Quality of life and satisfaction with care in a contemporary cohort of pancreatic cancer patients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21623-e21623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Abdel-Rahman ◽  
Daniel John Renouf ◽  
David F. Schaeffer ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung

e21623 Background: Pancreatic cancer patients face significant disease- and treatment-related morbidity while management is frequently complex. With recent advances in radiation and surgery and the introduction of new systemic therapy regimens, understanding these patients’ quality of life (QOL) and their satisfaction with the care that they currently receive is essential to inform the design of future care delivery models. Methods: Pancreas Centre BC was established in British Columbia in 2012 to promote efficient triage, rapid access to multidisciplinary care, and early involvement of palliative care, if necessary. Consecutive pancreatic cancer patients who were referred to and seen at Pancreas Centre BC completed the EORTC-QLQ C30 and PAN26 questionnaires before and after surgery as well as surveys focused on the levels of satisfaction with their disease management. Using independent samples t-tests, we correlated clinical characteristics with QOL and satisfaction scores. Results: In total, 167 patients were included: median age was 63 years, 45% were men, and 70% were ECOG 0/1. The majority had early stage disease (78%), pancreatic head tumors (53%), adenocarcinoma histology (68%), and adjuvant gemcitabine (75%). Baseline mean QOL scores were 63, 90, 83, 58 and 92 (out of 100) in the overall, physical, emotional, cognitive and social domains, respectively. Advanced age ( > 70 years), weight loss ( > 10 kg), and poor ECOG were independently associated with lower overall QOL rating (all p > 0.05). Surgery had a positive impact on all functional domains where we observed a mean improvement in QOL scores ranging from 8 to 17 points (all p > 0.05). In terms of satisfaction, 94% of patients rated their overall care as good to excellent. Likewise, 80% of patients were very or mostly satisfied with the amount of information they received and 84% of patients rated the healthcare information they received as very or mostly helpful. Conclusions: Despite the morbidity of pancreatic cancer, patients referred to and seen at a tertiary pancreatic cancer center reported good QOL and satisfaction levels, suggesting that the centralization of pancreatic cancer care may be an effective model to address the high priority needs of this population

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-52
Author(s):  
T. G. Gevorkyan ◽  
I. A. Feinstein

Pain syndrome, along with mechanical jaundice, is one of the most evident clinical manifestations of pancreatic cancer and is often a sign of tumor neglecting. Existing treatment options for chronic pain in cancer patients are diverse and include the various ways of impact on the different links of pathological pain: medicinal, endoscopic, surgical. With this pathology, drug therapy using analgesics, weak and strong opioids, is usually not effective enough. In such cases, preference is given to chemical neurolysis — denervation of the autonomic structures of the retroperitoneal space, carried out under the guidance of ultrasound or computed tomography. Conducting percutaneous neurolysis of the celiac plexus with the use of alcohol or phenol is prescribed upon insufficient effectiveness of pharmacotherapy. Surgical methods of anesthesia are used extremely rarely, as they considerably worsen the patient’s condition, without significantly affecting the quality of life or the prognosis. Thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy is considered a modern and effective method of endoscopic treatment of pain in unresectable pancreatic cancer, the conduction of which can significantly decrease the intensity of pain, reduce the number of narcotic analgesics and improve the quality of life of cancer patients. This minimally invasive intervention is the basis for the subsequent lifelong systemic drug therapy.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522199844
Author(s):  
Abdullah M Alhammad ◽  
Nora Alkhudair ◽  
Rawan Alzaidi ◽  
Latifa S Almosabhi ◽  
Mohammad H Aljawadi

