Impact of baseline symptom burden as assessed by patient-reported outcomes (PROs) on overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12020-12020
Author(s):  
Atul Batra ◽  
Colleen Ann Cuthbert ◽  
Andrew Harper ◽  
Lin Yang ◽  
Devon J. Boyne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Symptom Intensity ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Symptom Scores

12020 Background: Patients with metastatic cancer experience variable symptom burden, but serial symptom assessments using PROs may be challenging to implement in routine clinical practices. We aimed to determine if a single measurement of symptom burden at the time of metastatic diagnosis is associated with survival. Methods: We examined prospectively collected baseline PROs of patients newly diagnosed with metastatic breast, lung, colorectal, or prostate cancer using the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESASr) questionnaire from a large province (Alberta, Canada) between 2016 and 2019. The ESASr was categorized into physical (PH), psychosocial (PS), and total symptom (TS) domains whereby scores were classified as mild (0-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to evaluate the effect of baseline symptom scores on OS. Results: We identified 1,315 patients, of whom 57% were men and median age was 66 (IQR, 27-93) years. There were 180, 601, 240, and 294 patients with breast, lung, colorectal, and prostate cancer, respectively. Approximately one-quarter of all patients reported moderate to severe PH, PS, and TS scores, with lung cancer patients experiencing the highest symptom intensity across all domains ( P<0.0001). While age did not affect symptom scores, women were more likely to report severe PH, PS, and TS scores as compared to men ( P=0.02, 0.002, and 0.007, respectively). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, older age (HR 1.02, 95% CI, 1.02-1.03, P<0.0001) and female sex (HR 1.67, 95% CI, 1.39-1.99, P<0.0001) were predictive of worse OS as were severe baseline PH and TS scores (see Table) . However, baseline PS scores were not related to OS. Conclusions: A single assessment of baseline symptom burden using the ESASr in patients with metastatic cancer has significant prognostic value. This may represent a feasible first step toward routine collection of PROs in real-world settings where serial symptom measurements can be challenging to implement. [Table: see text]

587 PATIENT-REPORTED SYMPTOMS FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER PATIENTS UNDERGOING CURATIVE INTENT TREATMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaibhav Gupta ◽  
Catherine Allen-Ayodabo ◽  
Laura Davis ◽  
Haoyu Zhao ◽  
Julie Hallet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Cancer Symptoms ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Symptom Scores

Abstract   Esophageal cancer (EC) patients experience considerable symptom burden from treatment. This study utilized population-level patient-reported Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) scores collected as part of standard clinical care to describe symptom trajectories and characteristics associated with severe symptoms for patients undergoing curative intent EC treatment. Methods EC patients treated with curative intent at regional cancer centers and affiliates between 2009–2016 and assessed for symptoms in the 12 months following diagnosis were included. ESAS measures nine common patient-reported cancer symptoms. The outcome was reporting of severe (≥7/10) symptom scores. Multivariable analyses were used to identify characteristics associated with severe symptom scores. Results 1,751 patients reported a median of 7 (IQR 4–12) ESAS assessments in the year following diagnosis, for a total of 14,953 unique ESAS assessments included in the analysis. The most frequently reported severe symptoms were lack of appetite (n = 918, 52%), tiredness (n = 787, 45%) and poor wellbeing (713, 40.7%). The highest symptom burden is within the first five months following diagnosis, with moderate improvement in symptom burden in the second half of the first year. Characteristics associated with severe scores for all symptoms included female sex, high comorbidity, lower socioeconomic status, urban residence, and symptom assessment temporally close to diagnosis. Conclusion This study demonstrates a high symptom burden for EC patients undergoing curative intent therapy. Targeted treatment of common severe symptoms, and increased support for patients at risk for severe symptoms, may enhance patient quality of life.

scholarly journals Prescreening of Patient-reported Symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in Outpatient Palliative Cancer Care

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garden Lee ◽  
Han Sang Kim ◽  
Si Won Lee ◽  
Eun Hwa Kim ◽  
Bori Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Severe Symptom ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background: Although early palliative care is associated with a better quality of life and improved outcomes in end-of-life cancer care, the criteria of palliative care referral are still elusive. Methods: We collected patient-reported symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) at the baseline, first, and second follow-up visit. The ESAS evaluates ten symptoms: pain, fatigue, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, dyspnea, sleep disorder, appetite, and wellbeing. A total of 71 patients were evaluable, with a median age of 65 years, male (62%), and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status distribution of 1/2/3 (28%/39%/33%), respectively. Results: Twenty (28%) patients had moderate/severe symptom burden with the mean ESAS ≥5. Interestingly, most of the patients with moderate/severe symptom burdens (ESAS ≥5) had globally elevated symptom expression. While the mean ESAS score was maintained in patients with mild symptom burden (ESAS<5; 2.7 at the baseline; 3.4 at the first follow-up; 3.0 at the second follow-up; P =0.117), there was significant symptom improvement in patients with moderate/severe symptom burden (ESAS≥5; 6.5 at the baseline; 4.5 at the first follow-up; 3.6 at the second follow-up; P <0.001). Conclusions: Advanced cancer patients with ESAS ≥5 may benefit from outpatient palliative cancer care. Prescreening of patient-reported symptoms using ESAS can be useful for identifying unmet palliative care needs in advanced cancer patients.

