A Phase 1 Study of Concomitant High Dose Lenalidomide and 5-Azacytidine Induction in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3616-3616
Author(s):  
Giridharan Ramsingh ◽  
Peter Westervelt ◽  
Amanda Cashen ◽  
Geoffrey L. Uy ◽  
Keith Stockerl-Goldstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Remission ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Elderly Aml ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Induction Cycle ◽  
Refractory Aml

Abstract Abstract 3616 Novel therapies for elderly and relapsed AML are needed. We recently published an institutional phase 2 trial using high dose (50mg/day × 28 days) single agent lenalidomide (HDL) followed by maintenance of 10 mg daily for 12 months in responders in elderly untreated AML patients (≥ 60 years) showing a complete remission (CR)/complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) of 30% (Fehniger et al, Blood, 2011). Azacitidine (AZA) given IV or SC has also shown significant response in patients with MDS and AML. Recently Pollyea et al (JCO 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr #6505) reported on a phase 1 trial combining AZA and escalating doses of lenalidomide repeated sequentially in 6 week cycles in patients with untreated AML. Here, we report on a phase 1 single institutional study to evaluate the toxicities and feasibility of combining HDL and AZA concurrently as induction followed by a less intensive lenalidomide and AZA maintenance schedule in untreated elderly AML (≥60 years) or relapsed/refractory AML ≥18 years. Treatment schedule: 2 cycles of induction (each 28 days) of lenalidomide 50 mg PO days 1–28 and AZA at 3 dose cohorts 25 mg/m2 (cohort 1), 50 mg/m2 (cohort 2) and 75 mg/m2 (cohort 3) given IV days 1–5. Thereafter patients were given maintenance cycles (every 28 days) with lenalidomide 10 mg PO days 1–28 and AZA 75 mg/m2 days 1–5 for a total of 12 cycles. The median age was 74 (range 63–81); 7 males, 8 females; 6 with newly diagnosed elderly AML and 9 with relapsed or refractory AML. The median WBC count was 2600 (range 300–13100). The median bone marrow blast percentage was 22% (range 2–90%),with normal cytogenetics in 7 (63.6%), monosomy 7 in 3 (20%), trisomy 8 in 1 (6.7%), and other in 4 (26.6%). 8 patients were enrolled in cohort 1, 4 patients in cohort 2 and 3 patients in cohort 3. 2 patients in cohort 1 and 1 patient in cohort 2 who received less than 1 induction cycle (2 withdrew consent and 1 had progressive disease) were replaced. 11 (73.3%) of patients completed 1 induction cycle and 7 (46.7%) of patients completed 2 induction cycles and 5 (30%) patients went on to maintenance therapy. Patients remained on therapy for a median of 2 months (range 0.5–13 months). Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) observed included grade 3 rash in cohort 1 leading to expansion of the cohort to include 3 additional patients. To date grade 3/4 non-DLT hematological toxicity was seen in 6/11 (54.1%) patients. The most common 3/4 non-DLT non-hematological toxicity was neutropenic fever seen in 5/11 (45.4%). The most common grade 1/2 toxicity was fatigue in 7/11 (63.6%). 40% (6/15) of patients died, all due to progressive disease. Of the 11 evaluable patients 7 (63.6%) responded to treatment with CR/CRi in 3 (27.3%) and partial remission (PR) in 4 (36.4%) with the median duration of response of 3 months (range 0.5–11 months). In summary combination of lenalidomide with AZA appears to be a feasible regimen with acceptable toxicities. A phase 2 multicenter extension of this study with untreated elderly AML at the maximum tolerated dose of AZA and HDL will be initiated soon. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Here we discuss the use of lenalidomide and azacytidine in relapsed refractory or elderly AML. Stockerl-Goldstein:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Vij:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals A Phase 1/2 Trial of Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4774-4774
Author(s):  
James R. Berenson ◽  
Laura V. Stampleman ◽  
Alberto Bessudo ◽  
Peter J. Rosen ◽  
Leonard M Klein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD), such as thalidomide and lenalidomide (LEN) and its newest derivative pomalidomide (POM), have shown great promise for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts). POM has in vitro anti-MM potency and has shown efficacy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (RR) MM pts. POM with dexamethasone (DEX) induces responses even for MM pts who are refractory to bortezomib (BORT) and LEN (Richardson et al, 2012). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with BORT is FDA-approved for the treatment of MM pts who have received one prior therapy not containing BORT. The combination of PLD and LEN or thalidomide has shown efficacy for both RR and frontline MM pts (Offidani et al, 2006; 2007). We have also demonstrated that both the efficacy and tolerability of LEN in combination with DEX, PLD and BORT (DVD-R) may be improved by changing the doses and schedules of these drugs (Berenson et al, 2012). Based on these results, we hypothesized that the combination of POM, DEX and PLD would be effective for the treatment of RRMM pts. Thus, we conducted the first study investigating the safety and efficacy of POM in combination with intravenous (IV) DEX and PLD as a phase 1/2 trial using a modified dose, schedule and longer 28-day cycles for pts with RRMM. Methods The phase 1 portion enrolled MM pts w/ progressive disease whereas those enrolled in phase 2 also had to be refractory to LEN (single-agent or in combination), as demonstrated by progressive disease while receiving their last LEN-containing regimen or relapsed within 8 weeks of their last dose of this IMiD. Pts who have previously received POM treatment were ineligible. In the phase 1 portion, POM was administered at 2, 3 or 4 mg daily in three cohorts on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle and DEX (40 mg) and PLD (5 mg/m2) were fixed and given intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. Results As of June 20th, 2014, 48 pts were enrolled in the trial and a total of 47 pts had received study drug. Pts had received a median of 4 prior treatments (range 1-18), with a median of 2 prior IMiD-containing regimens (range, 0-8). Fifty-three percent of the pts had received a prior PLD-containing regimen and 21% had received a prior IMiD and PLD combination treatment. Among all enrolled pts, 40 pts discontinued treatment and seven remain active. Pts completed a median of 3 cycles (range: 1-8), with a median follow-up time of 5.4 months (range: 0-22). During the phase 1 portion of the trial, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of POM was established at 4 mg. Enrollment of pts into the phase 2 portion of the trial began at the MTD. However, neutropenia ≥ grade 3 was observed at this dose in 10/17 (58.8%) phase 2 pts; and, as a result, the protocol was amended so that the MTD was lowered to 3 mg for all pts subsequently enrolled. Among the 36 pts enrolled in phase 2, 78% percent were refractory to LEN and steroids with or without other agents and 47% had previously received PLD. A median of 2 cycles (range, 1 to 8) were administered among the pts enrolled in phase 2. Thirty-five pts were evaluable for response as one pt was active but had not yet had any post-baseline disease assessments. Among all pts enrolled in phase 2, the overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were 29% and 49%, respectively, with 6 pts (17%) showing stable disease and 12 pts (34%) demonstrating progressive disease. For all pts enrolled in phase 2, the median follow-up time was 4.7 months (range 0-12) and the median PFS was 5.3 months. ORR and CBR for pts in the phase 2 were higher among pts receiving POM at 3 mg (32% and 58%, respectively) than among pts receiving POM at 4 mg (25% and 37%, respectively). Pts receiving the 4 mg dose of POM experienced more toxicities resulting in discontinuations, which likely explains the lower ORR and CBR observed among pts receiving this POM dose. Common ≥ grade 3 adverse events observed throughout the trial were neutropenia (21 pts; 44.7%), lymphopenia (10 pts; 21.3%), and hyponatremia (4 pts; 8.5%). One pt died of grade 5 sepsis. Conclusions This phase 1/2 trial is the first evaluating POM with PLD and DEX and demonstrates that the combination of POM at 3 mg, PLD and DEX using a modified 28-day cycle schedule is safe and effective for the treatment of MM pts refractory to LEN. Disclosures Berenson: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Swift:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Vescio:Celgene: Honoraria.

