MC044h, a phase II trial of sorafenib in patients (pts) with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET): A Phase II Consortium (P2C) study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4504-4504 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Hobday ◽  
J. Rubin ◽  
K. Holen ◽  
J. Picus ◽  
R. Donehower ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Uncontrolled Hypertension ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3

4504 Background: Treatment options for metastatic NET, including islet cell carcinoma (ICC) and carcinoid tumor (CT), are limited. These tumors frequently express vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and platelet derived growth factor receptor receptor-β (PDGFR-β). Sorafenib, a small-molecule inhibitor of the VEGFR-2 and PDGFR-β tyrosine kinase domains, is a rational targeted therapy to evaluate in NET. Methods: Eligibility criteria included: ECOG PS = 2, = 1 prior chemotherapy, good organ function and signed informed consent. Prior interferon and prior or concurrent octreotide at a stable dose were allowed. Pts unable to take oral medications, with uncontrolled hypertension or with symptomatic coronary artery disease were excluded. Pts received sorafenib 400 mg po BID. Primary endpoint was response by RECIST in two cohorts (ie, CT and ICC) using separate 2-stage phase II designs. Results: 93 pts were enrolled: (50 CT, 43 ICC). For pts evaluable for the primary endpoint, 4 of 41 (10%) CT pts and 4 of 41 (10%) ICC pts had a PR. There were 3 minor responses (MR = 20–29% decrease in sum of target lesion diameters) in CT pts and 9 MRs in ICC pts for PR+MR rate of 17% for CT pts and 32% for ICC pts. For pts evaluable, 6-month progression-free survival was observed in 8/20 CT and 14/23 ICC pts. Grade 3–4 toxicity occurred in 43% of pts, with skin (20%), GI (7%) and fatigue (9%) most common. Translational studies from tumor tissue will be presented. Conclusions: Sorafenib at 400 mg po BID has modest activity in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, with frequent grade = 3 toxicity. Supported by NOI CM6225. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Randomized phase II study of S-1/CDDP plus TSU-68 versus S-1/CDDP in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 72-72
Author(s):  
Kensei Yamaguchi ◽  
Wasaburo Koizumi ◽  
Hisashi Hosaka ◽  
Yasutaka Takinishi ◽  
Norisuke Nakayama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

72^ Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in Japan as well as globally. Effective treatment of GC remains a therapeutic challenge. Although in the AVAGAST trial, bevacizumab was found to offer no survival benefit. Angiogenesis continues to be the standard treatment for GC, and thus, clinical trials on many anti-angiogenic drugs have been conducted. TSU-68 (orantinib) is an oral, angiokinase inhibitor targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, platelet-derived growth factor receptor β, and fibroblast growth factor receptor 1. The present study evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of TSU-68 in combination with Japanese standard S-1 and cisplatin (S-1/CDDP) in patients with advanced GC. Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, phase II trial, patients were randomized to Arm A (S-1/CDDP) or Arm B (TSU-68 plus S-1/CDDP). All patients received oral S-1 (40-60 mg/m2) twice daily for 21 days followed by a 14 day rest plus intravenous CDDP (60 mg/m2) on Day 8, repeated every 35 days. In Arm B pts received oral TSU-68 (400 mg/dose) alone, twice daily by addition 35 days. The primary endpoint was PFS. Results: In total, 93 patients were enrolled. For Arm A [male:female ratio], n=47 [35:11]; Arm B, n=45 [30:15]; the respective median age was 63.5 and 62.0 years. The median PFS was 7.0 and 6.8 months in Arms A and B, respectively (HR, 1.23; 95%CI, 0.74 to 2.05; P=0.425); the respective response rates were 56.5% and 62.2%. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (Arms A and B, 34.8% and 31.1%) and hemoglobin (Arms A and B, 26.1% and 48.9%). There were no differences in other toxicities between the 2 arms, both treatments were tolerated, and no treatment-related deaths were observed. In the PK study, although Arm B had a significantly lower plasma exposure to FT, CDHP, and Oxo compared to Arm A, the exposure to 5-FU was not different between the 2 arms. The exposure to CDDP in Arm B was significantly but slightly lower than that in arm A. Conclusions: Thus,TSU-68 plus S-1/CDDP therapy did not prolong PFS of patients with advanced GC as compared with S-1/CDDP. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-101327.

