Timed sequential therapy with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone as an effective and safe induction regimen for acute myeloid leukemia.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7055-7055
Author(s):  
Melissa L. Larson ◽  
Sakina Burhani ◽  
Kirstin Gallas ◽  
Deborah Ann Katz ◽  
Maura Hoyt ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3594-3594
Author(s):  
Pamela S. Becker ◽  
Bruno C. Medeiros ◽  
Anthony Selwyn Stein ◽  
Frederick R. Appelbaum ◽  
Bart L Scott ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3594 Background: Several regimens composed of clofarabine and cytarabine have exhibited efficacy for both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Faderl et al Blood 2005, 2006, 2008). Clofarabine's ability to increase araCTP formation and inhibit ribonucleotide reductase confer potent anti-leukemic effect. We previously reported the results of an induction regimen consisting of G-CSF priming, clofarabine, and high dose cytarabine for relapsed/refractory AML (GCLAC) (Becker et al Br J Haematol 2011), which resulted in a complete remission (CR) rate of 46% overall, and a CR rate of 50% in patients with poor risk cytogenetics. Furthermore, we demonstrated that GCLAC is superior to fludarabine/cytarabine combinations in the relapsed/refractory setting (retrospective comparison; Becker et al Haematologica Epub ahead of print, 2012). Because of its activity as a salvage regimen, we examined the response rate and toxicity of GCLAC in the upfront setting. Methods: A multicenter clinical trial (NCT01101880) of G-CSF priming, clofarabine, and high dose cytarabine enrolled newly diagnosed patients < 65 years old with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or advanced myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) from September 2010 through May 2012. The GCLAC regimen consists of G-CSF 5 mcg/kg/day by subcutaneous injection beginning the day prior to chemotherapy until neutrophil recovery, clofarabine 30 mg/m2/day × 5, and cytarabine 2 gm/m2/day × 5. A second induction with the same regimen was permissible if marrow blasts over 5% persisted on day 21 or thereafter. Consolidation courses were administered for up to 3 cycles, with clofarabine 25 mg/m2/day days 1–4, cytarabine 2 gm/m2/day days 1–4, and G-CSF days 0–4. Results: Fifty patients with non-APL AML, RAEB2, or myelofibrosis with >10% blasts were treated. The median age was 53, range 22–64. Twenty-one of the patients (42%) had antecedent hematologic disorders or proliferative/dysplastic disorders with ≥10% blasts or secondary leukemia. Twelve patients (24%) had unfavorable, 32 patients (64%) intermediate, and 4 (8%) favorable cytogenetics. Overall, 37 patients (74%) achieved complete remission (CR; 95% CI 62–86%), 40 (80%) CR + CRp (CR with incomplete platelet recovery). Of these remissions, 5CRs and 1 CRp had been attained after a second induction course in 11 patients. Thirty-four patients received one, 20 two, and 11 three cycles of consolidation treatment. The CR rate was 83% for patients without antecedent hematological disorder (AHD), and 57% for those with AHD. The CR rate was 100% for patients with favorable risk, 84% for those with intermediate risk, and 46% for those with unfavorable risk cytogenetics. The median time to neutrophil recovery (>500/μl) was 19 days (13–35 range) and to platelet recovery >100,000/μl 24 days (16–63 range) after induction. The most significant grade 4 toxicity occurring in 3 patients, was a constellation of pulmonary infiltrates, hypoxia, and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage that responded to steroids, and was rarely seen when patients were premedicated with steroids. Out of the 125 cycles of chemotherapy administered, the most frequent grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were pulmonary (11), bacteremia (22), and transaminase elevation (10). There were 11 grade 4 AEs including pulmonary (5), hyperglycemia (2), transaminase elevation (1), acute cholecystits (1), and septic shock (2). The 30 day mortality was 0%. Conclusion: GCLAC is a well tolerated induction regimen and a comparison with 7+3 is in progress, using data from Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC). Disclosures: Becker: Sanofi: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Clofarabine is indicated for the treatment of pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.


