select factors from multivariate analysis for patients with all covariates available are shown in the Table. Conclusions: We observed no association between perioperative MRI and LRR rates for patients with DCIS, even when RT was not given. The benefit of perioperative MRI for DCIS remains uncertain. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Radiotherapy of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Breast Care ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Krug ◽  
Rainer Souchon
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Multidisciplinary Treatment ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
The Past

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a heterogeneous disease in both its biology and clinical course. In the past, recurrence rates after breast-conserving surgery have been as high as 30% after 10 years. The introduction of mammography screening and advances in imaging have led to an increase in the detection of DCIS. The focus of this review is on the role of radiotherapy in the multidisciplinary treatment, including current developments in hypofractionation and boost delivery, and attempts to define low-risk subsets of DCIS for which the need for adjuvant radiation is repeatedly questioned.

scholarly journals Impact of consensus guidelines for breast‐conserving surgery in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abigail Tremelling ◽  
Rebecca L. Aft ◽  
Amy E. Cyr ◽  
William E. Gillanders ◽  
Katherine Glover‐Collins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Consensus Guidelines

scholarly journals Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Canelo-Aybar ◽  
Alvaro Taype-Rondan ◽  
Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka ◽  
David Rigau ◽  
Axel Graewingholt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Treatment Change ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objective To evaluate the impact of preoperative MRI in the management of Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Methods We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases to identify randomised clinical trials (RCTs) or cohort studies assessing the impact of preoperative breast MRI in surgical outcomes, treatment change or loco-regional recurrence. We provided pooled estimates for odds ratios (OR), relative risks (RR) and proportions and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Results We included 3 RCTs and 23 observational cohorts, corresponding to 20,415 patients. For initial breast-conserving surgery (BCS), the RCTs showed that MRI may result in little to no difference (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.00) (low certainty); observational studies showed that MRI may have no difference in the odds of re-operation after BCS (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.36 to 2.61) (low certainty); and uncertain evidence from RCTs suggests little to no difference with respect to total mastectomy rate (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.27) (very low certainty). We also found that MRI may change the initial treatment plans in 17% (95% CI 12 to 24%) of cases, but with little to no effect on locoregional recurrence (aHR = 1.18; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.76) (very low certainty). Conclusion We found evidence of low to very low certainty which may suggest there is no improvement of surgical outcomes with pre-operative MRI assessment of women with DCIS lesions. There is a need for large rigorously conducted RCTs to evaluate the role of preoperative MRI in this population. Key Points • Evidence of low to very low certainty may suggest there is no improvement in surgical outcomes with pre-operative MRI. • There is a need for large rigorously conducted RCTs evaluating the role of preoperative MRI to improve treatment planning for DCIS.

scholarly journals Patterns of invasive recurrence among patients originally treated for ductal carcinoma in situ by breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 186 (3) ◽  
pp. 617-624
Author(s):  
Kate R. Pawloski ◽  
Audree B. Tadros ◽  
Varadan Sevilimedu ◽  
Ashley Newman ◽  
Lori Gentile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Group A ◽  
First Recurrence

Abstract Purpose Local recurrence after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is more common than after mastectomy, but it is unclear if patterns of invasive recurrence vary by initial surgical therapy. Among patients with invasive recurrence after treatment for DCIS, we compared patterns of first recurrence between those originally treated with BCS vs. mastectomy. Methods From 2000 to 2016, women with an invasive recurrence occurring ≥ 6 months after initial treatment for DCIS were retrospectively identified. Clinicopathologic features and adjuvant treatment of the initial DCIS, as well as characteristics of first invasive recurrences, were compared between patients who had undergone BCS vs. mastectomy. Results 452 patients with an invasive recurrence after surgery for DCIS were identified: 367 patients (81%) had initially undergone BCS and 85 patients (19%) mastectomy. Patients originally treated with mastectomy were younger and were more likely to have had high grade, necrosis, and multifocal or multicentric DCIS (p < 0.001) compared with the BCS group. A higher proportion of invasive recurrences were local after BCS (93%; 343/367), whereas 88% (75/85) of recurrences after mastectomy were regional or distant (p < 0.001). The median time to first invasive recurrence was not different between surgical groups (BCS: 6.4 years vs. mastectomy: 5.5 years; p = 0.12). Conclusions Among women who experienced a first invasive recurrence after treatment for DCIS, those who had originally undergone mastectomy more commonly presented with advanced disease compared to those treated with BCS, likely related to the absence of the breast and the higher risk profile of their initial DCIS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document