Trend of second primary malignancy in Hodgkin lymphoma.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18713-e18713
Author(s):  
Mahesh Nepal ◽  
Ranju Kunwor ◽  
Dominic Ho ◽  
Krishna Bilas Ghimire
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erdem R ◽  
◽  
Aykas F ◽  
Gocer M ◽  
Ozen IN ◽  
...  

Hodgkin lymphoma is an uncommon neoplasm that characterized young age of onset, Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells derived from B-lymphocytes and a high cure rate, even when the patient presents with advanced metastatic spread. Lung cancer is the most common cancer worldwide and is still responsible for the most cancer deaths. We present an extremely rare case of coexisting Hodgkin lymphoma and lung cancer in a 67-year-old male patient. He initially presented with chest pain. Pet/ct revealed mass in the right lung and lymph nodes in the neck. Biopsy from the premaxillary lymph node was compatible with classical Hodgkin lymphoma. In terms of second primary malignancy, a biopsy was also performed from the mass in the right lung. Pathology showed a pulmonary adenocarcinoma and a right upper lobectomy was then performed. This patient was treated with gemcitabine plus docetaxel for lung cancer. At the end of treatment pet/ct was complete response including lymph nodes in the neck. Therefore, we did not give any treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma. The patient is still being followed up in remission.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 15-17
Author(s):  
Renata Abrahao ◽  
Ann M Brunson ◽  
Justine M. Kahn ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
Aaron S Rosenberg ◽  
...  

Introduction Second primary malignancy (SPM) is one of the most devastating late complications following Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treatment. Historically, the most common SPMs in patients treated for HL are solid tumors, which are largely related to radiation exposure during initial therapy. For the last three decades, efforts to address the risk of SPM after HL therapy have focused on reducing exposure to radiation, as well as refining the approach for patients where radiation is indicated. To date, few population-based studies in the United States have quantified the burden of SPMs and evaluated the potential effect of changes in therapeutic management over time. Additionally, to our knowledge, no study has compared SPM risk between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and HIV-uninfected HL survivors. Methods We used data from the California Cancer Registry on 21,043 patients diagnosed with primary HL between 1988 and 2015 with follow-up through 2017. We calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and absolute excess risks (AERs) to compare SPM incidence in our HL cohort with the expected number of first primary cancer incidence in the general California population, based on patient's age at diagnosis (5-year categories), sex, calendar year (3-year intervals), cancer site, and race/ethnicity. SIRs are presented by HIV status, SPM latency, treatment era, and cancer type. P-values for trends were used to examine whether SPM risk changed over time. Findings Among 20,303 HIV-uninfected patients (median follow-up of 14.1 years), overall SPM risk was increased 1.95-fold compared with the general population (SIR=1.95, 95% CI 1.86-2.04). In 740 HIV-infected patients (median follow-up of 11.7 years), overall risk was increased 2.68-fold compared with the general population (SIR=2.68, 95% CI 2.0-3.40), translating to an 37% higher incidence of SPM in HIV-infected vs. HIV-uninfected patients. The AER (per 10,000 person-years) of SPM was 43.1 in HIV-uninfected and 76.5 in HIV-infected patients, resulting in a 33.4 excess SPM per 10,000 person-years in HL survivors with HIV. Malignancies that contributed the most to overall AER were non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), female breast and lung cancers in HIV-uninfected patients; and Kaposi sarcoma, NHL, anorectal and head & neck (HNC) cancers in HIV-infected patients. Notably, among HIV-uninfected patients, the highest overall risk of SPM occurred ≥20 years after diagnosis (SIR= 2.27, 95% CI 1.99-2.58) (Figure). In contrast, the highest overall risk in HIV-infected patients was observed <2 years after diagnosis (SIR=4.42, 95% CI 2.53-7.19). Radiation used decreased from 46.9% in 1988-1996 to 29.5% in 2007-2015. Among HIV-uninfected patients, there was a trend towards decreased risk over time of overall and selected solid SPMs (lung, female breast, and gastrointestinal cancers) (Table). In an analysis restricted to HIV-uninfected patients who received radiation irrespective of chemotherapy, findings also suggested a declined risk of overall and selected solid SPMs over time: any solid (SIR=2.15 in 1988-1996 and SIR=1.30 in 2007-2015, p<0.0001), lung (SIR=3.69 in 1988-1996 and SIR=1.81 in 2007-2015, p=0.0031), and female breast (SIR=2.95 in 1988-1996 and SIR=0.63 in 2007-2015, p<0.0001). Conclusion Compared with the general population, the risk of developing a SPM following HL treatment was significantly higher among both HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected patients, with the absolute excess risk greater for those with HIV infection. There were different temporal patterns and types of SPM between HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected patients. These findings prompt the question on whether earlier and/or more intensive cancer screening should be pursued for HIV-infected survivors. The trend towards decreased risk for selected solid SPMs among HIV-uninfected patients, especially lung and female breast cancers, suggest that strategies to reduce radiation in HL survivors may be working. Despite promising trends in this group, the observation that SPM risk was highest ≥20 years after initial therapy further highlights the need for long-term surveillance and survivorship care in this at-risk population. Disclosures Rosenberg: Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wun:Glycomimetics, Inc.: Consultancy.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Simeakis ◽  
Katerina Saltiki ◽  
Evangelia Zapanti ◽  
Evanthia Kassis ◽  
Maria Alevizaki

