scholarly journals De-escalation of Systemic Therapy for Early-Stage, Node-Negative Her2+ and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Gonzalez ◽  
Joanne Mortimer ◽  
Laura Kruper
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Prospective Trials

Abstract Purpose of Review This review summarizes the most recent data on the management of small, node-negative Her2+ and triple-negative breast cancer. Recent Findings Both Her2+ and triple-negative breast cancers are characterized by high rates of recurrence and worse survival outcomes compared to hormone-positive cancers. De-escalation of systemic therapy in early-stage breast cancer is a recent national trend in clinical research. Recent prospective trials support the scaling back of cytotoxic agents and maximization of targeted therapy regimens. Similarly, large retrospective studies on small, node-negative triple-negative breast cancer report the omission of chemotherapy in women with T1a,N0 triple-negative cancers with favorable short term outcomes. Summary De-escalation of systemic therapy for Her2+ breast cancer is effective in the management of early-stage, node-negative disease. Future prospective studies on the omission of systemic therapy for triple-negative breast cancer are required to safely adopt into consensus guidelines.

scholarly journals Epigenetic Regulation of Immunotherapy Response in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 4139
Author(s):  
Pere Llinàs-Arias ◽  
Sandra Íñiguez-Muñoz ◽  
Kelly McCann ◽  
Leonie Voorwerk ◽  
Javier I. J. Orozco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Immune Escape ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Cancer Subtypes

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined by the absence of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression. This malignancy, representing 15–20% of breast cancers, is a clinical challenge due to the lack of targeted treatments, higher intrinsic aggressiveness, and worse outcomes than other breast cancer subtypes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising efficacy for early-stage and advanced TNBC, but this seems limited to a subgroup of patients. Understanding the underlying mechanisms that determine immunotherapy efficiency is essential to identifying which TNBC patients will respond to immunotherapy-based treatments and help to develop new therapeutic strategies. Emerging evidence supports that epigenetic alterations, including aberrant chromatin architecture conformation and the modulation of gene regulatory elements, are critical mechanisms for immune escape. These alterations are particularly interesting since they can be reverted through the inhibition of epigenetic regulators. For that reason, several recent studies suggest that the combination of epigenetic drugs and immunotherapeutic agents can boost anticancer immune responses. In this review, we focused on the contribution of epigenetics to the crosstalk between immune and cancer cells, its relevance on immunotherapy response in TNBC, and the potential benefits of combined treatments.

scholarly journals Practical Approach to Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 293-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijayakrishna K. Gadi ◽  
Nancy E. Davidson
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Proven Method

Triple negative is a term applied to breast cancers that do not meaningfully express the estrogen or progesterone hormone receptors or overexpress the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 tyrosine kinase. At present, the only proven method for systemic management of triple-negative breast cancer for both early-stage and metastatic settings is cytotoxic chemotherapy. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of management strategies that are best supported by available data. We also review recent advances most likely to affect treatment of triple-negative breast cancer in the coming years with particular emphasis on targeted agents, biologics, and immunotherapy.

Molecular characteristics and metastasis predictor genes of triple-negative breast cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1043-1043
Author(s):  
Wen-Hung Kuo ◽  
Yao-Yin Chang ◽  
Ming-Feng Hou ◽  
Eric Y Chuang ◽  
King-Jen Chang
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Prognostic Signature ◽  
Characteristic Analysis ◽  
Disease Etiology ◽  
Breast Cancer Outcome