scholarly journals A phase 1 study of azacitidine with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 599-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirk E. Cahill ◽  
Yasmin H. Karimi ◽  
Theodore G. Karrison ◽  
Nitin Jain ◽  
Margaret Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract In this phase 1 study, azacitidine (AZA) was given before high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) and mitoxantrone (mito) based on the hypothesis that epigenetic priming with a hypomethylating agent before cytotoxic chemotherapy would improve response rates in patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), including relapsed/refractory disease. The primary objective was to establish the recommended phase 2 dose of AZA given before standard HiDAC/mito. In a dose escalation scheme, 46 patients (median age, 66 years) received AZA at 37.5, 50, or 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously or IV once daily on days 1 to 5 followed by HiDAC (3000 mg/m2) and mitoxantrone (30 mg/m2) once each on days 6 and 10 (the HiDAC/mito dose was reduced 33% in elderly subjects). Two dose-limiting toxicities occurred (both in the same patient): acute liver failure and kidney injury at the 50 mg/m2 dose. The 30-day induction death rate was 2.2% (1 of 46). The overall response rate, including complete remission and complete remission with incomplete count recovery, was 61% (28 of 46). Previously untreated patients aged ≥60 years with therapy-related AML and de novo AML were more likely to respond than untreated patients with AML progressing from an antecedent hematologic disorder (myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia). Patients with favorable European Leukemia Network risk (P = .008), NPM1 mutations (P = .007), or IDH2 mutations (P = .03) were more likely to respond, and those with TP53 mutations (P = .03) were less likely to respond. The recommended phase 2 dose of AZA is 75 mg/m2 per day on days 1 to 5 followed by HiDAC (3000 mg/m2) and mitoxantrone (30 mg/m2) once each on days 6 and 10. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01839240.

