Phase 1/2 KEYNOTE-051 study of pembrolizumab (pembro) in pediatric patients (pts) with advanced melanoma or a PD-L1+ advanced, relapsed, or refractory solid tumor or lymphoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10525-10525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit Geoerger ◽  
Hyoung Jin Kang ◽  
Michal Yalon-Oren ◽  
Lynley V. Marshall ◽  
Catherine Vezina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Tumor Imaging ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Adult Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Refractory Solid Tumor

10525 Background: In phase 1 of the KEYNOTE-051 study (NCT02332668), the 2 mg/kg Q3W approved adult dose of pembro was also determined to be the pediatric recommended phase 2 dose. In phase 2, presented herein, we further evaluated this dose in pediatric pts with advanced cancer. Methods: Children aged 6 mo to < 18 y with advanced melanoma or a PD-L1+ advanced, relapsed or refractory solid tumor or lymphoma, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, and performance score ≥50 using Lansky Play or Karnofsky scales received pembro 2 mg/kg Q3W for 35 cycles or until confirmed disease progression per immune-related RECIST by investigator review, intolerable toxicity, or pt/investigator decision to discontinue. Tumor imaging was performed every 8 wk for the first 6 mo, then every 12 wk thereafter. AEs were graded by NCI CTCAE v4.0. Key efficacy endpoints were ORR, disease control rate (DCR), and PFS per RECIST v1.1 by investigator and OS. Results: Of 369 pts prescreened, 364 were evaluable for PD-L1 expression; of these, 121 (33.2%) were PD-L1+. 66 pts were enrolled; median follow-up was 2.5 mo (range, 0.2-18). As of the data cutoff (Nov 7, 2016), 23 (34.8%) pts were still on treatment. Median age was 13 y (range, 1-17), 77.3% had metastatic disease, and 34.8% had ≥3 prior lines of therapy for recurrent/metastatic disease. Primary diagnoses were non-CNS solid tumors (n = 45), CNS tumors (n = 16), and lymphoma (n = 5). 5 (7.6%) pts had grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs), most commonly neutropenia (n = 2). No treatment-related deaths occurred; 1 pt discontinued for a TRAE (grade 3 AST increased). 1 pt each with Hodgkin lymphoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, mesothelioma, and glioblastoma had partial response for an ORR of 6.1% (95% CI, 1.7-14.8); 7 (10.6%) pts had stable disease for a DCR of 16.7% (95% CI, 8.6-27.9). Median PFS and OS were 1.8 mo and 9.2 mo, respectively; 12-mo PFS was 10.2% and OS was 40.5%. Potential effects of pembro on the developing immune system (eg, T and B cells, vaccinated antibodies) will also be presented. Conclusions: Pembro showed low toxicity and warrants further study to determine activity in select pediatric tumors. Enrollment in KEYNOTE-051 is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02332668.

Phase 1/2 study of pembrolizumab (pembro) in children with advanced melanoma or a PD-L1-positive (PD-L1+) advanced, relapsed, or refractory solid tumor or lymphoma (KEYNOTE-051).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS10585-TPS10585
Author(s):  
Birgit Geoerger ◽  
Elizabeth Fox ◽  
Alberto S. Pappo ◽  
Michael Yalon Oren ◽  
Lynley V Marshall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Refractory Solid Tumor

Clinical activity of fianlimab (REGN3767), a human anti-LAG-3 monoclonal antibody, combined with cemiplimab (anti-PD-1) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9515-9515
Author(s):  
Omid Hamid ◽  
Ding Wang ◽  
Tae Min Kim ◽  
Sang-We Kim ◽  
Nehal J. Lakhani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3

