Microsatellite instability and adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 767-767
Author(s):  
Julie L. Koenig ◽  
Albert Y. Lin ◽  
Erqi L. Pollom ◽  
Daniel Tandel Chang

767 Background: Randomized control trials and population-based studies have not demonstrated a definitive benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancers. Tumor side and microsatellite instability (MSI) have been proposed as prognostic and predictive factors, but there is little consensus about their utility. Previous studies have been limited by the availability of MSI data. Because microsatellite stability (MSS) is associated with worse prognosis and higher risk of metastases, we hypothesized patients with MSS would have increased benefit from chemotherapy. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, we preformed a retrospective cohort study of patients with resected stage II colon cancer diagnosed 2006-2013. Patient and disease characteristics were compared with chi-square tests. Survival was evaluated with Cox proportional hazard models. Results: We identified 59,475 patients with stage II colon cancer. 11.4% of patients had known MSI status (n = 6,763) of which 88% had MSS (n = 5,953) and 12% had MSI (n = 810). Patients with MSS were more likely to receive chemotherapy (28.2% vs 19.9%, p < 0.001) and have left-sided tumors (38.8% vs 16.7%, p < 0.001). MSI (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.87; p = 0.003) and receipt of chemotherapy (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.42-0.69; p < 0.001) were associated with better survival after controlling for multiple characteristics including tumor side. Although left-sided tumors had better survival on univariate analysis (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.94; p < 0.001), side was not an independent predictor of survival after controlling for MSI and other characteristics (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.86-1.20; p = 0.860). Among patients with MSS, chemotherapy remained associated with improved survival (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.70; p < 0.001) and this benefit did not vary by tumor side (interaction p = 0.380). There was no interaction between MSI status and chemotherapy (p = 0.139), but we observed less of a survival benefit for chemotherapy in patients with MSI (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.38-1.75; p = 0.595). Conclusions: Our data suggest a benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer even after adjusting for MSI status. However, tumor side was not prognostic after controlling for MSI status.

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 573-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie L. Koenig ◽  
Diego A.S. Toesca ◽  
Jeremy P. Harris ◽  
Chiaojung Jillian Tsai ◽  
Sigurdis Haraldsdottir ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4052-4052
Author(s):  
W. Schippinger ◽  
H. Samonigg ◽  
R. Greil ◽  
J. Tschmelitsch ◽  
G. Steger ◽  
...  

4052 Background: Whereas several studies showed adjuvant chemotherapy to improve survival of patients with stage III colon cancer, survival benefit from adjuvant treatment in patients with stage II disease is a matter of controversy. Methods: Patients with curatively resected stage II colon cancer (T3–4, N0, M0) according to UICC were randomized to either adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU/LV (100 mg/m2 LV + 450 mg/m2 5-FU weekly, w 1–6, in 8 w cycles x 7) or surveillance only. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with 636 patients originally planned to demonstrate a difference in OS of 10% with 85% power and alfa =0.05 in a final analysis 7 years after study initiation. After accrual of 535 patients between 11/1993 and 6/2003, recruitment was stopped ahead of schedule for low accrual rates. Results: 505 patients were eligible and evaluable for analyses. After a median follow-up of 96 months, 56 (21.8%) patients have died in the 5-FU/LV arm and 58 (23.4%) in the surveillance arm. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between the two treatment arms (HR 1.137, 95% CI 0.787–1.641, p=0.4947, chi square), thus the primary endpoint of the study was not met. Disease relapse was documented in 35 (13.6%) patients of the chemotherapy arm and in 48 (19.4%) patients of the control arm. The relative risk for disease relapse was higher for patients in the surveillance arm compared to patients in the 5-FU/LV arm, however, this difference was statistically not significant (HR 1.506, 95% CI 0.974–2.328, p=0.0657, chi square). Subgroup analysis including in the chemotherapy arm only patients who received at least one cycle of 5-FU/LV (n=250), showed a statistically significantly lower risk for relapse in patients treated with 5- FU/LV (HR 1.559, 95% CI 1.001–2.429, p=0.0477, chi square). Conclusions: Results of this trial demonstrate a trend to a lower risk for relapse in patients treated with adjuvant 5-FU/LV for stage II colon cancer. However, adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly improve DFS and OS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 794-794
Author(s):  
Deepna Jaiswal ◽  
Suparna Mantha ◽  
Lucas Wong ◽  
Luis Seija ◽  
Yolanda Munoz

