Use of multiparametric MRI to alter management pathways: Treatment patterns of prostate cancer in the targeted biopsy era.

56 Background: As the use of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) to diagnose prostate cancer (PCa) becomes established, better knowledge of treatment patterns is needed to counsel patients. Prior studies have shown 40-55% undergo Radical Prostatectomy (RP), while only 6% prefer Active Surveillance (AS), and that stratification by risk does not greatly alter treatment pathways. We aim to delineate the distribution of PCa treatment modalities in the MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy (FB) era. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent FB at the NIH from 2010 to present. Demographics, Gleason scores, MRI Suspicion scores and treatment outcomes were recorded. Patients were stratified according to D’Amico Risk Criteria, and outcomes were coded into four categories: AS; RP; Radiation (XRT, Brachytherapy); and Other (Systemic or Focal therapy). Results: 839 men were reviewed. Mean age was 62.6 years old and mean PSA was 9.7 ng/mL. Total cancer detection rate was 70% (n = 589). Of FB positive men, 474 had treatment information available. Overall 225 (47.5%) entered AS, 158 (33.3%) underwent RP, 61 (12.9%) received XRT, and 30 (6.3%) received other intervention. Subgroup analysis by MRI suspicion score (Table) showed 47.4% frequency of RP in the high vs. 30.9% and 19.4% for moderate and low suspicion groups, respectively. Analysis by D’Amico Risk (Table) showed 86% of low risk men chose AS vs. 0% of high risk men. Conversely 9.7% of low, 44.5% of intermediate and 55.7% of high risk men underwent RP. Conclusions: FB was associated with a higher rate of AS choice as a treatment modality for low risk disease. However most patients with clinically significant PCa still chose RP as their treatment. FB is an additional tool that allows the urologist to better counsel patients and provides individualized treatment for PCa. [Table: see text]