Cost and efficacy of low-dose pembrolizumab in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients in Asia.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19385-e19385
Author(s):  
Jia Li Low ◽  
Kenneth Sooi ◽  
Yiqing Huang ◽  
Gloria HJ Chan ◽  
Yvonne Ang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

e19385 Background: Pembrolizumab has dramatically improved the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is considered the standard of care for first line treatment of NSCLC who do not harbour oncogenic drivers. The fixed dose of 200mg was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The dose of 200mg was based on pharmacokinetic analysis. Studies have demonstrated equivalent efficacy with weight-based dosing 2mg/kg. An average Asian weighs 50-60kg. We aimed to look at the efficacy of pembrolizumab at a low fixed dose compared to the standard dosing. Methods: A review of all consecutive patients receiving pembrolizumab for advanced NSCLC from January 2016 to December 2019 in a large, high-volume academic medical centre, the National University Hospital, Singapore was conducted. Data fields collected include patient’s demographics, treatment doses and clinical characteristics. Time on treatment and overall survival were analysed using the Kaplan Meier method. Results: In total, 92 ECOG 0-2 patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with pembrolizumab. Median age was 69 years (Range, 29-92). Most were males (76%) and Chinese race (68%). Of the 92 patients, 46 (50%) and 46 (50%) received 100mg (Pem100) and 200mg (Pem200) of pembrolizumab respectively. Pembrolizumab was prescribed as first line in 73 (79%) and second line in 19 patients (21%). The average dose of pembrolizumab received in the low dose group was 1.87mg/kg (Range, 1.24mg/kg – 2.70mg/kg). 88 patients were included in the survival analysis. 4 were excluded due to the presence of an oncogenic driver. Patients were followed up for a median of 13.2 months. There was no difference in progression free survival between Pem100 and Pem200 for first-line single agent and when combined with chemotherapy (PFS: NR versus 5.3months, HR 2.17, 95% CI 0.76-6.16, p = 0.15 and NR vs 16.9 months, HR 2.89, 95% CI 0.35-25.16, p = 0.33 respectively). For patients who received pembrolizumab in the first line setting, the response rate was 56% vs 20% (p = 0.07), 67% vs 52% (p = 0.69) for Pem100 and Pem200 as a single agent and when combined with chemotherapy respectively. The median number of cycles received was 8.9 (Range, 1-60 cycles), translating to estimated cost savings of SGD 45 395 (~ USD 32 664) per patient who received Pem100. Conclusions: A lower fixed dose of pembrolizumab at 100mg showed no difference in progression free survival and response rate in an Asian cohort with significant cost savings. A further randomised controlled trial in an Asian population should be carried out.

Effects of adding necitumumab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1331-1342
Author(s):  
Irena Ilic ◽  
Sandra Sipetic ◽  
Jovan Grujicic ◽  
Milena Ilic
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

Introduction Almost half of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Our aim was to assess the effects of adding necitumumab to chemotherapy in patients with stage IV NSCLC. Material and methods A comprehensive literature search was performed according to pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data on overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate and adverse events were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for time-to-event data and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes. Results The meta-analysis included four randomized clinical trials with 2074 patients. The pooled results showed significant improvement for overall survival (HR = 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.95), p = 0.004) when necitumumab was added to chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. No statistically significant improvement was noted for progression-free survival and objective response rate (HR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.69–1.01), p = 0.06 and OR = 1.46 (95% CI 0.90–2.38), p = 0.13, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with non-squamous NSCLC, there was no benefit in overall survival and objective response rate. Patients with advanced NSCLC who received necitumumab were at the highest odds of developing a skin rash (OR = 14.50 (95% CI 3.16–66.43), p = 0.0006) and hypomagnesaemia (OR = 2.77 (95% CI 2.23–3.45), p < 0.00001), while the OR for any grade ≥3 adverse event was 1.55 (95% CI 1.28–1.87, p < 0.00001). Conclusions The addition of necitumumab to standard chemotherapy in a first-line setting in patients with stage IV NSCLC results in a statistically significant improvement in overall survival, while the results were not significant for progression-free survival and objective response rate.

scholarly journals First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (CheckMate 568): Outcomes by Programmed Death Ligand 1 and Tumor Mutational Burden as Biomarkers

