Apatinib as second-line therapy in Chinese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase III study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4507-4507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiu Li ◽  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Shanzhi Gu ◽  
Xiaoming Chen ◽  
Lizhu Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Biological Behavior ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Advanced Hcc

4507 Background: Chinese patients (pts) account for more than 50% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases in the world and have special features in etiology, biological behavior, treatment strategy and prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib, an inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, in Chinese pts with pretreated advanced HCC. Methods: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial done in 31 sites in China, pts with HCC who had received at least one line of systemic therapy (including sorafenib and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, which is another first-line standard-of-care in China) and had Child-Pugh liver function class A or B ≤7 points were enrolled. The pts were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive 750 mg apatinib orally once daily or placebo and stratified by ECOG performance status (0 or 1), previous sorafenib treatment (yes or no), and extrahepatic spread and/or macrovascular invasion (yes or no) in 28-day treatment cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: Between Apr 01, 2014 and May 03, 2017, 393 pts were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment (261 in apatinib arm and 132 in placebo arm). The median OS was significantly longer with apatinib than that with placebo (8.7 months [95% CI 7.5-9.8] vs 6.8 months [95% CI 5.7-9.1]; hazard ratio 0.785 [95% CI 0.617-0.998]; p=0.0476). Pts in the apatinib arm also had prolonged median progression free survival (PFS) compared with those in the placebo arm (4.5 months [95% CI 3.9-4.7] vs 1.9 months [95% CI 1.9-2.0]; hazard ratio 0.471 [95% CI 0.369-0.601]; p˂0.0001). The objective response rate was 10.7% (95% CI 7.2-15.1) with apatinib versus 1.5% (95% CI 0.2-5.4) with placebo. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 250 (97.3%) pts in the apatinib arm and 92 (70.8%) pts in the placebo arm. The most common TRAEs of grade 3 and 4 were hypertension (71 [27.6%] pts in the apatinib arm vs 3 [2.3%] pts in the placebo arm), hand-foot syndrome (46 [17.9%] vs 0), decreased platelet count (34 [13.2%] vs 1 [0.8%]), and decreased neutrophil count (27 [10.5%] vs 0). 24 (9.3%) pts with apatinib and 13 (10.0%) pts with placebo died due to adverse events, and none were deemed treatment-related by investigators. Conclusions: Apatinib significantly prolonged OS and PFS in Chinese pts with pretreated advanced HCC, and was well tolerated with a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT02329860 .

The outcome of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in pre- and post-sorafenib eras using the SEER database.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 276-276
Author(s):  
Jiahuai Tan ◽  
Minsig Choi ◽  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
Gregory Dyson ◽  
Anthony Frank Shields ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Impact

276 Background: HCC is the third most common cause of cancer-related death globally. Prognosis for advanced HCC is dismal due to lack of effective treatment options for the majority of patients who present with advanced disease. Sorafenib was the first agent reported to improve overall survival in patients with good liver function enrolled in phase III clinical trials. However, survival impact of sorafenib on the general population with advanced HCC has not been studied to date. Methods: Sorafenib was approved for patients with advanced HCC and Child-Pugh A liver disease in 2007. We analyzed 2005-2006 and 2008-2009 clinical outcome data from the SEER to compare the impact of this targeted therapy in the population based setting. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median survival and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The log-rank test was used to test the difference in survival curves. Cox regression analyses were utilized for the estimation of hazard ratios. Results: We identified 2297 and 2808 stage III and IV HCC cases diagnosed in [2005, 2006] and [2008, 2009], respectively. Seventy-seven percent of the patients were male and the median age was 61 years old for males and 66 for females. The median survival estimates (95% CIs) are 3 (3, 4) months and 4 (4, 4) months for patients diagnosed in [2005, 2006] and [2008, 2009], respectively. The hazard ratio (95% CI) for overall survival comparing [2008, 2009] to [2005, 2006] was 0.92 (0.87, 0.98, p-value = 0.01). We performed multivariable Cox regression modeling and African American patients have a hazard ratio of death [1.14 (1.06, 1.23)] as compared to European American patients. Younger females have a decreased hazard of dying relative to younger men, while older females have an increase hazard of dying relative to older men. Conclusions: The approval of sorafenib treatment produced very modest median survival gain in advanced HCC patients based on SEER population study. However, the small benefit in hazard ratio may have been impacted by small number of patients with advanced HCC who are being treated or are able to be treated with sorafenib in this era.