Nilotinib Combined with Multi-Agents Chemotherapy for Adult Patients with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of a Prospective Study from a Single Center

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1301-1301
Author(s):  
Bingcheng Liu ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Chunlin Zhou ◽  
Hui Wei ◽  
Dong Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Induction Cycle

Abstract Background: Imatinib combined with conventional chemotherapy has significantly improved the prognosis of adults with Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia ( Ph+ ALL ). Nilotinib, the second generation TKIs is approximately 30 fold more potent than imatinib and is active in vitro against multiple BCR/ABL mutations. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of nilotinib combined with multiple reagents chemotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with Ph+ ALL. Methods: Newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL patients aged 15 to 59 and with adequate organ function were recruited. The 4weeks induction cycle consist of vincristine, daunorubicin, cyclophosphamide and prednisone. After achieving hematological complete remission (HCR), patients received 2 years of consolidation and maintenance therapy. Consolidation therapy was including 7 courses of multiple drug chemotherapy or allogeneic/autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo/auto HCT). Nilotinib was the only drug for maintenance therapy. Nilotinib 400mg was given orally twice daily along with combination chemotherapy starting from day 15 of induction until the initiation of conditioning for transplantation, hematological relapse or continuing for 2 years since achievement of hematological complete remission (HCR).Central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis was performed by intrathecally administering triple agents. The data cut-off day was June 1st 2015. HCR and molecular complete remission (MCR), overall survival(OS), hematologic relapse free survival (HRFS), toxicity, nilotinib concentration in serum and cerebrospinal fluid(CSF) were evaluated. MCR was defined as Bcr-Abl fusion gene becomes negative in bone marrow using quantitative RT-PCR. Results: A total of 30 patients (19 males and 11 females) were enrolled from September 2011 to November 2013. The median age was 40 (range 21-57) years old. The type of BCR breakpoint was minor in 24 patients, major in 2 patients and both in 4 patients. All the 30 patients (100%) and 8 patients (26.7%) achieved HCR and MCR respectively after the induction cycle. Cumulative MCR rate was 80%. 17 patients underwent HCT, 14 patients with alloHCT and 2 patients with autoHCT in first HCR, 1 patient received alloHCT after relapse. 9 patients died from leukemia relapse and 4 patients died post-alloHCT without relapse. The median HRFS and OS were 20.7 and 34 months respectively. The 4 year HRFS rate was 41% and the 4 year OS rate was 48%. The molecular response after induction has no impact on HRFS and OS. Patients achieving MCR had better HRFS (32 vs 8.9 months, p=0.006) but not OS(33.3vs 17.2months, p=0.068) than those patient without MCR. During induction, 23 patients experienced infectious fever including 2 patients with septicemia and 6 patients with pneumonia needing antifungal therapy. Intestinal obstruction occurred in 7 patients during induction and relived by interrupting nilotinib treatment. The incidence of non-hematologic adverse events (AE) over grade 3 during the study was 23% jaundice, 10% rash, 6.7% arthralgia and bone pain, 6.7%headache, 3.3% ALT elevation. No QTc prolongation over 500ms happened. Grade 2 tachycardia and premature ventricular contraction occurred in 2 patients and 1 patient respectively. During the high-dose methotrexate treatment cycle, delaying of methotrexate metabolism happened in 20 patients (66.7%), increasing creatine occurred in 8 patients (26.7%, grade 3 in 3 patients), 1 patient received haemodialysis. Nilotinib serum level reached to stable concentration after 15 days of administration. Only traces of nilotinib was detected in CSF. Conclusion: In this prospective study, combination of nilotinib and cytotoxic drug was shown to be effective and tolerable for adult Ph+ALL. Nilotinib could not penetrate the blood brain barrier. (ChiCTR-ONC-12002469) Disclosures Off Label Use: nilotinib,the 2nd generation TKI, was approved for CML. Wang:Novarits and Bristol-Mayers squibb. G.S.: Consultancy.

Phase I Study of Cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosie), Cytarabine and G-CSF Based Induction Therapy (CLAG) with ATRA (All-trans retinoic acid) and Midostaurin for Relapsed/Refractory AML,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3609-3609
Author(s):  
Giridharan Ramsingh ◽  
Andrew Sprau ◽  
Peter Westervelt ◽  
Ali McBride ◽  
Keith E. Stockerl-Goldstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Remission ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Pulmonary Hemorrhage ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Refractory Aml

