scholarly journals Systematic Review of the Impact of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans on Health Outcomes and Health Care Delivery

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (20) ◽  
pp. 2088-2100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul B. Jacobsen ◽  
Antonio P. DeRosa ◽  
Tara O. Henderson ◽  
Deborah K. Mayer ◽  
Chaya S. Moskowitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Health Care Delivery ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Survivorship Care Plan ◽  
Satisfaction With Care ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Plans

Purpose Numerous organizations recommend that patients with cancer receive a survivorship care plan (SCP) comprising a treatment summary and follow-up care plans. Among current barriers to implementation are providers’ concerns about the strength of evidence that SCPs improve outcomes. This systematic review evaluates whether delivery of SCPs has a positive impact on health outcomes and health care delivery for cancer survivors. Methods Randomized and nonrandomized studies evaluating patient-reported outcomes, health care use, and disease outcomes after delivery of SCPs were identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Library. Data extracted by independent raters were summarized on the basis of qualitative synthesis. Results Eleven nonrandomized and 13 randomized studies met inclusion criteria. Variability was evident across studies in cancer types, SCP delivery timing and method, SCP recipients and content, SCP-related counseling, and outcomes assessed. Nonrandomized study findings yielded descriptive information on satisfaction with care and reactions to SCPs. Randomized study findings were generally negative for the most commonly assessed outcomes (ie, physical, functional, and psychological well-being); findings were positive in single studies for other outcomes, including amount of information received, satisfaction with care, and physician implementation of recommended care. Conclusion Existing research provides little evidence that SCPs improve health outcomes and health care delivery. Possible explanations include heterogeneity in study designs and the low likelihood that SCP delivery alone would influence distal outcomes. Findings are limited but more positive for proximal outcomes (eg, information received) and for care delivery, particularly when SCPs are accompanied by counseling to prepare survivors for future clinical encounters. Recommendations for future research include focusing to a greater extent on evaluating ways to ensure SCP recommendations are subsequently acted on as part of ongoing care.

Impact of cancer survivorship care plans (SCPs) on health outcomes and health care delivery: A systematic review.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul B. Jacobsen ◽  
Antonio P. Derosa ◽  
Tara O. Henderson ◽  
Deborah Mayer ◽  
Chaya S. Moskowitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Satisfaction With Care ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Randomized Studies ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

2 Background: In 2006, the Institute of Medicine recommended that patients at or near completion of active treatment be provided with a SCP (treatment summary, relevant health information, and follow-up care plan) to improve care delivery and outcomes in the post-treatment period. We systematically reviewed published research to determine if SCPs have a positive impact on health outcomes and healthcare delivery. Methods: Randomized and nonrandomized studies evaluating patient-reported outcomes, healthcare utilization, and disease outcomes after delivery of SCPs were identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library. Data were extracted by independent raters and summarized based on qualitative synthesis. Results: Eleven nonrandomized and 13 randomized studies met inclusion criteria. Variability was evident across studies in cancer diagnoses, timing of SCP delivery in relation to treatment completion, SCP delivery method and recipients, SCP content, SCP-related counseling, and outcomes assessed. Findings from nonrandomized studies yielded descriptive information only on outcomes such as satisfaction with care and reactions to SCPs. Among randomized studies, findings were near uniformly negative for the impact of SCPs on the most commonly assessed outcomes (physical, functional, and psychological well-being); findings were positive in single studies for other outcomes including amount of information received, satisfaction with care, and physician implementation of recommended survivorship care. Conclusions: Existing research provides minimal evidence that SCPs improve quality of life in cancer survivors. Possible explanations include heterogeneity in study designs and the low likelihood that SCP delivery alone would influence distal health outcomes. Findings are very limited but more positive for proximal outcomes (e.g., information received) and for care delivery, especially when SCPs are accompanied by counseling to prepare survivors for future clinical encounters. In light of current findings, future research should focus to a greater extent on evaluating ways to ensure SCP recommendations are subsequently implemented as part of ongoing care.

Challenges of Providing Health Care in Complex Emergencies: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Hesam Seyedin ◽  
Morteza Rostamian ◽  
Fahimeh Barghi Shirazi ◽  
Haleh Adibi Larijani
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Delivery ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Information Access ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Complex Emergencies

Abstract Providing health care in times of complex emergencies (CEs) is one of the most vital needs of people. CEs are situations in which a large part of the population is affected by social unrest, wars, and food shortages. This systematic review study was conducted to identify the challenges of health-care delivery in CEs. We searched terms related to health-care delivery and CEs in PubMed, Web of Sciences, Science Direct, and Google scholar databases, as well as Persian databases SID and Magiran. The searching keywords included: “Health Care, Complex Crises, War, Humanitarian, Refugees, Displaced Persons, Health Services, and Challenges.” Of 409 records, we selected 6 articles based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) checklist. Studies were analyzed through qualitative content analysis. The results show that CEs affect health-care delivery in 4 primary areas: the workforce, infrastructure, information access, and organization of health services. These areas can pose potential threats for health-care providers and planners at times of emergencies. Thus, they should be informed about these challenges to strengthen the health-care system.

