Electrophysiological effects and clinical utility of propafenone in children

Aim: This retrospective case series study sought to describe the safety and clinical effectiveness of propafenone for the control of arrhythmias in children with and without CHD or cardiomyopathy. Methods: We reviewed baseline characteristics and subsequent outcomes in a group of 63 children treated with propafenone at 2 sites over a 15-year period Therapy was considered effective if no clinically apparent breakthrough episodes of arrhythmias were noted on the medication. Results: Sixty-three patients (29 males) were initiated on propafenone at a median age of 2.3 years. CHD or cardiomyopathy was noted in 21/63 (33%). There were no significant differences between demographics, clinical backgrounds, antiarrhythmic details, side effect profiles, and outcomes between children with normal hearts and children with CHD or cardiomyopathy. Cardiac depression at the initiation of propafenone was more common amongst children with CHD or cardiomyopathy compared to children with normal hearts. Systemic ventricular function was diminished in 15/63 patients (24%) prior to starting propafenone and improved in 8/15 (53%) of patients once better rhythm control was achieved. Other than one child in whom medication was stopped due to gastroesophageal reflux, no other child experienced significant systemic or cardiac side effects during treatment with propafenone. Propafenone achieved nearly equal success in controlling arrhythmias in both children with normal hearts and children with congenital heart disease or cardiomyopathy (90% versus 86%, p = 0.88). Conclusion: Propafenone is a safe and effective antiarrhythmic medication in children.

Ivabradine Monotherapy for the Treatment of Congenital Junctional Ectopic Tachycardia in a Premature Neonate

Congenital junctional ectopic tachycardia is a rare and special type of supraventricular arrhythmia. Junctional ectopic tachycardia is characterized by persistently elevated heart rates that may cause an impairment in cardiac function. Junctional ectopic tachycardia is considered one of the most difficult-to-treat conditions even with a combination of antiarrhythmic medications. Ivabradine is a novel antiarrhythmic medication used to decrease the heart rate in adults with angina pectoris. We report a first case of a premature neonate with a normal heart structure who developed junctional ectopic tachycardia and was subsequently treated successfully with ivabradine.

Does Catheter ablation for Premature Ventricular Contractions remain unsuccessful in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy?

We have read with great interest the article “Efficacy of Catheter Ablation for Premature Ventricular Contractions (PVC) in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC)” by Assis F.R. et. al. PVC ablation in ARVC was previously studied by Aras D. et al and they presented successful results.In this study, we believe that the study should not be considered as unsuccessful since 2 patients showed a decrease in PVC burden by more than 80% and in the other three patients between 45-70%. The demonstration of a decrease in PVC burden with catheter ablation in ARVD patients indicates that a second ablation may increase the success rate and decrease symptoms. The fact that ARVC has a complex substrate and the disease can progress is undoubtedly the most important factor in achieving the desired success with PVC ablation. Epicardial ablation with endocardial ablation has increased the chance of success in this patient group. In addition, given that BCSD ablation and basal heart rate are guaranteed by ICD implantation, we think that administration of the maximum dose of antiarrhythmic medication may create a significant improvement in these patients. And another factor, contact force sensing plays an important role in evaluating the effectiveness of the process. We suggest that with the current treatment modalities, a pharmacoablative combination therapy and re-ablation when necessary would be appropriate for such a complicated disease.

Safety of Inpatient Dofetilide Initiation per Cardiology Services: A Retrospective Review

Introduction: Dofetilide is an antiarrhythmic medication that has the potential to cause life threatening arrhythmias, such as Torsade de pointes. The 2014 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation state that patients need to meet certain criteria to be initiated on dofetilide. Patients who are not initiated on this therapy according to the guideline criteria are likely to be at higher risk of adverse reactions. Methods: This is a single center, retrospective chart review of patients who were initiated on dofetilide from July 2016-December 2019. Patients included in the study were initiated on dofetilide as a new antiarrhythmic and monitored inpatient for 3 days. The primary outcome was a composite of incidence of cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, cardiac death, and cardiac related hospital readmission. Results: There were 224 patients included in the analysis: 190 patients who were initiated on dofetilide inappropriately and 34 that were initiated appropriately. The primary outcome (composite of cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, cardiac death, and hospital readmission) was statistically significant with more patients experiencing an outcome in the group initiated inappropriately. Conclusions: Patients are placed at a higher risk of adverse reactions when this potentially dangerous antiarrhythmic medication is not used according to the protocol set forth by the guidelines. Practitioners should use caution when prescribing dofetilide. Other antiarrhythmic medications or non-pharmacologic options should be considered due to the incidence of these dangerous adverse reactions.