Abstract Abstract 3609 Patients with relapsed or refractory AML have poor outcomes after conventional salvage chemotherapy with long-term remissions likely only with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Hence, there is a need for better treatment options for these patients. Since it is known that multiple pathways are dysregulated in AML, combination therapy that targets multiple pathways may improve remission rates. The combination of salvage chemotherapy (CLAG), a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (midostaurin) and a differentiation inducing agent (ATRA) was investigated in patients with relapsed refractory AML in this study, to assess its tolerability and to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of midostaurin in the combination. Midostaurin is a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor that has been shown to inhibit FLT-3 (FMS like tyrosine kinase 3) mutations and wild type and other molecular targets thought to be important for the pathogenesis of AML including VEGFR-1, PDGFR, c-kit, H-ras, K-ras and MDR. FLT-3 mutations are seen in about 25–30% of patients with AML and is associated with poor long term survival. FLT-3 is highly expressed even in patients without FLT-3 mutations making FLT-3 a promising target in AML. In vitro studies have suggested that ATRA induces differentiation not only in AML-M3 but also in AML other than AML-M3. In AML cell lines ATRA has been shown to increase sensitivity to cytarabine. Addition of ATRA to induction therapy has shown to produce superior results in AML patients over 60 years of age. Here we conducted this single institutional phase I trial with the combination of midostaurin, ATRA and CLAG in patients with relapsed refractory AML. Patients ≥ 18 years of age with relapsed/refractory AML were included in the study. The treatment regimen consisted of CLAG (cladribine 5 mg/m2 IV days 2–6, cytarabine 2 g/m2 IV days 2–6, GCSF 300 mcg SC days 1–6), ATRA 15 mg/m2 PO days 7–20, midostaurin 25 mg (cohort 1) or 50 mg (cohort 2) PO BID days 7–20. Response was assessed by a bone marrow examination done at day 28–45. A total of 11 patients were enrolled in the study (4 in cohort 1 and 7 in cohort 2) of which 9 (3 in cohort 1 and 6 in cohort 2) were evaluable for the planned end points. The median age was 52 years (range 32–71) and male: female ratio was 45:55. FLT-3 mutation was positive in 6 patients, negative in 1 and unknown in the rest. 4 patients had complex karyotype cytogenetics. 7 patients were in enrolled at first relapse, 2 at second relapse and 2 after refractory disease following the first induction therapy. The ECOG performance score was 0 for all enrolled patients. No dose limiting toxicities was observed in either cohort. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was seen in 100% of patients as expected. Grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity was seen in 2 patients: 1 patient died of pulmonary hemorrhage which was attributed to severe thrombocytopenia and another patient developed grade 4 hyperglycemia. No significant hepatotoxicity occurred in our two dosing cohorts with midostaurin and ATRA likely as echinocandins were used instead of azoles for antifungal therapy. Overall 3/9 (33.3%) evaluable patients achieved complete remission/ complete remission with incomplete count recovery. Five patients died, 4 of progressive disease and one from pulmonary hemorrhage. The levels of midostaurin and ATRA were measured at pretreatment, 1 hour, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 7 days, 14 days and 20 days on treatment. The median levels of midostaurin were 2150 ng/ml (range 641–7210) in the 25 mg cohort and 1820 ng/ml (range 850–8930) in the 50 mg cohort. In summary CLAG+ midostaurin+ATRA regimen has an acceptable toxicity profile for relapsed refractory AML and the MTD of midostaurin defined in this trial is 50 mg. Additional phase 2 studies to assess the effectiveness of this regimen in relapsed refractory AML are warranted. Disclosures: Off Label Use: The purpose of the study is to investigate the use of midostaurin and ATRA in relapsed refractory AMl in compbination with chemotehrapy. Westervelt:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Abboud:novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

First Clinical Results Of a Randomized Phase 2 Study Of SGI-110, a Novel Subcutaneous (SQ) Hypomethylating Agent (HMA), In Adult Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 497-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Karen Yee ◽  
Patricia Kropf ◽  
Casey O'Connell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Elderly Aml ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Randomized Phase 2 ◽  
Refractory Aml