scholarly journals Implementing a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Hemodialysis Patients in Routine Clinical Care

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 1299-1309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna M. Evans ◽  
Alysha Glazer ◽  
Rebecca Lum ◽  
Esti Heale ◽  
Marnie MacKinnon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measure ◽  
Symptom Screening ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Patient Provider Communication

Background and objectivesThe Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal is a patient-reported outcome measure used to assess physical and psychosocial symptom burden in patients treated with maintenance dialysis. Studies of patient-reported outcome measures suggest the need for deeper understanding of how to optimize their implementation and use. This study examines patient and provider perspectives of the implementation process and the influence of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal on symptom management, patient-provider communication, and interdisciplinary communication.Design, setting, participants, & measurements Eight in-facility hemodialysis programs in Ontario, Canada, assessed patients using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal every 4–6 weeks for 1 year. Screening and completion rates were tracked, and pre- and postimplementation surveys and midimplementation interviews were conducted with patients and providers. A chart audit was conducted 12 months postimplementation.ResultsIn total, 1459 patients completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal; 58% of eligible patients completed the preimplementation survey (n=718), and 56% of patients who completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal at least once completed the postimplementation survey (n=569). Provider survey response rates were 71% (n=514) and 54% (n=319), respectively. Nine patients/caregivers from three sites and 48 providers from all sites participated in interviews. A total of 1207 charts were audited. Seven of eight sites had mean screening rates over 80%, suggesting that routine use of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal in clinical practice is feasible. However, the multiple data sources painted an inconsistent picture of the value and effect of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal standardized symptom screening processes across providers and sites; improved patient and provider symptom awareness, particularly for psychosocial symptoms; and empowered patients to raise issues with providers. Yet, there was little, if any, statistically significant improvement in the metrics used to assess symptom management, patient-provider communication, and interdisciplinary communication.ConclusionsThe Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal patient-reported outcome measure may be useful to standardize symptom screening, enhance awareness of psychosocial symptoms among patients and providers, and empower patients rather than to reduce symptom burden.

Performance Status and Symptom Scores of Women With Gynecologic Cancer at the End of Life

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 971-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori Spoozak ◽  
Hsien Seow ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Jason Wright ◽  
Lisa Barbera
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Gynecologic Cancer ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System ◽  
Symptom Scores

ObjectiveThe Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), which measures performance status (100 = best performance to 0 = dead), and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), which measures severity of 9 symptoms, are routinely collected at ambulatory cancer visits in Ontario. This study describes the trajectory of scores in patients with gynecologic cancer in the last 6 months of life.MethodsAn observational study was conducted between 2007 and 2010. Patients had ovarian/fallopian tube, uterine, and cervical cancer and required 1 or more PPS or ESAS assessment in the 6 months before death. Outcomes were the average PPS and ESAS scores per week before death. Using logistic regression, we analyzed the odds ratio of reporting a moderate to severe score for each symptom.ResultsSeven hundred ninety-five (PPS) and 1299 (ESAS) patients were included. The average PPS score started at 70 and ended at 30, rapidly declining in the last 2 months. For ESAS symptoms, drowsiness, decreased well-being, lack of appetite, and tiredness increased in severity closer to death and were prevalent in more than 70% of patients in the last week of life. Patients with cervical cancer had increased odds of moderate to severe pain (1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.30–2.32) compared with ovarian cancer.ConclusionsTrajectories of mean performance status had not reached the “end-of-life” phase until 1 week before death. A large proportion of the gynecologic cancer patients reported moderate to severe symptom scores as death approached. Pain was uniquely elevated in the cervical cancer cohort as death approached. Adequately managing the symptom burden appears to be a significant issue in end-of-life gynecologic care.