2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 445-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah M. Larson ◽  
Nicholas P. Campbell ◽  
Dezheng Huo ◽  
Andrew Artz ◽  
Yanming Zhang ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 1924-1930 ◽  
Author(s):  
PA Cassileth ◽  
E Lynch ◽  
JD Hines ◽  
MM Oken ◽  
JJ Mazza ◽  
...  

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a randomized trial in patients less than or equal to 65 years old (median, 44 years) to determine whether increasing the intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) would improve the outcome. After uniform induction therapy, patients in complete remission (CR) who were less than 41 years old and who had a histocompatible sibling underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) (54 patients). The remainder of patients in CR were randomized to receive either 2 years of continuous outpatient maintenance therapy with cytarabine and 6- thioguanine (83 patients) or a single course of inpatient consolidation therapy consisting of 6 days of high-dose cytarabine plus 3 days of amsacrine (87 patients). The median duration of follow-up is now 4 years, and patients are included in the analyses of outcome regardless of whether they relapsed before starting the intended treatment. Four- year event-free survival (EFS) was 27% +/- 10% for consolidation therapy versus 16% +/- 8% for maintenance therapy (P = .068) and 28% +/- 11% versus 15% +/- 9% (P = .047) in patients less than 60 years old. The outcome for patients receiving alloBMT was compared with the subset of patients less than 41 years old who received consolidation therapy (N = 29) or maintenance therapy (N = 21). Four-year EFS was 42% +/- 13% for alloBMT, 30% +/- 17% for consolidation therapy, and 14% +/- 15% for maintenance therapy. AlloBMT had a significantly better EFS (P = .013) than maintenance therapy, but was not different from consolidation therapy. In patients less than 41 years old, 4-year survival after alloBMT (42% +/- 14%) did not differ from consolidation therapy (43% +/- 18%), but both were significantly better than maintenance therapy (19% +/- 17%), P = .047 and .043, respectively. The mortality rate for maintenance therapy was 0%, consolidation therapy, 21%; and alloBMT, 36%. Consolidation therapy caused an especially high mortality rate in the patients greater than or equal to 60 years old (8 of 14 or 57%). The toxicity of combined high-dose cytarabine and amsacrine is unacceptable, especially in older patients, and alternative approaches to consolidation therapy such as high-dose cytarabine alone need to be tested. In AML, a single course of consolidation therapy or alloBMT after initial CR produces better results than lengthy maintenance therapy. Although EFS and survival of alloBMT and consolidation therapy do not differ significantly, a larger number of patients need to be studied before concluding that they are equivalent.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110465
Author(s):  
Wenhui Li ◽  
Katherine Richter ◽  
Jamie Lee ◽  
Kevin McCarthy ◽  
Timothy Kubal

Introduction The standard of care consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia is high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine, which are traditionally given inpatient. At Moffitt Cancer Center, we have moved the administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine to the outpatient setting through the inpatient/outpatient program. To facilitate outpatient administration, high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine are given in a shorter interval of every 10 h instead of 12 h. The safety of a shorter duration interval of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is unknown. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of administering high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy in the inpatient/outpatient setting. Methods This is a retrospective chart review to analyze acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with inpatient/outpatient high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy at Moffitt Cancer Center from January 1, 2015, through November 1, 2018. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of hospitalization during the inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine. Results Two hundred fifty-three of 255 cycles of high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine were delivered outpatient over the reviewed time period to 118 patients. No patients receiving outpatient high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation required hospitalization during chemotherapy. Our incidence of hospitalization (24%) after chemotherapy is consistent with the reported literature. Through the inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine, 1265 inpatient days were saved with an approximate revenue of $3,135,176 generated in our study period. Conclusion Inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is both safe and feasible. Moving high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine administration to the outpatient setting resulted in significant additional revenue vs. inpatient administration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document