scholarly journals SEARCH: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Sorafenib Plus Erlotinib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 559-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew X. Zhu ◽  
Olivier Rosmorduc ◽  
T.R. Jeffry Evans ◽  
Paul J. Ross ◽  
Armando Santoro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Class A ◽  
Pugh Class

Purpose To compare the clinical outcomes of sorafenib plus either erlotinib or placebo in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a multicenter, multinational, randomized, phase III trial. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced HCC and underlying Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis, who were naive to systemic treatment (N = 720), were randomly assigned to sorafenib plus either erlotinib (n = 362) or placebo (n = 358). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results Median OS was similar in the sorafenib plus erlotinib and sorafenib plus placebo groups (9.5 v 8.5 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.929; P = .408), as was median time to progression (3.2 v 4.0 months, respectively; HR, 1.135; P = .18). In the sorafenib/erlotinib arm versus the sorafenib/placebo arm, the overall response rate trended higher (6.6% v 3.9%, respectively; P = .102), whereas the disease control rate was significantly lower (43.9% v 52.5%, respectively; P = .021). The median durations of treatment with sorafenib were 86 days in the sorafenib/erlotinib arm and 123 days in the sorafenib/placebo arm. In the sorafenib/erlotinib and sorafenib/placebo arms, the rates of treatment-emergent serious AEs (58.0% v 54.6%, respectively) and drug-related serious AEs (21.0% v 22.8%, respectively) were similar. AEs matched the known safety profiles of both agents, but rates of rash/desquamation, anorexia, and diarrhea were higher in the sorafenib/erlotinib arm, whereas rates of alopecia and hand-foot skin reaction were higher in the sorafenib/placebo arm. Withdrawal rates for AEs during cycles 1 to 3 were higher in the sorafenib/erlotinib arm. Conclusion Adding erlotinib to sorafenib did not improve survival in patients with advanced HCC.

Sorafenib-Regorafenib Sequential Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Institute Experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 611-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuomi Ueshima ◽  
Naoshi Nishida ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Sequential Therapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Grade 3

Objectives: Previously, no therapeutic agent has been known to improve the overall survival compared with placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who have progressed after sorafenib. In this patient population, regorafenib was first demonstrated to confer a survival benefit in the RESORCE trial, and subsequently it was approved as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC. An open-label expanded access program (EAP) of regorafenib was implemented for compassionate use. We investigated the efficacy and safety of regorafenib based on our experience of the RESORCE trial and the EAP. Methods: Data from 5 patients from the RESORCE trial and 6 from the EAP were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had tolerated prior sorafenib and were progressing during sorafenib treatment. Results: The median progression-free survival was 9.2 months (95% CI 2.3-16.1). One patient achieved a partial response and 7 achieved stable disease. The objective response rate was 9.1%, and the disease control rate was 72.7%. No treatment-associated mortalities were observed. Grade 3 hypophosphatemia was observed in 2 patients, grade 2 anorexia was observed in 5 patients, and grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 2 patients. Grade 2 and grade 3 thrombocytopenia were observed in 2 and 3 patients, respectively. All treatment-related adverse events were improved by reduction or interruption of regorafenib. Five patients showed decreased serum albumin levels. Conclusion: Sorafenib and regorafenib sequential therapy presents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with advanced HCC.