Patient experience with service quality: Implications for survival outcomes in prostate cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 39-39
Author(s):  
Christopher G. Lis ◽  
Maurie Markman ◽  
Mark Rodeghier ◽  
Digant Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Service Quality ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Patient Reported

39 Background: Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among U.S. men. While self-reported quality of life has been shown to be prognostic of survival, there has been limited exploration of whether a patient’s assessment of the overall quality-of-care received might influence survival in prostate cancer. We evaluated the relationship between patient-reported experience with service quality and overall survival in prostate cancer. Methods: 832 returning prostate cancer patients treated at Cancer Treatment Centers of America between July 2007 and December 2010. Overall patient experience (“considering everything, how satisfied are you with your overall experience?”) was measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from “completely dissatisfied” to “completely satisfied”. It was dichotomized into 2 categories: top box response (7) versus all others (1-6). Cox regression was used to evaluate the association between patient experience and survival. Results: 560 patients were newly diagnosed while 272 had been previously treated. Majority of patients (n=570, 68.5%) had stage II disease at diagnosis. The mean age was 63.6 years. By the time of this analysis, 93 (11.2%) patients had expired. 710 (85.3%) patients were “completely satisfied” with the service quality they received while 122 (14.7%) patients were not. Median overall survival was 47.9 months. On univariate Cox regression analysis, “completely satisfied” patients had a significantly lower risk of mortality compared to those not “completely satisfied” (HR=0.48; 95% CI: 0.30-0.78; p=0.003). On multivariate Cox regression analysis controlling for stage at diagnosis, treatment history and age, “completely satisfied” patients demonstrated significantly lower mortality (HR=0.50; 95% CI: 0.29-0.87; p=0.01) compared to those not “completely satisfied”. Conclusions: Patient experience with service quality was an independent predictor of survival in prostate cancer. Based on this provocative observation, it is reasonable to suggest that further exploration of a possible meaningful relationship between patient perceptions of the care they have received and outcome in prostate cancer is indicated.

Change in symptom burden within one day of palliative care consultation in a cohort of gynecologic oncology inpatients.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 28-28
Author(s):  
Carolyn Lefkowits ◽  
Winifred Teuteberg ◽  
Madeleine Courtney-Brooks ◽  
Paniti Sukumvanich ◽  
Joseph L. Kelley
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Symptom Management ◽  
Severe Symptom ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Symptom Intensity ◽  
Care Consultation

28 Background: Change in symptom burden after inpatient palliative care consultation for symptom management in gynecologic oncology patients has not been described. Our objective was to evaluate the magnitude and time course of change in symptom burden after palliative care (PC) consultation in a cohort of gynecologic oncology inpatients. Methods: Women with a gynecologic malignancy and a PC consultation for symptom management between 3/1/12 and 2/28/13 were identified. Charts were reviewed for demographics and disease characteristics. PC provider reports of patient symptom intensity on a modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment System were retrospectively reviewed. Data was analyzed with descriptive statistics and two sample test of proportions to compare prevalence of moderate to severe symptom intensity on the day of consultation to the day after consultation. Results: Over 12 months, there were 172 PC consultations for symptom management involving 123 unique patients. The median age was 58 and most common cancer was ovarian (44%), followed by cervical (26%) and uterine (24%). Prevalence of moderate to severe symptoms on the day of consultation is outlined below. There were statistically significant decreases in prevalence of moderate to severe symptom intensity within one day of PC consultation for pain, anorexia, fatigue and shortness of breath (SOB) (see table). Conclusions: PC consultation is associated with significant improvements in symptoms within one day of consultation. Palliative care consultation may be an effective tool for symptom management during even very short hospitalizations and should be considered early in the hospitalization to effect timely symptom relief. [Table: see text]

Patient-Reported Symptom Burden as a Predictor of Emergency Department Use and Unplanned Hospitalization in Head and Neck Cancer: A Longitudinal Population-Based Study

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.01845
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Noel ◽  
Rinku Sutradhar ◽  
Haoyu Zhao ◽  
Victoria Delibasic ◽  
David Forner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Emergency Department Use ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Patient Reported

PURPOSE: To determine the association between patient-reported symptom burden and subsequent emergency department use and unplanned hospitalization (ED/Hosp) in a head and neck cancer (HNC) patient population. METHODS: This was a population-based study of patients diagnosed with HNC who had completed at least one outpatient Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) assessment between January 2007 and March 2018 in Ontario, Canada. Logistic regression models were used to determine the relationship between outpatient ESAS scores and subsequent 14-day ED/Hosp use. A generalized estimating equation approach with an exchangeable correlation structure was incorporated to account for patient-level clustering RESULTS: There were 11,761 patients identified, completing a total of 73,282 ESAS assessments and experiencing 5,203 ED/Hosp events. Six of the nine ESAS symptom scores were positively associated with ED/Hosp use, with pain, appetite, shortness of breath, and tiredness demonstrating the strongest associations. A global ESAS score was calculated by selecting the highest individual symptom score (h-ESAS). Among patients reporting a maximum h-ESAS score of 10, 15.1% had an ED/Hosp event within 14 days compared with 1.5% for those with the lowest possible score of zero. In adjusted analysis, the odds of ED/Hosp use increased with h-ESAS (1.23 per one-unit increase [95% CI, 1.22 to 1.25]). When treated as a categorical variable, patients with the maximum h-ESAS score of 10 had 9.23 (95% CI, 7.22 to 11.33) higher odds of ED/Hosp use, relative to the minimum score of zero. CONCLUSION: ESAS scores are strongly associated with subsequent ED/Hosp events in patients with HNC. Clinician education around how ESAS data might inform patient care may enhance symptom detection and management.

