scholarly journals The prognostic impact of K-RAS mutations in adult acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with high-dose cytarabine

2011 ◽  
pp. 115 ◽  
Author(s):  
elhefni
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Ras Mutations ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid

scholarly journals Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and RAS Mutations Benefit Most From Postremission High-Dose Cytarabine: A Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (28) ◽  
pp. 4603-4609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Neubauer ◽  
Kati Maharry ◽  
Krzysztof Mrózek ◽  
Christian Thiede ◽  
Guido Marcucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Relapse Risk ◽  
Ras Mutations ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Leukemia Group ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose RAS mutations occur in 12% to 27% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and enhance sensitivity to cytarabine in vitro. We examined whether RAS mutations impact response to cytarabine in vivo. Patients and Methods One hundred eighty-five patients with AML achieving complete remission on Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 8525 and randomly assigned to one of three doses of cytarabine postremission were screened for RAS mutations. We assessed the impact of cytarabine dose on cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) of patients with (mutRAS) and without (wild-type; wtRAS) RAS mutations. Results Thirty-four patients (18%) had RAS mutations. With 12.9 years median follow-up, the 10-year CIR was similar for mutRAS and wtRAS patients (65% v 73%; P = .31). However, mutRAS patients receiving high-dose cytarabine consolidation (HDAC; 3 g/m2 every 12 hours on days 1, 3, and 5 or 400 mg/m2/d × 5 days) had the lowest 10-year CIR, 45%, compared with 68% for wtRAS patients receiving HDAC and 80% and 100%, respectively, for wtRAS and mutRAS patients receiving low-dose cytarabine (LDAC; 100 mg/m2/d × 5 days; overall comparison, P < .001). Multivariable analysis revealed an interaction of cytarabine dose and RAS status (P = .06). After adjusting for this interaction and cytogenetics (core binding factor [CBF] AML v non-CBF AML), wtRAS patients receiving HDAC had lower relapse risk than wtRAS patients receiving LDAC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67; P = .04); however, mutRAS patients receiving HDAC had greater reduction in relapse risk (HR = 0.28; P = .002) compared with mutRAS patients treated with LDAC. Conclusion AML patients carrying mutRAS benefit from higher cytarabine doses more than wtRAS patients. This seems to be the first example of an activating oncogene mutation favorably modifying response to higher drug doses in AML.

Oncogenic RAS Enables DNA Damage- and p53-Dependent Differentiation of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells in Response to Chemotherapy.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 5040-5040
Author(s):  
Mona Meyer ◽  
Daniela Rübsamen ◽  
Robert K. Slany ◽  
Thomas Illmer ◽  
Kathleen Stabla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Myeloid Differentiation ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Ras Mutations ◽  
Oncogenic Ras ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 5040 Introduction Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clonal disease originating from myeloid progenitor cells with a heterogeneous genetic background. High-dose cytarabine is used as the standard consolidation chemotherapy. Oncogenic RAS mutations are frequently observed in AML, and patients with RAS mutations benefit most from high-dose cytarabine as postremission therapy (Neubauer et al., J Clin Oncol 2008). The molecular reason for this phenomenon is not well understood. Methods We used bone marrow cells expressing a conditional MLL-ENL-ER oncogene to investigate the interaction of oncogenic RAS and chemotherapeutic agents. In addition, we used primary human inversion 16 positive AML samples with or without oncogenic RAS mutations to corroborate our findings. Results There was no difference in cell cycle kinetics, apoptosis or cellular senescence in MLL-ENL cell expressing control vector vs. MLL-ENL cells expressing oncogenic RAS in response to cytarabine treatment. However, we observed an increased activation of DNA damage checkpoints in MLL-ENL-cells expressing oncogenic RAS after incubation with chemotherapeutic agents. This resulted in an Atm/r as well as p53-dependent genetic program causing dramatically reduction of clonogenicity in MLL-ENL cells expressing oncogenic RAS due to induction of myeloid differentiation. Co-expression of dominant – negative p53 completely abolished this differentiation resulting in the rescue of the clonogic potential. Activation of p53 as a result of inhibition of Mdm2-mediated degradation of p53 further enhances this myeloid differentiation. Of note, in primary AML cases, oncogenic RAS also was associated with a more differentiated phenotype. Conclusions The data can explain the beneficial effects observed in AML patients with oncogenic RAS mutations treated with high dosages of cytarabine and suggest that induction of p53-dependent differentiation, e.g. by interfering with Mdm2-mediated degradation, may be a rational approach to increase cure rate in response to chemotherapy since stronger acitvation of p53 by oncogenic RAS and chemotherapeutic agents cause the differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells to more differentiated progenitors. The data also support the notion that the therapeutic success of cytotoxic drugs may depend on their ability to promote the differentiation of tumor-initiating cells. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Phase I/II trial of cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, mitoxantrone, and G-CSF with dose-escalated mitoxantrone for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia and other high-grade myeloid neoplasms

