Alliance A071401: Phase II trial of FAK inhibition in meningiomas with somatic NF2 mutations.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2502-2502
Author(s):  
Priscilla Kaliopi Brastianos ◽  
Erin Twohy ◽  
Elizabeth Robins Gerstner ◽  
Timothy J. Kaufmann ◽  
A. John Iafrate ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Synthetic Lethal ◽  
Macdonald Criteria ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Grade 3

2502 Background: Patients with progressive or recurrent meningiomas have limited treatment options. Clinical trials of systemic therapies for meningiomas have failed to demonstrate benefit. FAK inhibition has a synthetic lethal relationship with NF2 loss. Given the predominance of NF2 mutations in meningiomas, we evaluated the efficacy of GSK2256098, a FAK inhibitor, as part of the first genomically-driven phase II study in recurrent or progressive grade I-III meningiomas. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) whose tumors screened positively for NF2 mutations were treated with GSK2256098 750mg po bid until progressive disease in 2 separate cohorts: grade I or II/III meningiomas. Two co-primary endpoints were used: progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and response rate (RR) by Macdonald criteria; per study design, the trial would be declared positive if either endpoint was met. RR was evaluated across the overall cohort; PFS6 was evaluated within each subgroup. Historical benchmark data was obtained from Kaley et al. Neuro Oncol 2014. In the grade I group, 12 evaluable pts provided >79% power to detect a PFS6 rate >65% (vs. null hypothesis of 25%; alpha=0.014). In the grade II/III group, 24 evaluable pts provided >85% power to detect a PFS6 >41.5% (vs. null 15%; alpha=0.02). The threshold for promising results for PFS6 was: 7+/12(grade I) and 8+/24(grade II/III) pts. For RR, 36 evaluable pts provided >94% power to detect RR >20% (vs. null 2.5%; alpha= 0.012). Results: Of 322 pts screened for all mutation cohorts of the study, 36 eligible and evaluable pts with NF2 mutations were enrolled. Across all grades, one pt had a partial response and 24 had stable disease as best response to treatment. In Grade I pts, the observed PFS6 rate was 83% (10/12 pts; 95% CI: 52-98%). In Grade II/III pts, the observed PFS6 rate was 33% (8/24 pts; 95% CI: 16-55%). The study met PFS6 efficacy endpoint both for the Grade I and the Grade II/III cohorts. Treatment was well tolerated. Only 7 patients had a maximum grade-3 adverse event that was at least possibly related to treatment; toxicities across these pts included: proteinuria (2), rash (1), pain (1), ALT (1), AST (1), cholecystitis (1), hypertriglyceridemia (1), apraxia (1), and lymphopenia (1) with no grade 4 or 5 events. Conclusions: GSK2256098 had excellent tolerability andresulted in an improved PFS6 rate in pts with recurrent or progressive NF2-mutated meningiomas. Trial endpoint was met. FAK inhibition warrants further evaluation in this patient population. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Clinical trial information: NCT02523014 .

Regorafenib in patients with refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer: a Phase II study (RESOUND)

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (35) ◽  
pp. 4009-4017
Author(s):  
Silvia Bozzarelli ◽  
Lorenza Rimassa ◽  
Laura Giordano ◽  
Simona Sala ◽  
Maria Chiara Tronconi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
End Point ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

Aim: Regorafenib may be active in different cancer types. This Phase II trial included patients with various refractory cancer types treated with regorafenib. Here, we report the results of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma cohort. Methods: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 8 weeks; further investigation of regorafenib would be warranted with a PFS rate ≥50%. Results: A total of 20 patients were enrolled. The best response was stable disease in four patients (20%). The 8-week PFS rate was 25% with a median PFS of 1.7 months (95% CI: 1.5–2.0). A total of 13 patients (65%) experienced grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events. Conclusion: The study did not meet its primary end point. Further investigation of regorafenib monotherapy in this setting is not recommended. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02307500

Phase II study of the combination of thalidomide and irinotecan in patients with recurrent anaplastic gliomas not on enzyme inducing anticonvulsants

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1564-1564 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. K. Puduvalli ◽  
P. Giglio ◽  
M. D. Groves ◽  
K. R. Hess ◽  
M. Gilbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Antiangiogenic Agents ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mr Perfusion Imaging ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Anaplastic Gliomas ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3