9515 Background: Fianlimab and cemiplimab are two high-affinity, fully human, hinge-stabilized IgG4 monoclonal antibodies. In a Phase 1 dose escalation study, fianlimab combined with cemiplimab showed an acceptable safety profile and some clinical activity in pts with advanced malignancies. Here, we present safety and clinical activity data from two expansion cohorts of pts with advanced melanoma (anti–programmed cell death/ligand-1 [anti–PD-(L)1] naïve or experienced) who were treated with fianlimab + cemiplimab and had an opportunity for first on-treatment tumor assessment (cut-off date: Jan 4, 2021). Methods: Pts with advanced melanoma who had no prior anti–PD-(L)1 treatment (naïve) or prior anti–PD-(L)1 treatment within 3 months of screening (experienced) received fianlimab 1600 mg + cemiplimab 350 mg by IV infusion every 3 weeks. Tumor measurements were performed every 6 weeks for the first 24 weeks and subsequently every 9 weeks per RECIST v1.1. Results: 48 pts with advanced melanoma were treated with the combination therapy: 33 were anti–PD-(L)1 naïve and 15 were anti–PD-(L)1 experienced (median age: 69 years vs 59 years; male: 66.7% vs 46.7%; Caucasian: 87.9% vs 60%). The safety profile (including immune-related adverse events [AEs]) of fianlimab + cemiplimab combination therapy was similar to that of anti–PD-1 monotherapy with one exception. The rate of adrenal insufficiency, 8.3% (4/48) of pts, is similar to the rate previously observed with anti–PD-1 + anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) combination therapy but higher than that observed with anti–PD-1 monotherapy. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 35.4% (17/48) of patients; Grade ≥3 serious TEAEs occurred in 22.9% (11/48) of patients; 8.3% (4/48) of patients discontinued treatment due to a TEAE. The most common TEAEs were fatigue (n = 15, 31.3%) and rash (n = 11, 22.9%). By investigator assessment, objective response rate (includes unconfirmed complete [CR] and partial responses [PR]) was 63.6% (3 CRs and 18 PRs) for anti–PD-(L)1 naïve pts and 13.3% (1 CR and 1 PR) for anti–PD-(L)1 experienced pts. Median progression-free survival and median duration of response for the anti–PD-(L)1 treatment naïve cohort have not been reached. Prognostic clinical markers and tumor biomarkers such as expression of LAG-3, PD-L1, and major histocompatibility complex II are being evaluated. Recruitment is ongoing. Conclusions: The safety profile of fianlimab + cemiplimab is similar to that observed with cemiplimab monotherapy and other anti–PD-1s, with the exception of higher rate of adrenal insufficiency. Fianlimab + cemiplimab combination has shown clinical activity for pts with advanced melanoma that is similar to anti–PD-1 + CTLA-4 combination therapy, but with lower demonstrated rates of TEAEs. Clinical trial information: NCT03005782.