1043 Background: Triple-negative breast cancer(TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer with aggressive tumor behavior and distinct disease etiology. Due to the lack of an effective targeted medicine, treatment options for triple-negative breast cancer are few and recurrence rates are high. Although various multi-gene prognostic markers have been proposed for the prediction of breast cancer outcome, most of them were proven clinically useful only for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. Reliable identification of triple-negative patients with a favorable prognosis is not yet possible. Methods: Clinicopathological information and microarray data from 157 invasive breast carcinomas were collected at National Taiwan University Hospital from 1995 to 2008. Gene expression data of 51 triple-negative and 106 luminal breast cancers were generated with oligonucleotide microarrays. A prognostic 45-gene signature for triple-negative breast cancer was identified using Student’s t test and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: Hierarchical clustering analysis revealed that the majority (94%) of triple-negative breast cancers were tightly clustered together carrying strong basal-like characteristics. A novel 45-gene signature giving 98% predictive accuracy in distant metastasis recurrence was identified in our triple-negative patient cohort. External validation of the prognostic signature in an independent microarray dataset of 59 early-stage triple-negative patients also obtained statistical significance (hazard ratio 2.29, 95% CI 1.04-5.06, Cox P = 0.04), outperforming five other published breast cancer prognostic signatures. The prognostic signature was statistically predictive with the node-negative triple-negative patients in the validation cohort. Conclusions: The 45-gene prognostic signature identified in this study revealed that TGF-β signaling in immune/inflammatory regulation may be critically involved in distant metastatic invasion of TNBC. The 45-gene signature, if further validated, may be a clinically useful tool in risk assessment of metastasis recurrence for early-stage triple-negative patients.

SEER-Medicare study of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: Real-world treatment patterns, survival, and expenditures 2010 to 2016.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12512-e12512
Author(s):  
Jan Sieluk ◽  
Amin Haiderali ◽  
Min Huang ◽  
Lingfeng Yang ◽  
Konstantinos Tryfonidis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
The Us ◽  
Poor Outcomes

e12512 Background: In the US, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents about 10–20% of breast cancers. Current information about the clinical and economic burden of early-stage TNBC in elderly patients is lacking. Methods: We used the SEER-Medicare database to identify patients with continuous Medicare Parts A/B enrollment, ≥66 years old, newly diagnosed between 2010 - 2015 (followed until 2016) with stage II-III TNBC, who initiated systemic neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant (including chemotherapy and radiation) therapy. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) from diagnosis were estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM). Healthcare costs were determined during neoadjuvant and adjuvant periods. Results: Of 1569 patients ( > 99% women), 94 (6%) received neoadjuvant therapy, 1162 (74%) received adjuvant therapy, and 313 (20%) received both (neo/adj; Table). Age and race/ethnicity distributions were comparable in the three cohorts. Primary tumor T stage was T1c/T2 for 43%, 83%, and 58% in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and neo/adj, respectively, and T3 for 14%, 10%, and 15%, respectively. The most common systemic regimens in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant periods were a taxane +/- anthracycline; 21% and 67% of patients in adjuvant and neo/adj cohorts received radiation therapy after surgery. Most claims were for outpatient treatment; hospitalizations were uncommon. The total mean expenditures per patient per month were US$10,620 and $24,408 during neoadjuvant and adjuvant periods, respectively. Conclusions: This study provides insights into patient characteristics, as well as clinical and economic outcomes for elderly patients with early-stage TNBC, treated from 2010-2016 in the US, highlighting the high monetary burden of TNBC and poor outcomes associated with stage III patients. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Early Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Conventional Treatment and Emerging Therapeutic Landscapes

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Diana ◽  
Francesca Carlino ◽  
Elisena Franzese ◽  
Olga Oikonomidou ◽  
Carmen Criscitiello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Cancer Subtypes

Triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are characterized by worse prognosis, higher propensity to earlier metastases, and shorter survival after recurrence compared with other breast cancer subtypes. Anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy is still the mainstay of treatment in early stages, although several escalation approaches have been evaluated to improve survival outcomes. The addition of platinum salts to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) remains controversial due to the lack of clear survival advantage, and the use of adjuvant capecitabine represents a valid treatment option in TNBC patients with residual disease after NACT. Recently, several clinical trials showed promising results through the use of poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and by incorporating immunotherapy with chemotherapy, enriching treatment options beyond conventional cytotoxic agents. In this review, we provided an overview on the current standard of care and a comprehensive update of the recent advances in the management of early stage TNBC and focused on the latest emerging biomarkers and their clinical application to select the best therapeutic strategy in this hard-to-treat population.