Brivanib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Who Were Intolerant to Sorafenib or for Whom Sorafenib Failed: Results From the Randomized Phase III BRISK-PS Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (28) ◽  
pp. 3509-3516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep M. Llovet ◽  
Thomas Decaens ◽  
Jean-Luc Raoul ◽  
Eveline Boucher ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Dual Inhibitor

Purpose Brivanib is a selective dual inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor receptors implicated in tumorigenesis and angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). An unmet medical need persists for patients with HCC whose tumors do not respond to sorafenib or who cannot tolerate it. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessed brivanib in patients with HCC who had been treated with sorafenib. Patients and Methods In all, 395 patients with advanced HCC who progressed on/after or were intolerant to sorafenib were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive brivanib 800 mg orally once per day plus best supportive care (BSC) or placebo plus BSC. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included time to progression (TTP), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and safety. Results Median OS was 9.4 months for brivanib and 8.2 months for placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95.8% CI, 0.69 to 1.15; P = .3307). Adjusting treatment effect for baseline prognostic factors yielded an OS HR of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.04; P = .1044). Exploratory analyses showed a median time to progression of 4.2 months for brivanib and 2.7 months for placebo (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.76; P < .001), and an mRECIST ORR of 10% for brivanib and 2% for placebo (odds ratio, 5.72). Study discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 61 brivanib patients (23%) and nine placebo patients (7%). The most frequent treatment-related grade 3 to 4 AEs for brivanib included hypertension (17%), fatigue (13%), hyponatremia (11%), and decreased appetite (10%). Conclusion In patients with HCC who had been treated with sorafenib, brivanib did not significantly improve OS. The observed benefit in the secondary outcomes of TTP and ORR warrants further investigation.

Pembrolizumab As Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Finn ◽  
Baek-Yeol Ryoo ◽  
Philippe Merle ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
Mohamed Bouattour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Previously Treated

PURPOSE Pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity and safety in the phase II KEYNOTE-224 trial in previously treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). KEYNOTE-240 evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS This randomized, double-blind, phase III study was conducted at 119 medical centers in 27 countries. Eligible patients with advanced HCC, previously treated with sorafenib, were randomly assigned at a two-to-one ratio to receive pembrolizumab plus best supportive care (BSC) or placebo plus BSC. Primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS; one-sided significance thresholds, P = .0174 [final analysis] and P = .002 [first interim analysis], respectively). Safety was assessed in all patients who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug. RESULTS Between May 31, 2016, and November 23, 2017, 413 patients were randomly assigned. As of January 2, 2019, median follow-up was 13.8 months for pembrolizumab and 10.6 months for placebo. Median OS was 13.9 months (95% CI, 11.6 to 16.0 months) for pembrolizumab versus 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.3 to 13.5 months) for placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.781; 95% CI, 0.611 to 0.998; P = .0238). Median PFS for pembrolizumab was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 4.1 months) versus 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 4.1 months) for placebo at the first interim analysis (HR, 0.775; 95% CI, 0.609 to 0.987; P = .0186) and 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 4.1 months) versus 2.8 months (95% CI, 1.6 to 3.0 months) at final analysis (HR, 0.718; 95% CI, 0.570 to 0.904; P = .0022). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 147 (52.7%) and 62 patients (46.3%) for pembrolizumab versus placebo; those that were treatment related occurred in 52 (18.6%) and 10 patients (7.5%), respectively. No hepatitis C or B flares were identified. CONCLUSION In this study, OS and PFS did not reach statistical significance per specified criteria. The results are consistent with those of KEYNOTE-224, supporting a favorable risk-to-benefit ratio for pembrolizumab in this population.

scholarly journals Sorafenib treatment on Chinese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (44) ◽  
pp. e17692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shou-Wu Lee ◽  
Teng-Yu Lee ◽  
Yen-Chun Peng ◽  
Sheng-Shun Yang ◽  
Hong-Zen Yeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment

Association of hypophosphatemia-occurring sorafenib with prognosis and hepatic impairment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 188-188
Author(s):  
M. Aizawa ◽  
S. Mitsunaga ◽  
H. Okuyama ◽  
K. Nakachi ◽  
I. Ohno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Observation Time ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Metabolic Demand ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Hbs Ag