scholarly journals A Phase 1/2 Trial of Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4774-4774
Author(s):  
James R. Berenson ◽  
Laura V. Stampleman ◽  
Alberto Bessudo ◽  
Peter J. Rosen ◽  
Leonard M Klein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD), such as thalidomide and lenalidomide (LEN) and its newest derivative pomalidomide (POM), have shown great promise for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts). POM has in vitro anti-MM potency and has shown efficacy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (RR) MM pts. POM with dexamethasone (DEX) induces responses even for MM pts who are refractory to bortezomib (BORT) and LEN (Richardson et al, 2012). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with BORT is FDA-approved for the treatment of MM pts who have received one prior therapy not containing BORT. The combination of PLD and LEN or thalidomide has shown efficacy for both RR and frontline MM pts (Offidani et al, 2006; 2007). We have also demonstrated that both the efficacy and tolerability of LEN in combination with DEX, PLD and BORT (DVD-R) may be improved by changing the doses and schedules of these drugs (Berenson et al, 2012). Based on these results, we hypothesized that the combination of POM, DEX and PLD would be effective for the treatment of RRMM pts. Thus, we conducted the first study investigating the safety and efficacy of POM in combination with intravenous (IV) DEX and PLD as a phase 1/2 trial using a modified dose, schedule and longer 28-day cycles for pts with RRMM. Methods The phase 1 portion enrolled MM pts w/ progressive disease whereas those enrolled in phase 2 also had to be refractory to LEN (single-agent or in combination), as demonstrated by progressive disease while receiving their last LEN-containing regimen or relapsed within 8 weeks of their last dose of this IMiD. Pts who have previously received POM treatment were ineligible. In the phase 1 portion, POM was administered at 2, 3 or 4 mg daily in three cohorts on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle and DEX (40 mg) and PLD (5 mg/m2) were fixed and given intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. Results As of June 20th, 2014, 48 pts were enrolled in the trial and a total of 47 pts had received study drug. Pts had received a median of 4 prior treatments (range 1-18), with a median of 2 prior IMiD-containing regimens (range, 0-8). Fifty-three percent of the pts had received a prior PLD-containing regimen and 21% had received a prior IMiD and PLD combination treatment. Among all enrolled pts, 40 pts discontinued treatment and seven remain active. Pts completed a median of 3 cycles (range: 1-8), with a median follow-up time of 5.4 months (range: 0-22). During the phase 1 portion of the trial, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of POM was established at 4 mg. Enrollment of pts into the phase 2 portion of the trial began at the MTD. However, neutropenia ≥ grade 3 was observed at this dose in 10/17 (58.8%) phase 2 pts; and, as a result, the protocol was amended so that the MTD was lowered to 3 mg for all pts subsequently enrolled. Among the 36 pts enrolled in phase 2, 78% percent were refractory to LEN and steroids with or without other agents and 47% had previously received PLD. A median of 2 cycles (range, 1 to 8) were administered among the pts enrolled in phase 2. Thirty-five pts were evaluable for response as one pt was active but had not yet had any post-baseline disease assessments. Among all pts enrolled in phase 2, the overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were 29% and 49%, respectively, with 6 pts (17%) showing stable disease and 12 pts (34%) demonstrating progressive disease. For all pts enrolled in phase 2, the median follow-up time was 4.7 months (range 0-12) and the median PFS was 5.3 months. ORR and CBR for pts in the phase 2 were higher among pts receiving POM at 3 mg (32% and 58%, respectively) than among pts receiving POM at 4 mg (25% and 37%, respectively). Pts receiving the 4 mg dose of POM experienced more toxicities resulting in discontinuations, which likely explains the lower ORR and CBR observed among pts receiving this POM dose. Common ≥ grade 3 adverse events observed throughout the trial were neutropenia (21 pts; 44.7%), lymphopenia (10 pts; 21.3%), and hyponatremia (4 pts; 8.5%). One pt died of grade 5 sepsis. Conclusions This phase 1/2 trial is the first evaluating POM with PLD and DEX and demonstrates that the combination of POM at 3 mg, PLD and DEX using a modified 28-day cycle schedule is safe and effective for the treatment of MM pts refractory to LEN. Disclosures Berenson: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Swift:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Vescio:Celgene: Honoraria.

scholarly journals ATIM-24. DOSE FINDING AND DOSE EXPANSION TRIAL OF D2C7 IMMUNOTOXIN (D2C7-IT) ADMINISTERED INTRATUMORALLY VIA CONVECTION-ENHANCED DELIVERY (CED) FOR RECURRENT MALIGNANT GLIOMA (MG)