1564 Background: Patients with recurrent anaplastic glioma (AG) have few treatment options after initial alkylating agent therapy. In this study, the efficacy of thalidomide and irinotecan against recurrent AG was tested to assess if synergistic activity of cytotoxic and antiangiogenic agents could affect clinical outcome. Methods: Patients with recurrent AG with a KPS≥70 not on enzyme inducing anticonvulsants and with fewer than three relapses after radiation therapy and chemotherapies were eligible; the total planned enrollment is 39 patients. Irinotecan is administered at 125 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks rest; thalidomide is initiated at 100 mg daily and escalated weekly up to 400 mg daily. Warfarin (1 mg) is given for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Patients undergo clinical and radiologic evaluations every 6-weeks. The primary endpoint is progression free survival at 6 months (PFS-6). To determine possible radiologic correlates to treatment effects, DCE- MR perfusion-imaging studies are obtained at baseline and subsequent follow up visits. Results: 17 are evaluable for response; the remainder were inevaluable. All evaluable patients had previously failed temozolomide and 9 had also failed nitrosourea therapy. The median age is 44 yrs and median KPS is 90. Four patients are alive and progression free at 6-months whereas 9 have progressed; the median progression free survival is 23 weeks and the PFS-6 is 34%. The best response was a CR in one patient, PR in 2 and stable disease in 9. Two patients have died of unspecified causes probably related to treatment. Median overall survival has not been reached; the 12-month and 18 month survivals by Kaplan Meier analysis are 73% and 26% respectively. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included fatigue (29%), leukopenia (29%), nausea/vomitting (24%), and diarrhea (18%) requiring dose reductions. Two patients had VTE. Conclusions: The preliminary results of this ongoing study suggest that the combination of irinotecan and thalidomide has activity in patients with recurrent anaplastic gliomas; the ongoing assessment of this combination in patients with AG will more definitively define whether the combination can be an effective second line therapy for this population. [Table: see text]

MC044h, a phase II trial of sorafenib in patients (pts) with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET): A Phase II Consortium (P2C) study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4504-4504 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Hobday ◽  
J. Rubin ◽  
K. Holen ◽  
J. Picus ◽  
R. Donehower ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Uncontrolled Hypertension ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3

4504 Background: Treatment options for metastatic NET, including islet cell carcinoma (ICC) and carcinoid tumor (CT), are limited. These tumors frequently express vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and platelet derived growth factor receptor receptor-β (PDGFR-β). Sorafenib, a small-molecule inhibitor of the VEGFR-2 and PDGFR-β tyrosine kinase domains, is a rational targeted therapy to evaluate in NET. Methods: Eligibility criteria included: ECOG PS = 2, = 1 prior chemotherapy, good organ function and signed informed consent. Prior interferon and prior or concurrent octreotide at a stable dose were allowed. Pts unable to take oral medications, with uncontrolled hypertension or with symptomatic coronary artery disease were excluded. Pts received sorafenib 400 mg po BID. Primary endpoint was response by RECIST in two cohorts (ie, CT and ICC) using separate 2-stage phase II designs. Results: 93 pts were enrolled: (50 CT, 43 ICC). For pts evaluable for the primary endpoint, 4 of 41 (10%) CT pts and 4 of 41 (10%) ICC pts had a PR. There were 3 minor responses (MR = 20–29% decrease in sum of target lesion diameters) in CT pts and 9 MRs in ICC pts for PR+MR rate of 17% for CT pts and 32% for ICC pts. For pts evaluable, 6-month progression-free survival was observed in 8/20 CT and 14/23 ICC pts. Grade 3–4 toxicity occurred in 43% of pts, with skin (20%), GI (7%) and fatigue (9%) most common. Translational studies from tumor tissue will be presented. Conclusions: Sorafenib at 400 mg po BID has modest activity in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, with frequent grade = 3 toxicity. Supported by NOI CM6225. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II study of sunitinib in recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma: A trial of the PMH Phase II Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5576-5576
Author(s):  
S. Welch ◽  
H. J. Mackay ◽  
H. Hirte ◽  
G. F. Fleming ◽  
R. Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