scholarly journals Osimertinib Rechallenge With Bevacizumab vs. Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patients With Osimertinib Resistance

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingli Cui ◽  
Yanhui Hu ◽  
Qingan Cui ◽  
Daoyuan Wu ◽  
Yuefeng Mao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Vegf Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Benefits ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Egfr Mutant

At present, treatment options for osimertinib resistance are very limited. Dual inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) significantly improved the progression-free survival (PFS) of advanced EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). After EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance, EGFR-TKI continuation combined with VEGF inhibitors still had clinical benefits. It is unclear whether the addition of bevacizumab after osimertinib progresses will prolong the duration of the osimertinib benefit. We screened 1289 patients with NSCLC and finally included 96 patients to evaluate osimertinib combined with bevacizumab (osi + bev) versus chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab (che + bev) for patients with acquired resistance to osimertinib. The overall response rate (ORR) for osi + bev and chem + bev was 15.8% (6 of 38) and 20.7% (12 of 58), respectively. The median PFS for osi + bev and che + bev was 7.0 and 4.9 months (HR 0.415 95%CI: 0.252–0.687 p = 0.001). The median OS for osi + bev and che + bev was 12.6 and 7.1 months (HR 0.430 95%CI: 0.266–0.696 p = 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that no brain metastases and osi + bev treatment after osimertinib resistance correlated with longer PFS (p = 0.044, p = 0.001), while the median PFS of osimertinib less than 6 months (p = 0.021) had a detrimental effect on sequent treatment. Only osi + bev treatment was identified as an independent predictor of OS (p = 0.001). The most common adverse events (AEs) of grade ≥3 were hypertension (13.2%) and diarrhea (10.5%) in the osi + bevacizumab group. Neutropenia (24.1%) and thrombocytopenia (19%) were the most common grade ≥3 AEs in the che + bev group. The overall incidence of serious AEs (grade ≥3) was significantly higher in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group. Our study has shown the superiority of osi + bev compared to che + bev after the failure of osimertinib, making it a preferred option for patients with acquired resistance to osimertinib.

Phase II study of FOLFOX, bevacizumab and erlotinib as initial therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3545-3545
Author(s):  
J. A. Meyerhardt ◽  
K. Stuart ◽  
A. Zhu ◽  
C. Fuchs ◽  
P. Bhargava ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Egfr Inhibition ◽  
Grade 3

3545 Background: Cytotoxic chemotherapy with targeted therapy against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has become a standard approach in MCRC, though combining VEGF and EGFR inhibition with chemotherapy as initial treatment is not well established. We conducted a phase II study of the combination of infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), bevacizumab, and erlotinib in chemotherapy naïve patients with MCRC. Methods: Eligible patients had measurable MCRC, no prior systemic therapy for MCRC or at least one year since completion of adjuvant therapy (only 5-FU and leucovorin acceptable), performance status 0–1. The regimen consisted of 14-day cycles of FOLFOX started on day 1 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 and 46-hour infusion 5-FU 2.4 g/m2), day 1 bevacizumab 5 mg/kg and erlotinib 150 mg daily. This isa single stage trial with goal of 35 patients. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Between Jan and Dec 2005, 31 patients have been enrolled with the following characteristics: male/female, 19/12; PS ECOG 0/1, 15/16; median age 58, range 38–81. Of the 28 patients who completed at least 1 cycle, the most common grade 3/4 adverse events include: 8/28 (29%) diarrhea, 8/28 (29%) neutropenia, 5/28 (18%) rash, 4/28 (14%) fatigue, 3/28 (11%) nausea/vomiting, 3/28 (11%) neuropathy. 22/28 (78%) of patients had at least 1 grade 3/4 toxicity. 14/31 patients remain on trial, 13/31 (42%) came off for toxicity or withdrew consent due to treatment-related toxicities, 4 withdrew consent for other reasons. Efficacy data is not available at time of submission but will be more mature by June 2006. Conclusions: The combination of FOLFOX, bevacizumab and erlotinib appears to have moderate toxicity, with ∼40% of patients coming off trial due to side effects. Further characterization of the tolerability profile will be necessary when interpreting the efficacy of the combination. We expect full accrual as well as reasonable point estimates of PFS by June 2006. Supported by: Sanofi-Synthelabo, a member of the Sanofi-Aventis group, Genentech [Table: see text]

