Phase II study of S-1 plus docetaxel as first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer (OGSG0902).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 129-129
Author(s):  
Jin Matsuyama ◽  
Hiroshi Imamura ◽  
Ryohei Kawabata ◽  
Tomono Kawase ◽  
Kazuyuki Okada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Treatment

129 Background: There is not enough evidence for the treatment of elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. S-1 plus CDDP is one of the standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer in japan, but the efficacy remains insufficient due to the drug toxicity such as renal function disorders. The efficacy and safety of S-1 plus docetaxel as first-line treatment for elderly patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer were investigated. Methods: 75 years or older patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer were enrolled. Docetaxel was administered i.v. (40mg/m2) on day 1, while S-1 was administered orally (80mg/m2/day, b.i.d.) for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest. This schedule was repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) of S-1 plus docetaxel; secondary endpoints were safety, progression free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). Sample size was set to be 30, which was determined to reject the response rate of 20% under the expectation of 40% with the power of 90% and two-sided alpha of 5%. Results: 31 patients were enrolled and assessable for efficacy. The response rate was 45.2% (95%CI 27.3-64.0, p = 0.001), and disease control rate was 77.4%. The median progression-free survival time was 5.8 months, the 1-year survival rate was 58.1%, and the median survival time was 16.1months. In 31 patients assessed for safety, the major grade 3/4 toxic effects were neutropenia (58%), febrile neutropenia (13%), anemia (10%), anorexia (10%), and fatigue (6%). Conclusions: These findings indicate that S-1 plus docetaxel as first-line treatment for elderly patients is feasible and shows promising efficacy against advanced gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: UMIN000002785.

Bevacizumab in Combination With Chemotherapy As First-Line Therapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (30) ◽  
pp. 3968-3976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Ohtsu ◽  
Manish A. Shah ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Sun Young Rha ◽  
Akira Sawaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
First Line Treatment

Purpose The Avastin in Gastric Cancer (AVAGAST) trial was a multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of adding bevacizumab to capecitabine-cisplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Patients and Methods Patients received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg or placebo followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 plus capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks. Fluorouracil was permitted in patients unable to take oral medications. Cisplatin was given for six cycles; capecitabine and bevacizumab were administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Log-rank test was used to test the OS difference. Results In all, 774 patients were enrolled; 387 were assigned to each treatment group (intention-to-treat population), and 517 deaths were observed. Median OS was 12.1 months with bevacizumab plus fluoropyrimidine-cisplatin and 10.1 months with placebo plus fluoropyrimidine-cisplatin (hazard ratio 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.03; P = .1002). Both median progression-free survival (6.7 v 5.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.93; P = .0037) and overall response rate (46.0% v 37.4%; P = .0315) were significantly improved with bevacizumab versus placebo. Preplanned subgroup analyses revealed regional differences in efficacy outcomes. The most common grade 3 to 5 adverse events were neutropenia (35%, bevacizumab plus fluoropyrimidine-cisplatin; 37%, placebo plus fluoropyrimidine-cisplatin), anemia (10% v 14%), and decreased appetite (8% v 11%). No new bevacizumab-related safety signals were identified. Conclusion Although AVAGAST did not reach its primary objective, adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy was associated with significant increases in progression-free survival and overall response rate in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Effect of the addition of bevacizumab to first-line FOLFOX on efficacy, including response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 588-588
Author(s):  
M. Suenaga ◽  
N. Mizunuma ◽  
S. Matsusaka ◽  
E. Shinozaki ◽  
M. Ogura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Treatment

588 Background: Bevacizumab (BV) is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor. Used in combination with chemotherapy, BV has been shown to improve survival in both first- and second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, it was reported that addition of BV to FOLFOX conferred only little survival benefit (Saltz et al. JCO2008). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of addition of BV to FOLFOX in first-line treatment for patients with mCRC. Methods: Bevacizumab was approved for mCRC in July 2007 in Japan. This study was conducted at a single institution and comprised 217 consecutive patients receiving first-line treatment for mCRC between 2005 and 2009. The primary objective was to compare survival benefit in patients treated with FOLFOX4 (FF) between 2005 and 2007 with that in patients receiving FOLFOX4+BV 5 mg/kg (FF+BV) between 2007 and 2009. Results: Total number of patients in the FF and FF+BV groups was 132 and 85, respectively. Characteristics of patients were as follows (FF vs. FF+B): median age, 62 yrs (range 28-76 yrs) vs. 60 yrs (range16-74 yrs); ECOG PS0, 98.8% vs. 81.8%; and median follow-up time, 20.8 months vs. 24.4 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the FF and FF+BV groups was 10 months (95% CI, 8.7-11.3) and 17 months (95% CI, 10.2-14.1), while median overall survival (OS) was 21 months (95% CI, 17.9-24.1) and not reached, respectively. Response rate was 46% (95% CI, 37- 54) in FF, and 62% (95% CI, 51-73) in FF+BV. Addition of BV to FOLFOX4 significantly improved PFS (p=0.002) and OS (p<0.001). Conclusions: The additive effect of BV for first-line FOLFOX was reconfirmed. These data indicate potential survival benefits from the addition of BV to FOLFOX in first-line treatment of mCRC. In addition, PFS may be a sensitive indicator of outcome prior to post-treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Galician lung cancer group: Afatinib´s data as first-line treatment for elderly patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20662-e20662
Author(s):  
Sara Agraso Busto ◽  
Vanesa Varela ◽  
Natalia Fernández Núñez ◽  
Jose-luis Firvida ◽  
Lucía Santomé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
First Line Treatment

