scholarly journals CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin) Liposome for Injection Versus Conventional Cytarabine Plus Daunorubicin in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (26) ◽  
pp. 2684-2692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey E. Lancet ◽  
Geoffrey L. Uy ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Laura F. Newell ◽  
Tara L. Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Bone Marrow Cells ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose CPX-351 is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin that delivers a synergistic 5:1 drug ratio into leukemia cells to a greater extent than normal bone marrow cells. Prior clinical studies demonstrated a sustained drug ratio and exposure in vivo and prolonged survival versus standard-of-care cytarabine plus daunorubicin chemotherapy (7+3 regimen) in older patients with newly diagnosed secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). Patients and Methods In this open-label, randomized, phase III trial, 309 patients age 60 to 75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk/sAML received one to two induction cycles of CPX-351 or 7+3 followed by consolidation therapy with a similar regimen. The primary end point was overall survival. Results CPX-351 significantly improved median overall survival versus 7+3 (9.56 v 5.95 months; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.90; one-sided P = .003). Overall remission rate was also significantly higher with CPX-351 versus 7+3 (47.7% v 33.3%; two-sided P = .016). Improved outcomes were observed across age-groups and AML subtypes. The incidences of nonhematologic adverse events were comparable between arms, despite a longer treatment phase and prolonged time to neutrophil and platelet count recovery with CPX-351. Early mortality rates with CPX-351 and 7+3 were 5.9% and 10.6% (two-sided P = .149) through day 30 and 13.7% and 21.2% (two-sided P = .097) through day 60. Conclusion CPX-351 treatment is associated with significantly longer survival compared with conventional 7+3 in older adults with newly diagnosed sAML. The safety profile of CPX-351 was similar to that of conventional 7+3 therapy.

Sequential Combination of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin and Standard Chemotherapy in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial by the EORTC and GIMEMA Consortium (AML-17)

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (35) ◽  
pp. 4424-4430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Amadori ◽  
Stefan Suciu ◽  
Roberto Stasi ◽  
Helmut R. Salih ◽  
Dominik Selleslag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy ◽  
Sequential Combination ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose This randomized trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of sequential gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) and standard chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods Patients (n = 472) age 61 to 75 years were randomly assigned to induction chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, cytarabine, and etoposide preceded, or not, by a course of GO (6 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15). In remission, patients received two consolidation courses with or without GO (3 mg/m2 on day 0). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results The overall response rate was comparable between the two arms (GO, 45%; no GO, 49%), but induction and 60-day mortality rates were higher in the GO arm (17% v 12% and 22% v 18%, respectively). With median follow-up of 5.2 years, median OS was 7.1 months in the GO arm and 10 months in the no-GO arm (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.45; P = .07). Other survival end points were similar in both arms. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic and liver toxicities were greater in the GO arm. Treatment with GO provided no benefit in any prognostic subgroup, with the possible exception of patients age < 70 years with secondary AML, but outcomes were significantly worse in the oldest age subgroup because of a higher risk of early mortality. Conclusion As used in this trial, the sequential combination of GO and standard chemotherapy provides no benefit for older patients with AML and is too toxic for those age ≥ 70 years.

scholarly journals Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Decitabine Versus Patient Choice, With Physician Advice, of Either Supportive Care or Low-Dose Cytarabine for the Treatment of Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (21) ◽  
pp. 2670-2677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Xavier G. Thomas ◽  
Anna Dmoszynska ◽  
Agnieszka Wierzbowska ◽  
Grzegorz Mazur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of decitabine with treatment choice (TC) in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and poor- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics. Patients and Methods Patients (N = 485) age ≥ 65 years were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive decitabine 20 mg/m2 per day as a 1-hour intravenous infusion for five consecutive days every 4 weeks or TC (supportive care or cytarabine 20 mg/m2 per day as a subcutaneous injection for 10 consecutive days every 4 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival (OS); the secondary end point was the complete remission (CR) rate plus the CR rate without platelet recovery (CRp). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results The primary analysis with 396 deaths (81.6%) showed a nonsignificant increase in median OS with decitabine (7.7 months; 95% CI, 6.2 to 9.2) versus TC (5.0 months; 95% CI, 4.3 to 6.3; P = .108; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.04). An unplanned analysis with 446 deaths (92%) indicated the same median OS (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.99; nominal P = .037). The CR rate plus CRp was 17.8% with decitabine versus 7.8% with TC (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.8; P = .001). AEs were similar for decitabine and cytarabine, although patients received a median of four cycles of decitabine versus two cycles of TC. The most common drug-related AEs with decitabine were thrombocytopenia (27%) and neutropenia (24%). Conclusion In older patients with AML, decitabine improved response rates compared with standard therapies without major differences in safety. An unplanned survival analysis showed a benefit for decitabine, which was not observed at the time of the primary analysis.

