Evaluation of the efficiency of an embedded palliative nurse practitioner in an oncology clinic.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 146-146
Author(s):  
Anne M. Walling ◽  
Sarah D'Ambruoso ◽  
Christopher Pietras ◽  
Jennifer Malin ◽  
Sara A. Hurvitz ◽  
...  

146 Background: We embedded a palliative nurse practitioner in 2 oncologists’ clinics in March 2014 using a reproducible training program. After one year, patients with advanced cancer receiving care in the embedded model clinics, compared to other oncologists’ clinics, were more likely to have advance care planning performed and to die receiving hospice. In order to expand the intervention to other oncologists, we evaluated the efficiency in our model of care delivery. Methods: We reviewed overall caseload and a subset of patient encounters in depth to understand how much of the NP's practice could be conducted by other staff to inform alternate clinical models of palliative care delivery in an oncology clinic. Overall time spent and time spent per task (Symptom Assessment Basic (SAB), Symptom Assessment Medical (SAM), Symptom Assessment Psychosocial (SAP), Communication Basic (CB), Communication Complex (CC)) was recorded for 16 patient encounters. We also completed 3 days of time motion study in which a trained observer tracked the NP's daily activities from minute to minute. Results: After part-time clinical participation over the first year of the program, the NP had seen 68 initial consults and 141 follow-up consults, which were potentially billable. She also had 120 encounters where she met a patient with an oncologist and 158 email or phone encounters that were not billable. Mean duration of a visit was 56 minutes (range 40-70 minutes) and about half of this time was spent on symptom assessment and communication topics requiring an MD or NP (SAM and CC), whereas half of the time was spent on topics that potentially could be covered by an RN (SAB or CB) or an MSW (SAB, SAP, CB). Time motion study revealed that a significant amount of time was spent with email correspondence and talking with other providers for care coordination. Conclusions: Palliative care is time consuming and much of the work is not reimbursed by a traditional fee for service model. Approximately half of the time spent by the NP in our embedded program potentially could have been completed by an RN or other interdisciplinary staff with training in palliative care under supervision of a physician. We plan to add an RN case management component to our model of care delivery.

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S102-S103
Author(s):  
E. Feng ◽  
Z. Zia ◽  
C. Tong ◽  
N. Cornell

Introduction: The growing scrutiny to improve Emergency Department (ED) wait times and patient flow have resulted in many efforts to increase efficiency and maximize patient throughput via systems improvements. This study investigates areas of efficiency improvement from the Emergency Physician (EP) perspective by examining EP workflow in a two phased observational time-motion study. In the initial phase, the distribution of time and activities of EPs were dissected to identify potential sources for streamlining to maximize physician productivity. The first phase was of the study was completed during the period immediately preceding the implementation of an Electronic Health Records (EHR). The second phase of the study will repeat the analysis one year post EHR implementation. This data will be dissected to again identify sources for streamlining in an EHR environment and to identify shifts in work flow from a paper-based system. Methods: An observational time motion study was conducted at St. Mary's Hospital ED, in Kitchener Ontario. An observer was paired with an EP for the duration of an 8 hour shift, to a total of 14 shifts in the first phase of the study. Nine task categories were measured concurrently with a stopwatch application on a tablet, along with the number of interruptions experienced by the EP. Means of each category were calculated and converted to percentages, representing the amount of time per 8 hour shift dedicated to each activity. The second phase will be repeated in Fall 2020, 1 year after EHR implementation. Results: A total of 14 shifts were observed, accounting for 112 hours of observation. EP's time was allocated amongst the following categories: direct patient interaction (40.8%), documentation (27.1%), reviewing patient results (18.4%), communicating with ED staff (7.63%), personal activities (5.7%), writing orders (5.1%), communicating with consultants (3.3%), teaching (1.7%) and medical information searches (1.3%). On average, EPs experienced 15.8 interruptions over the course of an 8 hour shift. Conclusion: In a paper charting system, the direct patient interaction accounts for the largest timeshare over the course of a given shift. However, the next two largest categories, documentation and reviewing patient data, both represent areas of potential streamlining via clerical improvements. Additionally, detailed measurements of EPs’ activities have proven feasible and provides the potential for future insight into the impact of EHR's on EP workflow.


