Using a multi-disciplinary process-mapping approach for care plan program design.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18203-e18203
Author(s):  
Meredith Jones

e18203 Background: The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation has challenged oncology practices to engage in practice transformation activities through participation in the Oncology Care Model (OCM). One difficult requirement of OCM is the creation of care plans inclusive of the 13 IOM components. Though OCM does not require that care plans be given to patients, true practice transformation exists not only with care plan creation, but with delivery and education to patients and caregivers. Many challenges to care plan implementation exist, starting with the lack of staff dedicated to the care planning process. Methods: Two multi-disciplinary teams representing the Medical Oncology Clinic were formed to simulate and process-map current workflow, incorporating care plan generation and delivery. First, teams process-mapped current workflows utilizing existing staff to establish a baseline. Second, teams added care planning to the baseline and determined whether existing or new staff would be needed to accomplish the OCM care plan requirements. Both teams received the same 6 care planning steps: 1. Enter patient demographics into software, 2. Give patient survey, 3. Enter clinical information in software, 4. Generate plan, 5. Print/deliver plan, and 6. Scan into EMR. Results: Both teams completed process mapping with minimal variation at baseline. However, the teams disagreed on responsible staff for each care planning step. Both teams agreed, though, that 4 out of 6 steps must be completed by RNs, NPs or Physicians. Both teams also indicated that current RN staffing levels would not accommodate capacity to add care planning responsibilities to existing positions, due to the time-consuming nature of the care planning process. Conclusions: Multi-Disciplinary teams recommended addition of RN Care Coordinator positions to oversee the care planning process. Successful implementation requires hiring adequate numbers of RN Care Coordinators that, with a reasonable caseload each, will manage the process, track patients and evaluate outcomes. Future opportunities exist to research the impact that the addition of both care plan delivery and RN Care Coordinators have on patient satisfaction and outcomes.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24051-e24051
Author(s):  
Christine B. Weldon ◽  
Julia Rachel Trosman ◽  
Rosa Berardi ◽  
Al Bowen Benson ◽  
Betty Roggenkamp ◽  
...  

e24051 Background: CSOC conducts quality improvements (QI) for cancer patients that facilitate delivery of appropriate health maintenance and supportive cancer care at diagnosis and during treatment. CSOC is implementing a care planning QI starting at diagnosis using the 4R oncology model (Right Info / Care / Patient / Time), which provides patients a formal personalized care plan called Patient Care Sequence. Each Care Sequence includes health maintenance, cancer treatments and supportive care. As part of CSOC, we conducted provider surveys as a pre-intervention baseline to inform QI opportunities. Methods: Online survey of cancer providers from 8 cancer centers (4 academic, 4 community) conducted July 2018 - October 2019, prior to 4R implementation. The survey focused on current care planning practices and inclusion of guideline recommended health maintenance in care plans. Results: Survey response rate: 80% (180/225); respondents were 53% physicians, 20% advanced practice, 27% nurses. Only 59% (107/180) of respondents give patients care plans at diagnosis: 61% (65/107) verbally, 22% (24/107) written, 17% (18/107) using a printed form. Providers reported considerable gaps in including guideline-based health maintenance and promotion activities in care plans given to patients (Table). Additionally, 61% of providers reported concerns that it is challenging for their patients to manage their own health maintenance activities. Providers who are concerned about patients’ challenges in managing their own health maintenance are significantly more likely to give their patients a written or printed plan (76%, 32/42) compared to those providing care plans to patients verbally or not at all (56%, 77/138), p = .02. Conclusions: Guideline based health promotion activities are not consistently included in care plans, and care planning is not sufficiently conducted at cancer diagnosis. The CSOC 4R Oncology Model, which implements Patient Care Sequences at diagnosis, will address these gaps and examine the impact of formal care planning on improving utilization of health maintenance and promotion activities. [Table: see text]


Author(s):  
Miles Rinaldi ◽  
Flippa Watkeys

Purpose – Increasingly mental health services are attempting to become recovery focused which demands changing the nature of day-to-day interactions and the quality of the experience in services. Care planning is the daily work of mental health services and within this context, care planning that enhances both the experience and the outcomes of a person's recovery is a key element for effective services. However, care plans, the care planning process and the Care Programme Approach (CPA) continue to pose a challenge for services. The purpose of this paper is to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Conceptual paper. Findings – Within recovery focused services a care plan becomes the driving force, or action plan, behind a person's recovery journey and is focused on their individual needs, strengths, aspirations and personal goals. If involving people directly in the development of their care plan is critical to creating better outcomes then supporting self-management, shared decision making and coproduction all underpin the care planning process. Based on the evidence of people's experience of care plans and the care planning process it is time to seriously debate our current conceptualisation and approach to care planning and the future of the CPA. Originality/value – The paper describes aspects of the current situation with regard to the effectiveness of care planning in supporting a person's recovery. The paper raises some important questions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 571
Author(s):  
Alice Shiner ◽  
John A Ford ◽  
Nicholas Steel

