Phase II study of the combination of thalidomide and irinotecan in patients with recurrent anaplastic gliomas not on enzyme inducing anticonvulsants

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1564-1564 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. K. Puduvalli ◽  
P. Giglio ◽  
M. D. Groves ◽  
K. R. Hess ◽  
M. Gilbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Antiangiogenic Agents ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mr Perfusion Imaging ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Anaplastic Gliomas ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3

1564 Background: Patients with recurrent anaplastic glioma (AG) have few treatment options after initial alkylating agent therapy. In this study, the efficacy of thalidomide and irinotecan against recurrent AG was tested to assess if synergistic activity of cytotoxic and antiangiogenic agents could affect clinical outcome. Methods: Patients with recurrent AG with a KPS≥70 not on enzyme inducing anticonvulsants and with fewer than three relapses after radiation therapy and chemotherapies were eligible; the total planned enrollment is 39 patients. Irinotecan is administered at 125 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks rest; thalidomide is initiated at 100 mg daily and escalated weekly up to 400 mg daily. Warfarin (1 mg) is given for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Patients undergo clinical and radiologic evaluations every 6-weeks. The primary endpoint is progression free survival at 6 months (PFS-6). To determine possible radiologic correlates to treatment effects, DCE- MR perfusion-imaging studies are obtained at baseline and subsequent follow up visits. Results: 17 are evaluable for response; the remainder were inevaluable. All evaluable patients had previously failed temozolomide and 9 had also failed nitrosourea therapy. The median age is 44 yrs and median KPS is 90. Four patients are alive and progression free at 6-months whereas 9 have progressed; the median progression free survival is 23 weeks and the PFS-6 is 34%. The best response was a CR in one patient, PR in 2 and stable disease in 9. Two patients have died of unspecified causes probably related to treatment. Median overall survival has not been reached; the 12-month and 18 month survivals by Kaplan Meier analysis are 73% and 26% respectively. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included fatigue (29%), leukopenia (29%), nausea/vomitting (24%), and diarrhea (18%) requiring dose reductions. Two patients had VTE. Conclusions: The preliminary results of this ongoing study suggest that the combination of irinotecan and thalidomide has activity in patients with recurrent anaplastic gliomas; the ongoing assessment of this combination in patients with AG will more definitively define whether the combination can be an effective second line therapy for this population. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Response and Toxicity to the Second Course of 3 Cycles of 177Lu-PSMA Therapy Every 4 Weeks in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2489
Author(s):  
Sazan Rasul ◽  
Tim Wollenweber ◽  
Lucia Zisser ◽  
Elisabeth Kretschmer-Chott ◽  
Bernhard Grubmüller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radioligand Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Node Metastases ◽  
Grade 3

Background: We investigated the response rate and degree of toxicity of a second course of three cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy (PSMA-RLT) every 4 weeks in mCRPC patients. Methods: Forty-three men (71.5 ± 6.6 years, median PSA 40.8 (0.87–1358 µg/L)) were studied. The response was based on the PSA level 4 weeks after the third cycle. The laboratory parameters before and one month after the last cycle were compared. Kaplan–Meier methods were used to estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the Cox regression model was performed to find predictors of survival. Results: Twenty-six patients (60.5%) exhibited a PSA reduction (median PSA declined from 40.8 to 20.2, range 0.6–1926 µg/L, p = 0.002); 18 (42%) and 8 (19%) patients showed a PSA decline of ≥50% and ≥80%, respectively. The median OS and PFS were 136 and 31 weeks, respectively. The patients with only lymph node metastases survived longer (p = 0.02), whereas the patients with bone metastases had a shorter survival (p = 0.03). In the multivariate analysis, only the levels of PSA prior to the therapy remained significant for OS (p < 0.05, hazard ratio 2.43, 95% CI 1.01–5.87). The levels of hemoglobin (11.5 ± 1.7 g/dL vs. 11 ± 1.6 g/dL, p = 0.006) and platelets (208 ± 63 g/L vs. 185 ± 63 g/L, p = 0.002) significantly decreased one month after cycle three, though only two grade 3 anemia and one grade 3 thrombocytopenia were recorded. Conclusion: A further intensive PSMA-RLT course is well tolerated in mCRPC patients and associated with promising response rates and OS.