Introduction Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is a serious complication of cancer treatment that compromises patients’ quality of life and treatment adherence, which necessitates regular assessment. Therefore, there is a need to assess patient-reported nausea and vomiting using a validated scale among Arabic speaking cancer patient population. The objective of this study was to translate and validate the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) instrument in Arabic, a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the influence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on patients’ quality of life. Methods Linguistic validation of an Arabic-language version was performed. The instrument was administered to cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in a tertiary hospital's cancer center in Saudi Arabia. Results One-hundred cancer patients who received chemotherapy were enrolled. The participants’ mean age was 53.3 ± 14.9 years, and 50% were female. Half of the participants had a history of nausea and vomiting with previous chemotherapy. The Cronbach coefficient alpha for the FLIE was 0.9606 and 0.9736 for nausea and vomiting domains, respectively, which indicated an excellent reliability for the Arabic FLIE. The mean FLIE score was 110.9 ± 23.5, indicating no or minimal impact on daily life (NIDL). Conclusions The Arabic FLIE is a valid and reliable tool among the Arabic-speaking cancer population. Thus, the Arabic version of the FLIE will be a useful tool to assess the quality of life among Arabic speaking patients receiving chemotherapy. Additionally, the translated instrument will be a useful tool for future research studies to explore new antiemetic treatments among cancer patients.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Wode ◽  
Johanna Hök Nordberg ◽  
Gunver Sophia Kienle ◽  
Nils Elander ◽  
Britt-Marie Bernhardson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Most pancreatic cancer patients present with advanced stage at diagnosis with extremely short expected survival and few treatment options. A multimodal palliative approach is necessary for symptom relief and optimisation of health-related quality of life. In a recent open-label trial of mistletoe extract for advanced pancreatic cancer patients not eligible for chemotherapy, promising results on improved overall survival and better health-related quality of life were reported. The objective of the present study is to assess the value of mistletoe extract as a complement to standard 18 treatment (palliative chemotherapy or best supportive care) in advanced pancreatic cancer patients with 19 regard to overall survival and health-related quality of life. Methods The trial is prospective, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel group and placebo-controlled. In total 290 participants are randomly assigned to placebo or mistletoe extract given subcutaneously in increasing dosage from 0.01mg to 20mg three times per week for nine months. Stratification is performed for site and palliative chemotherapy. Main inclusion criteria are advanced pancreatic cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status zero to two; main exclusion criteria are life expectancy less than four weeks and neuroendocrine tumour of the pancreas. Two ancillary studies on sub-sets of participants are nested in the trial: a biomarker study collecting blood samples and a cross-sectional qualitative study with semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first placebo-controlled randomised trial assessing the impact of mistletoe extract as a complement to standard treatment on overall survival and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The presented trial with its two nested ancillary studies exploring biomarkers and patient experiences is expected to give new insights into the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Trial registration EU Clinical Trial Register, EudraCT Number 2014-004552-64. Registered 19 January 2016, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2014-004552-64/SE


Pancreas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Macarulla ◽  
Andrew E. Hendifar ◽  
Chung-Pin Li ◽  
Michele Reni ◽  
Hanno Riess ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1380-1387 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Lindley ◽  
S Vasa ◽  
W T Sawyer ◽  
E P Winer

PURPOSE To evaluate the quality of life (QOL) of breast cancer patients who survived 2 to 5 years following initiation of adjuvant cytotoxic and/or hormonal therapy and to characterize relationships between QOL and patient physical symptoms, sexual function, and preferences regarding adjuvant treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eighty-six patients who had completed systemic adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer between 1988 and 1991 were surveyed by written questionnaire and telephone interview. Sociodemographic information was obtained for each patient, and patients were asked to complete the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC), the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS), the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form 36 (SF-36), a series of questions regarding sexual function, and a survey about preferences for adjuvant therapy in relation to possible benefit. RESULTS The mean FLIC score among all patients was 138.3 (+/- 12.2), which suggests a high level of QOL. The reported frequency of moderate to severe symptoms was generally low (ie, < 15%), with fatigue (31.4%), insomnia (23.3%), and local numbness at the site of surgery (22.1%) occurring with greatest frequency. Patients reported a wide range of sexual difficulties. Preference assessment showed that more than 65% of patients were willing to undergo 6 months of chemotherapy for a 5% increase in likelihood of cancer cure. CONCLUSION Self-rated QOL in breast cancer patients 2 to 5 years following adjuvant therapy was generally favorable. Less than one third of patients reported moderate to severe symptoms. Selected aspects of sexual function appeared to be compromised. The majority of patients indicated a willingness to accept 6 months of chemotherapy for small to modest potential benefit.


Author(s):  
Leah Curran ◽  
Louise Sharpe ◽  
Phyllis Butow

Abstract Background: Treatments for cancer-related anxiety show modest benefits, but most have been trialled in patients with early stage disease or patients who are currently disease free. However, many patients with cancer have incurable disease, or their disease is slowly progressing or likely to recur. Treating anxiety in the context of realistic threat and ongoing uncertainty is particularly challenging. Based on a theoretical model of cancer-related anxiety, we developed a transdiagnostic intervention for patients with advanced or recurred disease who are experiencing clinically significant anxieties. The intervention was a novel integration of traditional and contemporary CBT. Aims: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of the intervention in a pilot with patients with advanced or recurred cancer. Method: Twelve patients with advanced or recurred cancer, who were experiencing anxiety, participated. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed with participant’s ratings and adherence and retention rates. Psychological outcomes (anxiety, traumatic symptoms, fear of progression, depression, death anxiety and quality of life) were assessed pre-intervention, post-intervention and at 2-month follow-up. Results: Eleven of the 12 participants completed at least five therapy sessions of whom eight completed all nine sessions. Participants rated the intervention as having excellent face validity. Post-intervention, statistically significant improvements were demonstrated for anxiety, traumatic symptoms, fear of progression, depression and quality of life. These improvements were maintained at follow-up for anxiety, traumatic symptoms and depression. Conclusions: This pilot provides preliminary evidence for the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of the novel intervention for cancer-related anxiety in the context of advanced disease.


HPB ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S497-S498
Author(s):  
Naru Kim ◽  
In Woong Han ◽  
Danbee Kang ◽  
Youngju Ryu ◽  
Dae Joon Park ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document