188 Background: Hypophosphatemia is observed during sorafenib treatment. At the increased metabolic demand of the liver, hypophosphatemia is considered to be associated with a good clinical course. Hypophosphatemia associated with sorafenib treatment may also be a favorable event, but this has not yet been elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of hypophosphatemia developing during sorafenib treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: The data of 41 advanced HCC patients (median age: 68 years, female/male: 4/37, HBs-Ag(+)/HCV-Ab(+):10/22) who received sorafenib treatment (800 mg, daily) for more than 30 days were reviewed. There were 27 and 14 patients with Child-Pugh class A and B. UICC stage II/III/IV was observed in 13/10 /18 patients. Clinical data, including those on the serum level of inorganic phosphate (IP), were collected before and after 30 days of sorafenib treatment. Overall survival time (OS) was calculated from the start of sorafenib treatment. The significance level was set at p<0.05. Results: Mean serum IP level before sorafenib treatment was 3.2mg/dL (range 2.4-4.5). After 30 days treatment, IP level was decreased (mean 2.6mg/dL, range 1.3-3.9), compared to that at pre-treatment (p<0.001). The patients in whom the serum IP was less than 2.4mg/dL at 30 days was assigned to the decreased IP group (N=14, mean IP 2.1mg/dL, range1.3-2.3). The decreased IP group showed a better prognosis (no event of death during the observation time) than the nondecreased IP group (MST 286 days, p=0.024). In the non-decreased IP group, the serum Alb (mean 3.6g/dL) and T.Bil (mean 0.8mg/dL) were worse after 30 days treatment (Alb 3.4g/dL p=0.007, T.Bil 1.1mg/dL p=0.037). However, deterioration of Alb (mean 3.7 vs. 3.6g/dL p=0.505) and T.Bil (mean 0.7 vs. 0.8mg/dL p=0.404) could be avoided in the decrease IP group. Conclusions: Hypophosphatemia occurring during sorafenib treatment for advanced HCC was associated with a favorable prognosis. The serum Alb and T.Bil levels were indicators of liver function and were preserved in patients with decreased serum levels of phosphate. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase IIb randomized trial of Pexa-Vec (pexastimogene devacirepvec; JX-594), a targeted oncolytic vaccinia virus, plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who have failed sorafenib treatment (TRAVERSE).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4161-TPS4161
Author(s):  
Jeong Heo ◽  
Yee Chao ◽  
Derek J. Jonker ◽  
Ari David Baron ◽  
Francois Habersetzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Vaccinia Virus ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Gm Csf

TPS4161^ Background: Pexa-Vec is a targeted oncolytic and immunotherapeutic vaccinia virus engineered to express human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Direct oncolysis plus GM-CSF expression stimulates tumor vascular disruption and anti-tumor immunity (Nature Rev Cancer, 2009). Pexa-Vec was well-tolerated in Phase 1 trials and was shown to replicate in metastatic tumors following intratumoral (IT) or intravenous (IV) administration (Lancet Oncol, 2008 and Nature, 2011). A randomized high vs low dose Phase 2 trial in 30 patients with advanced HCC, demonstrated prolonged survival in the high-dose Pexa-Vec arm (median survival 14.1 mo vs. 6.7 mo; Hazard Ratio 0.39, p=0.02) (AASLD Annual Meeting, 2011, LB1). Methods: TRAVERSE is a Phase 2b randomized, open-label, multi-center trial in patients with advanced HCC who have failed sorafenib treatment. Approximately 120 patients will be randomized 2:1 to Pexa-Vec plus BSC versus BSC, respectively. Randomization will be stratified by region (Asian vs. non-Asian); sorafenib intolerant vs refractory; and presence vs absence of extra-hepatic disease. The primary objective is to determine overall survival. Main inclusion criteria are advanced HCC having failed sorafenib (intolerance or radiographic progression during or < 3 months following last sorafenib), Child-Pugh A-B7 (no ascites), acceptable hematologic function. Assuming a median overall survival of 4.0 months with BSC and a target hazard ratio of 0.57 (corresponding to an experimental arm median survival of 7.0 months), 73 events (deaths) will provide 70% power at 1-sided alpha = 0.05 to detect a difference in overall survival between the treatment groups using a stratified logrank test. Patients randomized to Pexa-Vec will receive a dose of 109 plaque forming units (pfu) IV on Day 1 followed by five IT treatments between Day 8 and Week 18. Enrollment has begun on this study with clinical trial registry number of NCT01387555. Clinical trial information: NCT01387555.