A prospective phase II trial of gemcitabine plus axitinib in patients with sarcomatoid type renal carcinoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 616-616
Author(s):  
Inkeun Park ◽  
Hyo Jin Lee ◽  
Woo Kyun Bae ◽  
Shinkyo Yoon ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee
Keyword(s):  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Sarcomatoid Carcinoma ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Uncontrolled Hypertension ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Median Percentage ◽  
Ecog Ps

616 Background: Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a rare but very aggressive type of RCC. The treatment option for SRCC is very limited, and there have been anecdotal reports of very good responders to gemcitabine or vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinaase inhibitors (VEGFR TKI). We conducted multicenter phase 2 trial of gemcitabine plus axitinib (GX) in patients (pts) with recurrent or metastatic SRCC to evaluate its efficacy and safety. Methods: Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed metastatic or recurrent RCC with sarcomatoid component of 25% or more on resected kidney or exclusive sarcomatoid carcinoma on needle biopsy, ECOG PS 0-2, measurable lesion by RECIST v1.1, and adequate cardiac, hepatic, renal and bone marrow function. Pts with uncontrolled hypertension, prior exposure to gemcitabine or VEGFR TKI were exclude. Pts received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 by 3-week cycle and axitinib 5 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1, and secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results: Twenty-five pts were enrolled between Oct 2014 and Aug 2018. Median age was 61 (range 33-80), and 84% was male. ECOG PS were 1 (92%) and 2 (8%), and 52% had prior nephrectomy. Clear cell carcinoma was the most common histology of carcinoma component, and median percentage of sarcomatoid component was 90% (25-100%). Pts belonged to intermediate (28%) and poor (72%) risk group according to IMDC risk stratification. Median 6 cycles of GX were administered, and 56%, 28%, and 12% of pts achieved PR, SD, and PD, respectively, with an ORR of 56% and median duration of response of 2.5 months. With a median follow-up duration of 21.4 mo, median PFS was 4.9 mo (95% CI, 3.5-13.3), and median OS was 8.4 months (95% CI 3.5-13.3 months). Most adverse events were manageable, and no unexpected toxicities were found. One pt died of grade 5 pneumonia. Conclusions: GX showed promising efficacy in pts with SRCC. GX might be considered as one of treatment options for pts with SRCC, although efficacy of GX should be confirmed in larger trial.

A phase II trial of gefitinib in patients (pts) with progressive metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET): A Phase II Consortium (P2C) study

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4043-4043 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Hobday ◽  
K. Holen ◽  
R. Donehower ◽  
J. Camoriano ◽  
G. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Islet Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Ecog Ps

4043 Background: Systemic treatment options for progressive metastatic NET, including islet cell carcinoma (ICC) and carcinoid tumor (CT), are limited. These tumors frequently express the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Gefitinib, a small-molecule inhibitor of the EGFR tyrosine kinase, has been shown to inhibit the growth of NET cell lines. Methods: Eligibility criteria included: radiographic progression by RECIST criteria, ECOG PS ≤ 2, ≤ 1 prior chemotherapy, and good organ function. Prior interferon and prior or concurrent octreotide (if disease progression documented on stable dose) were allowed. Pts received gefitinib 250 mg po daily. We evaluated 6 month (mos) progression-free survival (PFS) in two cohorts (ie, CT and ICC) using separate 2-stage phase II designs. 6 mos PFS rates of 30% (CT) and 10% (ICC) were considered promising. Results: 96 pts were enrolled: (57 CT, 39 ICC). For pts evaluable for the primary endpoint, 23 of 38 (61%) CT pts and 9 of 29 (31%) pts with ICC were progression-free at 6 mos. 1 PR and one minor response (MR = 20–29% decrease in sum of target lesion diameters) were observed in 40 CT pts; 2 PR and 1 MR in 31 ICC pts. In addition, 32% (12/38) of CT and 14% (4/29) of ICC pts had stable disease on study for a duration that exceeded by at least 4 months the time to progression documented prior to study entry. Grade 3–4 toxicity was infrequent with fatigue (6%), diarrhea (5%) and rash (3%) most common. Evaluation of markers of the EGFR pathway on tumor tissue will be presented. Conclusions: Gefitinib is well-tolerated and results in prolonged disease stabilization in pts with prior documented objective progression of CT and ICC, with rare objective responses. Supported by NOI CM17104. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II trial of the CDK4 inhibitor PD0332991 in CDK4-amplified liposarcoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10002-10002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Andrew Dickson ◽  
Mary Louise Keohan ◽  
William D. Tap ◽  
Cristina Antonescu ◽  
Jonathan Landa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Promising Result ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cdk4 Inhibitor

