Pembrolizumab vs paclitaxel as second-line treatment for Asian patients with PD-L1–positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal cancer (GC) in the phase III KEYNOTE-063 trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16586-e16586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Cheol Chung ◽  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Zhendong Chen ◽  
Yuxian Bai ◽  
Wan Zamaniah Wan Ishak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Significance Threshold ◽  
Open Label Phase

e16586 Background: Approximately 75% of GC cases occur in Asian persons. Pembrolizumab has shown antitumor activity in global studies of GC. KEYNOTE-063 (NCT03019588) is a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial in Asian patients with advanced PD-L1–positive (combined positive score [CPS] ≥1) GC that progressed after platinum + fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. After the KEYNOTE-063 study began, results of the global KEYNOTE-061 study (NCT02370498) showed that pembrolizumab did not prolong overall survival (OS) vs paclitaxel in patients previously treated for advanced GC (median OS, 9.1 months vs 8.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.66-1.03; 1-sided P= 0.0421 [significance threshold for OS was 1-sided P= 0.0135]). Methods: Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles (~2 years) or standard-dose paclitaxel. The primary efficacy end points were OS and progression-free survival (PFS). Planned enrollment was ~360 patients. Results: Because pembrolizumab did not significantly prolong OS in KEYNOTE-061, enrollment in KEYNOTE-063 was discontinued after 94 patients were enrolled (47 patients in each treatment group). In these Asian patients, median OS was 8.4 months in the pembrolizumab group and 7.7 months in the paclitaxel group; median PFS was 1.9 months and 4.0 months, respectively (Table). Objective response rate (ORR) and median duration of response (DOR) are shown in the Table. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 59.6% of patients receiving pembrolizumab and in 95.5% of patients receiving paclitaxel (Table). Conclusions: In this small sample of Asian patients with PD-L1–positive advanced GC, definitive conclusions are limited; however, second-line pembrolizumab monotherapy seems to be well tolerated in this patient population. Because this study was terminated early, there was insufficient power for comparisons between groups; therefore, these data should be viewed with caution. Clinical trial information: NCT03019588 . [Table: see text]

ELOQUENT-2: A phase III, randomized, open-label trial of lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Len/Dex) with or without elotuzumab (Elo) in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RR MM) (CA204-004).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8112-TPS8112
Author(s):  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Paul Gerard Guy Richardson ◽  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Robert Z. Orlowski ◽  
Jesùs F. San-Miguel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Surface Glycoprotein ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cell Surface Glycoprotein ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Duration Of Response

TPS8112 Background: MM remains incurable and patients (pts) typically relapse or become refractory to current treatments. Novel regimens are needed to improve pt outcomes. Elo is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody targeting the cell surface glycoprotein CS1, which is highly expressed on >95% of MM cells. Len/Dex is approved for treatment of relapsed MM and an objective response rate (ORR) of ~60% was reported in phase III trials of this combination in RR MM. In a phase II study (N=73) of Elo (10 or 20 mg/kg) in combination with Len/Dex in pts with RR MM, the 10 mg/kg group (n=36) demonstrated an ORR of 92% and median progression-free survival (PFS) that was not reached after a median follow-up of 14.1 months. Encouraging activity was seen in patients with high-risk cytogenetics and/or stage 2-3 disease. Based on these data, a randomized, open-label phase III trial has been initiated to determine if the addition of Elo to Len/Dex will improve PFS in patients with RR MM compared with Len/Dex alone. Methods: Pts (N=640) with RR MM and 1-3 prior therapies are eligible, including pts with mild or moderate renal impairment. Pts are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 28-day cycles of Len 25 mg PO (days 1-21) and Dex 40 mg PO (days 1, 8, 15 and 22) with or without Elo. Elo dose and schedule is 10 mg/kg IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22 in the first 2 cycles and on days 1 and 15 in subsequent cycles. Dex 8 mg IV + 28 mg PO is used during the weeks with Elo. Treatment will continue until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent. Patients will be followed for tumor response every 4 weeks until progressive disease and then survival every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint is PFS (90% power for a hazard ratio [experimental to control arm] of 0.74) and the secondary endpoints are ORR and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints are safety, time to response, duration of response, time to subsequent therapy, health-related quality of life, and pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of Elo. Potential biomarkers will also be assessed. As of January 10th, 2012, 107 pts were enrolled and 68 pts were treated. NCT01239797.