A phase II study of sorafenib and yttrium-90 glass microspheres for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, BCLC stage C.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4083-4083
Author(s):  
Ahmed Omar Kaseb ◽  
Reham Abdel-Wahab ◽  
Ravi Murthy ◽  
Manal Hassan ◽  
Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Combined Use ◽  
Elevated Liver Enzymes ◽  
Yttrium 90

4083 Background: Combined use of sorafenib and local therapy for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not well established. Notably, most common cause of death in HCC is liver failure, therefore we tested the promise of controlling the local tumors even in the setting of advanced/metastatic disease to improve survival. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of combined use of sorafenib and yttrium-90 resin microspheres (Y90 RMS) in unresectable HCC defined as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer class C. Methods: Between October 2013 and August 2016 we enrolled 40 advanced stage HCC patients, 38 patients were treated with sorafenib followed (after 4 weeks) with Y90 RMS at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Survival analysis was done to evaluate median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). We used modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) to assess response to treatment and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 to evaluate the grading of treatment related toxicity. Results: The majority of our patients were males (74%), white (47%), 66% of patients had underlying liver cirrhosis, 26% had vascular invasion, and 26% had extrahepatic disease. The estimated median OS and 95% confidence interval (CI) in months was 18.46 (12.29 – NA) and the estimated PFS was 12.29 months (5.72 – 18.79). Stable disease (SD) was observed in 44.74% of patients, while 28.95% achieved partial response (PR). Grade III-IV adverse events included fatigue (n = 3), hyperbilirubinemia (n = 2), thrombocytopenia (n = 1), proteinuria (n = 1), hyponatremia (n = 1), elevated liver enzymes (n = 4), hypertension (n = 4), diarrhea (n = 1), nausea (n = 1) and vomiting (n = 2). Conclusions: This is the first prospective study to evaluate sorafenib followed by Y90 in HCC. Our study included patients with metastatic HCC and showed that combined use of sorafenib and Y90 was tolerable and was associated with longer OS and PFS compared to previous studies which evaluated sorafenib alone. However, future randomized phase III studies are warranted to assess sorafenib+/-Y90 in metastatc disease setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01900002.

scholarly journals Adjuvant Erlotinib Versus Placebo in Patients With Stage IB-IIIA Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (RADIANT): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (34) ◽  
pp. 4007-4014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Kelly ◽  
Nasser K. Altorki ◽  
Wilfried E.E. Eberhardt ◽  
Mary E.R. O'Brien ◽  
David R. Spigel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Egfr Amplification

Purpose Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) –tyrosine kinase inhibitors have proven efficacy in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We hypothesized that erlotinib would be efficacious in the adjuvant setting. Patients and Methods An international randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in patients with completely resected IB to IIIA NSCLC whose tumors expressed EGFR protein by immunohistochemistry or EGFR amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Patients were assigned 2:1 to erlotinib 150 mg once per day or placebo for 2 years. Stratification factors were stage, histology, previous adjuvant chemotherapy, smoking status, EGFR amplification status, and country. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS); key secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and DFS and OS in patients whose tumors had EGFR-activating mutations (EGFRm-positive). Results A total of 973 patients were randomly assigned (November 26, 2007, to July 7, 2010). There was no statistically significant difference in DFS (median, 50.5 months for erlotinib and 48.2 months for placebo; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.10; P = .324). Among the 161 patients (16.5%) in the EGFRm-positive subgroup, DFS favored erlotinib (median, 46.4 v 28.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.98; P = .039), but this was not statistically significant because of the hierarchical testing procedure. OS data are immature. Rash and diarrhea were common adverse events occurring in 528 (86.4%) and 319 (52.2%) patients treated with erlotinib, respectively, versus 110 (32.1%) and 54 (15.7%) patients receiving placebo. The most common grade 3 adverse events in patients treated with erlotinib were rash (22.3%) and diarrhea (6.2%). Conclusion Adjuvant erlotinib did not prolong DFS in patients with EGFR-expressing NSCLC or in the EGFRm-positive subgroup. Further evaluation of erlotinib is warranted in the EGFRm-positive subgroup.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document