Breast cancer in women aged 80 years and older: Clinical characteristics and treatment patterns according to biologic subtype.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12594-e12594
Author(s):  
Stephanie M Wong ◽  
Jean-Francois Boileau ◽  
Mariam Rana ◽  
Thierry Muanza ◽  
Richard G. Margolese ◽  
...  

e12594 Background: Older age is associated with poorer breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) outcomes, despite a higher prevalence of biologically favorable disease. We sought to evaluate differences in the clinical characteristics and management of older women according to biologic subtype of breast cancer. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) treatment database was queried to identify all women aged 80 years or older with a first diagnosis of invasive breast cancer between 2010 and 2016. Patients were subgrouped according to biologic subtype and clinical and treatment-related variables were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was then performed to determine factors independently associated with receipt of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant radiation. Results: Overall, 27,375 women with a median age of 84 (range, 80-108 years) met inclusion criteria. The majority of older women were diagnosed with HR+HER2- breast cancer (78.9%), followed by HER2+ (11.0%) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (10.0%). In women with stage I-III disease, non-operative management was employed in 13.4% of HR+HER2- patients, compared to 16.7% of HER2+ patients and 11.0% of TNBC (p < 0.001). In those undergoing surgery, BCS was most common in HR+HER2- patients (80.9%), compared to HER2+ (68.9%) and TNBC (67.8%; p < 0.001). Axillary surgery was performed in 74.0% of early stage patients with HR+HER2- disease, compared to patients with HER2+ (77.8%) and TNBC (79.3%; p < 0.001). In adjusted analyses controlling for stage and clinical variables, women aged 80 years or older with HER2+ breast cancer and TNBC had a lower likelihood of BCS (ORHER2+ 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.80; ORTNBC 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.81), and an increased likelihood of adjuvant radiation (ORHER2+ 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27; ORTNBC 1.40, 95% CI 1.25-1.57). Conclusions: One fifth of women with breast cancer over age 80 are diagnosed with HER2+ and triple-negative subtypes, which are associated with more aggressive local therapy. Further studies are warranted to determine if higher rates of adjuvant radiation optimize local control in older HER2+ and TNBC patients at increased risk for early locoregional recurrences.

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose G. Bazan ◽  
Sachin R. Jhawar ◽  
Daniel Stover ◽  
Ko Un Park ◽  
Sasha Beyer ◽  
...  

AbstractIn the modern era, highly effective anti-HER2 therapy is associated with low local-regional recurrence (LRR) rates for early-stage HER2+ breast cancer raising the question of whether local therapy de-escalation by radiation omission is possible in patients with small-node negative tumors treated with lumpectomy. To evaluate existing data on radiation omission, we used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to test the hypothesis that RT omission results in equivalent overall survival (OS) in stage 1 (T1N0) HER2+ breast cancer. We excluded patients that received neoadjuvant systemic therapy. We stratified the cohort by receipt of adjuvant radiation. We identified 6897 patients (6388 RT; 509 no RT). Patients that did not receive radiation tended to be ≥70 years-old (odds ratio [OR] = 3.69, 95% CI: 3.02–4.51, p < 0.0001), to have ≥1 comorbidity (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06–1.68, p = 0.0154), to be Hispanic (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.00–2.22, p = 0.049), and to live in lower income areas (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07–1.64, p = 0.0266). Radiation omission was associated with a 3.67-fold (95% CI: 2.23–6.02, p < 0.0001) increased risk of death. While other selection biases that influence radiation omission likely persist, these data should give caution to radiation omission in T1N0 HER2+ breast cancer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 39-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Szeja ◽  
Sandra S. Hatch

39 Background: Adjuvant Radiation (RT) may be omitted for elderly women with early stage breast cancer having favorable estrogen receptor status, however in the setting of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), less evidence exists to guide decision making. As some findings thus far have shown TNBC to have an increased recurrence rate, this is an important subject to address. The purpose of this study is to use the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database to evaluate how the addition of adjuvant radiation affects the survival of women ages 70 and above with T1-2, N0, M0 TNBC that undergo Lumpectomy (L). Methods: Cases diagnosed from 2010-2011 were downloaded from the SEER Database. Inclusion criteria were ages 70 and above, with T1-2N0M0 TNBC. Kaplan meier curves calculated overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS) in months (m). Log-Rank tests were performed to compare survival. Cox multivariate regression was performed to calculate Hazard Ratios (HR) and control for confounding variables including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, number of lymph nodes sampled, age, laterality, grade, T stage, extent of surgery, existence of other cancers. Results: From 2010-2011, SEER contained 109,559 cases of breast cancer with recorded results of Her-2-neu (H2N) status. Combining other receptor values, showed 12,620 triple-negative, which was 12% of cases. Of these, 6980 (55%) had stage T1-2, N0, M0. Lumpectomy was used in 4002 of these cases. There were 974 lumpectomy cases of women aged 70 and above. RT was given in 662 (68%) cases. After 23 months, L+ RT was associated with improved OS at 98.2% compared to 85.6% for L only (p=<0.001), as well as DSS at 99% for L+RT better than 94% for L only (p=0.003). Cox Regression showed radiation demonstrated improved OS (HR=0.14, p<0.001) and DSS (0.14, p=0.01). Conclusions: The use of adjuvant RT after lumpectomy for elderly women with early stage TNBC was associated with improved OS and DSS. Noting the potential for selection bias in this study, future prospective study is required to define the management of early stage triple negative breast cancer.


2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 605-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shervin M. Shirvani ◽  
Jing Jiang ◽  
Anna Likhacheva ◽  
Karen E. Hoffman ◽  
Simona F. Shaitelman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lorena Gonzalez ◽  
Joanne Mortimer ◽  
Laura Kruper

Abstract Purpose of Review This review summarizes the most recent data on the management of small, node-negative Her2+ and triple-negative breast cancer. Recent Findings Both Her2+ and triple-negative breast cancers are characterized by high rates of recurrence and worse survival outcomes compared to hormone-positive cancers. De-escalation of systemic therapy in early-stage breast cancer is a recent national trend in clinical research. Recent prospective trials support the scaling back of cytotoxic agents and maximization of targeted therapy regimens. Similarly, large retrospective studies on small, node-negative triple-negative breast cancer report the omission of chemotherapy in women with T1a,N0 triple-negative cancers with favorable short term outcomes. Summary De-escalation of systemic therapy for Her2+ breast cancer is effective in the management of early-stage, node-negative disease. Future prospective studies on the omission of systemic therapy for triple-negative breast cancer are required to safely adopt into consensus guidelines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document