10002 Background: CDK4 is amplified in approximately 90% of well-differentiated/de-differentiated liposarcomas (WD/DDLS). The selective CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor PD0332991 (PD) inhibits growth and induces senescence in liposarcoma cell lines and xenografts. In a phase I trial of PD, several patients with progressive WD/DDLS had prolonged stable disease for several years. To determine the safety and efficacy of PD, a phase II study was performed. Methods: Participants were patients with advanced WD/DDLS. Eligibility criteria were age≥18 years, measurable WD/DDLS (RECIST 1.1), documented progression on at least one systemic therapy directly before enrollment, CDK4 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization and retinoblastoma protein (RB) expression by immunohistochemistry (≥1+). Pts received oral PD 200mg daily for 14 consecutive days in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 weeks. Based on historical data, a promising result was defined as a 12-week PFS of ≥40% and not promising as ≤20%. The sample size was up to 28 evaluable patients. If 9 patients were progression free at 12 weeks, then PD would be considered to have activity in WD/DDLS. Results: Of 44 patients screened (42/44 CDK4 amplified; 41/44 RB+), 29 were enrolled and 27 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Median age was 65 (range 37-83); 52% were male; ECOG scores were 0 (69%) or 1 (31%), and the median number of prior regimens was 1 (range 1-5). PFS at 12 weeks was 70% (19/27 patients; 90% CI 56-100%), and thus the study significantly exceeded its primary endpoint. At the data cutoff, the median PFS was 18 weeks. Seven patients remain on study with stable disease at 18-48 weeks of followup. Grade 3 and 4 events included anemia (grade 3, 14%), thrombocytopenia (grade 3, 17%; grade 4, 14%), neutropenia (grade 3, 41%; grade 4, 7%) and febrile neutropenia (3%). Dose reductions were required in 24% of patients. Conclusions: Among patients with WD/DDLS with CDK4 amplification and RB expression who had actively progressing disease despite prior systemic therapy, treatment with the CDK4 inhibitor PD0332991 was associated with improved PFS. A randomized phase 3 trial is planned.

Phase II trial of the CDK4 inhibitor PD0332991 in patients with advanced CDK4-amplified liposarcoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10512-10512
Author(s):  
Mark Andrew Dickson ◽  
William D. Tap ◽  
Mary Louise Keohan ◽  
Sandra P. D'Angelo ◽  
Mrinal M. Gounder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Promising Result ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Grade 3

