A geriatric assessment (GA) intervention for older patients with advanced cancer: Secondary outcomes from a University of Rochester cancer center NCI community oncology research program cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 33-33
Author(s):  
Supriya Gupta Mohile ◽  
Mostafa Mohamed ◽  
Huiwen Xu ◽  
Amita Patil ◽  
Eva Culakova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
Community Oncology ◽  
Treatment Type ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

33 Background: GA evaluates aging-related domains (e.g., function) known to be associated with cancer treatment toxicity. We found that providing a GA summary with management recommendations to oncologists reduces clinician-rated toxicity in older patients (pts) with advanced cancer receiving high risk treatment (presented @ASCO2020). Herein, we report secondary outcomes on the effects of the GA intervention on aging-related outcomes. Methods: Pts aged ≥ 70 with incurable solid tumors or lymphoma and ≥ 1 impaired GA domain starting a new treatment regimen were enrolled. Community oncology practices were randomized to intervention (oncologists received GA summary/recommendations) or usual care (none given). Secondary analyses examined effects of the intervention on functional outcomes (patient-reported falls, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), short physical performance battery (SPPB), geriatric depression scale (GDS), and medications [total and prescription]). Outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed effects model, logistic or Poisson regression adjusted for baseline values, time, and site effects as appropriate. Results: From 2013-19, 718 pts were enrolled from 41 practices. Age (mean 77 yrs), sex (43% women), number of impaired GA domains (median 4/8), and treatment type (chemotherapy 88%) were not different by arm. More pts in intervention were black (12% vs 3%, p<0.01), had GI cancer (38% vs 31%, p<0.01), and had prior chemotherapy (31% vs 23%, p=0.02). Overall, 16.4% of all pts had one new fall over 3 months; patients in the intervention arm were significantly less like to fall over 3 months (11.7% vs 20.7%; Risk Ratio 0.58; 95% CI 0.40-0.84, p=0.004). There was no difference in the total number of medications (mean 5.86 vs 5.79, p=0.80) and prescriptions (mean 4.26 vs 4.20, p=0.70) at baseline. More medications (adjusted mean 0.23 vs 0.09, p=0.03) and prescriptions (0.19 vs 0.07, p=0.05) were discontinued during intervention, although there was no difference at 3 month follow up. There were no significant between-arms differences in IADL, SPPB, and GDS. Conclusions: Providing GA information to oncologists reduces the proportion of older pts who experience a fall over 3 months and improves polypharmacy; both of these endpoints are of clinical importance to older adults with aging-related conditions and advanced cancer undergoing palliative treatment. Funding: R01CA177592, U01CA233167, UG1CA189961. Clinical trial information: NCT02054741 .

Improving person-centered communication of goals, proxy, and advance directives in older patients with advanced cancer: Secondary analysis from a University of Rochester NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11523-11523
Author(s):  
Marie Anne Flannery ◽  
Eva Culakova ◽  
Kah Poh Loh ◽  
Ronald M. Epstein ◽  
Charles Stewart Kamen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Advance Directive ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
Patient Goals ◽  
Age Related

11523 Background: Quality person-centered care relies on effective communication between the clinical team and the patient/caregiver eliciting goals and discussing wishes. In a PCORI- and NCI-funded CRCT, we found that providing community-based oncologists with geriatric assessment-guided recommendations led to more and higher quality discussions of age-related issues for older patients with advanced cancer. In this secondary analysis, we assessed whether specific recommendations to oncologists to discuss patient goals, proxy and advance directives resulted in increased communication about these topics. Methods: Patients aged 70+ with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma and at least one impaired geriatric domain (e.g., function, cognition) were enrolled (URCC 13070; PI: Mohile). Oncology practices were randomized to the intervention (oncologists received recommendations to elicit goals and discuss wishes) or usual care. The clinic visit after the oncologist received recommendations was recorded and transcribed; two blinded coders evaluated the transcripts for discussion of the specific topic areas recommended in the intervention. Between arm differences were compared using generalized linear models controlling for practice cluster. Results: From 2014-17, 528 patients (284 intervention) provided transcripts from 31 practices (mean age = 77, range 70-96 years; 49% female; mixed cancer diagnoses). Topics related to patient goals, proxy and advance directive wishes were more often discussed in the intervention arm (goals of care preferences: 9 vs 2%, p = .02, treatment goals: 35 vs 20%. p = .04, elicit caregiver input: 28 vs 3%. p < .01, assess values and goals: 25 vs 7%, p = .07, health care proxy: 40 vs 1%, p = .004, advance directive: 25 vs 1%, p = .002). Conclusions: In this community-based study of older adults providing recommendations to oncologists to discuss specific topics resulted in increased person-centered discussions with patients and caregivers about goals, proxy and advance directive wishes. However, the content areas were discussed in less than half of all visits. Clinical trial information: NCT02107443.