5576 Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) overexpression in EC correlates with poor outcome, thus targeting VEGF is a rational therapeutic approach. We have conducted a two-stage open-label phase II study in advanced EC with sunitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple VEGF receptors. Methods: Eligible pts have recurrent or metastatic EC and have received up to 1 prior chemotherapy (CT) regimen for metastatic disease. Sunitinib is given at 50 mg daily (OD) for 4 consecutive weeks (wks) followed by 2 wks off. Dose could be reduced to 37.5 mg OD and then 25 mg OD in the setting of toxicity. Imaging is repeated every 12 wks. Primary objectives are objective response rate (ORR by RECIST) and rate of 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). If 1 or more responses occur in the first 15 evaluable pts, the study would continue to a second stage (total = 30 pts). Secondary objectives are time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: We report the results of the first stage of this study. Sixteen pts have been treated (median age: 63; range 41–74) with 37 cycles of sunitinib (median 2; range: 1–7). Baseline ECOG PS was 0 (7 pts), 1 (8 pts), or 2 (1 pt). Histology was endometrioid (7 pts), serous (5 pts), clear cell (1 pt), or mixed/other (3 pts). Most pts had high-grade histology (G3: 8; G2: 4; G1: 2; GX: 2). Nine pts had prior adjuvant CT, 8 pts had 1 prior CT for advanced EC, 4 pts had prior hormones and 7 pts had prior radiotherapy. Partial response was achieved by 2 pts (ORR = 12.5%), and 2 other pts had a best response of stable disease; 3 of these pts remained progression-free > 6 months. Median TTP = 2.5 months (95% CI: 2.47-NR), and median OS = 6.2 months (95% CI: 5.1-NR). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) in >10% of pts were fatigue (7 pts, 44%) and hypertension (5 pts, 31%). Dose reduction was required for 11 of 16 pts (69%). Two pts were inevaluable after receiving <2 cycles due to AE (grade 4 hyponatremia; grade 3 fatigue) and 1 other pt has yet to complete 2 cycles. Conclusions: Sunitinib shows preliminary activity in EC. This trial will proceed to a second stage of accrual to further explore the efficacy and safety of sunitinib in advanced EC. [Table: see text]

Pazopanib and lapatinib in patients with relapsed malignant glioma: Results of a phase I/II study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2040-2040
Author(s):  
S. N. Frentzas ◽  
M. D. Groves ◽  
J. Barriuso ◽  
D. Harris ◽  
D. Reardon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Malignant Glioma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitor ◽  
Macdonald Criteria ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Elevated Liver Enzymes ◽  
Adequate Organ Function ◽  
Grade 3

2040 Background: Pazopanib (paz) is an oral angiogenesis inhibitor targeting VEGFR, PDGFR, and c-kit; and lapatinib (lap) is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of EGFR (ErbB1) and HER-2 (ErbB2). Combination of VEGFR, PDGFR, and ErbB1 inhibitors may provide synergistic antitumor activity in malignant glioma. Phase I determined the optimally tolerated regimen (OTR) of paz and lap when given with enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants (EIACs). Phase II, which evaluated the efficacy of daily paz/lap (400 mg/1000mg) in relapsed grade 4 glioma without EIACs, was previously reported. Methods: Patients (pts) with grade 3 or 4 glioma, on EIACs, and with adequate organ function were eligible. Doses of paz and lap were escalated in a 3 + 3 design. OTR was defined as the highest dose of paz/lap at which no more than 1 of 6 pts had dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and target concentrations were achieved. Results: 32 pts have been enrolled at doses of paz/lap (mg, daily unless specified) of 200/1500 (N = 4), 800/1500 (N = 6), 800/500 bid (N = 5), 800/750 bid (N = 7), 800/1000 bid (N = 6), and 600 bid/1000 bid (N = 4). Data on 28 pts: the most common adverse events (AEs) were: fatigue (25%); diarrhea (25%); headache (21%); ALT increase (18%); nausea (18%); and insomnia (14%). Hepatobiliary lab abnormalities were reversible, uncomplicated, and included: AST elevation (11%), hyperbilirubinemia (7%), ALT elevation (36%; 7% Gr 3), and Alk phos elevation (14%). DLTs were elevated liver enzymes (800/1500; 1 pt), elevated lipase (800/750 bid; 1 pt) and thrombocytopenia, fatigue, diarrhea, confusion (800/1000 bid; 1 pt). 2 pts dose reduced and 3 pts had a dose interruption. At 600 bid/1000 bid, the target paz Cmin of 17.5 μg/mL was achieved; median lap Cmin of 0.447 μg/mL approached the target of 0.5 μg/mL. Phase I best response (MacDonald criteria) was PR in 3 pts (11%) and SD ≥ 8 weeks in 5 pts (18%). Two pts remain on the phase II, at 21 months (PR) and 23 months (CR) of therapy. Conclusions: The paz/lap combination has a manageable safety profile with a preliminary OTR with EIACs of paz 600 mg bid/ lap 1000 mg bid. EIACs decreased plasma paz and lap concentrations. Responses and lengthy periods without disease progression were seen in some pts in phase I and II. [Table: see text]