Salvage immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combination therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16567-e16567
Author(s):  
Anish B. Parikh ◽  
Sarah P. Psutka ◽  
Yuanquan Yang ◽  
Katharine Collier ◽  
Abdul Miah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Combination Regimens

e16567 Background: ICI/TKI combinations are a new standard of care for the initial treatment (tx) of mRCC. Efficacy and toxicity of such combination regimens beyond the first-line (1L) setting remain unknown. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts for adult patients (pts) receiving an ICI/TKI combination in any line of tx for mRCC of any histology at one of two academic centers as of May 1, 2020. ICIs included pembrolizumab (Pm), nivolumab (Ni), ipilimumab (Ip), or avelumab (Av); TKIs included sunitinib (Su), axitinib (Ax), pazopanib (Pz), lenvatinib (Ln), or cabozantinib (Ca). Clinical data including pt demographics, histology, International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group, tx history, and ICI/TKI tx and toxicity details were recorded. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and safety, analyzed via descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 85 pts, 69 (81%) were male and 67 (79%) had clear cell histology. IMDC risk was favorable (24%), intermediate (54%), poor (20%), and unknown (2%). 39% had ICI/TKI tx in the 1L setting. ICI/TKI regimens included Pm/Ax (33%), Ni/Ca (25%), Ni/Ax (20%), Av/Ax (11%), Ni/Ip/Ca (8%), Ni/Su (2%), and Ni/Ln (1%). ORR and mPFS stratified by line of tx and prior tx are shown in the table. Of 52 pts who received ICI/TKI tx as salvage (after 1L), 52% had a grade 3 or higher (≥G3) adverse event (AE), of which the most common were anorexia (13.5%), diarrhea and hypertension (11.5% each), and fatigue (9.6%). 65% of pts on salvage ICI/TKI tx stopped tx for progression/death, while 16% stopped tx for ≥G3 AE. ≥G3 AE rates by line of tx were 62.5% (2L), 50% (3L), and 45% (≥4L). Conclusions: ICI/TKI combination therapy is effective and safe beyond the 1L setting. Prior tx history appears to impact efficacy but has less of an effect on safety/tolerability. These observations will need to be confirmed in prospective studies.[Table: see text]

Regorafenib in patients with refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer: a Phase II study (RESOUND)

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (35) ◽  
pp. 4009-4017
Author(s):  
Silvia Bozzarelli ◽  
Lorenza Rimassa ◽  
Laura Giordano ◽  
Simona Sala ◽  
Maria Chiara Tronconi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
End Point ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

Aim: Regorafenib may be active in different cancer types. This Phase II trial included patients with various refractory cancer types treated with regorafenib. Here, we report the results of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma cohort. Methods: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 8 weeks; further investigation of regorafenib would be warranted with a PFS rate ≥50%. Results: A total of 20 patients were enrolled. The best response was stable disease in four patients (20%). The 8-week PFS rate was 25% with a median PFS of 1.7 months (95% CI: 1.5–2.0). A total of 13 patients (65%) experienced grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events. Conclusion: The study did not meet its primary end point. Further investigation of regorafenib monotherapy in this setting is not recommended. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02307500

Phase I trial of docetaxel (D), cisplatinum (C), and continuous capecitabine (CAP) (TCX) in advanced esophagogastric cancer (AEC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14587-e14587
Author(s):  
Simon Gollins ◽  
Arwel Lloyd ◽  
Jackie Morris ◽  
Nick Smith ◽  
Brian Haylock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