scholarly journals Providing Care for Cancer Survivors in Integrated Health Care Delivery Systems: Practices, Challenges, and Research Opportunities

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 184-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Chubak ◽  
Leah Tuzzio ◽  
Clarissa Hsu ◽  
Catherine M. Alfano ◽  
Borsika A. Rabin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Health Care Delivery ◽  
Exploratory Study ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Delivery Systems ◽  
Integrated Health Care ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Integrated Health ◽  
Health Care Delivery Systems

Exploratory study suggests an awareness of cancer survivorship care in integrated health care delivery systems, although approaches to providing such care vary across systems.

The impact of an automatically generated survivorship care plan on patient reported outcomes (ROGY Care): Results of a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial among endometrial cancer patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16517-e16517
Author(s):  
Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse ◽  
Kim A.H. Nicolaije ◽  
Nicole P.M. Ezendam ◽  
M. Caroline Vos ◽  
Dorry Boll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Health Care Use ◽  
Survivorship Care Plan ◽  
Satisfaction With Care ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
The Impact

e16517 Background: More patient tailored information for cancer survivors is needed. Evidence on effects of implementing Survivorship Care Plans (SCPs), is limited. Aim of this pragmatic cluster randomized trial is to assess the impact of SCPs in routine clinical practice. Primary endpoint is patient satisfaction with information. Secondary endpoints are QoL and health care use. Methods: We built an SCP-application in the web-based Registrationsystem Oncological GYnecology (ROGY), used in our area since 2006. By clicking the SCP-icon in ROGY, a personalized SCP is automatically generated. Twelve hospitals were randomized to usual care or SCP care. In usual care, gynecologists did not have access to the SCP-icon. In SCP care, SCPs are personally discussed and handed to patients. All newly diagnosed endometrial cancer patients (age ≥ 18) were asked to complete a questionnaire after surgery, 6, 12 and 24 months after diagnosis. The questionnaire included the EORTC INFO25 and asked whether patients actually received an SCP. We expected 150 endometrial cancer patients: 75 per arm. We hypothesized that patients receiving SCP care are more satisfied with the information. Results: 201 patients (74%) returned a questionnaire after surgery: 109 SCP arm, 92 usual care arm. Of the patients in the SCP arm, 69% reported receiving an SCP. Analyses according to randomization arm showed that patients in both arms reported similar scores on all scales of the INFO25, including satisfaction with care (87% vs. 82%, SCP vs usual care, p=0.20). Analyses according to actual care received showed that patients who received SCP care reported significantly higher scores (4-18 points) on all scales of the INFO25, including satisfaction with care (91% vs. 78%, SCP vs usual care, p=0.046) compared to those who did not receive SCP care. Conclusions: Even in a situation where SCPs are automatically generated, still one third does not receive an SCP. But, those who receive SCP care report better information provision and satisfaction. Follow-up measures will show whether this ultimately results in better QoL and decreased health care use. Clinical trial information: NCT01185626.

Gaps in supportive and survivorship care for lung cancer patients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 32-32
Author(s):  
Tara Perloff ◽  
Jennifer C. King ◽  
Maureen Rigney
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Health Care Delivery ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients

32 Background: Clinical guidelines increasingly recommend an expansion of multidisciplinary care for oncology patients to include supportive and survivorship care. Despite recommendations, lung cancer patients may not access these services due to implementation challenges among health care delivery systems. Our study goal was to assess treatment and care planning from the perspectives of lung cancer patients and caregivers. Methods: A Community Needs Assessment survey was electronically distributed to lung cancer patients and caregivers. 820 people responded, including 471 patients and 349 caregivers. The overall completion rate was 72.6%. The survey assessed the patient’s care team, values-based discussions in care planning, discussions regarding palliative care, and survivorship care planning. Demographic information was collected to determine if patterns of care correlated with geographical or socioeconomic factors. Results: Less than 50% of patients reported having a conversation about their values and care goals with their treatment team before determining their treatment plan. Less than 30% of patients reported a mental health professional, social worker, palliative care specialist, or nurse navigator as part of their care team. Although research shows a survival benefit to lung cancer patients receiving palliative care, only 26.9% of active patients had discussed palliative care and 20.13% reported receiving it. For caregiver reported data, the patients receiving care had more advanced cancer and had often not survived. Of those who had completed treatment and survived more than 5 years beyond diagnosis, only 22% of patients and 15% of caregivers reported having a survivorship care plan. Conclusions: The majority of lung cancer patients and caregivers reported having not received palliative care, survivorship care plans, psychosocial support, or values-based discussions with their oncologist. Respondents were technology enabled and generally health literate indicating that these problems could be more widespread in rural, lower socioeconomic areas where lung cancer is common. Addressing these problems in health care delivery could positively impact the survivorship of lung cancer patients and their families.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document