IMbrave150: Updated overall survival (OS) data from a global, randomized, open-label phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) versus sorafenib (sor) in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 267-267
Author(s):  
Richard S. Finn ◽  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Masafumi Ikeda ◽  
Peter R. Galle ◽  
Michel Ducreux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Treatment Benefit ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Phase Iii Study

267 Background: Atezo + bev has been approved globally for pts with unresectable HCC who have not received prior systemic therapy, based on results from IMbrave150 (NCT03434379). At a median of 8.6 mo follow-up, both coprimary endpoints were met, with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements observed with atezo + bev vs sor for OS (HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.42, 0.79]; P<0.001) and independently-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; per RECIST 1.1; HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.47, 0.76]; P<0.001) (Finn, et al. N Engl J Med 2020). Here, we report an updated OS analysis for IMbrave150. Methods: The global, multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase III study IMbrave150 enrolled 501 systemic treatment–naive pts with unresectable HCC, ≥1 measurable untreated lesion (RECIST 1.1), Child-Pugh class A liver function and ECOG PS 0/1. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive either atezo 1200 mg IV q3w + bev 15 mg/kg IV q3w or sor 400 mg bid until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit per investigator. This post hoc, descriptive OS analysis was conducted with 12 mo of additional follow up from the primary analysis. Results: 501 pts were enrolled, including 336 to atezo + bev and 165 to sor. At the clinical cut-off date of Aug 31, 2020, median follow-up was 15.6 mo and 280 OS events were observed. Median OS was 19.2 mo with atezo + bev vs 13.4 mo with sor (HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.52, 0.85]; P=0.0009). Survival at 18 mo was 52% with atezo + bev and 40% with sor. Survival benefit with atezo + bev over sor was generally consistent across subgroups and with the primary analysis. The updated objective response rate (ORR; 29.8% per RECIST 1.1) with atezo + bev was in line with the primary analysis, with more pts achieving complete response (CR; 7.7%) than previously reported. Additional response data are in Table. Safety was aligned with the primary analysis, with no new signals identified. Conclusions: IMbrave150 showed consistent clinically meaningful treatment benefit and safety with 12 mo of additional follow-up. The combination provides the longest survival seen in a front-line Phase III study in advanced HCC, confirming atezo + bev as a standard of care for previously untreated, unresectable HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03434379. [Table: see text]

Overall survival results from the randomized phase II study of palbociclib (P) in combination with letrozole (L) vs letrozole alone for frontline treatment of ER+/HER2– advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1; TRIO-18).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1001-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Finn ◽  
John Crown ◽  
Istvan Lang ◽  
Katalin Boer ◽  
Igor Bondarenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Frontline Treatment ◽  
Open Label Phase