Attempts to improve treatment outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older patients: the results of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial

Blood ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 1302-1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony H. Goldstone ◽  
Alan K. Burnett ◽  
Keith Wheatley ◽  
Alastair G. Smith ◽  
R. Michael Hutchinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Acute Myeloid

In an attempt to improve induction chemotherapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML),1314 patients were randomized to 1 of 3 induction treatments for 2 courses of DAT (daunorubicin, cytarabine, and thioguanine) 3 + 10, ADE (daunorubicin, cytarabine, and etoposide) 10 + 3 + 5, or MAC (mitoxantrone-cytarabine). The remission rate in the DAT arm was significantly better than ADE (62% vs 50%; P = .002) or MAC (62% vs 55%;P = .04). This benefit was seen in patients younger and older than 70 years. There were no differences between the induction schedules with respect to overall survival at 5 years (12% vs 8% vs 10%). A total of 226 patients were randomized to receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or placebo as supportive care from day 8 after the end of treatment course 1. The remission rate or survival were not improved by G-CSF, although the median number of days to recover neutrophils to 1.0 × 109/L was reduced by 5 days. Patients who entered remission (n = 371) were randomized to stop after a third course (DAT 2 + 7) or after 6 courses, ie, a subsequent COAP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, cytarabine, and prednisolone), DAT 2 + 5, and COAP. The relapse risk (81% vs 73%), disease-free survival (16% vs 23%), and overall survival at 5 years (23% vs 22%) did not differ between the 3-course or 6-course arms. In addition to a treatment duration randomization, 362 patients were randomized to receive 12-month maintenance treatment with low-dose interferon, but no benefit was seen with respect to relapse risk, disease-free survival, or overall survival.

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Does Not Predict Overall Survival in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3689-3689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen K. Ritchie ◽  
Danielle C. Marshall ◽  
Molly D. Greenberg ◽  
Tania J. Curcio ◽  
Ashley E. Giambrone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Wbc Count ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background Age and cytogenetics are the strongest predictors of overall survival (OS) in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but practitioners recognize that outcomes are also affected by medical comorbidities, physical function and a variety of psychosocial factors. Recent data suggest that geriatric assessment, including measures of physical, cognitive and psychological function, may be predictive of OS and helpful for risk stratification in AML (Klepin 2013). We evaluated the ability of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to predict overall survival in newly diagnosed older patients with AML. Patients and Methods All newly diagnosed AML patients age ≥60 years treated at Weill Cornell Medical Center and The New York Presbyterian Hospital completed a CGA including the OARS Physical Health Section, Mental Health Inventory (MHI-17), MOS Social Activity Survey, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) subscale of the MOS Physical Health, OARS Instrumental ADL subscale, Timed Up & Go, Blessed-Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). Laboratory data, medications, transfusions and days of hospitalization were also collected. Comorbidities were assessed using the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI). OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to compare survival profiles. The independent effects of the CGA and clinical risk factor variables on OS were estimated using hazard ratios in an adjusted Cox regression model. Results In total, 126 patients were evaluated (median age 74, range 60-90). Fifty-one percent of patients had a HCT-CI score >1, with the most common comorbidities being a history of cancer (28.57%), cardiac disease (20.6%), and psychiatric disturbances (17.5%). Half of the patients had prior hematologic disorders and 29% had poor-risk cytogenetics. Most patients (84.9%) received decitabine-based induction strategies; 44 of these patients (34.9%) subsequently received intensive salvage regimens (median age 69). The other 19 patients (15.1%) were treated with standard induction chemotherapy, and 29 patients (21%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (median age 68). One hundred twenty-three patients (96.6%) completed the CGA with a mean time to completion of 26 minutes (± 8.9 minutes). Thirty-five percent of patients did not complete the entire assessment and only 61.1% completed the follow up CGA. Median OS was 11.1 months (range 0.36-52.64), with 1-year survival of 47.6%, complete remission (CR) rate of 39.8%, and 30-day mortality of 2.4%. In univariate analysis, age (P=0.0289), physician-assigned KPS (P=0.0031), sex (P=0.0074), ELN cytogenetic risk (P=0.0194), creatinine (P=0.027), albumin (P=0.0052), white blood cell (WBC) count (P=0.0135), LDH (P=0.0004), and treatment response (P=0.0001) were significant clinical predictors of OS. Significant CGA variables included Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration score (P=0.0035), Bend-Kneel-Stoop (P=0.0239), “someone to prepare your meals” (P=0.0253) and self-reporting of heart disease (P<0.001). In a multivariate analysis controlling for age and cytogenetic risk, physician-assigned KPS (HR, 1.804; 95% CI 1.175 to 2.768), self-reported cardiac history (HR, 2.290; 95% CI 1.383 to 3.794), and WBC count <11.2/ul (HR, 2.360; 95% CI 1.415 to 3.936) were the only independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Conclusion In this study, age and cytogenetics remain the strongest predictors of OS in older patients with AML. While completion of the CGA was feasible, only performance status (KPS) was predictive of OS. Many measures previously reported as significant predictors of outcome, including impaired physical function (Klepin 2013), medication intake (Hurria 2011), pain (Sherman 2013), and HCT-CI score (Sorror 2005, 2009) were not predictive in our study population. The role of the CGA as a predictor of OS in AML requires further evaluation. The utility of the CGA in predicting functional performance and/or quality of life for older AML patients throughout treatment should also be investigated. Disclosures Ritchie: Celgene, Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Feldman:Ariad: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Daunorubicin and Cytarabine Liposome in Newly Diagnosed Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or AML With Myelodysplasia-Related Changes

