How to Select Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Primary Debulking Surgery in Patients With Stage IIIC or IV Ovarian Carcinoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (32) ◽  
pp. 3827-3828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignace B. Vergote ◽  
Els Van Nieuwenhuysen ◽  
Adriaan Vanderstichele
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Stage Iiic ◽  
Primary Debulking Surgery

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: a case-control study

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Loizzi ◽  
G. Cormio ◽  
L. Resta ◽  
C. A. Rossi ◽  
A. R. Di Gilio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Primary Debulking Surgery ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with those treated conventionally with primary debulking surgery. From 1994 to 2003, all consecutive cases of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma treated with NACT at the University of Bari were identified. A well-balanced group of women who underwent primary debulking surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy was selected as controls. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to determine the predictors for survival. Thirty women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma were treated with NACT and compared to 30 patients who underwent primary debulking surgery. Patients in the NACT were significantly older and had a poorer performance status compared to the controls. However, no statistical difference was observed in overall disease-specific survival (P = 0.66) and disease-free survival (P = 0.25) between the two groups. Although patients in the NACT group are significantly older and have a poorer performance status, this treatment modality does not compromise survival. Prospective randomized trials comparing NACT to conventional treatment to determine the quality of life and cost/benefit outcomes are now appropriate for women presenting advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with six cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer patients not candidates for optimal primary surgery: Safety and effectivenes.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5540-5540
Author(s):  
Vanessa Costa Miranda ◽  
Angelo Bezerra de Sousa Fede ◽  
Carlos Henrique Dos Anjos ◽  
Juliana Ribeiro da Silva ◽  
Fernando Barbosa Sanchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Stage Iiic ◽  
Primary Debulking Surgery

5540 Background: Primary debulking surgery (PDS) has been considered the standard of treatment in advanced ovarian cancer, while neoadjuvant chemotherapy, three cycles followed by interval debulking (ID) surgery, is a valid treatment alternative for patients with non-resectable disease. This study aimed to show the efficacy and safety of six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (N-CT) followed by cytoreduction, a single institution experience. Methods: Aretrospective analysis was performed of all patients (pts) with advanced ovarian cancer treated with platinum based N-CT, between January/2004 and February/2012. Results: 97 pts underwent N-CT in our institution; 78.1% and 18.8% the patients had extensive stage IIIC or IV disease at diagnosis, respectively. Median age 60 years (36 – 82). Histologic types: serous 84.5%, adenocarcinoma not specified 11.3%, endometrioide 1.0%. A median of six cycles of chemotherapy were performed. Patients did not received chemotherapy after debulking surgery. During the treatment 31.4% had grade 3/4 toxicity, the most commonly observed toxicities were hematologic toxicities and nausea, four (4.1%) patients died during chemotherapy due to disease progression. After N-CT 24.7% achieved clinical complete response, 57.7% partial response and 12.4% disease progression. From this cohort 63.1% underwent a complete resection of all macroscopic and microscopic disease (R0). Median length of hospital stay and postoperative ICU stay was 5 and 0.8 days respectively, surgical complications were not common however five (7.1%) patients needed second surgery due to operatory complications and 19 pts (27.1%) needed blood transfusion after debulking. With a median follow up of 21.8 months (0.5-139.7), median overall survival and chemotherapy-free interval were 57,7 and 9,5 months, respectively. Conclusions: Six cycles of neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel is safe, effective and does not increase perioperative and postoperative complications for patients with stage IIIC-IV not candidates for optimal/R0 PDS. The overall survival of this cohort is higher than those treated with interval debulking surgery.

scholarly journals Evaluating the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Gao ◽  
Yuan Li ◽  
Chunyu Zhang ◽  
Jinsong Han ◽  
Huamao Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Survival Curve ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Stage Iiic ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Primary Debulking Surgery ◽  
Interval Debulking Surgery

Abstract Objective To compare the chemoresistance and survival in patients with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) or primary debulking surgery (PDS). The clinical characteristics of patients who benefited from NACT were further evaluated. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 220 patients who underwent NACT followed by IDS or PDS from January 2002 to December 2016. Differences in clinicopathological features, chemoresistance and prognosis were analyzed. Results The incidence rate for optimal cytoreduction and chemoresistance in the NACT group was relatively higher than PDS group. No differences were observed in progression free survival or overall survival. Patients without macroscopic RD in NACT group (NACT-R0) had a similar prognosis compared to those in PDS group who had RD<1 cm, and a relatively better prognosis compared to the PDS group that had RD ≥ 1 cm. The survival curve showed that patients in NACT-R0 group that were chemosensitive seemed to have a better prognosis compared to patients in PDS group that had RD. Conclusion Patients without RD after PDS had the best prognosis, whereas patients with RD after NACT followed by IDS had the worst. However, even if patients achieved no RD, their prognosis varied depending on chemosensitivity. Survival was better in patients who were chemosensitive compared to thosewho underwent PDS but had RD. Hence evaluating the chemosensitivity and feasibility of complete cytoreduction in advance is crucial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document