NMR-metabolite-resonance signature to predict HR+ breast cancer patient response to CDK4/6 inhibitors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3043-3043
Author(s):  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Jason Warner ◽  
Christopher Pinto ◽  
Dejan Juric ◽  
Elizabeth ODay

3043 Background: Advanced ER+ breast cancer patients have reported prolongation of stable disease when treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor as a monotherapy or in combination with endocrine treatment. However ~20% of patients are intrinsically resistant and all patients eventually acquire resistance to these therapies. There is a critical need to identify biomarkers that accurately predict response and resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors. ER-positivity, luminal patterns of gene expression, Rb function, overexpression of cyclin D1, cyclin E, CDK6 and low levels of p16 are biomarkers that do not accurately match clinical outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective study analyzing plasma-based metabolites from a baseline (pre-dose) and ~2 months post treatment of 21 women with estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Results: By correlating the metabolite expression profiles to clinical outcomes we were able to identify a metabolic signature that could differentiate the CDK4/6 responders and resistant patients with a predictive accuracy of > 90%. Further we were able to identify independent signatures predictive of response for individual CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib and ribociclib. Conclusions: The results of this study could lead to a paradigm shift in the administration of CDK4/6 inhibitors wherein prior to treatment and during treatment patient plasma is screened to determine whether that individual patient is responsive or resistant to a CDK4/6 inhibitor.

2019 ◽  
Vol 176 (2) ◽  
pp. 429-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leticia Varella ◽  
Akaolisa Samuel Eziokwu ◽  
Xuefei Jia ◽  
Megan Kruse ◽  
Halle C. F. Moore ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. vii141
Author(s):  
Akira Tsunoda ◽  
Yutaka Mizuno ◽  
Masato Shizuku ◽  
Nobuhiko Kurata ◽  
Toshihiro Mori ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10749-10749
Author(s):  
D. O. Bauerschlag ◽  
C. Schem ◽  
W. Jonat ◽  
N. Maass

10749 Background: We report our clinical experience using the steroid estrogen receptor antagonist Fulvestrant to treat postmenopausal women with hormone sensitive metastasized breast cancer. We discuss the position of Fulvestrant in the endocrine treatment cascade, taking into account the new application guidelines for aromatase inhibitors. Methods: Data from 16 female patients and one male patient treated with Fulvestrant were analyzed. We describe the time point in the treatment cascade when Fulvestrant was administered and the resulting time to progression (TTP). The reviewed cohort was heterogeneous regarding the initial tumor size, the therapy and the progression of the tumor, respectively. The patients were 54 years of age at the time of diagnosis. The estrogen receptor was positive in all cases. Results: Fulvestrant was usually given as the last step in the endocrine treatment cascade (n = 14). The mean TTP was 5.7 months (n = 13). 3 patients are still under successful treatment with Fulvestrant. No common side effects as usually caused by endocrine therapies with Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors were documented. Conclusions: The specific estrogen receptor down-regulator Fulvestrant is a valid and well tolerated endocrine treatment option in heavily pre-treated and metastasized breast cancer patients (TTP 5.7 month). Also in the clinical situation of Tamoxifen resistant tumors, Patients could benefit from Fulvestrant. 3rd generation aromatase inhibitors are now used for the first-line treatment of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Shifting the sequential endocrine therapy cascade might need a new positioning of Fulvestrant. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12003-e12003
Author(s):  
H. Chang ◽  
S. Han ◽  
D. Oh ◽  
S. Im ◽  
T. Kim ◽  
...  

e12003 Background: Irinotecan (I) has some efficacy in taxane (T) and anthracycline (A)-refractory breast cancer, and combination of I and fluoropyrimidine (F) shows synergistic effects in preclinical model. We conducted this study to reveal the clinical outcomes of I and F combination therapy in T, A, and F-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Methods: We consecutively enrolled metastatic breast cancer patients treated with I and F combination chemotherapy from 2000 to 2008 in Seoul National University Hospital. They all had been previously heavily treated with T, A, and F. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes. Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. The median age was 38 years (range: 30–56years). The performance status was: ECOG 1 (11 patients), 2 (13), and 3 (1). The most commonly involved site was bone (16 patients), liver (13), and lung (12). The biologic subtype was: hormone receptor (+) 17 patients, HER-2 (+) 2, triple-negative (TNBC) 6. The median time from diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer to the initiation of IF therapy was 34 months (range: 12–97 months). The used regimens were: FOLFIRI (18 patients), TS-1/ irinotecan (6), capecitabine/irinotecan (1). Response was evaluable in 24 patients. There was no CR/PR. Stable disease was shown in 29.2% and 70.8% was PD, that is disease control rate was 29.2% (95% CI:10–45%). The median duration of disease control was 3.9 months (95% CI 3.7–4.2, range 2.4–11). The progression-free survival was 1.4 months (95% CI:0.7–21, range: 0.5–11.4), and overall survival was 6 months (95% CI: 4.2–7.8, range: 1–23). According to the biologic subtypes, the median PFS was 2.0 vs. 1.3 months (p=0.895) and OS was 4 vs. 6 months (p=0.807) respectively in TNBC VS Non-TNBC. In multivariate analysis, patients with good PS showed longer OS (p = 0.035). The Gr 3/4 hematologic toxicity was: neutropenia 18.6%, anemia 1.3%, thrombocytopenia 1.3%. And the major Gr 3/4 non-hematologc toxicity was: diarrhea (4%), hand-foot syndrome (0%), fatigue (0%). No treatment-related death was occurred. Conclusions: Treatment of I combined with F might be an option in metastatic breast cancer patients heavily treated with T, A, and F, irrespective of TNBC. Further prospective studies are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 365-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herman Andres Perroud ◽  
Carlos Maria Alasino ◽  
Maria Jose Rico ◽  
Leandro Ernesto Mainetti ◽  
Francisco Queralt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document