Phase I trial of docetaxel (D), cisplatinum (C), and continuous capecitabine (CAP) (TCX) in advanced esophagogastric cancer (AEC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14587-e14587
Author(s):  
Simon Gollins ◽  
Arwel Lloyd ◽  
Jackie Morris ◽  
Nick Smith ◽  
Brian Haylock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

e14587 Background: This phase I study assessed the combination of D, C, and continuous CAP in AEC to develop a regimen of acceptable toxicity to take forward to phase II study. Methods: Patients with AEC were treated in cohorts of 3, at one of 3 dose levels (DL). DL0: D at 60 mg/m2 IV on day 1, C at 60 mg/m2 IV on day 1, CAP at 1,000 mg/m2 per day in two divided doses days 1-21, every 3 weeks. DL1: CAP increased to 1,250 mg/m2 per day. DL2: D increased to 75 mg/m2 IV day 1 and CAP to 1,250 mg/m2 per day. Prophylactic colony stimulating factors were not used. Patients received a maximum of 6 cycles. Blood counts and biochemistry were assessed twice weekly and daily for grade 3/4 abnormality. Results: Between 1.11.07 and 24.6.09 15 patients were enrolled: male/female:14/1, WHO PS:0/1:10/5, median age 63 yr (range 46-69), primary site oesophagus/GOJ/stomach:7/3/5, adeno/squamous:14/1, T2/3/4:2/9/4, N0/1/2:1/13/1, M0/1:1/14. 6 patients were treated at DL0, 6 at DL1 and 3 at DL2. All patients received 6 cycles apart from 2 at DL 1 who received 3 because of disease progression. Dose intensity: DL0: D 95%, C 100%, CAP 85%; DL1: D 91%, C 98.2%, CAP 79%; DL2: D 86%, C 100%, CAP 79%. There were no deaths on chemotherapy or within 30d of the last dose. The main dose limiting toxicity was febrile or infective neutropenia developing in 1/6 DL0, 2/6 DL1 and 3/3 DL2 (see table of most common treatment-related adverse events below: serious toxicity is gr 3 unless specified gr 4). The maximum length of gr 4 neutropenia was 5d. Best response (RECIST): 1 CR, 11PR, 2 SD and 1PD. 11 patients received second-line chemotherapy. Median and 1 yr overall survival: 17.5m and 60%. Median and 1 yr progression-free survival: 7m and 27%. Conclusions: TCX DLO is recommended for further study in a phase II trial. Encouraging response and survival were seen. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of cabozantinib (cabo) in patients (pts) with recurrent/metastatic endometrial cancer (EC): A study of the Princess Margaret, Chicago, and California phase II consortia.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5524-5524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neesha C. Dhani ◽  
Hal W. Hirte ◽  
Julia V. Burnier ◽  
Angela Jain ◽  
Marcus O. Butler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Pik3ca Mutations ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Grade 3