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi6-vi6
Author(s):  
Annick Desjardins ◽  
Dina Randazzo ◽  
Vidya Chandramohan ◽  
Katherine Peters ◽  
Margaret Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Cerebral Edema ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Dose Range ◽  
Antibody Fragment ◽  
Genetically Engineered ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Recombinant Immunotoxin ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BACKGROUND D2C7-IT is a recombinant immunotoxin comprised of a dual-specific antibody fragment targeting EGFRwt and EGFRvIII and a genetically engineered form of the Pseudomonas exotoxin, PE38-KDEL. We report results of a phase 1 trial, with dose expansion at the selected phase 2 dose, evaluating D2C7-IT delivered intratumorally by CED. METHODS Eligible patients are adults with recurrent supratentorial WHO grade III or IV MG; solitary tumor; ≥4 weeks after chemotherapy, bevacizumab or study drug; adequate organ function; and KPS >70%. Two patients per dose level (DL) were to be enrolled in the dose escalation portion (dose range: 40ng/mL to 23,354ng/mL), followed by dose expansion at the selected phase 2 dose (DL13). RESULTS As of 6/07/2019, 51 patients have been treated; 10 patients on the phase 2 dose. Observed dose limiting toxicities include: grade 4 seizure (n=1) on DL3, grade 3 confusion and pyramidal tract syndrome (n=1) on DL13, and grade 4 cerebral edema (n=1) and grade 3 dysphasia (n=1) on DL17. Grade 3 or higher adverse events possibly related to D2C7-IT include: seizure (grade 4, n=2, grade 3, n=3), cerebral edema (grade 4, n=1), hydrocephalus (grade 3, n=5), headache (grade 3, n=4), hemiparesis (grade 3, n=4), dysphasia (grade 3, n=4), lymphopenia (grade 3, n=3), thromboembolic event (grade 3, n=3); and one each of grade 3 elevated ALT, urinary tract infection, fall, wound complication, generalized muscle weakness, confusion, encephalopathy, and somnolence. Fourteen patients are alive. Three patients have partial radiographic response and remain alive without additional therapy more than 46, 27 and 21 months after D2C7-IT infusion. CONCLUSION Dose level 13 was selected as the optimal phase 2 dose and patient accrual is ongoing on the dose expansion arm. Encouraging efficacy results have been observed. A trial of D2C7-IT with checkpoint inhibitor is planned to start in the near future.

scholarly journals Phase 1 and Pharmacokinetic Study of Intravenous Irinotecan in Refractory Solid Tumor Patients with Hepatic Dysfunction

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3782-3791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry J. Schaaf ◽  
Lisa A. Hammond ◽  
Stuart J. Tipping ◽  
Richard M. Goldberg ◽  
Rakesh Goel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Hepatic Dysfunction ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Tumor Patients ◽  
Refractory Solid Tumor

A Phase I/II Study of Lenalidomide in Combination with Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2719-2719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luhua Wang ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽  
Sattva Neelapu ◽  
Felipe Samaniego ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2719 Poster Board II-695 Background: Rituximab directly targets CD20 positive lymphoma cells while lenalidomide targets the microenvironment. This combination was proven effective in vitro and in vivo in mantle cell lymphoma (Wu et al, Clin Cancer Res 2008; Zhang et al, Am J Hematol 2009). Clinically, lenalidomide (Habermann et al, Br J Haematol 2009) and rituximab have single-agent activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and may be an effective combination. The goal of our study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in phase 1 and evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide plus rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL in phase 2. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory MCL received lenalidomide on days 1–21 of every 28-day cycle, and rituximab (375 mg/m2) weekly during cycle 1. Dose escalation was used to determine the MTD with lenalidomide (10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, and 25 mg). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic, or grade 4 hematologic adverse events in cycle 1. Phase 2 has reached targeted enrolment with 45 patients treated at MTD. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression free survival rate and response duration. Median time to event in months with 95% confidence interval was calculated. Of 45 patients treated at the MTD, the median age was 66 (46–85), 91% were males. All patients had received prior rituximab and were enrolled regardless of prior rituximab sensitivity or resistance. Results: The median follow-up time for the censored observations was 11.4 months. Two DLTs occurred at 25 mg in phase 1 (hypercalcemia, non-neutropenic fever); therefore, the MTD was 20 mg. The grade 3–4 non-hematologic events included elevated AST, elevated ALT, fatigue, myalgia, tremors, ataxia, cough, deep vein thrombosis, dyspnea, edema (facial), infection, neuropathy sensory, rash, and respiratory failure. Grade 3–4 hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (37 events), neutropenic fever (4 events), and thrombocytopenia (16 events). There were no responses in patients treated at 10 mg or 15 mg. Thirty six patients (36) were evaluable for response. Nine (9) patients are too early in their treatment and are not yet eligible for response evaluation. Among the 36 evaluable patients, 11 (31%) patients achieved CR, 8 (22%) patients achieved PR, 3 (8%) patients had minor response, 6 (17%) patients had stable disease and 8 (22%) patients had progressive mantle cell lymphoma. The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 53%. Seventy eight (78%) patients achieved stable disease or better and benefited from oral Lenalidomide plus 4 doses of rituximab. The median time to response was 2 months (2–8), and the median duration of response for the 19 patients with CR or PR was 18 months (95% CI: 10.6, NA) (range1–30 months). The median progression free survival for all patients on phase 2 was 14 months (95% CI: 9.8, NA) (ranging from 1–32 months). Conclusion: Oral lenalidomide plus rituximab resulted in durable responses in relapsed/refractory MCL with a favourable toxicity profile. Disclosures: Wang: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hagemeister:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Samaniego:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Yi:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Shah:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Elan: Consultancy; Millennium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bell:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Knight:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zeldis:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