e14587 Background: This phase I study assessed the combination of D, C, and continuous CAP in AEC to develop a regimen of acceptable toxicity to take forward to phase II study. Methods: Patients with AEC were treated in cohorts of 3, at one of 3 dose levels (DL). DL0: D at 60 mg/m2 IV on day 1, C at 60 mg/m2 IV on day 1, CAP at 1,000 mg/m2 per day in two divided doses days 1-21, every 3 weeks. DL1: CAP increased to 1,250 mg/m2 per day. DL2: D increased to 75 mg/m2 IV day 1 and CAP to 1,250 mg/m2 per day. Prophylactic colony stimulating factors were not used. Patients received a maximum of 6 cycles. Blood counts and biochemistry were assessed twice weekly and daily for grade 3/4 abnormality. Results: Between 1.11.07 and 24.6.09 15 patients were enrolled: male/female:14/1, WHO PS:0/1:10/5, median age 63 yr (range 46-69), primary site oesophagus/GOJ/stomach:7/3/5, adeno/squamous:14/1, T2/3/4:2/9/4, N0/1/2:1/13/1, M0/1:1/14. 6 patients were treated at DL0, 6 at DL1 and 3 at DL2. All patients received 6 cycles apart from 2 at DL 1 who received 3 because of disease progression. Dose intensity: DL0: D 95%, C 100%, CAP 85%; DL1: D 91%, C 98.2%, CAP 79%; DL2: D 86%, C 100%, CAP 79%. There were no deaths on chemotherapy or within 30d of the last dose. The main dose limiting toxicity was febrile or infective neutropenia developing in 1/6 DL0, 2/6 DL1 and 3/3 DL2 (see table of most common treatment-related adverse events below: serious toxicity is gr 3 unless specified gr 4). The maximum length of gr 4 neutropenia was 5d. Best response (RECIST): 1 CR, 11PR, 2 SD and 1PD. 11 patients received second-line chemotherapy. Median and 1 yr overall survival: 17.5m and 60%. Median and 1 yr progression-free survival: 7m and 27%. Conclusions: TCX DLO is recommended for further study in a phase II trial. Encouraging response and survival were seen. [Table: see text]

Prospective phase II study of sunitinib rechallenge in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A G.I.O.N. trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16081-e16081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camillo Porta ◽  
Vittorio D. Ferrari ◽  
Paolo Andrea Zucali ◽  
Giuseppe Fornarini ◽  
Antonio Bernardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Stage Design ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prospective Phase ◽  
Grade 3

e16081 Background: Sunitinib is a 1st-line standard of care in mRCC. Lack of cross-resistance to sequential VEGF-targeting drugs and the possibility of a successful rechallenge with Sunitinib have been postulated. Whether mRCC patients (pts) could benefit from rechallenge with Sunitinib after progressing on 1st-line Sunitinib and 2nd-line Everolimus was the aim of this phase II study Methods: 39 mRCCpts were prospectively treated with Sunitinib (50 mg/daily, 4:2); main inclusion criteria were: histologically proven RCC with clear cell component, previous 1st-line Sunitinib with a Disease Control Rate lasting at least 10 months, 2nd-line Everolimus, and written informed consent. The primary end-point of this study was 6-months progression-free survival (PFS). A Simon’s 2-stage design was used; after testing Sunitinib on 12 pts in the first stage, the trial would have been terminated if 5 or fewer had a PFS of less than 6 months. Otherwise, the trial would have proceeded to the second stage, enrolling a total of 38 pts. If the total number of pts free of progression at 6 months would have been less than or equal to 18, Sunitinib would have been rejected Results: As a whole, 39 pts (30 males, 9 females) were enrolled. The study quickly moved from the first stage to its completion and ultimately succeeded; indeed, 6-months PFS was 60%, median PFS being 8.6 months (average: 9.59, range: 0.7-24.6 months). In terms of safety no unexpected toxicities were observed. Tx-related grade 3-4 AEs observed in ≥5% of the pts were: hand-foot skin reaction, fatigue, nausea, hypertriglyceridemia, hypophosphatemia, hypocalcemia, hyperglycemia, and neutropenia. One case each of myocardial infarction, atrial flutter and spontaneous pneumothorax were also reported, but resolved Conclusions: Despite an ineluctable time-lead-bias, median PFS on Sunitinib rechallenge was high (8.6 months), clearly showing that many pts may become sensitive again to VEGFRs-inhibition. Although many agents are presently available from 2nd-line on, in countries where treatment options are still limited, Sunitinib rechallenge could still represent a reasonable treatment option. EudraCT number: 2012-000473-23. Clinical trial information: 2012-000473-23.