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 792-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miryoung Kim ◽  
Sherry Williams
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome in older adults with newly diagnosed therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC). Data Source: A literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE (January 2017 to January 2018) was performed using the terms CPX-351, Vyxeos, daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome, and acute myeloid leukemia. Study Selection/Data Extraction: Phase I, II, and III clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome were reviewed with a specific focus on its use in older patients with newly diagnosed AML. All peer-reviewed articles with clinically relevant information were evaluated for inclusion. Data Synthesis: The phase II trial demonstrated that daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome improved response rates (RR), but there was no difference in event-free survival and overall survival in the overall patient population. However, clinical benefit was most pronounced in secondary AML with an increased RR and survival. The phase III trial illustrated that daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome improved survival and RR with tolerable toxicity compared with standard 7 plus 3 (daunorubicin and cytarabine) in patients 60 to 75 years of age with t-AML or AML-MRC. More patients proceeded to a stem cell transplant, and 30-day and 60-day mortality was lower with daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome. Grade 3 to 5 toxicities were similar between the 2 groups, except daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome had prolonged cytopenia and a higher risk of hemorrhage. Conclusions: Daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome improves RR and survival, with tolerable toxicity in older patients with t-AML or AML-MRC.

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Idarubicin and High-Dose Daunorubicin in Induction Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (24) ◽  
pp. 2754-2763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Je-Hwan Lee ◽  
Hawk Kim ◽  
Young-Don Joo ◽  
Won-Sik Lee ◽  
Sung Hwa Bae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose We compared two induction regimens, idarubicin (12 mg/m2/d for 3 days) versus high-dose daunorubicin (90 mg/m2/d for 3 days), in young adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods A total of 299 patients (149 randomly assigned to cytarabine plus idarubicin [AI] and 150 assigned to cytarabine plus high-dose daunorubicin [AD]) were analyzed. All patients received cytarabine (200 mg/m2/d for 7 days). Results Complete remission (CR) was induced in 232 patients (77.6%), with no difference in CR rates between the AI and AD arms (80.5% v 74.7%, respectively; P = .224). At a median follow-up time of 34.9 months, survival and relapse rates did not differ between the AI and AD arms (4-year overall survival, 51.1% v 54.7%, respectively; P = .756; cumulative incidence of relapse, 35.2% v 25.1%, respectively; P = .194; event-free survival, 45.5% v 50.8%, respectively; P = .772). Toxicity profiles were also similar in the two arms. Interestingly, overall and event-free survival times of patients with FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutation were significantly different (AI v AD: median overall survival, 15.5 months v not reached, respectively; P = .030; event-free survival, 11.9 months v not reached, respectively; P = .028). Conclusion This phase III trial comparing idarubicin with high-dose daunorubicin did not find significant differences in CR rates, relapse, and survival. Significant interaction between the treatment arm and the FLT3-ITD mutation was found, and high-dose daunorubicin was more effective than idarubicin in patients with FLT3-ITD mutation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document