Pharmacy involvement in an oral anticancer management program: Drug acquisition and safety in an ambulatory comprehensive care center.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 85-85
Author(s):  
Audrea H Szabatura ◽  
Marina D. Kaymakcalan ◽  
Cathy Cao ◽  
Phuong Nguyen

85 Background: Oral anticancer agents (OACA) offer benefits of convenience, flexibility and quality of life; however, similar to intravenous therapy, OACA can be prone to medication ordering errors, drug-interactions, and administration errors. Additionally, they carry unique challenges such as treatment delay due to acquisition barriers and errors related to self-administration and monitoring. An oral anticancer management program was implemented to address vulnerable aspects of the outpatient OACA medication use process. Pharmacy benefit specialists (PBS) assist with prior authorizations (PA) and drug acquisitions; while, clinical pharmacists perform medication assessments and patient education. Methods: A retrospective review of patients prescribed OACAs between January 1 - March 31, 2019 was performed. A review of all PAs facilitated by our PBS was conducted and included date of prescription, date of submission to insurance, and date of PA approval. An assessment of pharmacist interventions on the prevention of medication-related errors and toxicity was conducted and was defined by any clarification or recommendation regarding medication dose, administration instructions, drug interactions, symptom management, medication reconciliation, and/or medication monitoring. Results: A total of 567 PAs were processed. Twenty-eight PA requests were denied and 539 were approved. The average time to approval was 1.5 days (range 0-13 days). 299 of the 567 patients were prescribed a new OACA and were enrolled into our education program. Pharmacists educated 191 patients. Pharmacists intervened 175 times for the 191 patients counseled. Interventions included recommendations/clarifications for symptom management (21.5%), medication reconciliation (19.5%), drug administration (16.2%), drug interactions (13.6%), and medication monitoring (7.3%). Conclusions: Pharmacy staff can make a valuable contribution to drug acquisition and overall clinical care of patients receiving OACAs. Our PBS reduced delays in acquisition and clinical pharmacists minimized medication-related errors and toxicity.

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonhard A Bakker ◽  
Carin D Schröder ◽  
Harold H G Tan ◽  
Simone M A G Vugts ◽  
Ruben P A van Eijk ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) is widely applied to assess disease severity and progression in patients with motor neuron disease (MND). The objective of the study is to assess the inter-rater and intra-rater reproducibility, i.e., the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability and agreement, of a self-administration version of the ALSFRS-R for use in apps, online platforms, clinical care and trials.MethodsThe self-administration version of the ALSFRS-R was developed based on both patient and expert feedback. To assess the inter-rater reproducibility, 59 patients with MND filled out the ALSFRS-R online and were subsequently assessed on the ALSFRS-R by three raters. To assess the intra-rater reproducibility, patients were invited on two occasions to complete the ALSFRS-R online. Reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients, agreement was assessed with Bland-Altman plots and paired samples t-tests, and internal consistency was examined with Cronbach’s coefficient alpha.ResultsThe self-administration version of the ALSFRS-R demonstrated excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. The assessment of inter-rater agreement demonstrated small systematic differences between patients and raters and acceptable limits of agreement. The assessment of intra-rater agreement demonstrated no systematic changes between time points; limits of agreement were 4.3 points for the total score and ranged from 1.6 to 2.4 points for the domain scores. Coefficient alpha values were acceptable.DiscussionThe self-administration version of the ALSFRS-R demonstrates high reproducibility and can be used in apps and online portals for both individual comparisons, facilitating the management of clinical care and group comparisons in clinical trials.


Author(s):  
Susan D Bex ◽  
Amy S Boldt ◽  
Sarah B Needham ◽  
Stacy M Bolf ◽  
Cassandra M Walston ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Winson Y. Cheung

The number of anticancer drugs currently available in oral formulation has increased dramatically over the past 15 to 20 years, especially with the recent development of new hormonal and targeted therapies. 1 , 2 At present, approximately 25% of all cancer drugs are available in oral formulation, with numbers expected to increase exponentially in the coming years. 1 , 3 , 4 The convenience associated with the self-administration of oral therapy, the requirement of fewer trips to the physician's office, and the lack of infusion reactions are all benefits for patients, allowing them to potentially maintain their relative independence while undergoing active anticancer treatment. On the other hand, there are growing concerns regarding patients' poor adherence to oral therapy as well as the challenges of monitoring patient compliance when treatment administration does not occur in the presence of health care professional (HCPs). More importantly, poor adherence to proven therapies may detrimentally affect the patients' clinical outcomes, such as survival. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify more effective strategies to measure and monitor adherence to oral anticancer agents in an effort to maximize their therapeutic benefits.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 44-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Mancini ◽  
David Wilson ◽  
Jessie Modlin ◽  
Dan Sayam Zuckerman ◽  
Colleen Powell ◽  
...  