Head & Neck ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1042-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Lin ◽  
Snehal G. Patel ◽  
Pen Yuan Chu ◽  
Jeannette M. S. Matsuo ◽  
Bhuvanesh Singh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Hong ◽  
Rongrong Wei ◽  
Chuang Nie ◽  
Anastasiia Leonteva ◽  
Xu Han ◽  
...  

Aim: To assess and predict risk and prognosis of lung cancer (LC) patients with second primary malignancy (SPM). Methods: LC patients diagnosed from 1992 to 2016 were obtained through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated to evaluate SPM risk. Cox regression and competing risk models were applied to assess the factors associated with overall survival, SPM development and LC-specific survival. Nomograms were built to predict SPM probability and overall survival. Results & conclusion: LC patients remain at higher risk of SPM even though the incidence declines. Patients with SPM have a better prognosis than patients without SPM. The consistency indexes for nomograms of SPM probability and overall survival are 0.605 (95% CI: 0.598–0.611) and 0.644 (95% CI: 0.638–0.650), respectively.


Author(s):  
René-Olivier Casasnovas ◽  
Reda Bouabdallah ◽  
Pauline Brice ◽  
Julien Lazarovici ◽  
Hervé Ghesquieres ◽  
...  

PURPOSE The AHL2011 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01358747 ) demonstrated that a positron emission tomography (PET)-driven de-escalation strategy after two cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) provides similar progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and reduces early toxicity compared with a nonmonitored standard treatment. Here, we report, with a prolonged follow-up, the final study results. METHODS Patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (stage III, IV, or IIB with mediastinum/thorax ratio > 0.33 or extranodal involvement) age 16-60 years were prospectively randomly assigned between 6 × BEACOPP and a PET-driven arm after 2 × BEACOPP delivering 4 × ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) in PET2– and 4 × BEACOPP in PET2+ patients. PET performed after four cycles of chemotherapy had to be negative to complete the planned treatment. RESULTS In total, 823 patients were enrolled including 413 in the standard arm and 410 in the PET-driven arm. With a 67.2-month median follow-up, 5-year PFS (87.5% v 86.7%; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.57; P = .67) and OS (97.7% in both arms; HR = 1.012; 95% CI, 0.50 to 2.10; P = .53) were similar in both randomization arms. In the whole cohort, full interim PET assessment predicted patients' 5-year PFS (92.3% in PET2–/PET4–, 75.4% [HR = 3.26; 95% CI, 18.3 to 5.77] in PET2+/PET4– and 46.5% [HR = 12.4; 95% CI, 7.31 to 19.51] in PET4+ patients, respectively; P < .0001) independent of international prognosis score. Five-year OS was also affected by interim PET results, and PET2+/PET4– patients (93.5%; HR = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.07 to 10.1; P = .036) and PET4+ patients (91.9%; HR = 3.756; 95% CI, 1.07 to 13.18; P = .038) had a significant lower OS than PET2–/PET4– patients (98.2%). Twenty-two patients (2.7%) developed a second primary malignancy, 13 (3.2%) and 9 (2.2%) in the standard and experimental arms, respectively. CONCLUSION The extended follow-up confirms the continued efficacy and favorable safety of AHL2011 PET-driven strategy, which is noninferior to standard six cycles of BEACOPP. PET4 provides additional prognostic information to PET2 and allows identifying patients with particularly poor prognosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document