A Phase 1 Study of Concomitant High Dose Lenalidomide and 5-Azacytidine Induction in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3616-3616
Author(s):  
Giridharan Ramsingh ◽  
Peter Westervelt ◽  
Amanda Cashen ◽  
Geoffrey L. Uy ◽  
Keith Stockerl-Goldstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Remission ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Elderly Aml ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Induction Cycle ◽  
Refractory Aml

Abstract Abstract 3616 Novel therapies for elderly and relapsed AML are needed. We recently published an institutional phase 2 trial using high dose (50mg/day × 28 days) single agent lenalidomide (HDL) followed by maintenance of 10 mg daily for 12 months in responders in elderly untreated AML patients (≥ 60 years) showing a complete remission (CR)/complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) of 30% (Fehniger et al, Blood, 2011). Azacitidine (AZA) given IV or SC has also shown significant response in patients with MDS and AML. Recently Pollyea et al (JCO 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr #6505) reported on a phase 1 trial combining AZA and escalating doses of lenalidomide repeated sequentially in 6 week cycles in patients with untreated AML. Here, we report on a phase 1 single institutional study to evaluate the toxicities and feasibility of combining HDL and AZA concurrently as induction followed by a less intensive lenalidomide and AZA maintenance schedule in untreated elderly AML (≥60 years) or relapsed/refractory AML ≥18 years. Treatment schedule: 2 cycles of induction (each 28 days) of lenalidomide 50 mg PO days 1–28 and AZA at 3 dose cohorts 25 mg/m2 (cohort 1), 50 mg/m2 (cohort 2) and 75 mg/m2 (cohort 3) given IV days 1–5. Thereafter patients were given maintenance cycles (every 28 days) with lenalidomide 10 mg PO days 1–28 and AZA 75 mg/m2 days 1–5 for a total of 12 cycles. The median age was 74 (range 63–81); 7 males, 8 females; 6 with newly diagnosed elderly AML and 9 with relapsed or refractory AML. The median WBC count was 2600 (range 300–13100). The median bone marrow blast percentage was 22% (range 2–90%),with normal cytogenetics in 7 (63.6%), monosomy 7 in 3 (20%), trisomy 8 in 1 (6.7%), and other in 4 (26.6%). 8 patients were enrolled in cohort 1, 4 patients in cohort 2 and 3 patients in cohort 3. 2 patients in cohort 1 and 1 patient in cohort 2 who received less than 1 induction cycle (2 withdrew consent and 1 had progressive disease) were replaced. 11 (73.3%) of patients completed 1 induction cycle and 7 (46.7%) of patients completed 2 induction cycles and 5 (30%) patients went on to maintenance therapy. Patients remained on therapy for a median of 2 months (range 0.5–13 months). Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) observed included grade 3 rash in cohort 1 leading to expansion of the cohort to include 3 additional patients. To date grade 3/4 non-DLT hematological toxicity was seen in 6/11 (54.1%) patients. The most common 3/4 non-DLT non-hematological toxicity was neutropenic fever seen in 5/11 (45.4%). The most common grade 1/2 toxicity was fatigue in 7/11 (63.6%). 40% (6/15) of patients died, all due to progressive disease. Of the 11 evaluable patients 7 (63.6%) responded to treatment with CR/CRi in 3 (27.3%) and partial remission (PR) in 4 (36.4%) with the median duration of response of 3 months (range 0.5–11 months). In summary combination of lenalidomide with AZA appears to be a feasible regimen with acceptable toxicities. A phase 2 multicenter extension of this study with untreated elderly AML at the maximum tolerated dose of AZA and HDL will be initiated soon. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Here we discuss the use of lenalidomide and azacytidine in relapsed refractory or elderly AML. Stockerl-Goldstein:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Vij:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Phase 1/2 Trial Of Lenalidomide In Combination With Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone (REP) In Patients With Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (REPEAT-study)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 287-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inger S. Nijhof ◽  
Sonja Zweegman ◽  
Mark-David Levin ◽  
Harry R. Koene ◽  