Efficacy of liposomal-irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/LV) versus oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines in previous gemcitabine treated pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) patients (pts).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 383-383
Author(s):  
Markus Kieler ◽  
Matthias Unseld ◽  
Daniela Bianconi ◽  
Werner Scheithauer ◽  
Gerald W. Prager
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Analysis ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan

383 Background: The chemotherapy regimens nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV as well as oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines are used after previous gemcitabine based chemotherapy in the 2nd line treatment of metastatic PAC. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of these two treatment options. Methods: In this single institutional retrospective cohort analysis all pts with advanced PAC that were treated between 01/2012-08/2018 with nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV or oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines after previous 1st line gemcitabine based chemotherapy were analysed for clinical parameters, median progression free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS). Survival analyses were performed by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Characteristics of pts were well matched (Table). mPFS in pts (n=30) that received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV in the 2nd line treatment after gemcitabine based chemotherapy was 4.49 months while treatment with oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines (n=31) resulted in a mPFS of 3.44 months (p=0.007, HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.81). Furthermore, pts with a CA 19-9 level >1000 kU/l at the beginning of 2nd line treatment had a significantly improved mPFS and mOS, when treated with nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV compared to oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines (mPFS 4.94 months versus 3.44 months, p=0.0186, HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.98; mOS 9.31 months versus 6.16 months, p=0.0386, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.18-1.02). Conclusions: The efficacy of nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV in our study is encouraging and outperforms oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the 2nd line treatment setting for PAC pts pretreated with gemcitabine. Prospective randomized trials are urged to validate our observation. [Table: see text]

Predictors of immunotherapy (IO) response in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 555-555
Author(s):  
Samantha Ann Armstrong ◽  
Bhavana Pendurthi Singh ◽  
Monika Kulasekaran ◽  
Petra Prins ◽  
Aiwu Ruth He
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Viral Etiology ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Steroid Use ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Student’S T ◽  
Multifocal Disease

555 Background: Despite advances in understanding the molecular pathways of HCC, therapeutic options are limited and patient survival is dismal. IO is a promising HCC treatment. There are currently no indicators to identify which patients (pts) will have a prolonged response. Methods: In this single-institutional retrospective analysis, pts received one of five IO containing regimens with nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, durvalumab or cemiplimab until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Relevant factors including: stage, viral etiology, vascular invasion (VI), tumor thrombus (TT), multifocal disease, toxicity grade, steroid use for IO mediated toxicities and derived Neutrophil-to Lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), were correlated to clinical outcome: progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), using Pearson’s chi-square test or student's t-test . Responses were assessed using RECIST v 1.1 criteria for stable disease (SD), partial response (PR) and PD were correlated with best response and PFS. OS was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Cohort demographics (n = 76) were: 72% male; 38% African American, 30% Caucasian and 16% Asian; 29% of pts had HBV, 41% had HCV, 1% had both HBV/HCV and 13% had no viral etiology (n = 64). The majority of pts were stage III (43%) or IV (38%). At the start of IO, 32% had VI, 32% had TT and 80% had multifocal or metastatic disease. 65% of pts experienced IO toxicity, with 24.3% at grade 3 or higher, and 34% requiring steroids. Best response to IO was SD in 65.7% of pts, PR in 25.7% and PD in 8.6%. Median OS was 13m (95% CI 7.9-18.1) from the start of IO and median PFS (n = 65) was 14m (95% CI 6.8-21.2). Median OS and PFS were significantly improved in pts with PR compared to PD (45 vs 8m, p < 0.0005, PFS 15 vs 3m p = 0.007). Both OS and PFS showed benefits for SD of ≥2 months compared to those with PD (11 vs 8m, p < .0005, PFS 5 vs 3m p = .007). VI, TT, stage, viral etiology, toxicity grade or dNLR did not correlate with OS, PFS and RR, however need of steroid treatment trended toward worse outcome. Conclusions: PR and SD are independent predictors for prolonged PFS and OS in HCC pts receiving IO therapy. Absence of steroid use for toxicity trended toward improved IO response.