Abstract Background SGI-110 is second generation HMA formulated as a dinucleotide of decitabine (DAC) and deoxyguanosine delivered as a small volume, pharmaceutically stable SQ injection allowing longer half-life and more extended decitabine exposure than DAC IV infusion. SGI-110 differentiated pharmacokinetic profile resulted in potent hypomethylation and clinical responses in previously treated MDS and AML patients in the phase 1 trial (Kantarjian et al. 2012). Methods In a randomized Phase 2 study, relapsed/refractory AML, or elderly treatment naïve AML patients who were not suitable for induction chemotherapy (poor major organ function; poor cytogenetics; or secondary AML) were randomized to one of two SQ doses – the biologically effective dose (BED) of 60 mg/m2 QDx5 or 90 mg/m2 QDx5. The primary endpoint of the phase 2 study is the overall remission rate (CR, CRi, and CRp) based on the International Working Group Criteria 2003. Safety findings based on adverse events (AEs) as graded by the CTCAE v4 criteria and pharmacodynamic data on Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element (LINE-1) DNA methylation (an index of global DNA methylation) activity were also assessed and reported. Results As of June 30, 2013, sixty-seven patients (50 relapsed/refractory AML, 17 treatment naïve elderly AML) were treated and had a minimum follow up of 3 months. Patients were randomized to either 60 mg/m2 dose (32 patients) or 90 mg/m2 dose (35 patients). The median age was 66 years (range, 22–84), 69% were male, and ECOG PS of 0/1/2 was reported in 11/47/9 patients respectively. Median number of prior regimens was 2 (range, 0–10). Patients’ characteristics were well balanced between the 2 dose groups. The primary endpoint of overall remissions (CR, CRp, or CRi) was observed in 17/67 patients (25% with 95% CI, 16–37%). There were 8 complete remissions (CR, CRp, or CRi) in 50 patients with relapsed/refractory AML (16% with 95% CI, 7-29%); and 9 complete remissions (CR, CRp, or CRi) in 17 treatment-naïve elderly AML patients (53% with 95% CI, 28-77%). Five patients (4 relapsed/refractory, and one treatment-naïve elderly AML) subsequently received a stem cell transplant. There was no difference in the complete remission rate between 60 and 90 mg/m2 doses (8 remissions in 32 patients at 60 mg/m2, and 9 remissions in 35 patients at 90 mg/m2). LINE-1 DNA methylation data before and after treatment was available in 50 (75%) patients enrolled. LINE-1 demethylation ≥ 10% post treatment was observed in 83% and 78% in the 60 mg/m2 and 90 mg/m2, respectively. The median maximum LINE-1 demethylation for responders is 25% as compared to 19% for non-responders. The most common adverse events (AEs) regardless of relationship to SGI-110 ≥ Grade 3 include febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and pneumonia. The 90 mg/m2 dose showed a greater frequency of Grade 3/4 related AEs ≥ 10% (anemia, febrile neutropenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) compared to the 60 mg/m2 dose. Conclusions SQ SGI-110 is a new HMA which is well tolerated and clinically active in the treatment of AML. Complete remissions and potent demethylation of ≥10% were equally observed at the 2 dose groups of 60 and 90 mg/m2. These data support further phase 3 investigation of this agent in the treatment of AML. Preliminary overall remission rate of 53% in treatment-naïve elderly AML seems to compare favorably with previous results reported for HMA treatment but this needs to be confirmed in a larger number of patients and randomized studies. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Jabbour:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Yee:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Kropf:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. O'Connell:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Stock:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Tibes:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Rizzieri:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Walsh:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Griffiths:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Roboz:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Savona:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Ervin:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Podoltsev:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Pemmaraju:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Daver:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Garcia-Manero:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Borthakur:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Wierda:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Ravandi:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Cortes:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Brandwein:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Odenike:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Feldman:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Chung:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Research Funding. Naim:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Choy:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Taverna:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Hao:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment. Dimitrov:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Azab:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Issa:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