Aart Beeker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Oral Cyclophosphamide ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background The outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) patients who are no longer responding to thalidomide, lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT) is very poor, with a median event-free survival of 5 months and median overall survival (OS) of 9 months (Kumar SK et al, Leukemia 2012; 26;149-157). We have previously shown in a small retrospective study that the combination of continuous low dose oral cyclophosphamide (endoxan) and prednisone combined with lenalidomide (REP) had remarkable activity in heavily pretreated LEN-refractory multiple myeloma patients (median 6 lines of previous chemotherapy) (vd Donk et al; Br J Haematol 2010;148(2):335-7). To determine the optimal dose of lenalidomide with continuous cyclophosphamide and prednisone, we initiated a prospective study to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the REP regimen and to assess its efficacy and safety in LEN-refractory MM patients. Here we report safety and efficacy data from the phase 1 dose-escalation part of the REPEAT-study (NCT01352338). Patients and Methods Patients aged ≥ 18 years with LEN-refractory MM, ECOG-performance status 0-3 and adequate kidney, liver and hematologic function were included. Five dose levels were evaluated using a standard 3+3 design, based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1. Patients received LEN in doses ranging from 10-25 mg/day on days 1-21 of 28-day cycle, while oral cyclophosphamide (50 or 100 mg) and prednisone (20 mg) were given continuously. Therapy was continued until progression. The MTD for the phase 2 part is defined as the highest dose level with 0 or 1 DLT's observed in 6 patients. Results Up till now, 35 patients were enrolled (22 in phase 1 and 13 in phase 2) from August 2011 to June 2013. The phase 2 part is still recruiting and data are not evaluable yet. One patient in phase 1 was excluded because of study violation and is not included in the analysis. The median age of the 21 evaluable patients in phase 1 was 69 years (range 41-73); 76% were male. The median duration of the disease from diagnosis was 41 months (range 18-96), median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 2-6), and 12 patients (57%) had previously received autologous SCT. All patients were LEN-refractory, 19 (90%) had prior BORT treatment, and 16 (76%) had BORT-refractory MM. Fifty-five % of the patients were considered high risk by FISH. At the time of analysis, 16 of 21 patients in phase 1 have discontinued treatment because of disease progression (13), alternative treatment (allo-SCT) (1), or adverse events (2). The MTD was defined as LEN 25 mg days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, combined with oral cyclophosphamide 50 mg and prednisone 20 mg continuously (dose level 4), based on three patients experiencing a DLT: two developed pneumonia (in dose levels 4 and 5; CTC grade 3), and one patient at dose level 5 experienced CTC grade 3 dyspnea. Neutropenia (18%) and thrombocytopenia (18%) were the most common grade 3 hematological adverse events (AEs), which were managed with growth factor support and/or dose modification. There were no grade 4 hematologic AEs. Grade 3 respiratory tract infections (29%) and grade 2 fatigue (19%) were the most common non-hematological AEs. Venous thromboembolism occurred in 1 patient. Figure 1 shows a waterfall plot of the responses of the patients that participated in the phase 1 part of the study. Overall response rate (≥ PR) was 67% with 6 out of 21 (29%) patients achieving at least VGPR. In addition 2 patients achieved MR (≥ MR: 76%). Median PFS and OS were 6.3 and 15.5 months respectively. Similar results were achieved in the subset of patients with LEN- and BORT-refractory disease. Interestingly, laboratory experiments with purified myeloma cells from these patients suggest synergism between LEN and cyclophosphamide. Conclusions The REP regimen induces high response rates and prolonged PFS and OS in LEN-refractory patients with acceptable toxicity. The MTD is defined as LEN 25 mg days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, combined with oral cyclophosphamide 50 mg and prednisone 20 mg continuously. Phase 2 is enrolling patients and evaluates efficacy and safety of the REP regimen at the MTD. REP should be considered a valuable salvage option for LEN-refractory MM patients. We will present an updated follow-up at ASH. Disclosures: Sonneveld: Onyx: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding. Lokhorst:Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Johnson-Cilag: Honoraria; Mudipharma: Honoraria. van de Donk:Celgene: Research Funding.