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 992-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal Ready ◽  
Matthew D. Hellmann ◽  
Mark M. Awad ◽  
Gregory A. Otterson ◽  
Martin Gutierrez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mutational Burden ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Tumor Mutational Burden ◽  
First Line Treatment

PURPOSE CheckMate 568 is an open-label phase II trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab as first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed the association of efficacy with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB). PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred eighty-eight patients with previously untreated, recurrent stage IIIB/IV NSCLC received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) in patients with 1% or more and less than 1% tumor PD-L1 expression. Efficacy on the basis of TMB (FoundationOne CDx assay) was a secondary end point. RESULTS Of treated patients with tumor available for testing, 252 patients (88%) of 288 were evaluable for PD-L1 expression and 98 patients (82%) of 120 for TMB. ORR was 30% overall and 41% and 15% in patients with 1% or greater and less than 1% tumor PD-L1 expression, respectively. ORR increased with higher TMB, plateauing at 10 or more mutations/megabase (mut/Mb). Regardless of PD-L1 expression, ORRs were higher in patients with TMB of 10 or more mut/Mb (n = 48: PD-L1, ≥ 1%, 48%; PD-L1, < 1%, 47%) versus TMB of fewer than 10 mut/Mb (n = 50: PD-L1, ≥ 1%, 18%; PD-L1, < 1%, 5%), and progression-free survival was longer in patients with TMB of 10 or more mut/Mb versus TMB of fewer than 10 mut/Mb (median, 7.1 v 2.6 months). Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 29% of patients. CONCLUSION Nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab was effective and tolerable as a first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic NSCLC. TMB of 10 or more mut/Mb was associated with improved response and prolonged progression-free survival in both tumor PD-L1 expression 1% or greater and less than 1% subgroups and was thus identified as a potentially relevant cutoff in the assessment of TMB as a biomarker for first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin or Carboplatin, With or Without Cetuximab, As First-Line Therapy for Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (36) ◽  
pp. 5777-5784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. Butts ◽  
David Bodkin ◽  
Edward L. Middleman ◽  
Craig W. Englund ◽  
David Ellison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab added to first-line gemcitabine/platinum in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and MethodsIn this noncomparative, randomized trial, chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent/metastatic NSCLC (stage IV or stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusion) were eligible. Patients received cisplatin (75 mg/m2IV, every 3 weeks) or carboplatin (area under the concentration-versus-time curve of 5 intravenously [IV], every 3 weeks), and gemcitabine (1,250 or 1,000 mg/m2IV, days 1 and 8) plus cetuximab (400 mg/m2IV day 1, followed by 250 mg/m2weekly), in arm A, or chemotherapy alone, in arm B. Response rate was the primary end point; safety, progression-free survival, and overall survival were secondary end points.ResultsSixty-five patients were randomly assigned to arm A and 66 to arm B. Partial responses were observed in 18 patients (27.7%; 95% CI, 17.3 to 40.2) in arm A and 12 (18.2%; 95% CI, 9.8 to 29.6) in arm B. Median progression-free survival was 5.09 months for arm A (95% CI, 4.17 to 5.98) and 4.21 months (95% CI, 3.81 to 5.49) in arm B. Median overall survival was 11.99 months (95% CI, 8.80 to 15.18) and 9.26 months (95% CI, 7.43 to 11.79) in arms A and B, respectively. Overall toxicity was acceptable and consistent with the profiles of the individual agents.ConclusionFirst-line treatment with cetuximab plus gemcitabine/platinum is well tolerated and can be administered safely in patients with advanced NSCLC. Differences in response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival suggest that the addition of cetuximab to platinum/gemcitabine may improve clinical outcomes. Larger studies are in progress to address this hypothesis.

scholarly journals Overall Response Rate, Progression-Free Survival, and Overall Survival With Targeted and Standard Therapies in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: US Food and Drug Administration Trial-Level and Patient-Level Analyses

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1008-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gideon M. Blumenthal ◽  
Stella W. Karuri ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Lijun Zhang ◽  
Sean Khozin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
Level Analysis