Author(s):  
Meagan Whisenant ◽  
Kathi Mooney

This case study reviews the evidence for adoption of concurrent palliative care (CPC) during treatment for advanced cancer. Increasing research evidence and expert panel consensus has resulted in national guidelines and professional society endorsement of early integration of palliative care into oncology care. However, there is variable uptake of these guidelines and penetration of CPC into practice. Barriers to implementation include the need to increase awareness of existing evidence and guidelines, stigma, adequacy of a workforce for scale-up, lack of models for integration and delivery, and restrictive reimbursement mechanisms. Changing health care models that emphasize value-based care over fee-for-service can accelerate adoption. Use of technology can also overcome barriers related to scalability and resource use. The case study concludes with the recommendation that implementation science methodologies be used to guide successful integration of CPC in outpatient and home-based settings for patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 280-280
Author(s):  
Kathleen Elizabeth Bickel ◽  
Kristen McNiff ◽  
Jennifer Malin ◽  
Amy Pickar Abernethy ◽  
Anupama Kurup Acheson ◽  
...  

280 Background: Multiple studies illustrate the benefits of combined palliative and standard cancer care, but oncology practices need guidance to fill existing gaps in delivering high quality palliative care (PC) to cancer patients. As a first step, ASCO and the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM) sought to develop a consensus definition of which PC aspects are within the purview of general adult oncology practice in the United States. Methods: An ASCO and AAHPM steering group used existing publications to define 9 domains of PC in oncology: Symptom Assessment and Management (A&M), Psychosocial A&M, Spiritual and Cultural A&M, Communication and Shared Decision-Making, Care Planning, Appropriate Palliative Care and Hospice Referral, Coordination and Continuity of Care, Carer Support, and End-of-Life Care. Within each domain, key PC activities were itemized and described (e.g. pain assessment using a standardized scale at every clinical encounter), totaling 966 activities. A 31-member multidisciplinary panel participated in a modified RAND Delphi process, rating each activity on a 9-point scale according to 3 constructs: importance, feasibility, and scope of practice. Composite scoring categorized activities as either reasonably within scope of oncology practice, uncertain, or typically not in scope. Results: The response rate for each round was 94%. Notable panelist concerns included the breadth of palliative care practice, the varied access that oncology practices have to PC resources, and the varied individual knowledge and comfort with specific activities. Despite multiple small ranking changes between surveys, only 41 activities changed in scope of practice category. Of 966 activities, 62% were ranked as reasonably within scope of oncology practice, 36% were uncertain, and 2% were typically not in scope. Conclusions: Despite the diverse range of PC activities, panelists strongly agreed that more than half were reasonably within the scope of adult medical oncology practice. These items provide a foundation for improving palliative care delivery within an oncology practice, with suggestions for future performance measures and quality improvement activities.


2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1433-1438
Author(s):  
Grace Meijuan Yang ◽  
Sungwon Yoon ◽  
Yung Ying Tan ◽  
Karen Liaw

Background: Palliative care is associated with better outcomes in advanced cancer, but there is limited research comparing different models of palliative care delivery alongside oncology care. For inpatients with cancer, palliative care is mostly delivered through a consult service, primarily relying on oncologist-initiated referrals to a separate specialist palliative care team. In our hospital setting, we piloted a palliative care and oncology corounding model of care. Aim: To explore the views and experience of oncology and palliative care professionals on the corounding model compared to an inpatient consult service. Design: A qualitative study nested within a pre–post study of the corounding model of care, with semistructured interviews using thematic analysis. Setting/Participants: Eleven doctors and nurses involved in the pilot corounding model were interviewed. Results: Two main themes emerged: (1) the efficiency of care delivery and (2) quality of patient care. The theme on the efficiency of care delivery was related to access to palliative care input, team communications, and parallel workflow. The quality of patient care was described in terms of holistic approach to cancer care and rapport building with patients and their families. Most participants acknowledged positive aspects of the corounding model, yet some minor concerns were reported, such as disagreements between oncology and palliative care professionals. Conclusions: This study provides insights into the benefits and drawbacks of a corounding model of care for inpatients. The views of health-care professionals can be incorporated into the development of integrated oncology and palliative care models to improve care for patients with advanced cancer.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. e792-e799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne M. Walling ◽  
Sarah F. D’Ambruoso ◽  
Jennifer L. Malin ◽  
Sara Hurvitz ◽  
Ann Zisser ◽  
...  