5524 Background: Recurrent/metastatic EC has a poor prognosis with no standard 2ndline therapy. Cabo is a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor of MET, VEGFR, TIE2, AXL & KIT, relevant in epithelial-stromal cross-talk. The role of MET/HGF in aggressive EC biology, where transient benefit of VEGF-targeting is due to MET/HGF, TIE2 & AXL, provides rationale for MET targeting in EC. Methods: PHL86 (NCI#9322/NCT01935934) is a multi-centre, phase II trial of cabo (60mg oral daily dose) in pts with EC recurring within a year of adjuvant chemotherapy (ctx), or with progression after 1 line of ctx for metastatic disease. Experimental (E) cohort was stratified by histology (serous (SER) vs endometroid (END)) in a Simon two-stage design for co-primary endpoints of response rate ( > 30%) & 12-week progression-free-survival (PFS) ( > 55%). Activity was defined as > 7 partial responses (PRs) or > 15 instances of 12 wk-PFS in 36 pts. Pts with rare histology EC were treated in a parallel exploratory (Ex) cohort. Results: From May 2013 to Nov 2016, 102 pts (E: 71; Ex: 31) have been treated with cabo after prior radiation (59) and/or ctx (no. lines: 1(77); 2(22)). Cabo was well tolerated with common toxicities of fatigue, nausea, diarrhea & hand-foot syndrome. Most frequent Grade 3/4 toxicity was hypertension (32/101 pts). Fistula/perforation occurred in 4 of 71 SER/END pts & 4 of 31 Ex pts; no risk factors were identified. In 33 END pts, 6 PRs & 24 instances of > 12-wk PFS were observed; median PFS is 4.8 mths (95% CI: 4.4 – 6.4) with estimated 6-mth PFS of 43% (95% CI: 27 to 59%). In 34 SER pts, 4 PRs & 20 instances of > 12-wk PFS were observed; median PFS is 4.0 mths (95% CI: 2.7 – 4.7) with estimated 6-mth PFS of 30% (95% CI: 15 to 46%). 4 pts have had PFS > 12 mths, 1 SER pt remains on study after 25mths. Mutational analysis demonstrated presence of KRAS with PTEN or PIK3CA mutations in 9 (SER/END) pts, of whom 8/9 pts met 12-wk PFS endpoint, with a median PFS 5.9 mth (4.1 to 15.4). Conclusions: Cabo has single agent activity in END and SER EC with durable disease control. Concurrent mutation in KRAS/PTEN/PIK3CA may enrich for response. The current data support further evaluation of cabo in EC. Clinical trial information: NCT01935934.

Prospective phase II study of sunitinib rechallenge in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A G.I.O.N. trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16081-e16081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camillo Porta ◽  
Vittorio D. Ferrari ◽  
Paolo Andrea Zucali ◽  
Giuseppe Fornarini ◽  
Antonio Bernardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Stage Design ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prospective Phase ◽  
Grade 3

e16081 Background: Sunitinib is a 1st-line standard of care in mRCC. Lack of cross-resistance to sequential VEGF-targeting drugs and the possibility of a successful rechallenge with Sunitinib have been postulated. Whether mRCC patients (pts) could benefit from rechallenge with Sunitinib after progressing on 1st-line Sunitinib and 2nd-line Everolimus was the aim of this phase II study Methods: 39 mRCCpts were prospectively treated with Sunitinib (50 mg/daily, 4:2); main inclusion criteria were: histologically proven RCC with clear cell component, previous 1st-line Sunitinib with a Disease Control Rate lasting at least 10 months, 2nd-line Everolimus, and written informed consent. The primary end-point of this study was 6-months progression-free survival (PFS). A Simon’s 2-stage design was used; after testing Sunitinib on 12 pts in the first stage, the trial would have been terminated if 5 or fewer had a PFS of less than 6 months. Otherwise, the trial would have proceeded to the second stage, enrolling a total of 38 pts. If the total number of pts free of progression at 6 months would have been less than or equal to 18, Sunitinib would have been rejected Results: As a whole, 39 pts (30 males, 9 females) were enrolled. The study quickly moved from the first stage to its completion and ultimately succeeded; indeed, 6-months PFS was 60%, median PFS being 8.6 months (average: 9.59, range: 0.7-24.6 months). In terms of safety no unexpected toxicities were observed. Tx-related grade 3-4 AEs observed in ≥5% of the pts were: hand-foot skin reaction, fatigue, nausea, hypertriglyceridemia, hypophosphatemia, hypocalcemia, hyperglycemia, and neutropenia. One case each of myocardial infarction, atrial flutter and spontaneous pneumothorax were also reported, but resolved Conclusions: Despite an ineluctable time-lead-bias, median PFS on Sunitinib rechallenge was high (8.6 months), clearly showing that many pts may become sensitive again to VEGFRs-inhibition. Although many agents are presently available from 2nd-line on, in countries where treatment options are still limited, Sunitinib rechallenge could still represent a reasonable treatment option. EudraCT number: 2012-000473-23. Clinical trial information: 2012-000473-23.