a Phase 1/2 Trial of Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5383-5383 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Berenson ◽  
Laura Stampleman ◽  
Alberto Bessudo ◽  
Peter J Rosen ◽  
Leonard M. Klein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD), such as thalidomide and lenalidomide (LEN) and its newest derivative pomalidomide (POM), have shown great promise for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts). POM has in vitro anti-MM potency and has shown efficacy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (RR) MM pts. POM with dexamethasone (DEX) induces responses even for MM pts who are refractory to bortezomib (BORT) and LEN (Richardson et al, 2012). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with BORT is FDA-approved for the treatment of MM pts who have received one prior therapy not containing BORT. The combination of PLD and LEN or thalidomide has shown efficacy for both RR and frontline MM pts (Offidani et al, 2006; 2007). We have also demonstrated that both the efficacy and tolerability of LEN in combination with DEX, PLD and BORT (DVD-R) may be improved by changing the doses and schedules of these drugs (Berenson et al, 2012). Based on these results, we hypothesized that the combination of POM, DEX and PLD would be effective for the treatment of RRMM pts. Thus, we conducted the first study investigating the safety and efficacy of POM in combination with intravenous (IV) DEX and PLD as a phase 1/2 trial using a modified dose, schedule and longer 28-day cycles for pts with RRMM. Methods The phase 1 portion enrolled MM pts w/progressive disease whereas those enrolled in phase 2 also had to be refractory to LEN (single-agent or in combination), as demonstrated by progressive disease while receiving their last LEN-containing regimen or relapsed within 8 weeks of their last dose of this IMiD. Pts who previously received POM treatment were ineligible. POM was administered orally on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, while DEX (40 mg) and PLD (5mg/m2) were both infused on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. During phase 1 enrollment, three cohorts were enrolled at 2, 3 and 4 mg doses of POM, and DEX and PLD were both administered at fixed doses. Phase 2 enrollment commenced once the MTD was established from the phase 1 portion of the study. Results As of August 1, 2015, 70 pts were screened, 68 were enrolled in the trial (with the pre-planned enrollment goal reached) and had received study drug, and a total of 50 pts were evaluable for safety and efficacy. Among all enrolled pts, 60pts discontinued treatment and 8 remain active. Pts had received a median of 4 prior treatments (range 1-18). Median number of cycles for all pts was 4 (range 1-8), with a median follow-up time of 5.5 months (range 0-22). During the phase 1 portion of the trial, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of POM was established at 4 mg. Enrollment of pts into the phase 2 portion of the trial began at the MTD. However, neutropenia ≥ grade 3 was observed at this dose in 10/17 (58.8%) phase 2 pts; and, as a result, the protocol was amended so that the MTD was lowered to 3 mg for all pts subsequently enrolled. Among the 57 pts enrolled in phase 2, 53% percent were refractory to LEN and steroids with or without other agents and 31% had previously received PLD. A median of 4 cycles (range, 1 to 8) were administered among the pts enrolled in phase 2. Fifty-five pts were evaluable for response as 2 pts are active but have not yet had any post-baseline disease assessment. Among all evaluable pts (n=55) enrolled in phase 2, the overall response rate (ORR) was 33% (CR= 5%, VGPR= 5% and PR=23%) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 47% with 11 pts (26%) showing stable disease and 5 pts (12%) demonstrating progressive disease. For all evaluable pts enrolled in phase 2, the median follow-up time was 3.6 months (range 0-12 months) and the median PFS was 4.2 months (range 0.3- 29.0+). ORR and CBR for pts in the phase 2 were higher among pts receiving POM at 3 mg (36% and 51%, respectively) than among pts receiving POM at 4 mg (25% and 37%, respectively). Pts receiving the 4 mg dose of POM experienced more toxicities resulting in discontinuations, which likely explains the lower ORR and CBR observed among pts receiving this POM dose. Common ≥ grade 3 adverse events observed throughout the trial were neutropenia (49 pts; 72.0%), lymphopenia (36 pts; 52.9%), leukopenia (33 pts; 48.5%), hyponatremia (27 pts; 39.7%), and hypokalemia (26pts; 38.2%). One pt died of grade 5 sepsis. Conclusions This phase 1/2 trial is the first evaluating POM with PLD and DEX and demonstrates that the combination of POM at 3 mg, PLD and DEX using a modified 28-day cycle schedule is safe and effective for the treatment of MM pts refractory to LEN. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Phase 1 Trial of G-CSF, Cladribine, Cytarabine, and Dose-Escalated Mitoxantrone (G-CLAM) in Adults with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1339-1339
Author(s):  
Asma Anwar ◽  
Anna B. Halpern ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Bart L. Scott ◽  
Paul C. Hendrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Early Death ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Persistent Disease ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Refractory Aml

Abstract Background: Although some adults with AML or high-risk MDS will experience long-term disease-free survival after initiation of curative-intent therapy, most patient will require therapy re-induction therapy either for primary induction failure of disease recurrence after an initial complete remission (CR) was achieved. The outcomes with standard regimens for relapsed/refractory AML are generally poor, with CR rates often not exceeding 15-20%. Data from a large single arm phase 2 study in poor-risk relapsed/refractory AML suggested tolerability and encouraging activity of a combination of G-CSF, cladribine, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone (G-CLAM). Given recent data suggesting benefit of escalated doses of anthracyclines in AML, the goal of our phase 1 study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of mitoxantrone within G-CLAM in adults with relapsed/refractory AML or high-risk MDS and estimate the efficacy of this regimen. Patients and Methods: Adults ≥18 years of age with relapsed or refractory AML (APL excluded) or high-risk MDS (>10% blasts) were eligible if they had a treatment-related mortality (TRM) score of ≤6.9 (corresponding to a risk of early death with standard induction chemotherapy of ≤3%) and adequate organ function (LVEF ≥45%, creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dL, bilirubin ≤2.5-times upper limit of normal). Excluded were patients with concomitant illness with expected survival <1 year and those with active, uncontrolled infection. Cohorts of 6-12 patients were assigned to 1 of 4 total dose levels of mitoxantrone (12, 14, 16, or 18 mg/m2/day on days 1-3, as compared to 10 mg/m2/day used in standard-dose G-CLAM). Other drug doses were G-CSF 300 or 480 μg/day (for weight <76 kg vs. ≥76 kg; days 0-5), cladribine 5 mg/m2/day (days 1-5), and cytarabine 2 g/m2/day (days 1-5). A second identical course of G-CLAM was given in the case of persistent disease. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: 1) any grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting >48 hours that resulted in >7 day delay of the subsequent treatment cycle, with the exception of febrile neutropenia or infection; 2) any grade ≥4 non-hematologic toxicity, with the exception of febrile neutropenia or infection or constitutional symptoms, if recovery to grade ≤2 within 14 days. Results: 26 patients (14M, 12F), median age 57 (range: 37-77) years, median TRM score 1.73 (range: 0.29-3.92) with relapsed/refractory AML (n=23), or high-risk MDS (n=3) and cytogenetically favorable (n=2), intermediate (n=13), and adverse (n=11) disease characteristics were enrolled. One DLT occurred at dose level 1 (nausea) and 2 at dose level 4 (encephalitis and cardiogenic shock), establishing G-CLAM with mitoxantrone at 16 mg/m2/day as the MTD in our study. 2 patients (8% [95% exact confidence interval: 1-25%]) died within 28 days of treatment initiation from sepsis and cardiogenic shock, respectively. Overall, 13/26 patients (50% [30-70%]) achieved a CR (n=8) (31% [14-52%]), CRp (n=1) (4% [0-20%]), or CRi (n=4) (15% [4-35%]) with 1-2 cycles of re-induction therapy; one patient each achieved a leukemia-free state and partial remission (in a patient presenting with myeloid sarcomas); nine patients (35% [17-56%]) had persistent disease. We were unable to assess response in 2 patients due to early death (n=1) and refusal for marrow re-assessment (n=1). 7/13 responders (54%) had no evidence of residual disease by flow cytometry at best response. Among responders, median times to an absolute neutrophil count ≥500/µL and a platelet count of 50,000/µL were 33 (range: 17-51) and 31 (range: 18-54) days, respectively. Besides infections and neutropenic fever, nausea, hypoxia (fluid overload/infection-related), and maculopapular rash were the most common grade ≥3 adverse events. Conclusion G-CLAM with mitoxantrone up to 16 mg/m2/day is feasible, well tolerated, and effective in relapsed/ refractory AML/high-risk MDS. A phase 2 study based on these findings has been initiated. Disclosures Scott: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Becker:Igenica: Research Funding. Walter:Pfizer, Inc.: Consultancy; Amgen, Inc.: Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Covagen AG: Consultancy; AstraZeneca, Inc.: Consultancy.