Objectives: Care plans may improve health when patients are involved in the care planning process. They are recommended for primary care.  This study aimed to identify characteristics of older patients with functional impairment (age ≥75 years with problems completing daily activities) who report having a care plan and who are involved in care planning.Methods: The General Practice Patient Survey (individual-level dataset) 2015-16 in England was analysed. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations between having a care plan and being involved with care planning and age, gender, ethnicity, deprivation, multimorbidity, interpersonal relationship with general practitioner (GP) and other variables, clustered at practice level.Results: Three point five percent of GPPS respondents and 14.4% of older people with functional impairment reported having a care plan; however, only a quarter of the latter were involved with the care planning process. Involvement with care planning was associated with seeing own GP (odds ratio (OR) 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI)1.48 to 2.38) and factors reflecting a positive interpersonal relationship with the GP, including having confidence in the GP (OR 5.92, CI 2.38 to 14.77). Respondents involved with care planning reported greater confidence in managing their own health.Conclusions: Few older people with functional impairment report having a care plan and fewer report involvement in the care planning process. This may reduce the ability of care plans to deliver health benefits and person-centered care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i1-i8
Author(s):  
R Didehvar ◽  
G Ehtheshamirad ◽  
G Batty ◽  
S Sage ◽  
S Mullins ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction People living with severe frailty in care homes are vulnerable to frequent non-elective hospital attendances. However provision of enhanced healthcare support to care home residents can reduce this risk and increase quality of life for residents.1 The framework for enhanced health in care homes (EHCH) summarises best practice in this area and provides guidance for implementing services.2 Methods This study was a pilot implementation of the EHCH framework based on a Primary Care and Specialist Frailty Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) and delivered on a Primary Care Network (PCN) footprint. The MDT targeted five care homes in a PCN area with historically high levels of non-elective attendances. The model of care was based on the principle of anticipatory care planning, training and support for care home staff to understand and implement plans. Results Over the pilot period of 9 months, non-elective attendances from the 5 homes reduced by 27% compared to the previous year, which was a significant reduction (p<0.042). There was variation between the homes in the reduction in non-elective attendances with the greatest impact seen in the homes that had the highest level of attendance at training and engagement in the care planning process. Feedback received from the care home staff indicated that they felt more confident to refer to the care plans and had alternative options to calling 999. A quality audit of the care plans completed as part of the pilot revealed a number of additional training needs for clinicians completing the plans to ensure consistency of recoding. This training was delivered following the pilot period. Conclusions The pilot demonstrated that the EHCH framework could be successfully implemented on a PCN footprint. Analysis shows this implementation coincided with a reduction in non-elective attendances from the targeted homes. Further analysis is required to compare the impact in different homes and to understand contributing factors. The pilot implementation provides helpful information to inform PCN development. References 1. Lloyd T, Wolters A and Steveton A (2014) The impact of providing enhanced support for care home residents in Rushcliffe: Health Foundation consideration of findings from the Improvement Analytics Unit. The Health Foundation. 2. NHS England (2016) The framework for enhanced health in care homes.


Author(s):  
Candace Necyk ◽  
Jeffrey A. Johnson ◽  
Ross T. Tsuyuki ◽  
Dean T. Eurich

Background: In 2012, the Government of Alberta introduced a funding program to remunerate pharmacists to develop a comprehensive annual care plan (CACP) for patients with complex needs. The objective of this study is to explore patients’ perceptions of the care they received through the pharmacist CACP program in Alberta. Methods: We invited 3442 patients who received a pharmacist-billed CACP within the previous 3 months and 6888 matched controls across Alberta to complete an online questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of the short version Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-11), with 3 additional pharmacy-specific assessment questions added. Additional questions related to health status and demographics were also included. Results: Overall, most patients indicated a low level of chronic illness care by pharmacists, with few differences noted between CACP patients and non-CACP controls. Of note, controls reported higher quality of care for 5 domains within the adapted PACIC-like tool compared with CACP patients ( p < 0.05 for all). Interestingly, only 79 (44%) of CACP patients reported that they had received a CACP, whereas only 192 (66%) of control patients reported that they did not receive a care plan. In a sensitivity analysis including only these respondents, individuals who received a CACP perceived a significantly higher quality of chronic illness care across all PACIC domains. Conclusion: Overall, chronic illness care incentivized by the pharmacist CACP program in Alberta is perceived to be moderate to low. When limited to respondents who explicitly recognized receiving the service or not, the perceptions of quality of care were more positive. This suggests that better implementation of CACP by pharmacists may be associated with improved quality of care and that some redesign is needed to engage patients more. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2021;154:xx-xx.


