Lung metastasis as predictor for prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer with mutated KRAS.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 636-636
Author(s):  
Ben Boursi ◽  
Einat shacham-Shmueli ◽  
Yaacov Richard Lawrence ◽  
Yu-Xiao Yang ◽  
Kim Anna Reiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Lung Metastasis ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Single Site ◽  
Primary Tumor Location

636 Background: Previous studies have shown that prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may vary according to sites of metastasis. We evaluated prognosis in individuals with single site metastasis, according to several clinical and genetic variables. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database we identified 58,044 mCRC patients with a synchronous single site of metastasis. We first examined the effect of metastasis site on prognosis. In a secondary analysis, among individuals who had not undergone surgery or received radiotherapy, we examined the prognostic value of chemotherapy intensity, KRAS status, primary tumor location and CEA levels. Results: Individuals with lung metastasis had the best prognosis (HR = 0.80, 0.77-0.83), followed by those with liver metastasis (HR = 1.11, 1.07-1.15), while those with bone or brain metastasis had the worse prognosis. In a subgroup analysis, we assessed prognosis among individuals who received multi-agent chemotherapy and had not undergone surgery or received radiotherapy. Individuals with lung metastasis and mutant KRAS had better prognosis compared with those with liver metastasis, (HR = 0.69, 0.54-0.88), regardless of primary tumor location or CEA levels. Conclusions: Single site metastasis to the lungs is associated with better prognosis in mCRC, specifically among KRAS mutant tumors. This survival advantage should be taken into consideration in clinical decision-making.

scholarly journals Impact of biomarkers and primary tumor location on the metastatic colorectal cancer first-line treatment landscape in five European countries

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Kafatos ◽  
Victoria Banks ◽  
Peter Burdon ◽  
David Neasham ◽  
Kimberly A Lowe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
First Line ◽  
Primary Tumor Location ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Prognostic And Predictive Factors

Background: Advances in therapies for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and improved understanding of prognostic and predictive factors have impacted treatment decisions. Materials & methods: This study used a large oncology database to investigate patterns of monoclonal antibody (mAb) plus chemotherapy treatment in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK in mCRC patients treated in first line in 2018. Results: Anti-EGFR mAbs were most often administered to patients with RAS wild-type mCRC and those with left-sided tumors, while anti-VEGF mAbs were preferred in RAS mutant and right-sided tumors. Adopted treatment strategies differed between countries, largely due to reimbursement. Conclusion: Biomarker status and primary tumor location steered treatment decisions in first line. Adopted treatment strategies differed between participating countries.

scholarly journals Prognostic impact of primary tumor location in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A 5 year retrospective analysis of our treated population.

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. iii118-iii119
Author(s):  
Gonçalo Atalaia ◽  
Marta Vaz Baptista ◽  
Tiago Tomás ◽  
Susana Almeida ◽  
Inês Eiriz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Primary Tumor Location

Understanding the Prognostic Value of Primary Tumor Location and KRAS in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of the OPTIMOX3 DREAM Phase III Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-208.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoist Chibaudel ◽  
Thierry André ◽  
Christophe Tournigand ◽  
Christophe Louvet ◽  
Magdalena Benetkiewicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Tumor Location ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Post Hoc

Primary tumor location and efficacy of second-line therapy after initial treatment with FOLFIRI in combination with cetuximab or bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer- FIRE-3 (AIOKRK0306).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3525-3525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominik Paul Modest ◽  
Sebastian Stintzing ◽  
Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal ◽  
Thomas Decker ◽  
Alexander Kiani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Primary Tumor Location ◽  
Line Therapy

3525 Background: FIRE3 compared 1st-line therapy with FOLFIRI plus either cetuximab (arm A) or bevacizumab (arm B) in 592 patients (pts) with KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Second-line therapies appeared more successful in arm A compared to arm B. The impact of primary tumor location on this observation is unclear. Methods: Pts. were stratified for primary tumor site (left- vs. right-sided). Duration of 2nd-line therapy was calculated as time from first to last application. Progression-free survival (PFS2nd) and overall survival (OS2nd) of second-line therapy) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log rank test as well as Cox regression. All analyses were performed in the RAS wild-type population of the trial and reported according to drug sequences. Results: 272 of 400 pts. (68%) received 2nd-line therapy, of those 206 (109 in arm A, 97 in arm B) pts. presented left-sided, whereas 66 (26 in arm A, 40 in arm B) pts. presented right-sided primaries. PFS2nd was markedly longer in pts. with left-sided as compared to right-sided primary tumors (6.0 (95% CI: 5.5-6.7) vs. 3.4 (95% CI: 3.0-5.8) months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47-0.87), P = 0.005). Differences in PFS2nd between study-arms were evident in pts. with left-sided primaries (arm A: 7.3 (95% CI: 6.4-7.7) vs. arm B: 5.3 (95% CI: 4.3-5.9) months, HR: 0.61 (95% CI: 0.44-0.84), P = 0.002), but not in pts. with right-sided primaries (arm A: 4.0 (95% CI: 3.0-6.3) vs. arm B: 3.3 (95% CI: 2.6-5.8) months, HR: 1.09 (95% CI: 0.62-1.90). Consistent observations were also made for treatment duration and OS2nd. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis indicates that treatment duration and efficacy of second-line therapy are associated with primary tumor location. Efficacy of second-line therapy was significantly greater in pts. with left-sided tumors as compared to right sided tumors. This difference was driven by superior activity of second-line regimens of arm A compared to arm B in left-sided tumors. Our observations confirm the strong prognostic value of primary tumor location in mCRC across treatment lines. Clinical trial information: NCT00433927.

scholarly journals Prognostic and Predictive Relevance of Primary Tumor Location in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Tejpar ◽  
Sebastian Stintzing ◽  
Fortunato Ciardiello ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Primary Tumor Location
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document