Subjective and Perseverative Cognition Mediate the Relationship Between Sleep and Work Impairment

The study examined the mediating role of subjective and perseverative cognition on sleep and work impairment. Sixty nurses completed a background survey and 14-days of ecological momentary assessments (EMA) and sleep actigraphy. Each day, participants evaluated their subjective cognition (mental sharpness, memory, processing speed), perseverative cognition (rumination) and work impairment (how much did you cut back on normal paid work, how much did the quality of your work suffer). Multiple sleep characteristics were measured by EMA and actigraphy. Multilevel mediation models adjusted for sociodemographics and work shift. At the between-person and within-person levels, there were mediated associations of sleep quality and sufficiency (but not actigraphy-measured sleep) with work impairment through subjective and perseverative cognition. Better sleep quality or higher sleep sufficiency were associated with better subjective and perseverative cognition, which, in turn, were associated with less work impairment.

Health-Related Quality of Life and fatigue are associated with a higher work productivity impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: Data from the Almenara Lupus Cohort

Objectives: This study aims to determine the factors associated with absenteeism, presenteeism, and overall work impairment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: A total of 133 consecutive working patients with SLE were assessed between October 2017 and December 2018, using a standardized data collection form. Sociodemographic, disease, and work-related variables were collected. Work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) was assessed with the respective questionnaire; absenteeism and presenteeism due to overall health and symptoms during the past 7 days were scored. Linear regression models were performed to determine the factors associated with absenteeism, presenteeism, and overall work impairment. Potential factors included were age at diagnosis, gender, socioeconomic status, educational level, SLEDAI, SLICC/ACR damage index (SDI), FACIT-Fatigue, and the domains of the LupusQoL Results: The mean age at diagnosis was 32.2 years (11.8); 121 (91.7%) were female. Nearly all patients were Mestizo. The mean percent of time for absenteeism was 5.0 (12.9), it was 28.5 (26.4) for presenteeism, and it was 31.3 (27.2) for overall work impairment. In the multiple regression analysis, factors associated with absenteeism were disease duration (B = −0.34; SE = 0.12; p = 0.007), pain (B = −0.14; SE = 0.06; p = 0.046), intimate relationship (B = −0.07; SE = 0.03; p = 0.046), and emotional health (B = 0.16; SE = 0.06; p = 0.006); factors associated with presenteeism were physical health (B = −0.43; SE = 0.14; p = 0.002) and FACIT (B = −0.87; SE = 0.30; p = 0.005); and factors associated with overall work impairment were pain (B = −0.40; SE = 0.11; p = 0.001) and FACIT-Fatigue (B = −0.74; SE = 0.28; p = 0.010). Conclusion: A poor HRQoL and higher levels of fatigue were associated with a higher percentage of absenteeism, presenteeism, and overall work impairment in SLE patients.

Ixekizumab improves sleep and work productivity in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results from the COAST-X trial at 52 weeks

Background Patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis experience negative impacts on sleep, work productivity, and activity impairment. Ixekizumab, a monoclonal antibody selectively targeting interleukin-17A, has shown efficacy in treating the signs and symptoms of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. This analysis evaluated the effect of ixekizumab treatment on sleep, work productivity, and activity impairment in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Methods COAST-X (NCT02757352) was a 52-week, phase 3, multicenter, randomised placebo-controlled trial evaluating 80-mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks and every 4 weeks in patients with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Sleep disturbance was measured with the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) and analysed using mixed-effects models for repeated measures. Work productivity and activity impairment were measured using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Spondyloarthritis and analysed using analysis of covariance. Absenteeism, presenteeism, and overall work impairment were assessed for patients reporting paid work; activity impairment was assessed regardless of work status. Results Overall, patients treated with both dosing regimens of ixekizumab reported numerically greater improvements in sleep than placebo through Week 52. At Weeks 16 and 52, patients treated with ixekizumab every 4 weeks had significantly greater improvements in presenteeism (p = 0.007 and p = 0.003, respectively) and overall work impairment (p = 0.014 and p = 0.005, respectively) and numeric improvements in absenteeism than placebo. Patients treated with ixekizumab every 2 weeks had numerically greater improvements in absenteeism, presenteeism, and overall work impairment than placebo. Both dosing regimens of ixekizumab were associated with significantly greater improvements in activity impairment than placebo (ixekizumab every 4 weeks: p = 0.003 at Week 16 and p = 0.004 at Week 52; ixekizumab every 2 weeks: p = 0.007 at Week 16 and p = 0.006 at Week 52). Conclusions Treatment with ixekizumab improved sleep, work productivity, and activity impairment in patients with nr-axSpA. Improvements in presenteeism and overall work impairment were sustained and consistent in the patients treated with ixekizumab every 4 weeks from Week 16 to Week 52. Improvements in activity impairment were sustained and consistent in both ixekizumab-treated groups from Week 16 to Week 52. Trial registration NCT02757352, May 2, 2016.

Prevalence and Impact of Treatment-Resistant Depression in Latin America: a Prospective, Observational Study

Approximately one-third of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) have treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The TRAL study will evaluate the prevalence and impact of TRD among patients with MDD in four Latin American countries. In this multicenter, prospective, observational study, patients with MDD were recruited from 33 reference sites in Mexico, Colombia, Brazil, and Argentina. Patients were assessed for TRD, defined as failure to respond to ≥ 2 antidepressant medications of adequate dose and duration. Demographics, previous/current treatments, depressive symptoms, functioning, healthcare resource utilization, and work impairment were also collected and evaluated using descriptive statistics, chi-square test, Fisher exact test, t-test for independent samples, or the Mann–Whitney nonparametric test, as appropriate. 1475 patients with MDD were included in the analysis (mean age, 45.6 years; 78% women); 89% were receiving relevant psychiatric treatment. 429 patients met criteria for TRD, and a numerically higher proportion of patients with TRD was present in public versus private sites of care (31% vs 27%). The mean Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score was 25.0 among all MDD patients and was significantly higher for patients with TRD versus non-TRD (29.4 vs 23.3; P < 0.0001). Patients with TRD, versus those with non-TRD, were significantly more likely to be older, have a longer disease duration, have more comorbidities, be symptomatic, have a higher median number of psychiatric consultations, and report greater work impairment. Patients with TRD have a disproportionate burden of disease compared to those with non-TRD. Appropriate treatment for TRD is a substantial unmet need in Latin America. https://www.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03207282, 07/02/2017.