Safety and activity of venetoclax in combination with high-dose cytarabine in children with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10004-10004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth E Karol ◽  
Thomas Alexander ◽  
Soumyasri Das Gupta ◽  
Stanley B. Pounds ◽  
Kristin Canavera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

10004 Background: Venetoclax is an orally available BCL-2 antagonist with demonstrated activity in adults with newly diagnosed or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here, we describe the first use of venetoclax 1) in combination with high-dose cytarabine and idarubicin 2) in patients 2-22 years old with relapsed AML. Methods: Patients with relapsed AML or AML refractory to at least two courses of induction therapy were enrolled in this Phase 1 study with a rolling-six design. All patients received venetoclax (240 or 360 mg/m2) on days 1-28 and low-dose (LD: 100 mg/m2 every 12 hours x 20 doses) or high-dose (HD: 1000 mg/m2 every 12 hours x 8 doses) cytarabine beginning on day 8 (Table). Patients who had previously received < 270 mg/m2 of doxorubicin equivalents also received idarubicin 12 mg/m2 on day 8 in dose level 4; other patients were enrolled on the expansion cohort at dose level 3. Non-hematologic CTCAE grade 3 or higher toxicities were intensity limiting (ILT), excluding those anticipated with HD cytarabine. Results: Among 18 evaluable patients, a single ILT (prolonged hematological suppression beyond day 50) was observed (Table). Toxicities were consistent with the underlying cytotoxic chemotherapy, with 14 patients experiencing a total of 40 grade 3 toxicities including 6 documented infections and 23 episodes of febrile neutropenia. There was 1 grade 4 fungal sepsis. The recommended phase 2 dose of venetoclax was 360 mg/m2 (max 600 mg) when combined with HD cytarabine or HD cytarabine/idarubicin. Of the 12 patients with > 50% reduction in blasts following the 7-day venetoclax window therapy, end-of-cycle marrow responses included 7 CR/CRi and 3 PR. Minimal residual disease negative remissions occurred in 4 patients. BH3 profiling of samples and a phase 2 expansion of both dose levels 3 and 4 to further characterize the promising activity of these combinations are underway. Conclusions: Venetoclax combined with cytarabine or cytarabine/idarubicin is active and well tolerated in pediatric patients with relapsed/ refractory AML. Clinical trial information: NCT03194932. [Table: see text]

A phase I/II study to assess safety and dose of ixazomib in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8065-8065
Author(s):  
Keren Osman
Keyword(s):  
Light Chain ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Grade 3