e20662 Background: There are scarcy data or studies on safety and efficacy of afatinib in elderly patients. Methods: Retrospective study on patients from differents hospitals in Galicia (Spain) diagnosed of metastasic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR positive mutation who have received first line treatment with afatinib between July 2015 and September 2018 were included. Main objectives were to asses safety, dose reductions and as well as its effects on effectiveness of the treatment in patients 70 years old or older (elderly patients) comparing with data from patients under 70 years of age. Results: 45 patients were included in our analysis (33 women, 12 men). Median age was 71.2 years (39-91) with 24 patients (53.3%) being 70 years old or older. Common adverse events grade 3/4 were mucositis and skin toxicity (28.6% in patients under 70 years and 20.8% in elderly patients) and diarrhea (9.5% and 16.7% respectively). The dose was reduced in 47.6% patients under 70 vs 75% in elderly patients. Treatment was discontinued in 14.3% patients vs 20.8% patients respectively owing to adverse events. Overall response was 76% and 62.5% respectively. Disease control rates were 90.3% (95% CI: 96.7-83.8) and 83.3% (95% CI: 98.2-68.4) respectively. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 27 months (95% CI 14.8-39.1) and overall survival was not reached. By ages, median PFS was 20 months (95% CI: 7.4-32.5) vs not reached in elderly patients although being unable to demonstrate differences in progression-free survival between both groups. Conclusions: PFS was 20 months in people under 70 years vs not reached in elderly patients. Elderly patients need more treatment interruption or dose adjustments compared with younger patients, but this does not seem to impair safety and does not compromise effectiveness either.

scholarly journals Erlotinib and bevacizumab versus cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab in unselected nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 219-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Thomas ◽  
Jürgen Fischer ◽  
Stefan Andreas ◽  
Cornelius Kortsik ◽  
Christian Grah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Treatment

Erlotinib with bevacizumab showed promising activity in recurrent nonsquamous (NS) nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The INNOVATIONS study was designed to assess in first-line treatment of unselected cisplatin-eligible patients this combination compared to cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab.Stage IIIB/IV patients with NS-NSCLC were randomised on erlotinib (150 mg daily) and bevacizumab (15 mg·kg−1 on day 1, every 3 weeks) (EB) until progression, or cisplatin (80 mg·m−2 on day 1, every 3 weeks) and gemcitabine (1250 mg·m−2 on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks) up to six cycles and bevacizumab (15 mg·kg−1 on day 1, every 3 weeks) (PGB) until progression.224 patients were randomised (EB n=111, PGB n=113). The response rate (12% versus 36%; p<0.0001), progression-free survival (median 3.5 versus 6.9 months; hazard ratio (HR) 1.85, 95% CI 1.39–2.45; p<0.0001) and overall survival (median 12.6 versus 17.8 months; HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01–1.97; p=0.04) clearly favoured PGB. In patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (n=32), response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were not superior with EB.Platinum-based combination chemotherapy remains the standard of care in first-line treatment of unselected NS-NSCLC. Molecular targeted approaches strongly mandate appropriate testing and patient selection.

Apatinib in combination with S-1 as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer: A phase II clinical trial.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 71-71
Author(s):  
Chuantao Zhang ◽  
Zimin Liu ◽  
Na Zhou ◽  
Jianli Zhang ◽  
Jingjuan Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

71 Background: Apatinib is a standard therapy for advanced gastric cancer in third-line setting. However, the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus S-1 as first-line therapy is unknown. Here, we conducted a single center study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of it. Methods: In this phase II trial, chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled between August 24, 2016 and Sept 25, 2017, at a single centers in P.R. China. The patients enrolled were assigned to S-1 plus apatinib, S-1 (40 mg m-2 depending on patient's body surface area) was given orally, twice daily for 2 consecutive weeks, followed by a 1-week rest period, and apatinib 500 mg was given once daily, every 3-week cycle. The primary endpoint was overall survival(OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival(PFS), time to progress (TTP), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. On disease progression, patients had the option to receive single-agent apatinib every 3 weeks.This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02525237. Results: Thirty eligible patients, median age 63 years (range 40-76) and median performance status 1 (ECOG 0-2) ,were enrolled, 9 patients have no evaluation or withdrew consent. Therefore, of the 21 patients the median PFS and TTP were 5.34±1.83 months [1.76–8.92] and 1.34±0.08 months[1.18–1.51], respectively. Additionally, one(4.76%) patient had a complete response, one (4.76%)patients had partial responses, 11 patients had stable disease, and 9 patients had progress of disease. The objective response rate(ORR)and the disease control rate(DCR) were 9.52%(2/21) and 57.14%(12/21),respectively. Until Sept 25.2017,the primary endpoint(OS) had not been reached. We recorded grade 3 or 4 adverse events including elevated bilirubin and/or transaminase, fatigue, abdominal pain, thrombocytopenia,et al. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: First-line chemotherapy with S-1 plus apatinib in patients with advanced gastric cancer did not reach its primary objective. However, it holds promise of becoming a standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02525237.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document