794 Background: Inflammation has a critical role in tumor genesis and progression of cancer. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an indication of balance between the immune systems pro and defense mechanism against cancer. Elevated NLR is of interest in many cancers, including colon cancer. Although surgery is the mainstay of treatment for early stage colon cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer has remained debatable. We proposed to study the impact of the NLR in patients with stage II colon cancer and to identify high risk patients who would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Three hundred and eighty patients diagnosed with Stage II colon cancer at our institution were included in this retrospective study. Kaplan-Meir curves and multivariate Cox-regression analyses were calculated for overall survival. Results: Univariate analysis showed NLR was not statistically significant as predictor of mortality (p-value=0.0857). However, after adjusting for recurrence, chemotherapy, age, white blood cell count, the NLR was predictive for survival, with a hazard ratio of 1.05 and 95% confidence interval of (1.006 - 1.1). Recurrence and age were also significant predictors of survival (p-values of <0.0001 for both), and HR of 3.1 (2.0 – 4.6) and 1.4 (1.2 – 1.5), respectively. Conclusions: The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio might be an independent prognostic marker for overall survival in stage II colon cancer patients. Given the retrospective nature of our study, further studies are indicated to confirm our findings.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15146-e15146
Author(s):  
Deepna Deepak Jaiswal ◽  
Suparna Mantha ◽  
Luis Seija ◽  
Yolanda Munoz ◽  
Lucas Wong

e15146 Background: Inflammation has a critical role in tumor genesis and progression of cancer. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an indication of balance between the immune systems pro and defense mechanism against cancer. Elevated NLR is of interest in many cancers, including colon cancer. Although surgery is the mainstay of treatment for early stage colon cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer has remained debatable. We proposed to study the impact of the NLR in patients with stage II colon cancer and to identify high risk patients who would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Three hundred and eighty patients diagnosed with Stage II colon cancer at our institution were included in this retrospective study. Kaplan-Meir curves and multivariate Cox-regression analyses were calculated for overall survival. Results: Univariate analysis showed NLR was not statistically significant as predictor of mortality (p-value = 0.0857). However, after adjusting for recurrence, chemotherapy, age, white blood cell count, the NLR was predictive for survival, with a hazard ratio of 1.05 and 95% confidence interval of (1.006 - 1.1). Recurrence and age were also significant predictors of survival (p-values of < 0.0001 for both), and HR of 3.1 (2.0 – 4.6) and 1.4 (1.2 – 1.5), respectively. Conclusions: The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio might be an independent prognostic marker for overall survival in stage II colon cancer patients. Given the retrospective nature of our study, further studies are indicated to confirm our findings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Alwers ◽  
Lina Jansen ◽  
Hendrik Bläker ◽  
Matthias Kloor ◽  
Katrin E. Tagscherer ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3560-3560
Author(s):  
J. E. Kim ◽  
H. J. Kim ◽  
Y. S. Hong ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
M. Ryu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Liu ◽  
Zezhi Shan ◽  
Dakui Luo ◽  
Sheng Zhang ◽  
Qingguo Li ◽  
...  

BackgroundBased on a prognostic scoring system (P score) proposed by us recently, this retrospective large population-based and propensity score-matched (PSM) study focused on predicting the survival benefit of adjuvant CT in stage II disease.MethodsPatients diagnosed with stage II colon cancer (N = 73397) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between January 1, 1988 and December 31, 2005 and divided into the CT and non-CT groups. PSM balanced the patient characteristics between the CT and non-CT groups.ResultsThe magnitude of CSS improvement among patients treated with adjuvant CT was significantly associated with the P score, score 8 [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.580, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.323–1.040, P = 0.067] was associated with a much higher increased CSS benefit among patients treated with adjuvant CT as compared to score 2* (*, including scores 0, 1, and 2; HR = 1.338, 95% CI = 1.089–1.644, P = 0.006).ConclusionsHigh P scores were demonstrated to be associated with superior survival benefit of adjuvant CT. Therapy decisions of adjuvant CT in stage II colon cancer could be tailored on the basis of tumor biology, patient characteristics and the P score.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document