Dissecting the Heterogeneity of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15) ◽  
pp. 1879-1887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Otto Metzger-Filho ◽  
Andrew Tutt ◽  
Evandro de Azambuja ◽  
Kamal S. Saini ◽  
Giuseppe Viale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Cancer Subtypes

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15% to 20% of breast cancers. It is a heterogeneous disease, not only on the molecular level, but also on the pathologic and clinical levels. TNBC is associated with a significantly higher probability of relapse and poorer overall survival in the first few years after diagnosis when compared with other breast cancer subtypes. This is observed despite its usual high sensitivity to chemotherapy. In the advanced setting, responses observed with chemotherapy lack durability. Early-stage clinical studies suggested impressive potential when a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor is given for the treatment of advanced TNBC with BRCA gene dysfunction. The molecular complexity of TNBC has led to proposed subclassifications, which will be of great value for the development of targeted therapies. In this review, we discuss the biology of TNBC at the pathologic and the molecular levels. We also elaborate on the role of systemic therapies and the results of the first phase III clinical trial evaluating the addition of iniparib, a novel investigational anticancer agent that does not possess characteristics typical of the PARP inhibitor class, in combination with chemotherapy in advanced TNBC.

scholarly journals De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose G. Bazan ◽  
Sachin R. Jhawar ◽  
Daniel Stover ◽  
Ko Un Park ◽  
Sasha Beyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk

AbstractIn the modern era, highly effective anti-HER2 therapy is associated with low local-regional recurrence (LRR) rates for early-stage HER2+ breast cancer raising the question of whether local therapy de-escalation by radiation omission is possible in patients with small-node negative tumors treated with lumpectomy. To evaluate existing data on radiation omission, we used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to test the hypothesis that RT omission results in equivalent overall survival (OS) in stage 1 (T1N0) HER2+ breast cancer. We excluded patients that received neoadjuvant systemic therapy. We stratified the cohort by receipt of adjuvant radiation. We identified 6897 patients (6388 RT; 509 no RT). Patients that did not receive radiation tended to be ≥70 years-old (odds ratio [OR] = 3.69, 95% CI: 3.02–4.51, p < 0.0001), to have ≥1 comorbidity (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06–1.68, p = 0.0154), to be Hispanic (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.00–2.22, p = 0.049), and to live in lower income areas (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07–1.64, p = 0.0266). Radiation omission was associated with a 3.67-fold (95% CI: 2.23–6.02, p < 0.0001) increased risk of death. While other selection biases that influence radiation omission likely persist, these data should give caution to radiation omission in T1N0 HER2+ breast cancer.

Cytokeratin 7, GATA3, and SOX-10 is a Comprehensive Panel in Diagnosing Triple Negative Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

2021 ◽  
pp. 106689692199071
Author(s):  
Eric Statz ◽  
Julie M. Jorns
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Metastatic Tumor ◽  
Cytokeratin 7 ◽  
Breast Cancer Metastases ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Metastases ◽  
Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis ◽  
The Brain

Following lung cancer, breast cancer is the second most common metastatic tumor to the brain, of which triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ (HER2+) breast cancer are the most common subtypes. TNBC does not have standard immunoprofiles and can be difficult to distinguish from other metastases. A tissue microarray was created from 47 patients with breast cancer metastases to the brain and 12 paired breast primaries. Of 47 breast cancer metastases, 24 were HER2+, 14 were TNBC, and 9 were luminal. Forty-five were cytokeratin 7 (CK7) positive, 36 were GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) positive, 7 were Sry-related HMg-Box gene 10 (SOX-10) positive, 20 were mammaglobin positive, and 19 were gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 positive. At least one of the CK7, GATA3, or SOX-10 was positive in all TNBC metastases. A panel of CK7, GATA3, and SOX-10 is complementary in the diagnosis of breast cancer brain metastasis. SOX-10 appears to be a specific but not particularly sensitive marker in this context.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document