Purpose To conduct analyses exploring trial-level and patient-level associations between overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) trials. Methods We identified 14 trials (N = 12,567) submitted to US Food and Drug Administration since 2003 of treatments for advanced NSCLC. Only randomized, active-controlled trials with more than 150 patients were included. Associations between trial-level PFS hazard ratio (HR), OS HR, and ORR odds ratio were analyzed using a weighted linear regression model. Patient-level responder analyses comparing PFS and OS between patients with and without an objective response were performed using pooled data from all studies. Results In the trial-level analysis, the association between PFS and ORR was strong (R2 = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.98). There was no association between OS and ORR (R2 = 0.09; 95% CI, 0 to 0.33) and OS and PFS (R2 = 0.08; 95% CI, 0 to 0.31). In the patient-level responder analyses, patients who achieved a response had better PFS and OS compared with nonresponders (PFS: HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.42; OS: HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.43). Conclusion On a trial level, there is a strong association between ORR and PFS. An association between ORR and OS and between PFS and OS was not established, possibly because of cross-over and longer survival after progression in the targeted therapy and first-line trials. The patient-level analysis showed that responders have a better PFS and OS compared with nonresponders. A therapy in advanced NSCLC with a large magnitude of effect on ORR may have a large PFS effect.

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in first-line treatment for patients with metastatic NSCLC that were PD-L1 negative or less than 1%.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9061-9061
Author(s):  
Thierry Landre ◽  
Gaetan Des Guetz ◽  
Kader Chouahnia ◽  
Cherifa Taleb ◽  
Alain Vergnenegre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Study Heterogeneity ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Line Setting

9061 Background: Clinical efficacy of single agent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in patients with Non-Small-Cell-Lung-Cancer (NSCLC) that were PD-L1 negative or < 1% is controversial. Recent studies have evaluated the combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 to chemotherapy (CT) for this population in the first line setting. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis (MA) of randomized trials that compared PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus CT with CT alone in first line of treatment for advanced NSCLC. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) in patients with undetectable PD-L1 expression or < 1%. A fixed-effect or random-effects model was adopted depending on between-study heterogeneity. Results: Four studies evaluated atezolizumab + CT (IMpower 130,131,132 and 150), three studies pembrolizumab + CT (Keynote 021, 189 and 407) and one study evaluated nivolumab + CT (CheckMate 227). The eight eligible studies included 2037 patients (1246 with PD-L1 negative and 791 with PD-L1 expression < 1%). Most of the patients were men and smokers, with a median age of 64 years. There were 1423 Non-squamous (69.8 %) and 614 Squamous tumors (30%). The combination (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor + CT) was significantly associated with improvement of OS (hazards ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI 0.63–0.89; p < 0.0001), PFS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI 0.65–0.80; p < 0.0001) and ORR (relative ratio [RR], 2.59; 95% CI 1.46–4.60; p < 0.0001). Moreover, median duration of response (DOR) was statistically longer with combination (8.1 months versus 4.9; p < 0.0008). Conclusions: For patients with untreated NSCLC with low ( < 1%) or undetectable PD-L1 expression, the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combination with chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, is associated with significantly improved OS, PFS, and ORR.

Rituximab as First-Line and Maintenance Therapy for Patients With Indolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (20) ◽  
pp. 4261-4267 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Hainsworth ◽  
Sharlene Litchy ◽  
Howard A. Burris ◽  
Daniel C. Scullin ◽  
Steven W. Corso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stable Disease ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate response to single-agent rituximab in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and no previous systemic therapy, and the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of maintenance rituximab, administered at 6-month intervals, in patients with objective response or stable disease after first-line rituximab therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with indolent NHL (follicular or small lymphocytic subtypes) previously untreated with systemic therapy received rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenously weekly for 4 weeks. Patients were restaged at week 6 for response; those with objective response or stable disease received maintenance rituximab courses (identical dose and schedule) at 6-month intervals. Maintenance was continued for a maximum of four rituximab courses or until progression. Between March 1998 and May 1999, 62 patients were entered onto this trial; minimum follow-up was 24 months. RESULTS: Sixty patients (97%) completed the first 4-week course of rituximab and were assessable for response. All have now completed rituximab therapy; 36 (58%) received four courses at 6-month intervals. The objective response rate at 6 weeks was 47%; 45% of patients had stable disease. With continued maintenance, final response rate increased to 73%, with 37% complete responses. Response was similar in patients with follicular versus small lymphocytic subtypes (76% v 70%, respectively). Median actuarial progression-free survival was 34 months. Two patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicity with the first dose; one patient was removed from treatment. No cumulative or additional toxicities were seen with maintenance courses. CONCLUSION: Rituximab is highly active and extremely well tolerated as first-line single-agent therapy for indolent NHL. First-line treatment with scheduled maintenance at 6-month intervals produces high overall and complete response rates and a longer progression-free survival (34 months) than has been reported with a standard 4-week treatment.