scholarly journals Impact of Early Switching to Nilotinib As Second Line TKI in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Were Intolerant to, Suboptimal to and Failed Imatinib: The Thai Multi-Centered Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4267-4267
Author(s):  
Pongtep Viboonjuntra ◽  
Arnuparp Lekhakula ◽  
Kanchana Chansung ◽  
Chittima Sirijerachai ◽  
Pimjai Niparuck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction : To date, the ELN recommendation and NCCN guidelines are the principle mile stones to follow up the treatment response and to make the decision of TKIs switching. However, in real life practice, many factors influence changing the real switching date from the date had an indication. This study aims to analyze the impact of early switching to second line TKI, nilotinib, in real life practice, for the CML patients who failed, had sub-optimal response or were intolerant to imatinib. Methods : This prospective study was conducted through 7 medical centers in Thailand between 1st of September 2009 and 31st of August 2011. Adult CML patients of age ≥ 18 years old, in chronic and accelerated phase, who had failure, suboptimal response or intolerance to imatinib, based on ELN 2009 guideline, were included and were eligible with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily. Prospective data collection for 24 months of each patient was performed. The main objective was to identify the impact of early switching to nilotinib on major molecular response (MMR). The other objectives were to observe the efficacy of nilotinib including overall survival, progression free survival and the safety. The survival results were presented as Kaplan-Meier survival curves. For the comparison of the treatment groups, the Kaplan-Meier estimator with the corresponding log-rank test for equality of survivor functions across treatment group was applied. Results : The final 108 cases were analysed. The median age was 47 (17-79) years with the proportion of male to female of 1.4:1 respectively. The median duration of the prior imatinib treatment was 18 months (2-142 months). The median duration between the date of indication and the date of real switching was 3.1 months (0-62.8 months) with 50% changing less than 3 months, 26.9% between 3 months and 12 months, and 23.1% changing longer than 12 months. The indication of switching included 63.6% failure to imatinib, 29% intolerance to imatinib and 7.4% suboptimal to imatinib. On the nilotinib switching, 70.4% completed 24 months follow-up, and 29.6% discontinued treatment mostly because of unsatisfactory results or adverse events. Evaluation was made every 3 months based on 2009 ELN recommendation. At 3 months, 57%, 20%, and 8% of the patients achieved CHR, CCyR and MMR, respectively. Those who did not achieve CHR at 3 months never achieved MMR, while 86 % of those who achieved CCyR at 3 months achieved MMR. All CML achieving MMR at 3 months had sustained MMR throughout the study period (24 months). Imatinib suboptimal response had better outcome than imatinib failure and imatinib intolerance groups. A preliminary analysis of BCR-ABL mutation was performed on 90 cases, and mutations were found on 21 cases. Two of them were T315I which were excluded from the study. The cases with mutation had poorer response to treatment than those without mutation. There was one case with initial G250E mutation developing T315I mutation after treatment with nilotinib. At 24 months, one case progressed to accelerated phase and 3 cases progressed to blastic transformation. The 2-year overall survival and 2-year progression-free survival and were 98.9% and 96.9% (figure 1 and 2), respectively. The interquatile analysis was done to identify the groups of cumulative MMR according to the duration between the date of indication and the date of real switching to nilotinib. The patients who switched to nilotinib within 12 months after date of indication could have a greater chance to achieved MMR than those who switched treatment later than 12 months (p(log-rank) = 0.002) (figure 3). Skin rash, musculoskeletal pain, and infection were the three most common non-hematologic adverse events, However, most of them were grade 1-2, except for 4 cases with grade 3-4 infections. Grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events included thrombocytopenia (12%), neutropenia (11%), anemia (5%) and leucopenia (4%), and most of them were manageable. Although biochemical abnormalities were commonly found, most of them were mild. Conclusions : Nilotinib, as a second line treatment showed excellent efficacy and tolerability. Indication for nilotinib treatment, initial mutation status and depth of response at 3 months after treatment can predict outcomes of the patients. However, the patients will have a greater chance to achieve MMR if they switched to nilotinib within 12 months after the date of indication for changing. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Daratumumab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (5) ◽  
pp. 421-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Joaquín Martinez-Lopez ◽  
María-Victoria Mateos ◽  
Joan Bladé ◽  
Lotfi Benboubker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Frontline Treatment ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drug ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have limited treatment options and poor survival outcomes. The increasing adoption of lenalidomide-based therapy for frontline treatment of multiple myeloma has resulted in a need for effective regimens for lenalidomide-refractory patients. This phase 1b study evaluated daratumumab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone (D-Kd) in patients with RRMM after 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy, including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory drug; lenalidomide-refractory patients were eligible. Carfilzomib- and daratumumab-naïve patients (n = 85) received carfilzomib weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle (20 mg/m2 initial dose, escalated to 70 mg/m2 thereafter) and dexamethasone (40 mg/wk). Of these, 10 patients received the first daratumumab dose as a single infusion (16 mg/kg, day 1 cycle 1), and 75 patients received a split first dose (8 mg/kg, days 1-2 cycle 1). Subsequent dosing was per the approved schedule for daratumumab. Patients received a median of 2 (range, 1-4) prior lines of therapy; 60% were lenalidomide refractory. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (31%), lymphopenia (24%), anemia (21%), and neutropenia (21%). Infusion-related reactions were observed in 60% and 43% of single and split first-dose patients, respectively. Overall response rate was 84% (79% in lenalidomide-refractory patients). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached; 12-month PFS rates were 74% for all treated patients and 65% for lenalidomide-refractory patients. D-Kd was well tolerated with low neutropenia rates, and it demonstrated deep responses and encouraging PFS, including in patients refractory to lenalidomide. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01998971.