Purpose: To test a simultaneous care model for palliative care for patients with advanced cancer by embedding a palliative care nurse practitioner (NP) in an oncology clinic. Methods: We evaluated the effect of the intervention in two oncologists’ clinics beginning March 2014 by using implementation strategies, including use of a structured referral mechanism, routine symptom screening, integration of a psychology-based cancer supportive care center, implementation team meetings, team training, and a metrics dashboard for continuous quality improvement. After 1 year of implementation, we evaluated key process and outcome measures for supportive oncology and efficiency of the model by documenting tasks completed by the NP during a subset of patient visits and time-motion studies. Results: Of approximately 10,000 patients with active cancer treated in the health system, 2,829 patients had advanced cancer and were treated by 42 oncologists. Documentation of advance care planning increased for patients of the two intervention oncologists compared with patients of the other oncologists. Hospice referral before death was not different at baseline, but was significantly higher for patients of intervention oncologists compared with patients of control oncologists (53% v 23%; P = .02) over the intervention period. Efficiency evaluation revealed that approximately half the time spent by the embedded NP potentially could have been completed by other staff (eg, a nurse, a social worker, or administrative staff). Conclusion: An embedded palliative care NP model using scalable implementation strategies can improve advance care planning and hospice use among patients with advanced cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Marta Salek ◽  
Cameka Woods ◽  
Jami S. Gattuso ◽  
Belinda Neal Mandrell ◽  
Justin N. Baker ◽  
...  

9 Background: Integration of palliative care into cancer care is recognized as best practice by international oncology and pediatrics organizations. However, optimal strategies for integration of pediatric palliative care (PPC) within cancer care remain understudied. While the majority of PPC provision for cancer patients occurs through subspeciality consultation, growing evidence suggests that models embedding PPC within cancer care have the potential to improve quality of care. Embedded models rely on partnerships with multidisciplinary clinicians, whose perspectives regarding this model are not well known. Methods: We conducted 25 focus groups with 175 clinicians in an academic pediatric cancer center, with groups stratified by discipline (physicians, advance practice providers (APPs), nurses, psychosocial providers) and by care team (hematologic malignancy, bone marrow transplant, solid tumor, brain tumor). Focus groups were led by trained research facilitators and audio-recorded for subsequent targeted content analysis to identify clinician perspectives regarding embedded PPC models. Results: Across 4 physician, 5 APP, 12 nurse, and 4 psychosocial focus groups, 25 physicians, 30 APPs, 71 nurses, and 49 psychosocial providers participated, respectively. When asked to describe features of an “ideal” PPC model, physicians, APPs, and nurses predominantly discussed care delivery and identified early integration of PPC into cancer care as a core feature of an ideal model. Physicians, nurses, and psychosocial providers also emphasized the importance of having a formalized, structured care model. The need for collaboration was the dominant theme for psychosocial providers. Clinicians in all disciplines identified potential benefits from an embedded model, including access to PPC across care settings, normalization of PPC integration, and emphasis on collaboration, teamwork, communication, and earlier PPC involvement. Physicians, APPs, and nurses anticipated similar challenges with an embedded model, including possible reticence of oncology providers and inadequate PPC staffing. Nurses, APPs, and psychosocial providers also voiced concern about potential lack of clarity in delegation of roles and responsibilities between PPC and oncology providers. Conclusions: Pediatric oncology multidisciplinary providers recognize the potential value of an embedded model for integration of PPC in the care of children with cancer. Though providers at times identified similar themes with respect to ideal PPC provision and the benefits and challenges to an embedded model, some identified priorities varied by discipline. These findings highlight the importance of integrating varied interdisciplinary perspectives when developing an embedded care model to align with priorities of diverse pediatric cancer stakeholders.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemary Ann Frey ◽  
Sophia Barham ◽  
Deborah Balmer ◽  
Jackie Robinson ◽  
Michal Boyd ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundThe supportive hospice aged residential Exchange (SHARE) is a new model of palliative care education that has been designed for residential aged care. The goal of SHARE is to help clinical staff improve palliative care within residential aged care facilities and to improve specialist palliative care nurses' knowledge and skill to care for frail older people.MethodThe experiences of 16 bereaved families concerning the palliative care journey (both at the start and finish of a one-year implementation of SHARE) were explored using semi-structured interviews.ResultsFour themes were important to bereaved families’ experience: communication with staff, relationship with general practitioners, systems of care, and hospice involvement. A sub-theme indicating changes in these four components of care between the start and finish of SHARE was identified. A fifth theme highlighted challenges (staff shortages and turnover).ConclusionFindings indicated that SHARE benefited families (improved communication and support) through the end of life journey of their relatives, but challenges remained.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah F. D'Ambruoso ◽  
John A. Glaspy ◽  
Sara A. Hurvitz ◽  
Neil S. Wenger ◽  
Christopher Pietras ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Guidelines support early integration of palliative care (PC) into standard oncology practice; however, little is known as to whether outcomes can be improved by modifying health care delivery in a real-world setting. METHODS: We report our 6-year experience of embedding a nurse practitioner in an oncology clinic (March 2014-March 2020) to integrate early, concurrent advance care planning and PC. RESULTS: Compared with patients with advanced cancer not enrolled in the palliative care nurse practitioner program, in March 2020, patients who are enrolled are more likely to have higher quality of PC (eg, goals of care note documentation [82% v 15%; P < .01], referral to the psychosocial oncology program [67% v 37%; P < .01], and referral to hospice [61% v 34%; P < .01]) and less inpatient utilization in the last 6 months of life (eg, hospital days [12 v 18; P < .01] and intensive care unit days [1.2 v 2.3; P < .01]). The program expanded over time with the support of faculty skills training for advance care planning and PC, supporting a shared mental model of PC delivery within the oncology clinic. CONCLUSION: Embedding a trained palliative care nurse practitioner in oncology clinics to deliver early integrated PC can lead to improved quality of care for patients with advanced cancer.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Boakye