10512 Background: Approximately 90% of well-differentiated / de-differentiated liposarcomas (WD/DDLS) have CDK4 amplification. The selective CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor PD0332991 inhibits growth and induces senescence in liposarcoma cell lines and xenografts. Our prior phase II study demonstrated that treatment with PD0332991 (200mg daily x 14d every 21d) results in clinical benefit in WD/DDLS but moderate hematologic toxicity (48% Grade 3/4 neutropenia; dose reduction in 24%). Aiming to reduce toxicity, we conducted a phase II study to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity with PD0332991 at a new dose and schedule, 125mg daily x 21d every 28d. Methods: Participants were patients with advanced WD/DDLS. Eligibility criteria were age ≥ 18 years, measurable WD/DDLS (RECIST 1.1), documented progression on at least one systemic therapy directly before enrollment, CDK4 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization and retinoblastoma protein expression by immunohistochemistry (≥1+). Pts received oral PD0332991 at 125mg daily for 21 days in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS at 12 weeks. Based on historical data, a promising result was defined as a 12-week PFS of ≥40% and not promising as ≤20%. The sample size was up to 28 evaluable patients. If 9 patients were progression free at 12 weeks, then PD0332991 would be considered to have activity in WD/DDLS. Results: 29 pts were enrolled and 25 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Median age was 62 (range 42-85); 55% were male; median ECOG score was 0 (range 0-1). PFS at 12 weeks was 56% (14/25 patients; 90% CI 41-100%), and thus the study significantly exceeded its primary endpoint. Median PFS was 23.6 weeks (95% CI: 11.6 to Not Reached). There was 1 confirmed partial response lasting > 1 year. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events included anemia (grade 3, 21%), thrombocytopenia (grade 3, 7%; grade 4, 3%), and neutropenia (grade 3, 34%). Dose reduction was required in only 1 patient. Conclusions: In patients with WD/DDLS with CDK4 amplification, PD0332991 treatment was associated with a favorable PFS and objective tumor response. This dose and schedule appears active and may have less toxicity than 200mg x 14d. The 125mg x 21d schedule warrants evaluation in a phase 3 study. Clinical trial information: NCT01209598.

Dual blockade of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 (IGF-1R) signaling in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Phase I/randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine, erlotinib, and cixutumumab versus gemcitabine plus erlotinib (SWOG-0727).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4019-4019
Author(s):  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
Bryan H. Goldman ◽  
Ramesh K. Ramanathan ◽  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
Andrew M. Lowy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Fasting Blood Glucose ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Grade 3

4019 Background: Targeting a single pathway in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) is unlikely to impact its natural history. EGFR targeting with erlotinib added to gemcitabine (G) marginally improved the outcome of patients with advanced disease. We tested the hypothesis that if the EGFR and IGF-1R pathways are simultaneously blocked then progression free survival (PFS) would be significantly improved by abrogating reciprocal signaling that leads to resistance to either drug. Methods: This was a phase I/randomized phase II (RP2) study testing the anti-IGF-1R monoclonal antibody cixutumumab combined with erlotinib and G in patients with metastatic PAC. The control arm was erlotinib plus G. The primary endpoint of the RP2 portion of the study was PFS. Eligibility included patients with untreated metastatic disease, performance status 0/1, fasting blood glucose less than institutional upper limit of normal, and willingness to provide tissue and blood specimens for correlative studies. Results: In phase I portion (n=10) safety of cixutumumab 6 mg/kg IV/wk, erlotinib 100 mg/day orally and G 1000 mg/m2 IV D 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle was established. In the RP2 portion (n=124) 114 eligible patients (median age 63) were included. On the cixutumumab arm, 59% of patients were female vs. 40% on control arm. Median PFS and overall survival were 3.7 and 6.7 months, respectively, in both arms of the study. Major grade 3 and 4 toxicities were (cixutumumab/control) elevation of transaminases (12%/6%), fatigue (16%/12%), gastrointestinal (35%/28%), neutropenia (21%/10%), and thrombocytopenia (16%/7%). Grade 3/4 hyperglycemia was seen in 16% of patients on cixutumumab. Grade 3 or 4 kin toxicity was similar in both arms of the study (< 5%). Five treatment-related deaths were reported: 2 cardiac on each arm, 1 pulmonary on cixutumumab. Conclusions: IGF-1R inhibitor cixutumumab did not improve the progression free or overall survival of patients with metastatic PAC treated with erlotinib and G in a molecularly unselected population.