Weekly vinblastine in chemotherapy-naive children with unresectable or progressive low grade glioma: A Canadian cooperative study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10029-10029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Bouffet ◽  
Katrin Scheinemann ◽  
Shayna M. Zelcer ◽  
Juliette Hukin ◽  
Beverley Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3

10029 Background: Vinblastine has shown promising activity in a phase II study in children with recurrent/refractory LGG. The aim of this study was to assess the activity of vinblastine in chemotherapy naïve children. Methods: Patients < 18 years old with unresectable or progressive LGG were eligible if they had not received any previous treatment with chemotherapy or radiation. Vinblastine was administered weekly at a dose of 6 mg/m2over a period of 70 weeks. Patients who showed progression on 2 consecutive imaging studies or evidence of clinical progression were removed from treatment. Results: 54 patients (23 female) were enrolled between 2007 and 2010. Median age at inclusion was 7 years, 13 patients were < 3 years. 32 had chiasmatic/hypothalamic tumours, 6 had evidence of dissemination. 13 had neurofibromatosis type 1. Histology was pilocytic astrocytoma (25), pilomyxoid astrocytoma (4), low grade astrocytoma variant (8); 17 patients had no histological diagnosis. Treatment was well tolerated; however, only 14 patients received full dose for the duration of the study. Most common toxicity was haematological: 40 patients who experienced grade 3+ neutropenia. There were only 6 episodes of febrile neutropenia, 3 RBC transfusions and no toxic death. Best response to chemotherapy was assessed centrally by an independent radiologist: 1 CR, 10 PR, 3 MR, 28 SD, 12 PD, for a response rate of 24.5%. With a median follow-up of 2 years (9-48 months), progression-free survival at 2 years was 72.1% (95%CI: 58.1-82.2). One patient died of progression. Conclusions: Weekly vinblastine is well tolerated in paediatric LGG patients. Although the response rate appears inferior to other common LGG regimens, progression free survival at 2 years favourably compares to most currently used regimens. Supported by a grant from the Ontario Institute Cancer Research. Clinical trial information: 1000011227.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document