A geriatric assessment (GA) intervention to reduce treatment toxicity in older patients with advanced cancer: A University of Rochester Cancer Center NCI community oncology research program cluster randomized clinical trial (CRCT).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12009-12009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supriya Gupta Mohile ◽  
Mostafa Refaat Mohamed ◽  
Eva Culakova ◽  
Huiwen Xu ◽  
Kah Poh Loh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Treatment Intensity ◽  
Treatment Toxicity ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
Community Oncology ◽  
Grade 3

12009 Background: GA evaluates aging-related domains (e.g., function) known to be associated with cancer treatment toxicity. In this CRCT, we evaluated if providing a GA summary with management recommendations to oncologists can reduce toxicity in older patients (pts) with advanced cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or other agents with a high reported prevalence of grade 3-5 toxicity. Methods: Pts aged > 70 with incurable solid tumors or lymphoma and > 1 impaired GA domain starting a new treatment regimen were enrolled. Community oncology practices were randomized to intervention (oncologists received GA summary/recommendations for impairments) or usual care (none given). The primary outcome was proportion of pts who experienced any grade 3-5 toxicity (CTCAE v.4) within 3 months. Practice staff prospectively captured toxicities; blinded oncology clinicians reviewed medical records to verify. Secondary outcomes included 6 month overall survival (OS) and treatment intensity (standard vs reduced). Outcomes were analyzed using generalized linear mixed/Cox models with Arm as a fixed effect, controlling for practice. Results: From 2013-19, 718 pts were enrolled from 41 practices. Age (mean 77 yrs), sex (43% women), number of impaired GA domains (median 4/8), and treatment type (chemotherapy 88%) were not different by Arm. More pts in intervention were Black (12% vs 3%, p<0.01), had GI cancer (38% vs 31%, p<0.01), and had prior chemotherapy (31% vs 23%, p=0.02). Pts in intervention experienced a lower proportion of grade 3-5 toxicity (175/349; 50%) than pts in usual care (262/369; 71%). The relative risk (RR: intervention vs usual care) of grade 3-5 toxicity was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63-0.87; p=0.0002); the difference was mostly driven by non-heme toxicities (RR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.53-1.0, p<0.05). OS was not significantly different (71% vs 74%, p=0.3). More pts in intervention received reduced intensity treatment at cycle 1 (49% vs 35%, RR 0.81, p=0.01). Dose modifications due to toxicity were lower in intervention (42% vs 58%, p<0.0001), but results were not significant after controlling for practice (RR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.67-1.08, p=0.2). Conclusions: Providing GA information to oncologists reduces the proportion of older pts who experience grade 3-5 toxicity from high-risk palliative cancer treatment, without compromising OS. Reduced treatment intensity at cycle 1 may explain these results. Funding: R01CA177592, U01CA233167, UG1CA189961. Clinical trial information: NCT02054741 .

scholarly journals Enhancing Patient-Provider Communication With the Electronic Self-Report Assessment for Cancer: A Randomized Trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1029-1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna L. Berry ◽  
Brent A. Blumenstein ◽  
Barbara Halpenny ◽  
Seth Wolpin ◽  
Jesse R. Fann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinic Visit ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cancer Symptoms ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Life Issues ◽  
Clinic Visits

Purpose Although patient-reported cancer symptoms and quality-of-life issues (SQLIs) have been promoted as essential to a comprehensive assessment, efficient and efficacious methods have not been widely tested in clinical settings. The purpose of this trial was to determine the effect of the Electronic Self-Report Assessment–Cancer (ESRA-C) on the likelihood of SQLIs discussed between clinicians and patients with cancer in ambulatory clinic visits. Secondary objectives included comparison of visit duration between groups and usefulness of the ESRA-C as reported by clinicians. Patients and Methods This randomized controlled trial was conducted in 660 patients with various cancer diagnoses and stages at two institutions of a comprehensive cancer center. Patient-reported SQLIs were automatically displayed on a graphical summary and provided to the clinical team before an on-treatment visit (n = 327); in the control group, no summary was provided (n = 333). SQLIs were scored for level of severity or distress. One on-treatment clinic visit was audio recorded for each participant and then scored for discussion of each SQLI. We hypothesized that problematic SQLIs would be discussed more often when the intervention was delivered to the clinicians. Results The likelihood of SQLIs being discussed differed by randomized group and depended on whether an SQLI was first reported as problematic (P = .032). Clinic visits were similar with regard to duration between groups, and clinicians reported the summary as useful. Conclusion The ESRA-C is the first electronic self-report application to increase discussion of SQLIs in a US randomized clinical trial.