Haematologica ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. e143-e146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna B. Halpern ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Emily M. Huebner ◽  
Bart L. Scott ◽  
Paul C. Hendrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Myeloid Neoplasms ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Acute Myeloid

scholarly journals Varying intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 1924-1930 ◽  
Author(s):  
PA Cassileth ◽  
E Lynch ◽  
JD Hines ◽  
MM Oken ◽  
JJ Mazza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Allogeneic Bone ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Postremission Therapy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a randomized trial in patients less than or equal to 65 years old (median, 44 years) to determine whether increasing the intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) would improve the outcome. After uniform induction therapy, patients in complete remission (CR) who were less than 41 years old and who had a histocompatible sibling underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) (54 patients). The remainder of patients in CR were randomized to receive either 2 years of continuous outpatient maintenance therapy with cytarabine and 6- thioguanine (83 patients) or a single course of inpatient consolidation therapy consisting of 6 days of high-dose cytarabine plus 3 days of amsacrine (87 patients). The median duration of follow-up is now 4 years, and patients are included in the analyses of outcome regardless of whether they relapsed before starting the intended treatment. Four- year event-free survival (EFS) was 27% +/- 10% for consolidation therapy versus 16% +/- 8% for maintenance therapy (P = .068) and 28% +/- 11% versus 15% +/- 9% (P = .047) in patients less than 60 years old. The outcome for patients receiving alloBMT was compared with the subset of patients less than 41 years old who received consolidation therapy (N = 29) or maintenance therapy (N = 21). Four-year EFS was 42% +/- 13% for alloBMT, 30% +/- 17% for consolidation therapy, and 14% +/- 15% for maintenance therapy. AlloBMT had a significantly better EFS (P = .013) than maintenance therapy, but was not different from consolidation therapy. In patients less than 41 years old, 4-year survival after alloBMT (42% +/- 14%) did not differ from consolidation therapy (43% +/- 18%), but both were significantly better than maintenance therapy (19% +/- 17%), P = .047 and .043, respectively. The mortality rate for maintenance therapy was 0%, consolidation therapy, 21%; and alloBMT, 36%. Consolidation therapy caused an especially high mortality rate in the patients greater than or equal to 60 years old (8 of 14 or 57%). The toxicity of combined high-dose cytarabine and amsacrine is unacceptable, especially in older patients, and alternative approaches to consolidation therapy such as high-dose cytarabine alone need to be tested. In AML, a single course of consolidation therapy or alloBMT after initial CR produces better results than lengthy maintenance therapy. Although EFS and survival of alloBMT and consolidation therapy do not differ significantly, a larger number of patients need to be studied before concluding that they are equivalent.

Safety and feasibility of outpatient high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine for consolidation therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110465
Author(s):  
Wenhui Li ◽  
Katherine Richter ◽  
Jamie Lee ◽  
Kevin McCarthy ◽  
Timothy Kubal
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Incidence Of Hospitalization ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Intermediate Dose

Introduction The standard of care consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia is high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine, which are traditionally given inpatient. At Moffitt Cancer Center, we have moved the administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine to the outpatient setting through the inpatient/outpatient program. To facilitate outpatient administration, high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine are given in a shorter interval of every 10 h instead of 12 h. The safety of a shorter duration interval of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is unknown. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of administering high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy in the inpatient/outpatient setting. Methods This is a retrospective chart review to analyze acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with inpatient/outpatient high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy at Moffitt Cancer Center from January 1, 2015, through November 1, 2018. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of hospitalization during the inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine. Results Two hundred fifty-three of 255 cycles of high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine were delivered outpatient over the reviewed time period to 118 patients. No patients receiving outpatient high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation required hospitalization during chemotherapy. Our incidence of hospitalization (24%) after chemotherapy is consistent with the reported literature. Through the inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine, 1265 inpatient days were saved with an approximate revenue of $3,135,176 generated in our study period. Conclusion Inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is both safe and feasible. Moving high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine administration to the outpatient setting resulted in significant additional revenue vs. inpatient administration.

scholarly journals A randomized study of high-dose cytarabine in induction in acute myeloid leukemia [see comments]

Blood ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 1710-1717 ◽  
Author(s):  
JF Bishop ◽  
JP Matthews ◽  
GA Young ◽  
J Szer ◽  
A Gillett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Dose Effect ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Remission Duration ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract High-dose cytarabine (ara-c) may overcome cytarabine resistance in leukemic blasts. It has been used as a successful salvage and in postremission therapy but not as initial induction treatment. Patients aged 15 to 60 years, presenting with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were randomized to receive either high-dose cytarabine, 3 g/m2 12 hourly on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 for 8 doses, daunorubicin 50 mg/m2 days 1 to 3, etoposide 75 mg/m2 days 1 to 7, (HIDAC-3–7) or standard dose cytarabine 100 mg/m2 continuous intravenous infusion for 7 days with daunorubicin and etoposide at the same dose and schedule as above (7–3–7). Patients could receive a second or third induction course if complete remission (CR) was not achieved. All patients received the same postinduction consolidation therapy (5–2–5) for 2 courses. Eligible patients had no prior chemotherapy or myelodysplastic disease. Patients have been followed for a median of 4.5 years. Of 301 patients treated, complete response (CR) was achieved in 71% with HIDAC- 3–7 and 74% with 7–3–7. For patients in CR, the estimated median remission duration was 45 months with HIDAC-3–7 and 12 months with 7–3– 7 (P = .0005 univariate analysis, P = .0004 multivariate analysis). The estimated percentage of patients relapse free 5 years after achieving a CR was 49% on HIDAC-3–7 and 24% on 7–3–7. Patients in CR tended to survive longer with HIDAC-3–7 but there were no overall survival differences between the two arms. HIDAC-3–7 was associated with significantly more toxicity in induction with more leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and vomiting and eye toxicity (all P < .001) but a similar incidence of severe central nervous system and cerebellar toxicity compared to 7–3–7. The consolidation treatment was the same in both arms but caused significantly more leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in patients previously treated with HIDAC-3–7 induction (P < .0001). We conclude that a dose-effect exists for cytarabine in AML and that HIDAC- 3–7 prolongs remission duration and disease-free survival and is tolerable when used as initial induction therapy in patients with de novo AML.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document