Second Primary Malignancy Risk Among HIV-Uninfected and HIV-Infected Survivors of Hodgkin Lymphoma: A 30-Year Follow-up Population-Based Study

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 15-17
Author(s):  
Renata Abrahao ◽  
Ann M Brunson ◽  
Justine M. Kahn ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
Aaron S Rosenberg ◽  
...  

Introduction Second primary malignancy (SPM) is one of the most devastating late complications following Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treatment. Historically, the most common SPMs in patients treated for HL are solid tumors, which are largely related to radiation exposure during initial therapy. For the last three decades, efforts to address the risk of SPM after HL therapy have focused on reducing exposure to radiation, as well as refining the approach for patients where radiation is indicated. To date, few population-based studies in the United States have quantified the burden of SPMs and evaluated the potential effect of changes in therapeutic management over time. Additionally, to our knowledge, no study has compared SPM risk between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and HIV-uninfected HL survivors. Methods We used data from the California Cancer Registry on 21,043 patients diagnosed with primary HL between 1988 and 2015 with follow-up through 2017. We calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and absolute excess risks (AERs) to compare SPM incidence in our HL cohort with the expected number of first primary cancer incidence in the general California population, based on patient's age at diagnosis (5-year categories), sex, calendar year (3-year intervals), cancer site, and race/ethnicity. SIRs are presented by HIV status, SPM latency, treatment era, and cancer type. P-values for trends were used to examine whether SPM risk changed over time. Findings Among 20,303 HIV-uninfected patients (median follow-up of 14.1 years), overall SPM risk was increased 1.95-fold compared with the general population (SIR=1.95, 95% CI 1.86-2.04). In 740 HIV-infected patients (median follow-up of 11.7 years), overall risk was increased 2.68-fold compared with the general population (SIR=2.68, 95% CI 2.0-3.40), translating to an 37% higher incidence of SPM in HIV-infected vs. HIV-uninfected patients. The AER (per 10,000 person-years) of SPM was 43.1 in HIV-uninfected and 76.5 in HIV-infected patients, resulting in a 33.4 excess SPM per 10,000 person-years in HL survivors with HIV. Malignancies that contributed the most to overall AER were non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), female breast and lung cancers in HIV-uninfected patients; and Kaposi sarcoma, NHL, anorectal and head & neck (HNC) cancers in HIV-infected patients. Notably, among HIV-uninfected patients, the highest overall risk of SPM occurred ≥20 years after diagnosis (SIR= 2.27, 95% CI 1.99-2.58) (Figure). In contrast, the highest overall risk in HIV-infected patients was observed <2 years after diagnosis (SIR=4.42, 95% CI 2.53-7.19). Radiation used decreased from 46.9% in 1988-1996 to 29.5% in 2007-2015. Among HIV-uninfected patients, there was a trend towards decreased risk over time of overall and selected solid SPMs (lung, female breast, and gastrointestinal cancers) (Table). In an analysis restricted to HIV-uninfected patients who received radiation irrespective of chemotherapy, findings also suggested a declined risk of overall and selected solid SPMs over time: any solid (SIR=2.15 in 1988-1996 and SIR=1.30 in 2007-2015, p<0.0001), lung (SIR=3.69 in 1988-1996 and SIR=1.81 in 2007-2015, p=0.0031), and female breast (SIR=2.95 in 1988-1996 and SIR=0.63 in 2007-2015, p<0.0001). Conclusion Compared with the general population, the risk of developing a SPM following HL treatment was significantly higher among both HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected patients, with the absolute excess risk greater for those with HIV infection. There were different temporal patterns and types of SPM between HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected patients. These findings prompt the question on whether earlier and/or more intensive cancer screening should be pursued for HIV-infected survivors. The trend towards decreased risk for selected solid SPMs among HIV-uninfected patients, especially lung and female breast cancers, suggest that strategies to reduce radiation in HL survivors may be working. Despite promising trends in this group, the observation that SPM risk was highest ≥20 years after initial therapy further highlights the need for long-term surveillance and survivorship care in this at-risk population. Disclosures Rosenberg: Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wun:Glycomimetics, Inc.: Consultancy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenming Wang