44 Background: Oral chemotherapies are becoming more predominant with 40% of the currently available oral agents being approved in the last 7 years. Patient self-administration and the costs of these medications raise concerns about monitoring and access. As a result, nonfulfillment rates in the literature have been reported to range from 10-24% with rates directly correlated with cost of the medication. Methods: Patients who utilized the pharmacist-managed oral chemotherapy program were included for evaluation. Patients were excluded if they utilized external mail order pharmacies. Patient charts were audited for documented pharmacist-initiated interventions such as drug-interactions, lab monitoring, and dose adjustments. Patient nonfulfillment rates were evaluated by evaluating percentage of patients referred to number of prescriptions filled. Patients were classified as either filled, mail order, financial assistance or never started. Financial assistance patients were divided into free drug or co-pay assistance. Total amount of free drug obtained was assessed by multiplying the average number of cycles obtained by patients by the average wholesale price (AWP). Results: A total of 702 patients were served by the Oral Chemotherapy program between August 2009 and October 2011. In those patients, 82 drug-drug interactions and 24 patients required dose adjustments up front, mostly due to renal dysfunction. Compared to the 10-24% nonfulfillment rates in the literature, this program was able to keep rates less than 1% for patients who were unable to obtain medication for financial reasons. In this time period, underinsured patients were able to obtain >$1 million in free drug and >$200,000 in co-pay assistance funds thanks to our financial advocates. Conclusions: Collaboration within one health system between oncologists, pharmacists, nurses and social workers/financial advocates was able to ensure better quality of care by helping address medication issues upfront with minimal delays in access. In addition, this program was able to ensure that most patients were able to obtain their medication within a reasonable time period at a reasonable cost, reducing non-fulfillment rates compared to what has previously been reported in the literature.


2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 166-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marie Gjerde ◽  
Elizabeth Aa ◽  
Janne Kutschera Sund ◽  
Pal Stenumgard ◽  
Lars Gunnar Johnsen

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 808-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Géraldine Leguelinel-Blache ◽  
Fabrice Arnaud ◽  
Sophie Bouvet ◽  
Florent Dubois ◽  
Christel Castelli ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 909-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thaddeus H. Grasela ◽  
Blake A. Edwards ◽  
Marsha A. Raebel ◽  
Thomas S. Sisca ◽  
Barbara J. Zarowitz ◽  
...  

A nationwide network of clinical pharmacists has been organized for the purpose of collecting drug experience data generated during the routine clinical care of patients. In order to assess the utility of this network a pilot project was performed to obtain a cross-sectional view of antibiotic utilization in the U.S. and to identify potential problems with a more widespread implementation of this program. One hundred eleven pharmacists enrolled in the drug surveillance network participated in this survey and collected information on more than 2000 patients treated with antimicrobial agents over approximately a three-month period (February-April 1987). The most common sites of infection were the lung, genitourinary tract, skin and soft tissue, and the abdomen, and accounted for approximately 75 percent of infections. Overall, the aminoglycosides, the first-generation cephalosporins, and the aminopenicillins remain the most commonly used antibiotics and represent approximately 50 percent of antimicrobials used in the surveyed population. The results of this pilot project suggest that the use of a nationwide network of clinical pharmacists is a promising source of clinically relevant drug experience data. The ability to concurrently evaluate patients and link information regarding patient demographics, drug therapy regimens, diagnosis, and clinical outcomes fills an important gap in our knowledge of clinical drug utilization.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Hansen ◽  
John M. Pietkiewicz ◽  
Bonnie L. Blum

Collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) is a practice agreement between a pharmacist and a physician, which allows the pharmacist to assume responsibility of drug therapy management. There has been limited documentation of CDTM practices in the oncology setting. Therefore, a CDTM program in the gynecology oncology clinic at Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI) was initiated to establish the feasibility and utility of CDTM and its effects on patient care and physician satisfaction. Primarily, 3 symptoms were managed by the CDTM pharmacists, namely chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), and women’s health. The CDTM program showed favorable results after a short 4-month period. The CDTM pharmacists were referred a total of 12 consultations for CDTM purposes; 8 patients enrolled in the CIPN CDTM protocol, 3 in the CINV protocol, and 1 in the women’s health protocol. The CDTM pharmacists were able to perform a total of 54 consultations, with a mean time of 16.9 minutes spent with each patient per consultation. Additionally, the CDTM pharmacists made 70 interventions and identified 6 medication-related adverse effects. The patient and physician satisfaction survey demonstrated the value of the CDTM pharmacists, and respondents were supportive of the program.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document