8065 Background: AL amyloidosis is an incurable clonal plasma cell disorder characterized by tissue deposits of immunoglobulin light chain fragments leading to organ dysfunction and death. Standard treatment for newly diagnosed patients (pts) has traditionally included oral melphalan + dexamethasone as well as high-dose melphalan + ASCT. Here we report preliminary results of a Phase 1/2, open-label, multi-institution study of ixazomib (I) in combination with cyclophosphamide (Cy) and dexamethasone (D) in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. Methods: Eligible pts are ≥18 years with newly diagnosed, untreated biopsy-proven AL amyloidosis. A total of up to 30 pts will be enrolled, with up to 18 in the dose escalation arm (phase 1) and 12 in the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) expansion arm (phase 2) according to a classical 3+3 design. Four dose levels were evaluated in phase 1. I and Cy are given orally (PO) on days 1, 8, 15, and D 20mg PO on days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle. Treatment continues for a total of 6 cycles or until disease progression, significant toxicity or withdrawal. The primary study objective in phase 1 is to establish the MTD and in phase 2 is to determine hematologic/organ response rate. Results: As of February 2020, 120 pts have been enrolled; 16 in phase 1 and 4 in phase 2. The MTD was established at dose level 3 (I 4mg and Cy 500mg). Median age is 65 years (range 46-79), 12 (67%) are male. Light chain isotype is lambda in 14 (78%). Seven pts (39%) have cardiac, 10 (56%) renal, 4 (22%) gastrointestinal, 1 (6%) hepatic, 2 (11%) soft tissue involvement, with 22% having multi-organ involvement. Four pts (22%) completed 6 cycles of therapy and 6 (33%) remain on study with a median of 3 cycles completed. Eight of 16 pts (50%) had at least 1 drug-related adverse event (AE) (any grade), most commonly edema (19%), fatigue (19%), dizziness/lightheadedness (13%) and lymphopenia (13%). Grade 3/4 AEs were rare with grade 3 lymphopenia, anemia, and hyponatremia occurring in 13%, 6%, and 6% of pts, respectively. Of 18 evaluable pts, 7 (39%) achieved ≥VGPR with the median time to best response 2 cycles (1-5). Conclusions: The combination of ICyD for pts with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis is safe and well tolerated. Phase 1 is completed and the recommended phase 2 dose has been established. Deep hematologic responses (≥VGPR) have occurred and time to response appears similar to standard of care induction regimens, ie CyBorD. Phase 2 response data will be updated at the meeting.

High Dose Cytarabine and Clofarabine (HiDAC → CLOF) in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia, a Phase 2 Trial.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1936-1936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bayard Powell ◽  
Ralph D’Agostino ◽  
Denise Levitan ◽  
Leslie Renee Ellis ◽  
Susan Lyerly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
First Relapse ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Refractory Aml

Abstract High dose cytarabine (HiDAC) is the most effective single agent studied to date for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML); clofarabine (CLOF) is also an active single agent in AML. Preclinical data suggest synergy between cytarabine and clofarabine. Based on the results of a limited phase 1 trial (Blood2006; 108: 221b), we conducted a phase 2 study of HiDAC (2g/m2 over 3 hours) followed immediately by CLOF (40 mg/m2 infused over 2 hours), given daily for 5 days, in 39 adults with AML in first relapse (n = 27), second relapse (n = 3), or refractory to initial induction chemotherapy (n = 9). Prophylactic intravenous hydrocortisone was incorporated to decrease the occurrence of skin toxicity. Patients with persistent leukemia on day 12–14 (n = 12) received a second course of HiDAC → CLOF for 3 days. The mean age was 53.4 years (range 18.4 – 79.0). Accrual began March 2006 and was completed in July 2008. Thirtyseven of 39 patients are evaluable for response (two patients were treated recently and are not included in this analysis): 14/37 achieved a complete remission (CR), 2/37 a CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) for an overall response (CR or CRi) in 16/37 (43%; 95% CI 27 – 59%). Twelve of 37 (32%) patients had resistant disease, 3/37 (8%) died of complications during marrow aplasia, 5/37 (14%) died of complications of their AML with unknown bone marrow status, and 1/37 (3%) refused further evaluation or treatment. CR or CRi was achieved in 11/25 patients in first relapse, 2/3 in second relapse, and 3/9 with refractory AML. Twelve patients received a second induction – 2/12 (17%) achieved a CR and 1/12 (8%) a CRi. Toxicity data are complete in 36 patients; the most frequent grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities were transient elevations of AST/ALT observed in 23/36 (64%) patients, hyperbilirubinemia in 8/36 (22%), infection in 16/36 (44%), and rash in 8/36 (22%). Patients who achieved CR or CRi received up to 3 additional courses of HiDAC → CLOF each daily for 5 days. Twenty-seven of 39 (69%) patients have died with a median survival of 119 days (95% CI 71 – 322 days). In summary, HiDAC → CLOF is a very active combination in adults with relapsed and refractory AML, a group in whom CR/CRi rates of 30–35% are achieved with many salvage regimens. Toxicities are comparable to other salvage regimens with transient elevations in transaminases identified as the most frequent toxicity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document