Ultrafractionated radiation therapy (3x per day) for glioblastoma: Preliminary results of a phase II study

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1570-1570
Author(s):  
P. D. Beauchesne ◽  
L. Taillandier ◽  
V. Bernier ◽  
M. Djabri ◽  
X. Michel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3

1570 Background: Ultrafractionation radiation therapy consists in irradiating cells or tumors several times daily, delivering low doses at which hyperradiosensitivity occur. We recently reported the high efficiency of ultrafractionation radiotherapy in glioma cell lines and xenografts, and are now conducting a phase II clinical trial to determine the effect of an ultrafractionation regimen for glioblastoma patients. Methods: A prospective, multicenter, phase II study has opened for accrual in September 2003. Patients over 18 years of age who are able to give informed consent and have histologically proven, newly diagnosed and unresectable, supratentorial glioblastoma (WHO grade IV) are eligible. Three doses of 0.75 Gy spaced by at least four hours are delivered daily, five days a week for six consecutive weeks for a total of 67.5 Gy. Conformal irradiation includes the tumor bulk including a margin of 2.5 cm. Tolerance and toxicity are the primary endpoints; survival and progression-free survival are secondary endpoints. Results: To date 25 patients have been enrolled in this study, 19 currently evalualbe: 11 men and 8 women, median age 58 (range 37 to 76), median Karnofsky performance status (80 range from 70 to 100). The median time between histological diagnosis and the start of treatment is 7 weeks. The ultrafractionated radiation therapy has been well tolerated; no acute grade 3 and/or 4 CNS toxicity has been observed. Minor responses at the end of irradiation were seen in 5 patients. Median survival from initial diagnosis was 13.5 months, nine patients remain alive. Conclusions: Ultrafractionated radiation therapy is safe and well tolerated. No acute CNS toxicitiy has been observed. Overall survival of over 13 months for patients without prior debulking surgery compares favorably with other reports. Updated definitive results will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4112-4112
Author(s):  
Nitya Prabhakar Raj ◽  
Youyun Zheng ◽  
Virginia Kelly ◽  
Seth Katz ◽  
Joanne F Chou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Complete Evaluation ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Patient Decision ◽  
Mutation Burden ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Adrenocortical Carcinomas

4112 Background: Adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) are rare and aggressive. Treatment options are limited and marked by poor efficacy and substantial toxicity. In this phase II single-center study, the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab was assessed in patients (pts) with advanced ACC. Methods: Enrolled pts were aged ≥18 y with advanced ACC, ECOG ≤ 1, available tumor samples for biomarker analysis. Pts received pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for 2 y or until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, physician/patient decision to stop treatment. Imaging was performed every 9 wks. Tumor PD-L1 positivity (modified proportion score ≥ 1% or presence of stromal interface) was evaluated. Primary endpoint was ORR (by RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints included DOR, PFS, OS, safety. Somatic and germline next-generation sequencing was performed. Results: 39 pts were treated. Median age 62 (range, 19-87), 28% ECOG 0, 72% received ≥ 1 therapy. In available samples to date, 7/31 (23%) PD-L1+. At time of analysis, median follow-up among survivors was 17.8 mo (range, 5.4-34.7). ORR was 23.1% (95% CI, 11.1-39.3); 0 CR, 9PR. Seven pts (17.9%) had SD as best response. Among the 9 PRs, median time to PR was 4.1 mo (range, 1.7-10.5) and median DOR was not reached (95% CI, 4.1-not reached). Three pts achieving PR have completed 2 y of treatment with ongoing response noted. Tumor PD-L1 status is currently available in 6 pts with PR, 2/6 (33%) PD-L1+. Median PFS was 2.1 mo (95% CI, 2.0-10.7). Median OS was 24.9 mo (95% CI, 4.2-not reached); 2-year OS rate was 50% (95% CI, 36-69%). In the 34 tested tumors, germline testing identified 2 PR pts with Lynch syndrome; the remaining 7 PRs were MSS. Median tumor mutation burden for all PRs was 4.1 mutations/megabase (range, 0-31.5). There was no significant relationship between somatic alterations and response to treatment. Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 7/39 (17.9%) pts. Two pts discontinued therapy due to AEs; both pts achieved PRs and continue to respond. All pts with PRs had LFT elevation ≥ grade 2. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity and was well tolerated in advanced ACC. Durable responses were noted. Complete evaluation of tumor PD-L1 and microsatellite status will be reported at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02673333.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document