Non-infectious uveitis burden on quality of life and work impairment assessed through different psychometric questionnaires

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between a novel psychometric 12-item questionnaire (U-qest) and other validated questionnaires to assess quality of life and work impairment in patients with non-infectious uveitis. Methods: Data were collected at baseline and 3 months postbaseline using U-qest and two other validated questionnaires: The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) and the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). Results: A total of 136 patients (52.2% female) aged 47.9 ± 14.8 years (mean ± SD) were enrolled in 14 uveitis referral centres. U-qest correlated moderately with VFQ-25 and SF-12 at baseline and at 3 months. Both U-qest and VFQ-25 scores improved as disease improved; however, U-qest also detected improvement in patients for whom VFQ-25 scores did not improve. Disease activity was shown to significantly affect activity impairment. Patients and physicians expressed positive perceptions regarding the use and benefit of this instrument. U-qest showed very good reliability in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91). Conclusions: U-qest can be considered a useful tool to assess the burden of uveitis on quality of life.

P269 Real-world impact of biological therapies on work impairment and quality of life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients

Background Randomised controlled trials have reported improvement of work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) as well as quality of life in biological-treated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. However, data beyond clinical trials are limited. Methods This multicentre prospective cohort study evaluated the effect of initiating biological or small molecule therapy on work impairment in IBD patients. Subjects completed the WPAI questionnaire and Short IBD questionnaire (SIBDQ) at biological therapy initiation and at week 26. Clinical disease activity was assessed using the Harvey Bradshaw Index and Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index. Biochemical disease activity was assessed using C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Results In total, 156 IBD patients were included for analysis (median age 40 years, 55% male, 55% Crohn’s disease). Of these patients, 28% started infliximab, 33% adalimumab, 19% vedolizumab, 18% ustekinumab, 1% tofacitinib and 1% golimumab. Concomitant medication use at baseline included 28% prednisone, 12% budesonide, 34% mesalamine, and 46% immunomodulator. At baseline, 58% had clinical disease activity and 58% had biochemical disease activity. In our cohort, 111 (71%) were employed and 17 (11%) patients reported partial or full occupational disability. The mean total work impairment at baseline was 52% ± 36%. During follow-up, 7 patients lost their job and 8 patients started employment. For the entire cohort, improvements in all WPAI domains were observed: mean 11%-points decrease in missed working hours, 4%-points decrease in impairment while working, 15%-points decrease in total work impairment and 15%-points decrease in total activity impairment. Parallel improvements were seen in SIBDQ scores (mean improvement 7.6 ± 11.3). At week 26, 66 (42%) patients achieved the minimal clinical important difference in total work impairment (improvement ≥7%-points). Patients with clinical disease activity at baseline and clinical response to the biological (n=32) showed a larger improvement in total work impairment compared with other subjects (n=86) (mean difference 29%-points versus 10%-points; p=0.036 (T-test)). Similarly, these patients showed greater improvement in SIBDQ scores compared to other subjects (mean 13.8 versus 5.4, respectively; p&lt;0.001 (T-test)). Conclusion IBD patients experienced substantial work impairment prior to initiating biological treatment. Improved work impairment scores were seen after initiation of biological therapy and patients with clinical response showed even greater improvements. These results underline the importance of IBD disease control to improve work productivity and participation.

Poor Sleep Health and Next Day Work Impairment: The Mediating Role of Fatigue

Nightly sleep impacts next-day alertness and cognitive functioning. For healthcare professions, work impairment can be life-threatening for patients. Thus, understanding how sleep affects work quality is imperative to promoting medical safety and overall health of workers. The current study investigated whether nightly sleep health is associated with next-day work impairment in nurses and whether this association is mediated by daily fatigue. Sixty nurses reported their sleep characteristics, fatigue, and work impairment using ecological momentary assessment for two weeks. We used a series of multilevel models (a path: sleep→fatigue, b path: fatigue→work impairment, c path: sleep→work impairment, c′ path: sleep and fatigue→work impairment), adjusting for sociodemographics and work shift. At the between-person level, poorer sleep quality was associated with greater work impairment (βc=-23.36, p&lt;.001). This association was mediated by fatigue such that poorer sleep quality was associated with greater fatigue (βa=-19.54, p&lt;.01), which was further associated with greater work impairment (βb=0.79, p&lt;.001). After including fatigue, the association of sleep quality with work impairment was reduced (βc′ =-7.07, p=.08). Similarly, fatigue mediated the relationship between sleep sufficiency and work impairment (βa=-16.49; βb=0.79; βc=-19.36; p&lt;.001; βc′ =-6.32, p=.05). At the within-person level, on days after long sleep duration (&gt;8hrs), nurses reported greater work impairment (βc=10.08, p&lt;.01), however, this was not mediated by fatigue. Our results suggest that poor sleep health may impair next-day work performance, mostly through increased fatigue. Future interventions for nurses can target daily fatigue to reduce the adverse effects of poor sleep on work impairment.