1001 Background: Preclinical data identified a synergistic role for P and hormone blockade in blocking growth of ER+ breast cancer (BC) cell lines. PALOMA-1 was an open-label phase II trial comparing progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with advanced ER+/HER2– BC treated with P+L or L alone. Median PFS increased with addition of P to L to 20.2 mos (vs 10.2 mos with L alone; HR = 0.488), with an acceptable safety profile, leading to accelerated approval by the US FDA. These results were confirmed in the phase 3 PALOMA-2 trial. At the time of the final PFS analysis, overall survival (OS) data were immature with only 61 events in both arms and a median follow-up of < 30 mos with a trend in favor of P+L vs L (37.5 vs 33.3 mos; HR = 0.813; P= 0.211). Here we present final OS results. Methods: PALOMA-1 was a 2-part study evaluating P+L in ER+/HER2– advanced BC. Part 1 enrolled postmenopausal pts with this subtype using only ER+/HER2– while Part 2 enrolled pts of this subtype additionally screened for CCND1 amplification and/or loss of p16. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, OS, safety, and correlative biomarker studies. A total of 165 pts were randomized; 66 in Part 1 and 99 in Part 2. Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment arms. In both parts, pts were randomized 1:1 to receive P+L or L alone. OS data were collected as well as post-study therapy. Results: As of Dec 2016, there were 116 OS events. Median OS was 37.5 mos (95% CI: 31.4, 47.8) with P+L vs 34.5 mos (95% CI: 27.4, 42.6) for L (HR = 0.897 [95% CI: 0.623, 1.294]; P= 0.281). Median OS was 37.5 vs 33.3 mos (HR = 0.837; P= 0.280) for Part 1 and 35.1 vs 35.7 mos (HR = 0.935; P= 0.388) for Part 2. 78.6% of pts in the P+L arm received post-study systemic therapy vs 86.4% in the L arm. More pts in the L arm received ≥3 lines of therapy (37% vs 18%). Further subgroup analyses and details on post-study therapies will be presented. Conclusions: In PALOMA-1, P+L provided a statistically non-significant trend towards an improvement in OS. Survival data from the phase III, PALOMA-2 study is awaited. Sponsor: Pfizer; Clinical trial information: NCT00721409.

scholarly journals Randomised Phase 1b/2 trial of tepotinib vs sorafenib in Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with MET overexpression

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baek-Yeol Ryoo ◽  
Ann-Li Cheng ◽  
Zhenggang Ren ◽  
Tae-You Kim ◽  
Hongming Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Phase 1B

Abstract Background This open-label, Phase 1b/2 study evaluated the highly selective MET inhibitor tepotinib in systemic anticancer treatment (SACT)-naive Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) with MET overexpression. Methods In Phase 2b, tepotinib was orally administered once daily (300, 500 or 1,000 mg) to Asian adults with aHCC. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs). Phase 2 randomised SACT-naive Asian adults with aHCC with MET overexpression to tepotinib (recommended Phase 2 dose [RP2D]) or sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was independently assessed time to progression (TTP). Results In Phase 1b (n = 27), no DLTs occurred; the RP2D was 500 mg. In Phase 2 (n = 90, 45 patients per arm), the primary endpoint was met: independently assessed TTP was significantly longer with tepotinib versus sorafenib (median 2.9 versus 1.4 months, HR = 0.42, 90% confidence interval: 0.26–0.70, P = 0.0043). Progression-free survival and objective response also favoured tepotinib. Treatment-related Grade ≥3 AE rates were 28.9% with tepotinib and 45.5% with sorafenib. Conclusions Tepotinib improved TTP versus sorafenib and was generally well tolerated in SACT-naive Asian patients with aHCC with MET overexpression. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01988493.

Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated patients with PD-L1–positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC): Update from the phase III KEYNOTE-061 trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4503-4503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Fuchs ◽  
Mustafa Özgüroğlu ◽  
Yung-Jue Bang ◽  
Maria Di Bartolomeo ◽  
Mario Mandalà ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Dose ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Duration Of Response