scholarly journals Changes in fatigue, barriers, and predictors towards physical activity in advanced cancer patients over a period of 12 months—a comparative study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Frikkel ◽  
M. Beckmann ◽  
N. De Lazzari ◽  
M. Götte ◽  
S. Kasper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Physical Functioning ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Psychological Conditions ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Purpose Physical activity (PA) is recommended to improve advanced cancer patients’ (ACP) physical functioning, fatigue, and quality of life. Yet, little is known about ACPs’ attitude towards PA and its influence on fatigue and depressiveness over a longer period. This prospective, non-interventional cohort study examined ACPs’ fatigue, depression, motivation, and barriers towards PA before and after 12 months of treatment among ACP Methods Outpatients with incurable cancer receiving treatment at a German Comprehensive Cancer Center reporting moderate/severe weakness/tiredness during self-assessment via MIDOS II were enrolled. Fatigue (FACT-F), depression (PHQ-8), cancer-related parameters, self-assessed PA behavior, motivation for and barriers against PA were evaluated (T0). Follow-up data was acquired after 12 months (T1) using the same questionnaire. Results At follow-up, fatigue (p=0.017) and depressiveness (p=0.015) had increased in clinical relevant extent. Physically active ACP did not show significant progress of FACT-F (p=0.836) or PHQ-8 (p=0.799). Patient-reported barriers towards PA remained stable. Logistic regression analyses identified motivation as a positive predictor for PA at both time points (T0, β=2.152, p=0.017; T1, β =2.264, p=0.009). Clinically relevant depression was a negative predictor for PA at T0 and T1 (T0, β=−3.187, p=0.044; T1, β=−3.521, p=0.041). Conclusion Our findings emphasize the importance of psychological conditions in physical activity behavior of ACP. Since psychological conditions seem to worsen over time, early integration of treatment is necessary. By combining therapy approaches of cognitive behavioral therapy and exercise in interdisciplinary care programs, the two treatment options might reinforce each other and sustainably improve ACPs’ fatigue, physical functioning, and QoL. Trial registration German Register of Clinical Trials, DRKS00012514, registration date: 30.05.2017

scholarly journals A cluster randomized controlled trial comparing Virtual Learning Collaborative and Technical Assistance strategies to implement an early palliative care program for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: a study protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Zubkoff ◽  
Kathleen Doyle Lyons ◽  
J. Nicholas Dionne-Odom ◽  
Gregory Hagley ◽  
Maria Pisu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Technical Assistance ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Early Palliative Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Community Oncology ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Abstract Background Virtual Learning Collaboratives (VLC), learning communities focused on a common purpose, are used frequently in healthcare settings to implement best practices. Yet, there is limited research testing the effectiveness of this approach compared to other implementation strategies. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a VLC compared to Technical Assistance (TA) among community oncology practices implementing ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends), an evidence-based, early palliative care telehealth, psycho-educational intervention for patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer and their caregivers. Methods Using Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) and Proctor’s Implementation Outcomes Frameworks, this two-arm hybrid type-III cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) will compare two implementation strategies, VLC versus TA, among the 48 National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) practice clusters that have not historically provided palliative care to all patients with advanced cancer. Three cohorts of practice clusters will be randomized to the study arms. Each practice cluster will recruit 15–27 patients and a family caregiver to participate in ENABLE. The primary study outcome is ENABLE uptake (patient level), i.e., the proportion of eligible patients who complete the ENABLE program (receive a palliative care assessment and complete the six ENABLE sessions over 12 weeks). The secondary outcome is overall program implementation (practice cluster level), as measured by the General Organizational Index at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Exploratory aims assess patient and caregiver mood and quality of life outcomes at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks. Practice cluster randomization will seek to keep the proportion of rural practices, practice sizes, and minority patients seen within each practice balanced across the two study arms. Discussion This study will advance the field of implementation science by evaluating VLC effectiveness, a commonly used but understudied, implementation strategy. The study will advance the field of palliative care by building the capacity and infrastructure to implement an early palliative care program in community oncology practices. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov. NCT04062552; Pre-results. Registered: August 20, 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04062552?term=NCT04062552&draw=2&rank=1