Atrial fibrillation ablation – the value of AF burden monitoring in the long-term follow-up

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, increasing the risk of stroke and all-cause mortality, predominantly due to cardiovascular diseases. Catheter ablation (CA) is recommended therapy, with far better long-term outcome compared to antiarrhythmic medication, and prolonged cardiac monitoring is crucial in the post-ablation follow-up. Due to technology advancements, we can introduce not only more effective methods for invasive AF treatment, but also the valuation of its long-term outcome. Implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) provide continuous ECG recording, required to assess the exact time of AF duration. AF burden, defined as the proportion of time an individual is in AF during the monitoring period is an excellent quantitative indicator for more complex evaluation of the AF ablation outcome, presenting it not merely as the binary effect.

Effectiveness of the Cox Maze-IV Procedure in Cardiac Surgery Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Aim Analyzing a 5-year experience of surgical treatment of cardiosurgical patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).Material and methods The study analyzed results of surgical treatment with extracorporeal circulation in 132 patients with AF who underwent the Maze-IV procedure using a radiofrequency ablator with transmurality feedback from 2013 through 2018.Results Two fatal outcomes were observed in the study group. These outcomes took place in the early postoperative period and were associated with progressive acute heart failure in patients with repeated surgery for mitral valve restenosis. 61.2% of the patients had no AF. Recurrent AF was observed during the first three years after surgery in association with withdrawal of the antiarrhythmic medication, which confirmed a need for long-term antiarrhythmic therapy. Analysis of risk factors for AF relapse identified significant predictors, including left ventricular dilatation larger than 5.5 cm at baseline and more than two-year duration of a history of arrhythmias.Conclusion The Maze-IV procedure proved an effective and safe method of surgical treatment in AF patients with acquired heart defects and ischemic heart disease, which allowed maintaining sinus rhythm in 61.2% of patients for 5 years. Preventive amiodarone saturation reduced the risk of AF relapse by 24.2 % (p=0.038) and incidence of postoperative arrhythmic complications by 34.9 % (p=0.008) in cardiosurgical patients.

Antiarrhythmika: Welche Rolle spielen sie heute noch?

The use of medical antiarrhythmic therapy apart from beta-blockers has been steadily decreasing in the recent past. This can partly be attributed to technological progress that has rendered the ablation of complex cardiac arrhythmias like atrial fibrillation, focal atrial tachycardias and ventricular arrhythmias feasible and efficacious. Furthermore, an awareness regarding pro-arrhythmic and toxic side-effects of antiarrhythmic medication has evolved. Nevertheless, medical antiarrhythmic therapy still plays a fundamental role in acute therapy of arrythmias as well as certain indications for long-term therapy. This review comprehensively summarizes the current role of medical antiarrhythmic therapy in daily clinical practice focusing on mechanisms and therapies of the most common cardiac arrythmias.

Multicenter Analysis of Dosing Protocols for Sotalol Initiation

Sotalol, a Vaughan-Williams Class III antiarrhythmic medication, is used to manage atrial arrhythmias. Due to its QT-prolonging effect and subsequent increased risk of torsade de pointes, many centers admit patients during the initial dosing period. Despite its widespread use, little information is available regarding dosing protocols during this period. In this multicenter investigation, dosing protocols in patients initiating sotalol therapy were examined to identify predictors of successful sotalol initiation. Over a 4-year period, patients admitted to 5 hospitals in the United States for inpatient telemetry monitoring during initiation for nonresearch purposes were enrolled. A 3-day course of 5 of 6 doses of sotalol was considered successful completion of the loading protocol. Of the 213 enrolled patients, over 90% were successfully discharged on sotalol. Significant bradycardia, ineffectiveness, and excessive QT prolongation were reasons for failed completion. Absence of a dose adjustment was a strong predictor of successful initiation (odds ratio: 6.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-32.7, P = .02). Hypertension, use of a calcium channel blocker, use of a separate β-blocker, and presence of a pacemaker were predictors of dose adjustments. Marginal structural models (ie, inverse probability weighting based on probability of a dose adjustment) verified that these factors also predicted successful initiation via preventing any dose adjustment and suggests that considering these factors may result in a higher likelihood of successful initiation in future investigations. In conclusion, we found that the majority of patients admitted for sotalol initiation are successfully discharged on the medication. The study findings suggest that factors predicting need for dose adjustment can be used to identify patients who could undergo outpatient initiation. Prospective studies are needed to verify this approach.