A randomized discontinuation phase II trial of ridaforolimus in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with KRAS mutations.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7531-7531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory J. Riely ◽  
Julie R. Brahmer ◽  
David Planchard ◽  
Lucio Crinò ◽  
Robert Charles Doebele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Free Survival

7531 Background: Mutations in KRAS are present in ~25% of patients with advanced NSCLC. Preclinical data support the role of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in KRAS mediated oncogenesis. Ridaforolimus is an inhibitor of mTOR which has been shown to have efficacy in advanced endometrial cancer and soft tissue sarcoma. Everolimus, another mTOR inhibitor was previously evaluated in unselected patients with advanced NSCLC and found to have a response rate <5%. We hypothesized that by enrichment for patients with NSCLC and KRAS mutations, treatment with ridaforolimus would be associated with prolonged stable disease relative to available standard treatments for NSCLC. Methods: Patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer with KRAS mutation who had received prior chemotherapy for NSCLC began treatment with oral ridaforolimus 40 mg once daily on a 5 day/week schedule. After 8 weeks, patients with >30% tumor shrinkage remained on ridaforolimus and patients with >20% tumor growth discontinued treatment. Patients with stable disease were randomized 1:1 to placebo or ridaforolimus. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS) after randomization. Results: 79 patients were enrolled (40 women, median age 58 [range 28-85]). The overall response rate (CR+PR) at 8 weeks was 1/79 (1%, 95% CI 0-7%).  28 patients with stable disease at 8 weeks were randomized to ridaforolimus or placebo.  Median PFS based on investigator assessment from randomization was significantly longer with ridaforolimus (4 months) than placebo (2 months, p=0.013, HR 0.36).  Median OS from randomization was 18 months in the ridaforolimus treated arm and 5 months in the placebo treated group, (HR 0.46, p=0.09).  The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were fatigue (10%), mucositis/stomatitis (10%), pneumonia (10%), dyspnea (9%), diarrhea (6%), and hyperglycemia (6%). Conclusions: In patients with KRAS mutant NSCLC who had stable disease after 8 weeks of ridaforolimus, ridaforolimus was associated with prolonged progression-free survival.  Further evaluation of ridaforolimus in this patient population is warranted. 

scholarly journals Single arm, phase two study of low-dose metronomic eribulin in metastatic breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavani Chalasani ◽  
Kiah Farr ◽  
Vicky Wu ◽  
Isaac Jenkins ◽  
Alex Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background Treatment options for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes are limited. In a phase III trial, eribulin demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival compared to treatment of physician’s choice, but had limited tolerability because of neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy. Based on prior studies of alternative treatment schedules with other therapies, we hypothesized that a low-dose metronomic schedule of eribulin would permit patients to remain on treatment more consistently without treatment delays, resulting in longer time to progression, and improved toxicity profile. Methods We conducted a multi-site single arm, phase II trial patients with MBC. All patients were treated with metronomic eribulin (0.9 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle.) Treatment was continued until the patient developed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or chose to stop the study. Patients must have had prior taxane exposure. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary end points were overall survival, response rate, and clinical benefit rate. Exploratory biomarkers were performed to analyze change in levels of circulating endothelial cells (CECs), circulating endothelial precursors, and carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) with response to therapy. Findings We consented 86 patients and 59 were evaluable for final analysis. Median age was 59 years; 78% had HER2 negative tumors. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months with overall survival (OS) of 14.3 months. Objective response rate was 15% with clinical benefit rate of 48%. Reported grade 3 neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were 18% and 5%, respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity was seen in 3% of patients. Interpretation Metronomic weekly low-dose eribulin is an active and tolerable regimen with significantly less myelosuppression, alopecia, and peripheral neuropathy than is seen with the approved dose and schedule, allowing longer duration of use and disease control, with similar outcomes compared to the standard dose regimen.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document