Phase I/II study of MKC-1 and pemetrexed (PEM) as second-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19005-e19005
Author(s):  
N. H. Hanna ◽  
D. Estes ◽  
J. Arnott ◽  
S. Marcotte ◽  
A. Hannah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
One Year

e19005 Background: MKC-1 is a novel oral cell cycle inhibitor with preclinical activity against NSCLC cell lines including multi-drug resistant lines, and single agent activity in NSCLC pts. Binding targets of MKC-1 include microtubules, members of the importin-β family and AKT-mTOR. This phase 1/2 study evaluated MKC-1 in combination with PEM as second-line therapy in pts with advanced NSCLC. Methods: Eligible pts had NSCLC previously treated with one regimen for metastatic disease or disease progression within one year following adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. Phase 1 dose escalation used 3+3 design. Phase 2 pts were treated with MKC-1 at 75 mg/m2 given p.o. BID for 14 days along with PEM at 500 mg/m2 given i.v. on day 1 of each 21 day cycle. Following 4 cycles of combined treatment, single agent MKC-1 was continued as maintenance therapy. An interim analysis after 17 pts in phase 2 would allow accrual to continue provided one response was confirmed. Results: 27 pts were enrolled (8 in phase 1 and 19 in phase 2). Median age/PS for phase 2 is 64/1 and 89% had adenocarcinoma. Total # of treatment cycles to date for phase 2 pts is 95, with a median of 4 cycles. Of the 19 phase 2 pts, 18 were evaluable for tumor response. The best response was confirmed PR, noted in 3 pts. 5 additional pts (4 confirmed) had minor responses (>10% but <30% shrinkage). One additional pt continues on study with stable disease for >18 months. In phase 2 (n=19), all grade toxicities were anorexia (59%), fatigue (63%), nausea (58%), and dyspnea (48%). Grade 3/4 toxicities included fatigue (26%); neutropenia (22%); dyspnea, anorexia, AST and ALT elevation (11% each); nausea and constipation (5% each). 7 pts had at least one dose reduction of both PEM and MKC-1 and 3 additional pts had only MKC-1 reduced. Median PFS was 86 days with two pts continuing on study (treated for 530+ days and 140+ days, respectively). Conclusions: The phase 2 dose of MKC-1 (75 mg/m2 BID) and PEM (500 mg/m2) has been defined. The combination is well tolerated with 17% of patients achieving a confirmed PR thus far. A decision to proceed with additional accrual in this single arm study versus initiating a randomized phase 2 study of this combination is pending. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document