Prevention of palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) with an antiperspirant in breast cancer patients treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), a placebo-controlled, double blinded, phase lll trial (SAKK 92/08).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9059-9059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Ruhstaller ◽  
Karin Ribi ◽  
Hong Sun ◽  
Shu-Fang Schmitz ◽  
Markus Borner ◽  
...  

9059 Background: PPE, also known as hand-foot syndrome, is a distinctive adverse drug reaction of PLD treatment. PLD has been detected in elevated concentrations in eccrine sweat glands in palms and soles. We postulated that prophylactic administration of an antiperspirant (F511 cream) prior and during treatment with PLD could decrease the incidence of PPE. Methods: Patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer treated with PLD monotherapy ≥10mg/m2 per week applied an antiperspirant to the left or right hand and foot and a corresponding placebo to the opposite site with double-blinding for the content of the cream applied to either side (intra-patient randomization). The creams were applied once daily during the first week, then three times per week. The primary endpoint was the rate of PPE grade (G) ≥ 2 in the antiperspirant or placebo treated side. Pts were evaluable if they developed PPE G ≥ 2 or had received cumulatively at least 160mg/m2 PLD. Patient-reported extent of symptom burden was a secondary endpoint. Using McNemar’s matched pairs design 53 pts were needed to detect a difference of 20% between the sides with a significance level of 5% and power of 90%. Results: 52 of 90 pts from 11 Swiss centers included were evaluable. Median age was 64.5 years; median duration of PLD treatment was 12 weeks. 30 pts developed PPE G ≥ 2. In 3 pts PPE G ≥ 2 occurred on the placebo side but not on the antiperspirant side (p=0.097; table). PPE G ≥ 2 was borderline significantly more frequent in placebo foot than antiperspirant foot (p=0.048). Patient-reported extent of symptom burden showed a trend in favor of the antiperspirant side for skin problems (peeling, blistering, bleeding) in the group of pts with PPE G ≥ 2 (p=0.051). Conclusions: In this double-blind trial with intra-patient randomization we observed a trend towards less PPE G ≥ 2 with application of the antiperspirant cream F511 in pts treated with PLD as determined by the treating physician and reported by the pts. [Table: see text]

Author(s):  
Larissa Elisabeth Hillebrand ◽  
Ulrike Söling ◽  
Norbert Marschner

Background: Breast cancer is still the most common malignancy in women worldwide. Once metastasized, breast cancer treatment primarily aims at reducing symptom burden, thereby trying to maintain and improve a patient´s quality of life (QoL), delaying disease progression, and prolonging survival. Curing the disease is not possible in the palliative setting. To better understand metastatic breast cancer patients, their symptoms and wishes, which are important for treatment-decision making and outcome, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are of great importance, giving an impression of what really matters to and concerns a patient. Summary: Many advances have been made to implicate PROs in clinical trials, non-interventional studies, registries, and clinical routine care of metastatic breast cancer. For example, large phase III trials like PALOMA-3 (NCT01942135), MONALEESA-7 (NCT02278120), HER2CLIMB (NCT02614794), and KEYNOTE-119 (NCT02555657) trials implemented PROs in their trial design to assess the QoL of their trial patients. Also, non-interventional studies on metastatic breast cancer, like e.g., the NABUCCO study (IOM-02240), and prospective non-interventional, multicenter registries e.g., the tumor registry breast cancer (NCT01351584) or the breast cancer registry platform OPAL (NCT03417115), have implemented PROs to assess QoL during the anti-cancer treatment periods of the patients. Key Message: Using PROs in metastatic breast cancer can support shared treatment-decision making and management of symptoms, eventually leading to an improvement in QoL. Progressively, regulatory authorities take PROs into consideration for the approval of new drugs. Hence, the implication of PROs in cancer treatment, and especially in MBC, is of significant value.


Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Margarete Karsten ◽  
Friedrich Kühn ◽  
Therese Pross ◽  
Jens-Uwe Blohmer ◽  
Anna Maria Hage ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Despite the progress of research and treatment for breast cancer, still up to 30% of the patients afflicted will develop distant disease. Elongation of survival and maintaining the quality of life (QoL) become pivotal issues guiding the treatment decisions. One possible approach to optimise survival and QoL is the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to timely identify acute disease-related burden. We present the protocol of a trial that investigates the effect of real-time PRO data captured with electronic mobile devices on QoL in female breast cancer patients with metastatic disease. Methods This study is a randomised, controlled trial with 1:1 randomisation between two arms. A total of 1000 patients will be recruited in 40 selected breast cancer centres. Patients in the intervention arm receive a weekly request via an app to complete the PRO survey. Symptoms will be assessed by study-specific optimised short forms based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 domains using items from the EORTC CAT item banks. In case of deteriorating PRO scores, an alarm is sent to the treating study centre as well as to the PRO B study office. Following the alarm, the treating breast cancer centre is required to contact the patient to inquire about the reported symptoms and to intervene, if necessary. The intervention is not specified and depends on the clinical need determined by the treating physician. Patients in the control arm are prompted by the app every 3 months to participate in the PRO survey, but their response will not trigger an alarm. The primary outcome is the fatigue level 6 months after enrolment. Secondary endpoints include among others hospitalisations, use of rescue services and overall QoL. Discussion Within the PRO B intervention group, we expect lower fatigue levels 6 months after intervention start, higher levels of QoL, less unplanned hospitalisations and less emergency room visits compared to controls. In case of positive results, our approach would allow a fast and easy transfer into clinical practice due to the use of the already nationwide existing IT infrastructure of the German Cancer Society and the independent certification institute OnkoZert. Trial registration DRKS (German Clinical Trials Register) DRKS00024015. Registered on 15 February 2021


2014 ◽  
Vol 144 (3) ◽  
pp. 673-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark S. Walker ◽  
Anthony S. Masaquel ◽  
Jiandong Kerr ◽  
Deepa Lalla ◽  
Oyewale Abidoye ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document