A placebo-controlled trial of Sertraline's effects on symptoms, well-being and survival in advanced cancer: The ZEST Trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9002-9002 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. R. Wilcken ◽  
D. Goldstein ◽  
A. K. Nowak ◽  
P. J. Beale ◽  
M. Jefford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses

9002 Background: Depression, anxiety, fatigue and impaired well-being are common, important and closely related in advanced cancer. We sought to determine the effects of sertraline (a well-tolerated, SSRI antidepressant) on these symptoms and survival in a broad cross-section of people with advanced cancer but without major depression. Methods: 189 participants (pts) were randomly allocated to sertraline 50 mg daily or placebo. Assessments were at baseline; months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12; and, then 3-monthly. Outcome measures rated by pts included the: Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D); Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A, HADS-D); and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General and Fatigue scales (FACT-G and FACT-F). Clinicians completed Spitzer's Quality of Life Index (SQLI). Outcomes on all scales are expressed from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The primary analyses of sertraline's effects on quality of life were based on scores at 4 and 8 weeks adjusted for baseline scores using generalised estimating equations. Efficacy analyses are by intention to treat; toxicity analyses by treatment received. P-values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are 2-sided. Results: Recruitment was stopped after the first planned interim analysis of 150 pts showed a trend in overall survival favouring placebo (univariable logrank p=0.04; multivariable Cox model hazard ratio 1.61, CI 1.1 to 2.5, p=0.02). This trend was weaker at the final analysis including all 189 patients and longer follow-up (univariable logrank p=0.09); and, after accounting for baseline factors (multivariable Cox model hazard ratio 1.27, CI 0.87 to 1.8, p=0.2). Sertraline had no significant effects (scale: benefit over placebo, 95% CI) on depression (CES-D: 0.4, −2.6 to 3.4), anxiety (HADS-A: 2.0, −1.5 to 5.5), fatigue (FACT-F: 0.3, −4.3 to 4.9), overall quality of life (FACT-G: 1.7, −1.3 to 4.7) or clinicians’ ratings (SQLI: 2.0, −2.5 to 6.5). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses also excluded significant benefits. Sertraline was discontinued more often and earlier than placebo (logrank p = 0.03). The trial was closed for lack of benefit. Conclusions: Sertraline did not improve symptoms, well-being or survival and should be reserved for those with a proven indication. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Improving communication with older patients with cancer using geriatric assessment (GA): A University of Rochester NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA10003-LBA10003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supriya Gupta Mohile ◽  
Ronald M. Epstein ◽  
Arti Hurria ◽  
Charles E. Heckler ◽  
Paul Duberstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Usual Care ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Clinic Visit ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Cluster Randomized

LBA10003 Background: GA includes validated measures that assess age-related health domains (e.g., function, cognition) known to increase adverse outcomes. In this PCORI and NCI funded CRCT, we evaluated if providing a GA summary and recommendations for GA-guided interventions improves communication about age-related concerns for older patients (pts) with cancer. Methods: Pts aged ≥ 70 with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma and at least 1 impaired GA domain were enrolled. Oncology practices were randomized to intervention (oncologists received GA summary) or usual care (no summary provided). The primary outcomes were: 1) number of discussions about age-related concerns (the clinic visit after GA was audio-recorded and transcribed; 2 blinded coders evaluated quality of communication and plan for follow-up interventions) and 2) telephone surveys of patient satisfaction (modified Health Care Climate Questionnaire [HCCQ-age] scored 7-35). Outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed models with arm as the fixed effect, controlling for practice. Results: From 2014-17, 544 pts (295 in GA) were enrolled from 31 practices. There were no differences in demographics by arm (mean age 77 yrs; 49% female). More patients in usual care had impaired physical performance (96% vs 92%, p = 0.03) and social support (33% vs 25%, p = 0.05). In 530 evaluable pts, the overall mean number of discussions was 6.3 (SD: 4.0). The GA arm had 3.5 more discussions about age-related concerns (95%CI: 2.28-4.72, p = 10-6; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.24) compared to usual care; of these, in the GA arm, 2.0 more discussions on average had higher quality communication (95%CI: 1.20-2.69; p = 6x10-6) and 1.9 more led to interventions (95% CI: 1.14-2.73; p = 1.6x10-5). The GA arm had significantly more discussions for almost all GA domains. In 511 pts with HCCQ-age, the mean score was 22.9 (SD 4.5); the score was 1.12 points higher in the GA arm (95%CI: 0.23-2.03; p = .027; ICC = 0.02). Conclusions: Providing a GA summary to oncologists increases the number and quality of discussions about age-related concerns and improves pt satisfaction. Clinical trial information: NCT02107443.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document