4503 Background: KEYNOTE-061 ( NCT02370498) is a global phase 3 study of pembrolizumab vs paclitaxel as second-line therapy for GC. At the time of primary analysis (data cutoff: Oct 26, 2017), in patients with PD-L1–positive status (combined positive score [CPS] ≥1), pembrolizumab did not significantly prolong overall survival (OS) vs paclitaxel (9.1 months vs 8.3 months) but did elicit a longer duration of response (DOR) and a favorable safety profile vs paclitaxel. We present results of KEYNOTE-061 in patients with CPS ≥1, ≥5, and ≥10 after 2 additional years of follow-up (cutoff: Oct 7, 2019). Methods: Adult patients with GC that progressed after platinum + fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles (~2 y) or standard-dose paclitaxel. OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in the CPS ≥1 population were the primary end points. Comparisons were made using stratified log-rank tests. Results: At the time of this analysis, 366/395 patients with CPS ≥1 had died (92.6%). Pembrolizumab prolonged OS vs paclitaxel in PD-L1–positive patients (Table). No significant differences appeared between groups in PFS (Table). Objective response rate (ORR) was higher for pembrolizumab in the CPS ≥10 group, and DOR was longer with pembrolizumab using all CPS cutoffs (Table). There were fewer drug-related adverse events (AEs) with pembrolizumab than paclitaxel in the overall population (53% vs 84%). Conclusions: This long-term analysis found that second-line pembrolizumab prolonged OS among patients with PD-L1–positive GC and led to fewer drug-related AEs vs paclitaxel. Clinical trial information: NCT02370498 . [Table: see text]

Randomized Phase II Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Mucosal Melanoma

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.00902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xieqiao Yan ◽  
Xinan Sheng ◽  
Zhihong Chi ◽  
Lu Si ◽  
Chuanliang Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mucosal Melanoma ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase

PURPOSE Mucosal melanoma (MM) is a highly vascularized tumor with an extremely poor prognosis. In this randomized, open-label, phase II study, we characterized the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin plus paclitaxel (CPB) in patients with previously untreated advanced MM. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) once every 4 weeks in combination with (CPB arm, 5 mg/kg) or without (CP arm) bevacizumab once every 2 weeks. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and adverse events. RESULTS We recruited 114 patients to our study. The median PFS was significantly longer in the CPB arm (4.8 months; 95% CI, 3.6 to 6.0 months) than in the CP arm (3.0 months; 95% CI, 1.7 to 4.3 months) (hazard ratio, 0.461; 95% CI, 0.306 to 0.695; P < .001). Objective response rates were 19.7% and 13.2%, respectively ( P = .384). The median OS was also significantly longer in the CPB arm than in the CP arm (13.6 v 9.0 months; hazard ratio, 0.611; 95% CI, 0.407 to 0.917; P = .017). No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION PFS and OS were significantly better in patients with metastatic MM who received bevacizumab in addition to CPB than in those who received CPB alone. A phase III study should be performed to confirm these benefits (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02023710 ).

Update on overall survival (OS) of RESCUE: An open-label, phase 2 trial of camrelizumab (C) in combination with apatinib (A) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4076-4076
Author(s):  
Yun Zhang ◽  
Jianming Xu ◽  
Jie Shen ◽  
Shanzhi Gu ◽  
Lihua Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Open Label Phase

4076 Background: C+A combination therapy displayed high objective response rate, disease control rate, and durable response with a manageable safety profile in patients (pts) with advanced HCC. Here we performed an updated analysis of OS to characterize the OS benefit of C+A in HCC pts. Methods: 70 pts in first-line cohort and 120 pts in second-line cohort were enrolled. Median OS and 2-year OS rate were evaluated via updated data (data cutoff, 3 January, 2021). Median time from enrollment to data cutoff of the total population (N = 190) was 29.1 months (range, 24.0-33.7). Results: OS events had occurred in 58.6% pts in first-line cohort and 60.0% pts in second-line cohort. The median OS was 20.1 months (95% CI, 14.9-NR) and 2-year OS rate was 43.3% (95% CI, 31.3-54.7) in first-line cohort. The median OS was 21.8 months (95% CI, 17.3-26.8) and 2-year OS rate was 44.6% (95% CI, 35.5-53.3) in second-line cohort. Conclusions: Long-term follow-up of C+A demonstrated remarkable survival benefit in advanced HCC pts, which further suggested that C+A is a promising combination therapy in advanced HCC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03463876.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document