A phase II study of cetuximab (C225) in combination with chemoradiation (CRT) in patients (pts) with stage III A/B non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An interim report of the RTOG 0324 trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7531-7531 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Blumenschein ◽  
J. Moughan ◽  
W. Curran ◽  
F. Robert ◽  
F. Fossella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Preclinical Model ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Trial Testing ◽  
Grade 3

7531 Background: Cetuximab (C225) is a chimerized monoclonal antibody that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). NSCLC commonly expresses the EGFR, which is associated with aggressive tumor behavior and poor clinical outcome. Preclinical model systems demonstrate radiosensitization following molecular inhibition of EGFR signaling. Methods: We report a phase II trial testing the combination of C225 with CRT in unresectable stage III NSCLC with a planned sample size of 84 PTS. Eligibility criteria included Zubrod performance status (PS) = 1, weight loss = 5% over past 3 months, FEV1 = 1.2 l, adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. PTS received an initial dose of C225 (400 mg/m2) on day 1 of week 1, then weekly doses of C225 (250 mg/m2) until completion of therapy (weeks 2 –17). During week 2, patients started CRT (63 Gy/35 fractions) with weekly carboplatin (C) AUC 2 and paclitaxel (P) 45 mg/m2 × 6 doses followed by C (AUC 6) and P (200 mg/m2) × 2 cycles (weeks 12–17). Interim monitoring for severe (grade = 3) or excessive non-hematologic toxicities occurred after pts had been treated and followed for at least 90 days after RT. Primary endpoints include safety and compliance of concurrent C225 and CRT. Results: 93 pts were enrolled with 87 evaluable pts. Pts characteristics: 57% male, median age 64 years (range 42–85), 47% PS 0, 46% stage IIIA. Median follow-up is 14 months. Response rate is 62% (n=54) and 12 month overall survival (OS) is 68% (# at risk=56). Adverse events related to treatment include 20% (n=17) of pts with grade 4 hematologic toxicities and 7 pts who had grade 3 esophagitis. There was 1 infection related death, 1 death NOS, and 3 pts who died of pulmonary complications (adult respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonitis, and hypoxia). Conclusions: The combination of C225 with CRT is feasible. Further study will be needed to determine whether the addition C225 to CRT enhances toxicity or efficacy. Complete compliance and toxicity data along with 18 month OS will be reported. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II trial of carboplatin, weekly paclitaxel, and biweekly bevacizumab in patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8560-8560 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Perez ◽  
V. Suman ◽  
T. Amatruda ◽  
M. Gornet ◽  
R. Morton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Uncontrolled Hypertension ◽  
Unresectable Stage ◽  
Full Study ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Stage Iv Melanoma

8560 Background: In patients with metastatic melanoma, the combination of chemotherapy with an agent that specifically targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) might be able to control tumor growth and progression much more effectively than chemotherapy alone. Methods: A two-stage phase II clinical trial was conducted in patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma to assess the anti-tumor activity and toxicity profile of the combination of paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle), carboplatin (AUC = 6 IV on day 1) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 15). The primary end point of the study was the 8-week progression-free survival rate (PFS). Enrollment to the second stage of the study was opened if 8 or more of the first 20 patients enrolled remained progression-free at 8 weeks. Eligible patients had measurable disease by RECIST criteria, a performance status (PS) of 0–2 and acceptable pre-registration organ function. Exclusion criteria included: brain metastases, significant recent bleeding, uncontrolled hypertension and ongoing anticoagulation. The study opened in February 2006 and completed full study accrual in August 2006. Data from the 20 patients enrolled in the first stage are presented here. Results: Patients (60% male) had a median age of 63 and had a good performance status (85% had PS of 0). M1c disease was present in 45% of patients and 35% had undergone previous chemotherapy for stage IV melanoma (50% prior immunotherapy). Only 6 patients did not complete more than 2 cycles of chemotherapy due to refusal (3), desire for alternative treatment (1) or progression (2). Median follow-up among the 15 patients still alive was 5.5 months (range: 6 weeks - 9 months). The 8-week PFS rate was 70% (14/20). The median time to progression was 163 days. One partial response was observed. There were 3 disease-related deaths at 65, 120 and 190 days post-registration. The most common toxicities were neutropenia (95%; 45% = grade 3), anemia (95%; 15% = grade 3), fatigue (90%; 5% = grade 3), leukopenia (85%; 25% = grade 3), and thrombocytopenia (75%; 5% = grade 3). Conclusions: The combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin and bevacizumab appears to be well tolerated and clinically active in patients with stage IV melanoma. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document