2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akuh Adaji ◽  
Peter Schattner ◽  
Kay Margaret Jones ◽  
Bronwyn Beovich ◽  
Leon Piterman

Objective. To test the association, in patients with a diagnosis of diabetes I and II, between having or not having a care plan, (i.e. General Practice Management Plans (GPMPs),Team Care Arrangements (TCAs)), and having the recommended number of biochemical checks according to the diabetes Annual Cycle of Care guideline. The checks comprised HbA1c, HDL cholesterol and urinary microalbumin. Methods. Chi-square analysis of retrospective group data obtained from the Medicare database (from ‘billing’ patterns only). Results. The creation of GPMPs was associated with general practitioners (GPs) requesting checks for HbA1c (59.7%), HDL cholesterol (36.9%) and microalbumin (50.8%) for diabetes patients in accordance with guideline recommendations. Although the introduction of multidisciplinary care via a TCA was associated with an increase in the frequency of HbA1c checks (61.3%) in accordance with the guidelines, there was a reduction in the number of HDL cholesterol (23.7%) and microalbumin (36.8%) checks. The group with no care plans had the lowest association with HbA1c (47.8%), HDL cholesterol (19.7%) and microalbumin (29.3%) checks that met guideline requirements for diabetes. Conclusions. The use of GPMPs showed strong association with increased testing of process measures that met guideline requirements for diabetes. Further research is needed to understand the value and benefits of TCAs in promoting adherence to diabetes guidelines. What is known about the topic? Research suggests that care planning is associated with increased adherence by GPs to some of the processes of care stipulated in diabetes guidelines. What does the paper add? This study examines Australia-wide data obtained from Medicare. The findings demonstrated strong association between care planning and the process measures examined in this study. In contrast to previous studies, multidisciplinary team involvement via a TCA appeared to be less important than a GPMP in promoting adherence to process measures. What are the implications for practitioners? GPs should continue to provide structure care to patients via General Practice Management Plans.


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 64-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenni Burt ◽  
Martin Roland ◽  
Charlotte Paddison ◽  
David Reeves ◽  
John Campbell ◽  
...  

Objectives Among patients with long-term conditions, to determine the prevalence and benefits of care planning discussions and of care plans. Methods Data from the 2009/10 General Practice Patient Survey, a cross sectional survey of 5.5 million patients in England. Outcomes were patient reports of: care planning discussions; perceived benefit from care planning discussions and resultant care plans. Patient and practice variables were included in multilevel logistic regression to investigate predictors of each outcome. Results Half the respondents (49%) reported a long-term condition and were eligible to answer the care planning questions. Of these, 84% reported having a care planning discussion during the last 12 months and most reported some benefit. Only 12% who reported a care planning discussion also reported being told they had a care plan. Patients who reported having a care plan were more likely to report benefits from care planning discussions. Several factors predicted the reporting of care planning and care plans of which the most important was patients' reports of the quality of interpersonal care. Conclusions There is a gap between policy and current practice which might reflect uncertainty as to the benefits of care plans. There is, therefore, a need for rigorous evaluation of care plans.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kathrine Hammill ◽  
Michelle Bissett ◽  
Craig Slater

Interprofessional teams will often meet with residents and their families to coordinate an effective care plan. Occupational therapists provide a unique contribution, supporting resident participation in meaningful and purposeful activities. Kathrine Hammill, Michelle Bissett and Craig Slater consider a variety of strategies to enhance care planning and assist with its successful implementation


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18032-e18032
Author(s):  
Julia Rachel Trosman ◽  
Christine B. Weldon ◽  
Claudia B. Perez ◽  
Swati Kulkarni ◽  
Seema Ahsan Khan ◽  
...  

e18032 Background: The IOM ’11 and ’13 reports recommend a written care plan (WCP) at cancer diagnosisto enable teamwork and patient (pt) engagement. Standardized multimodality WCP is a key part of the 4R model of care planning and pt engagement proposed under “NCI ASCO Teams” Project (Trosman JOP 2016). 4R (Right Information / Care / Patient / Time) is under implementation at 3 centers: academic, community and safety net. As current state assessment prior to implementing 4R and standard multimodality WCP, we surveyed pts not impacted by 4R on care planning, enablement and whether they received any WCP. Methods: Survey of breast cancer stage I-III pts who received care at the three sites Jan ’15 - Mar ’16, prior to 4R. We used simple frequencies and Fisher’s exact test in analysis. Results: Survey response rate: 47%, 241/515. Gaps of > 30% were reported in 7 of 8 aspects of care planning and pt enablement - Table. A non standard WCP was received by 46% of pts. Receiving a WCP impacted whether pts were clear about care (85% with WCP vs 52% without, p < .0001), able to manage own care (79% with WCP vs 58% without, p = .0005) and overwhelmed (35% with WCP vs 49% without, p = .04). Care complexity was a significant factor for feeling overwhelmed by pts without WCP (49% of pts receiving > 6 care services felt overwhelmed vs. 30% of pts receiving < = 6 services, p = .04), but not a significant factor in pts with WCP (45% vs 41%, p = .7). More pts with WCP reported well managed care by providers than pts without WCP (77%, 62%, P = .02). Conclusions: Serious gaps found in care planning and pt enablement at our sites support the need for 4R implementation. Even pre-4R, non standard WCPs improve pt understanding of care and ability to manage it, and reduce the impact of care complexity on pts. Providers using WCP appear to also coordinate care, but WCP itself may be an important factor of patient enablement. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document