A noninvasive multi-analytic approach for lung cancer screening of patients with pulmonary nodules.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1550-1550
Author(s):  
Hong Zheng ◽  
Tiancheng Han ◽  
Quanxing Liu ◽  
Dong Zhou ◽  
Li Jiang ◽  
...  

1550 Background: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is an effective approach for lung cancer screening of high-risk patients with pulmonary nodules, however with varying false positive rates depending on the somewhat subjective judgement of the practice professional. Artificial intelligence derived from machine learning of comprehensive patient profiles, including multi-omics and clinical data, has the potential to provide more objective assessment of patient’s risk in order to aid clinician’s decision making. We have developed a multi-analyte algorithm-based assay (MAAA) that incorporates ctDNA mutation, ctDNA methylation, and protein biomarker profiles evaluated through non-invasive blood-based testing, as well as patient’s clinical information, to improve the diagnostic efficacy of lung cancer. Methods: 98 high-risk patients with pulmonary nodules were enrolled in two independent cohorts (68 for training/testing and 30 for independent validation). The malignancy of the pulmonary nodules were established through pathology of surgical-removed nodules. Prior to surgery, each patient was also subject to cell-free DNA-based sequencing for DNA mutation and DNA methylation profiling, as well as serum protein biomarker profiling. On the training/testing patient cohort, machine-learning-based predictive models were first built for malignancy status prediction based on each type of molecular or clinical features. A final ensemble model was then constructed to incorporate the measurements based on molecular and clinical markers to provide the ultimate recommendation on the malignancy of the pulmonary nodule. The performance of each individual model and the final ensemble model was benchmarked on the training/testing cohort, and also validated on the independent validation cohort. Results: On the 30-patient independent validation cohort, individual prediction models based on clinical information, protein marker, ctDNA mutation, and ctDNA methylation profiles achieved predictive AUC of 0.59, 0.48, 0.71, and 0.84, respectively. The final ensemble model achieved predictive AUC of 0.86, which has strongly indicated that an integrative, algorithm-based approach of multi-analytic molecular and clinical profiles greatly outperforms any single-analytic profiling. Conclusions: Multi-analyte algorithm-based approach can be utilized to assist in lung cancer screening for patients with pulmonary nodules. It has demostrated a high accuracy through independent validation, and has outperformed any single-analyte testing in our study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zixing Wang ◽  
Ning Li ◽  
Fuling Zheng ◽  
Xin Sui ◽  
Wei Han ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The timeliness of diagnostic testing after positive screening remains suboptimal because of limited evidence and methodology, leading to delayed diagnosis of lung cancer and over-examination. We propose a radiomics approach to assist with planning of the diagnostic testing interval in lung cancer screening. Methods From an institute-based lung cancer screening cohort, we retrospectively selected 92 patients with pulmonary nodules with diameters ≥ 3 mm at baseline (61 confirmed as lung cancer by histopathology; 31 confirmed cancer-free). Four groups of region-of-interest-based radiomic features (n = 310) were extracted for quantitative characterization of the nodules, and eight features were proven to be predictive of cancer diagnosis, noise-robust, phenotype-related, and non-redundant. A radiomics biomarker was then built with the random survival forest method. The patients with nodules were divided into low-, middle- and high-risk subgroups by two biomarker cutoffs that optimized time-dependent sensitivity and specificity for decisions about diagnostic workup within 3 months and about repeat screening after 12 months, respectively. A radiomics-based follow-up schedule was then proposed. Its performance was visually assessed with a time-to-diagnosis plot and benchmarked against lung RADS and four other guideline protocols. Results The radiomics biomarker had a high time-dependent area under the curve value (95% CI) for predicting lung cancer diagnosis within 12 months; training: 0.928 (0.844, 0.972), test: 0.888 (0.766, 0.975); the performance was robust in extensive cross-validations. The time-to-diagnosis distributions differed significantly between the three patient subgroups, p < 0.001: 96.2% of high-risk patients (n = 26) were diagnosed within 10 months after baseline screen, whereas 95.8% of low-risk patients (n = 24) remained cancer-free by the end of the study. Compared with the five existing protocols, the proposed follow-up schedule performed best at securing timely lung cancer diagnosis (delayed diagnosis rate: < 5%) and at sparing patients with cancer-free nodules from unnecessary repeat screenings and examinations (false recommendation rate: 0%). Conclusions Timely management of screening-detected pulmonary nodules can be substantially improved with a radiomics approach. This proof-of-concept study’s results should be further validated in large programs.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 749S
Author(s):  
Gregory M. Loewen ◽  
DongFeng Tan ◽  
Donald Klippenstein ◽  
Zachary Grossman ◽  
Enriqueta Nava ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 248 (2) ◽  
pp. 625-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Wang ◽  
Rob J. van Klaveren ◽  
Hester J. van der Zaag–Loonen ◽  
Geertruida H. de Bock ◽  
Hester A. Gietema ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 114-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kinga Kiszka ◽  
Lucyna Rudnicka-Sosin ◽  
Romana Tomaszewska ◽  
Małgorzata Urbańczyk-Zawadzka ◽  
Maciej Krupiński ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bojiang Chen ◽  
Jun Shao ◽  
Jinghong Xian ◽  
Pengwei Ren ◽  
Wenxin Luo ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundLow-dose computed tomographic (LDCT) screening has been proven to be powerful in detecting lung cancers in early stage. However, it’s hard to carry out in less-developed regions in lacking of facilities and professionals. The feasibility and efficacy of mobile LDCT scanning combined with remote reading by experienced radiologists from superior hospital for lung cancer screening in deprived areas was explored in this study.MethodsA prospective cohort was conducted in rural areas of western China. Residents over 40 years old were invited for lung cancer screening by mobile LDCT scanning combined with remote image reading or local hospital-based LDCT screening. Rates of positive pulmonary nodules and detected lung cancers in the baseline were compared between the two groups.ResultsAmong 8073 candidates with preliminary response, 7251 eligibilities were assigned to the mobile LDCT with remote reading (n = 4527) and local hospital-based LDCT screening (n = 2724) for lung cancer. Basic characteristics of the subjects were almost similar in the two cohorts except that the mean age of participants in mobile group was relatively older than control (61.18 vs. 59.84 years old, P < 0.001). 1778 participants with mobile LDCT scans with remote reading (39.3%) revealed 2570 pulmonary nodules or mass, and 352 subjects in the control group (13.0%) were detected 472 ones (P < 0.001). Proportions of nodules less than 8 mm or subsolid were both more frequent in the mobile LDCT group (83.3% vs. 76.1%, 32.9% vs. 29.8%, respectively; both P < 0.05). In the baseline screening, 26 cases of lung cancer were identified in the mobile LDCT scanning with remote reading cohort, with a lung cancer detection rate of 0.57% (26/4527), which was significantly higher than control (4/2724 = 0.15%, P = 0.006). Moreover, 80.8% (21/26) of lung cancer patients detected by mobile CT with remote reading were in stage I, remarkedly higher than that of 25.0% in control (1/4, P = 0.020).ConclusionMobile LDCT combined with remote reading is probably a potential mode for lung cancer screening in rural areas.Trial registrationNo. of registration trial was ChiCTR-DDD-15007586 (http://www.chictr.org).


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (S16) ◽  
pp. S2100-S2102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjolein A. Heuvelmans ◽  
Matthijs Oudkerk

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1410-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan E. Walter ◽  
Marjolein A. Heuvelmans ◽  
Uraujh Yousaf-Khan ◽  
Monique D. Dorrius ◽  
Erik Thunnissen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 553-562
Author(s):  
V.A. Gombolevskiy ◽  
◽  
A.E. Nikolaev ◽  
A.N. Shapiev ◽  
A.O. Kosolapov ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document