The acceptance of electronic laboratory information system (LIS) is gradually increasing in developing countries. However, the issue of time effectiveness due to computerization is less clear as there is fewer accessible information. One of the key issues for laboratorians is their indecision with LISs’ would-be effect of time on their work. A polyclinic in Ghana was in the process of implementing electronic LIS. Several of the laboratorians did not have knowledge and skill in computing and there were disagreeing views on the time effectiveness of the LIS after implementation. The management of the polyclinic laboratory was concerned to assess time advantageousness of recording data when using the electronic LIS compared with paper-based LIS. <div><br></div><div>Five randomly selected laboratorians were provided two sheets of paper with tables to document the time they spent for both paper-based and electronic LIS. Data were collected for a total of 230 records,115 electronic LIS and 115 paper-based LIS. The t-test (mean-comparison test) was computed to compare the means of both electronic and paperbased LIS times. </div><div><br></div><div>There was a statistical significant difference in the time spent between electronic and paper-based LIS. The time spent between paper-based and electronic LIS was 0.41 minutes (95% CI 0.15 to 0.66) longer than in electronic LIS. </div><div><br></div><div>LIS can be adopted in polyclinics without having significant negative impact on time spent between electronic and paper-based LIS. More time–motion studies that include laboratorians are however necessary in order to get a more complete picture of time spent between electronic and paper-based LIS. </div>


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii175-ii175
Author(s):  
Ramya Tadipatri ◽  
Amir Azadi ◽  
Madison Cowdrey ◽  
Samuel Fongue ◽  
Paul Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Early access to palliative care is a critical component of treating patients with advanced cancer, particularly for glioblastoma patients who have low rates of survival despite optimal therapies. Additionally, there are unique considerations for primary brain tumor patients given the need for management of headaches, seizures, and focal neurological deficits. METHODS We conducted a survey of 109 physicians in Sub-Saharan Africa in order to determine level of understanding and skill in providing palliative care, types of palliative care therapies provided, role of cultural beliefs, availability of resources, and challenges faced. Demographic data including age, gender, and prior training was collected and analyzed using ANOVA statistical testing. RESULTS Among the participants, 48% felt comfortable in providing palliative care consultations, 62% have not had prior training, 52% believed that palliative care is only appropriate when there is irreversible deterioration, 62% expressed having access to palliative care, 49% do not have access to liquid opioid agents, 50% stated that cultural beliefs held by the patient or family prevented them from receiving, palliative care, and 23% stated that their own beliefs affected palliative care delivery. Older providers (age &gt; 30) had a clearer understanding of palliative care (p = 0.004), were more comfortable providing consultation (p = 0.052), and were more likely to address mental health (p &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Palliative care delivery to glioblastoma patients in Sub-Saharan Africa is often delayed until late in the disease course. Barriers to adequate palliative care treatment identified in this survey study include lack of training, limited access to liquid opioid agents, and cultural beliefs. Challenges most often identified by participants were pain management and end-of-life communication skills, but also included patient spirituality and psychological support, anxiety and depression, terminal dyspnea, ethics, and intravenous hydration and non-oral feeding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document