AbstractWe identified patients diagnosed with malignant astrocytoma (MA) as the first of two or more primary malignancies between 1973 and 2015 from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Multiple primaries-standardized incidence ratio (MP-SIR) was calculated to quantitate the risk of second primary malignancy (SPM). We further identified the risk factors of developing SPM and factors affecting overall survival (OS) in MA patients with SPM. Our results revealed that overall risk of SPM among MA patients was significantly higher than that in general population (SIR: 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1–1.18, P<0.05). Specific sites where the risk of SPM increased included salivary gland, bone and joints, soft tissue including heart, brain, cranial nerves other nervous system, thyroid, acute non-lymphocytic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia. Overall risk of SPM in patients aged ≤29 and 30–59 years significantly increased (4.34- and 1.41-fold respectively). Whereas patients aged ≥60 years had a significantly decreased risk of SPM. Patients in the group of latency at 36–59, 60–119 and ≥120 months carried significantly increased overall risk of SPM. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, race, marital status, WHO grade, differentiated grade of cancer tissues, latency was independent predictor of OS in MA patients with SPM, which were all selected into the nomogram. The calibration curve for probability of survival showed good agreement between prediction by nomogram and actual observation. In conclusion, MA survivors should be advised of their increased risk for developing certain cancers in their lifetime. Our study had clinical implications for the surveillance of MA survivors at risk of developing SPM.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1830-1830
Author(s):  
Amir Bista ◽  
Dipesh Uprety ◽  
Yazhini Vallatharasu ◽  
Lubina Arjyal ◽  
Subash Ghimire ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare hematological disorder characterized by clonal proliferation and activation of abnormal mast cells. It can vary from an indolent form to an aggressive form including progression to leukemia. There is limited data on epidemiology, clinical characteristics and outcome of this disease in population based setting. Till date, a retrospective study by Lim, Ken-Hong, et.al which included 342 patients diagnosed with systemic mastocytosis in Mayo clinic, is the largest series of patient published so far. This study reports the clinical presentation and outcome of patients with SM but there are no population based study in United States so far. We therefore conducted this population based study to determine epidemiology, survival pattern and incidence of second primary malignancy among patients with SM. Methods: We used SEER 18 database (2000-2014) to select all adult patients with age 20 or above with SM. Patient population was divided into various cohorts based on age (20-59, 60-79 and 80+ years), sex, race (Caucasians, African American and Others), area of residence (rural, urban and metropolitan) and annual household income (<$25000, $25000-<$50000 and ≥$50000). Age adjusted incidence rate was calculated using 2000 US standard population using SEER stat rate session. 5-year relative survival (RS) rate was calculated using SEER stat and compared using Z test. Cox proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis of factors associated with relative survival using Cansurv software. MP-SIR session in SEER stat was used to calculate the risk of second primary malignancy. Result: The incidence was found to be 0.046 per 10000 among general population. Incidence was found to be higher among Caucasians compared to African American (0.056 vs. 0.018 per 100000). Median age at diagnosis was 55 years. Of the total 425 patients, majority were Caucasians (92.5%), age <60 years (59.3%) and from metropolitan area (84.7%) but there was equal distribution among male and females. 10 year overall survival was found to be 61.5±3.1% by KM curve. 5-year RS was found to be 74.0±2.7% for the whole population. Females had significantly better survival compared to males, 5-year RS of 84.7±3.1% vs. 62.3±4.3%, P <0.0001. Survival trended to be better for Caucasians compared to African American but didn't reach clinical significance, 74.6±2.8 vs. 50±14.8, p 0.08. Patients <60 years had significant better survival compared to 60 to 79 and 80+ years ( 5-year RS of 88.6±2.4 vs. 58.4±5.2 and 16.0±11.2 respectively with P <0.0001 for both comparison). In multivariate analysis, younger age group, female sex and Caucasian race were found to be independent predictor of better 5 year relative survival with P<0.0001 compared to their counterparts. Patients with systemic mastocytosis were found to have higher risk of developing both solid organ as well as hematological malignancy within 5 years of diagnosis (as shown in table 1). After that the risk decreased and was comparable to general population. Conclusion: Our study shows that systemic mastocytosis is rare disease in general population and survival is better among specific subgroup of patients including females, younger patient and Caucasians. As the majority deaths occurred in first 5 years after diagnosis and as incidence of second primary malignancy is higher in the first 5 years, we recommend close follow up for first five years after diagnosis. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Bergqvist ◽  
François Hemery ◽  
Arnaud Jannic ◽  
Salah Ferkal ◽  
Pierre Wolkenstein

AbstractNeurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is an inherited, autosomal-dominant, tumor predisposition syndrome with a birth incidence as high as 1:2000. A patient with NF1 is four to five times more likely to develop a malignancy as compared to the general population. The number of epidemiologic studies on lymphoproliferative malignancies in patients with NF1 is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence rate of lymphoproliferative malignancies (lymphoma and leukemia) in NF1 patients followed in our referral center for neurofibromatoses. We used the Informatics for Integrated Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) platform to extract information from the hospital’s electronic health records. We performed a keyword search on clinical notes generated between Jan/01/2014 and May/11/2020 for patients aged 18 years or older. A total of 1507 patients with confirmed NF1 patients aged 18 years and above were identified (mean age 39.2 years; 57% women). The total number of person-years in follow-up was 57,736 (men, 24,327 years; women, 33,409 years). Mean length of follow-up was 38.3 years (median, 36 years). A total of 13 patients had a medical history of either lymphoma or leukemia, yielding an overall incidence rate of 22.5 per 100,000 (0.000225, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.000223–0.000227). This incidence is similar to that of the general population in France (standardized incidence ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.60–1.79). Four patients had a medical history leukemia and 9 patients had a medical history of lymphoma of which 7 had non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 2 had Hodgkin lymphoma. Our results show that adults with NF1 do not have an increased tendency to develop lymphoproliferative malignancies, in contrast to the general increased risk of malignancy. While our results are consistent with the recent population-based study in Finland, they are in contrast with the larger population-based study in England whereby NF1 individuals were found to be 3 times more likely to develop both non-Hodgkin lymphoma and lymphocytic leukemia. Large-scale epidemiological studies based on nationwide data sets are thus needed to confirm our findings.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Hong ◽  
Rongrong Wei ◽  
Chuang Nie ◽  
Anastasiia Leonteva ◽  
Xu Han ◽  
...  

Aim: To assess and predict risk and prognosis of lung cancer (LC) patients with second primary malignancy (SPM). Methods: LC patients diagnosed from 1992 to 2016 were obtained through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated to evaluate SPM risk. Cox regression and competing risk models were applied to assess the factors associated with overall survival, SPM development and LC-specific survival. Nomograms were built to predict SPM probability and overall survival. Results & conclusion: LC patients remain at higher risk of SPM even though the incidence declines. Patients with SPM have a better prognosis than patients without SPM. The consistency indexes for nomograms of SPM probability and overall survival are 0.605 (95% CI: 0.598–0.611) and 0.644 (95% CI: 0.638–0.650), respectively.


Author(s):  
René-Olivier Casasnovas ◽  
Reda Bouabdallah ◽  
Pauline Brice ◽  
Julien Lazarovici ◽  
Hervé Ghesquieres ◽  
...  

PURPOSE The AHL2011 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01358747 ) demonstrated that a positron emission tomography (PET)-driven de-escalation strategy after two cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) provides similar progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and reduces early toxicity compared with a nonmonitored standard treatment. Here, we report, with a prolonged follow-up, the final study results. METHODS Patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (stage III, IV, or IIB with mediastinum/thorax ratio > 0.33 or extranodal involvement) age 16-60 years were prospectively randomly assigned between 6 × BEACOPP and a PET-driven arm after 2 × BEACOPP delivering 4 × ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) in PET2– and 4 × BEACOPP in PET2+ patients. PET performed after four cycles of chemotherapy had to be negative to complete the planned treatment. RESULTS In total, 823 patients were enrolled including 413 in the standard arm and 410 in the PET-driven arm. With a 67.2-month median follow-up, 5-year PFS (87.5% v 86.7%; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.57; P = .67) and OS (97.7% in both arms; HR = 1.012; 95% CI, 0.50 to 2.10; P = .53) were similar in both randomization arms. In the whole cohort, full interim PET assessment predicted patients' 5-year PFS (92.3% in PET2–/PET4–, 75.4% [HR = 3.26; 95% CI, 18.3 to 5.77] in PET2+/PET4– and 46.5% [HR = 12.4; 95% CI, 7.31 to 19.51] in PET4+ patients, respectively; P < .0001) independent of international prognosis score. Five-year OS was also affected by interim PET results, and PET2+/PET4– patients (93.5%; HR = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.07 to 10.1; P = .036) and PET4+ patients (91.9%; HR = 3.756; 95% CI, 1.07 to 13.18; P = .038) had a significant lower OS than PET2–/PET4– patients (98.2%). Twenty-two patients (2.7%) developed a second primary malignancy, 13 (3.2%) and 9 (2.2%) in the standard and experimental arms, respectively. CONCLUSION The extended follow-up confirms the continued efficacy and favorable safety of AHL2011 PET-driven strategy, which is noninferior to standard six cycles of BEACOPP. PET4 provides additional prognostic information to PET2 and allows identifying patients with particularly poor prognosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 3269-3277
Author(s):  
Lei Deng ◽  
Hrönn Harðardottír ◽  
Huan Song ◽  
Zhengrui Xiao ◽  
Changchuan Jiang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document