Prevention of palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) with an antiperspirant in breast cancer patients treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), a placebo-controlled, double blinded, phase lll trial (SAKK 92/08).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9059-9059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Ruhstaller ◽  
Karin Ribi ◽  
Hong Sun ◽  
Shu-Fang Schmitz ◽  
Markus Borner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Sweat Glands ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Palmoplantar Erythrodysesthesia

9059 Background: PPE, also known as hand-foot syndrome, is a distinctive adverse drug reaction of PLD treatment. PLD has been detected in elevated concentrations in eccrine sweat glands in palms and soles. We postulated that prophylactic administration of an antiperspirant (F511 cream) prior and during treatment with PLD could decrease the incidence of PPE. Methods: Patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer treated with PLD monotherapy ≥10mg/m2 per week applied an antiperspirant to the left or right hand and foot and a corresponding placebo to the opposite site with double-blinding for the content of the cream applied to either side (intra-patient randomization). The creams were applied once daily during the first week, then three times per week. The primary endpoint was the rate of PPE grade (G) ≥ 2 in the antiperspirant or placebo treated side. Pts were evaluable if they developed PPE G ≥ 2 or had received cumulatively at least 160mg/m2 PLD. Patient-reported extent of symptom burden was a secondary endpoint. Using McNemar’s matched pairs design 53 pts were needed to detect a difference of 20% between the sides with a significance level of 5% and power of 90%. Results: 52 of 90 pts from 11 Swiss centers included were evaluable. Median age was 64.5 years; median duration of PLD treatment was 12 weeks. 30 pts developed PPE G ≥ 2. In 3 pts PPE G ≥ 2 occurred on the placebo side but not on the antiperspirant side (p=0.097; table). PPE G ≥ 2 was borderline significantly more frequent in placebo foot than antiperspirant foot (p=0.048). Patient-reported extent of symptom burden showed a trend in favor of the antiperspirant side for skin problems (peeling, blistering, bleeding) in the group of pts with PPE G ≥ 2 (p=0.051). Conclusions: In this double-blind trial with intra-patient randomization we observed a trend towards less PPE G ≥ 2 with application of the antiperspirant cream F511 in pts treated with PLD as determined by the treating physician and reported by the pts. [Table: see text]

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from the VIRGO observational cohort study (OCS).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 111-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Andrew Kaufman ◽  
Musa Mayer ◽  
Nancy A. Dreyer ◽  
Yeun Mi Yim ◽  
Elaine Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Interest ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Work Productivity ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Activity Impairment ◽  
Work Impairment ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Related Quality

111 Background: Limited data exist on patient (pt) experience and work productivity (WP) in MBC. VIRGO is a prospective OCS following >1,200 pts with locally advanced or MBC receiving 1st-line hormonal therapy (HT) or chemotherapy (CT) in a real-world setting. We report baseline characteristics of 277 pts from the VIRGO PRO substudy and correlations between health-related quality of life (HRQoL), symptoms, activities of daily living, and WP. Methods: Symptom severity and interference (M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory [MDASI]), functional status (Activity Level Scale [ALS] from the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist) and WP (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire) were assessed. Pts rated their HRQoL during the past week on a scale of 0–10. Results: See table. The five most severe symptoms at baseline were fatigue, decreased sexual interest, disturbed sleep, drowsiness, and emotional distress; these were reported with less severity in the HT cohort (24%-37% vs 42%-59%). Overall MDASI severity and interference correlated with WP measures in the CT (R=0.46 to 0.78) and HT cohorts (0.36 to 0.94). Mean of the 5 most severe symptoms also significantly correlated with WP indices (R=0.47 to 0.66). HRQoL correlated (p<0.05) with all WP measures (R=-0.46 to -0.56) in the CT cohort and with % impairment while working (R=-0.65) and % overall work impairment (R=-0.71) in the HT cohort. In univariate regression analysis, MDASI symptom interference score was the best predictor of reduced WP (R2=0.52 while working; R2=0.48 for non-work activities). Conclusions: MBC pts receiving CT and HT report significant work impairment. Results indicate moderate correlations between WP indices, HRQoL and symptom burden. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document