Assessment of the impact of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale on the initiation of treatment in newly diagnosed cancer patients in a safety-net hospital.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 250-250
Author(s):  
Daulath Singh ◽  
Annapoorna Singh ◽  
Punita Grover ◽  
Mahathi Indaram ◽  
Nikki Malomo ◽  
...  

250 Background: Distress is a universal symptom in oncologic patients which negatively impact the quality of life and survival. It interferes with the ability to cope with the diagnosis and is a risk factor for non-adherence with treatment. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), is used at our institution for distress screening. The aim of our study is to assess the impact of distress, measured by the HADS score, on initiation of treatment in newly diagnosed cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with a new diagnosis of cancer, between March 1st, 2014 and December 31st, 2015; who had been evaluated for distress at their first oncology clinic visit. We included only patients who were treated with chemotherapy or chemoradiation, with curative intent. Poisson regression analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between HADS to treatment initiation while including age, sex, race, insurance status, cancer type, and stage as covariates in the model. Results: A total of 101 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 54 years, 63% were female and 37% were male. The majority were Caucasians (53%), followed by African-Americans (36%). 56% of the population had Medicaid, and 26% had Medicare and private insurance. The most common cancers were – breast (30%), gastrointestinal (20%), gynecologic (15%) and lung (11%). 64% received chemotherapy and 36% were treated with chemoradiation. We grouped patients into 3 categories based on the HADS score – category 1 with score ≤7 (28%), category 2 with score 8-10 (17%) and category 3 with score ≥11 (55%). The median time to treatment initiation was 28 days. Multivariate Poisson regression analysis did not show any correlation between the HADS score and treatment initiation. Subscales analyses showed that higher depression scores correlate with a delay in treatment initiation (p-value 0.01), while the anxiety scores had no influence (p-value 0.57). Conclusions: In our study, the initial total HADS score did not affect the treatment initiation. Interestingly, depression had an influence on the initiation of treatment in newly diagnosed cancer patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 3921-3926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Antonietta Annunziata ◽  
Barbara Muzzatti ◽  
Ettore Bidoli ◽  
Cristiana Flaiban ◽  
Francesca Bomben ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 490-497
Author(s):  
Deborah A Forst ◽  
Kit Quain ◽  
Sophia L Landay ◽  
Maya Anand ◽  
Emilia Kaslow-Zieve ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with malignant gliomas have a poor prognosis. However, little is known about patients’ and caregivers’ understanding of the prognosis and the primary treatment goal. Methods We conducted a prospective study in patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas (N = 72) and their caregivers (N = 55). At 12 weeks after diagnosis, we administered the Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire to assess understanding of prognosis and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to evaluate mood. We used multivariable regression analyses to explore associations between prognostic understanding and mood and McNemar tests to compare prognostic perceptions among patient-caregiver dyads (N = 48). Results A total of 87.1% (61/70) of patients and 79.6% (43/54) of caregivers reported that it was “very” or “extremely” important to know about the patient’s prognosis. The majority of patients (72.7%, [48/66]) reported that their cancer was curable. Patients who reported that their illness was incurable had greater depressive symptoms (B = 3.01, 95% CI, 0.89-5.14, P = .01). There was no association between caregivers’ prognostic understanding and mood. Among patient-caregiver dyads, patients were more likely than caregivers to report that their primary treatment goal was cure (43.8% [21/48] vs 25.0% [12/48], P = .04) and that the oncologist’s primary goal was cure (29.2% [14/48] vs 8.3% [4/48], P = .02). Conclusions Patients with malignant gliomas frequently hold inaccurate perceptions of the prognosis and treatment goal. Although caregivers more often report an accurate assessment of these metrics, many still report an overly optimistic perception of prognosis. Interventions are needed to enhance prognostic communication and to help patients cope with the associated distress.


2009 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 908-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Singer ◽  
S Kuhnt ◽  
H Götze ◽  
J Hauss ◽  
A Hinz ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1335-1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. H. OSBORNE ◽  
G. R. ELSWORTH ◽  
D. W. KISSANE ◽  
S. A. BURKE ◽  
J. L. HOPPER

Background. Assessment of adjustment of patients in cancer treatment trials is becoming more common and increasingly regarded as a useful outcome measure. The widely used Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) Scale was designed to measure Fighting Spirit (FS), Anxious Preoccupation (AP), Helpless–hopelessness (HH) and Fatalism.Methods. Questionnaire responses from 632 breast cancer patients were randomly divided into two groups, one for exploratory analyses and possible scale refinement, and the other for validation purposes.Results. Estimates of reliability (Cronbach's α) were satisfactory for two scales, FS (α = 0·85) and HH (α = 0·81), but lower for AP (α = 0·65) and Fatalism (α = 0·64). Exploratory factor analysis suggested that the MAC Scale might be measuring six independent constructs including two related to Fighting Spirit (Positive Orientation to the Illness, Minimizing the Illness), two related to Fatalism (Fatalism-revised, Loss of Control), a construct we have named Angst, and an unchanged HH construct. Scales developed to measure these constructs were satisfactorily replicated in confirmatory analyses but some reliabilities were lower than desirable. The general structure of the MAC Scale remained little changed despite the division of two scales and the suggested removal of six items. The refined scales correlated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale and the Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire, indicating good concurrent validity.Conclusions. While reasonable reliability of the original scales persists through analyses of the MAC Scale, the original factor structure could not be reproduced. Six refined constructs with strong construct validity were identified within the overall domain of mental adjustment to cancer.


2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 821-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyriaki Mystakidou ◽  
Eleni Tsilika ◽  
Efi Parpa ◽  
Emmanuela Katsouda ◽  
Antonis Galanos ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document