Treatment-free survival after discontinuation of immuno-checkpoint therapy, and outcome of subsequent molecular targeted therapy: Retrospective study of Japanese metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients (after I-O study).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 677-677
Author(s):  
Yoshihiko Tomita ◽  
Go Kimura ◽  
Satoshi Fukasawa ◽  
Yutaka Sugiyama ◽  
Kazuyuki Numakura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3

677 Background: Guidelines for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) recommend nivolumab monotherapy (NIVO) for treated mRCC, and nivolumab + ipilimumab combination therapy (NIVO+IPI) for untreated IMDC intermediate and poor risk mRCC patients. Though molecular targeted therapies (TTs) such as VEGFR-TKIs and mTORi are recommended as subsequent therapy after NIVO or NIVO+IPI, their impact is still unclear. Methods: Japanese mRCC patients treated with TT after NIVO (CheckMate 025) or NIVO+IPI (CheckMate 214) were retrospectively analyzed. Primary endpoints were investigator assessed ORR of the first TT after NIVO, and after NIVO+IPI. Secondary endpoints included treatment-free survival (TFS) after discontinuation of NIVO and NIVO+IPI, and progression-free survival (PFS) and safety of the first subsequent TT after NIVO and NIVO+IPI. Results: Twenty-six patients of CheckMate 025 and 19 patients of CheckMate 214 from 20 centers in Japan were analyzed. Median TFS after ICI discontinuation was 1.0m and 2.5m for CheckMate 025 and CheckMate 214 patients, respectively. Median follow-up period from the start of TT after ICI discontinuation to date of analysis or death was 22.1m for CheckMate 025, and 20.3m for CheckMate 214 patients. As the first subsequent TT after NIVO or NIVO+IPI, axitinib was the most treated therapy for both CheckMate 025 (53.8%) and CheckMate 214 (47.4%) patients. ORR of TT after NIVO and NIVO+IPI was 26.9% and 31.6%, and median PFS was 8.9m and 16.3m, respectively. During the treatment of first TT after NIVO and NIVO+IPI, 98% percent experienced treated-related adverse events, 51% experienced grade 3-4, but no treatment related death. Conclusions: TTs have favorable antitumor activity for mRCC after NIVO and NIVO+IPI, possibly by changing the mode of action. Safety signals of TTs after ICI were similar to the previous reports. These results indicate sequential TTs after ICI may contribute for durable survival benefit.

Clinical outcome of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who interrupted VEGFR-TKI after achieving stable disease or better response.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 459-459
Author(s):  
Dong Hoe Koo ◽  
Inkeun Park ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee ◽  
Jin-Hee Ahn ◽  
Dae Ho Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

459 Background: The purpose of the this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of VEGFR-TKIs interruption in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after achieving stable disease (SD) or better response. Methods: A retrospective analysis of medical records and imaging studies was performed on all patients with mRCC treated with VEGFR-TKIs between January 2008 and July 2014 (n=505). Patients who achieved SD or better response under VEGFR-TKI and later discontinued VEGFR-TKIs for any reason with the exception of disease progression were included in the analysis. Outcomes analyzed were progression free survival (PFS) after VEGFR-TKIs discontinuation, patterns of disease progression, time to subsequent therapy (TST), response to VEGFR-TKI resumption, and time to treatment failure (TTF) after TKI resumption. Results: We identified 32 patients (sunitinib=20, sorafenib=7, and pazopanib=5). The responses to VEGFR-TKIs were CR (n=4), PR (n=11), SD (n=15), and controlled but non-measurable (n=2). Median time to interruption from the initiation of VEGFR-TKI therapy was 16.6 months (95% CI, 12.8-20.3). The main causes of VEGFR-TKI interruption was toxicity (n=19, 59.4%), will to have treatment holiday (n=7, 21.8%), patient’s refusal (n=3, 9.4%), and others (n=3, 9.4%). At the time of analysis, 16 patients had disease progression and 1 patient was dead. With a median follow-up duration of 56.6 months (range, 12.6-167.4), median PFS from VEGFR-TKI interruption was 23.8 months (95% CI, 12.5-35.0), and the median TST was 26.2 months (95% CI, 15.9-36.6). The progression was observed in pre-existing lesions in 7 patients (43.7%) or new lesions developed in 9 (56.3%). Among 11 patients who received VEGFR-TKI resumption, 2 patients (18.2%) achieved a PR and the stable disease was observed in 9 (81.8%) with a median TTF of VEGFR-TKI resumption of 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.0-8.4). Conclusions: In patients with mRCC controlled with VEGFR-TKIs, VEGFR-TKI could be interrupted at least temporarily when clinically warranted.

A phase II study of alternative sunitinib scheduling in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 533-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Jonasch ◽  
Rebecca Slack ◽  
Daniel M. Geynisman ◽  
Matthew I. Milowsky ◽  
Kimryn Rathmell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Endpoint Data

533 Background: Sunitinib is an oral antiangiogenic agent indicated for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Sunitinib is given in a 4 week on, 2 week off (4/2) schedule. Significant toxicities are observed in patients in the 3rd and 4thweeks of therapy. We hypothesized that a 2 week on, 1 week off (2/1) schedule would provide improved toxicity without compromising efficacy. Methods: A multicenter, single arm study was performed, with all patients initiating sunitinib 50mg on a 2/1 schedule. Schedule and dose alterations were performed if grade > 3 toxicities were observed. The primary objective was to determine the percentage of patients who experienced grade > 3 fatigue, diarrhea, or HFS. The sample size of 60 patients was selected to ensure that the upper bound of a 95% confidence would fall below the standard schedule rate of 25%-30% if the sample rate was 10%-15%, respectively. Secondary outcomes included response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS), and dose reductions. Results: Between August 2014 and April 2016, a total of 60 patients were enrolled, and 59 were treated. Patients had a median age of 65.5 years (ranging from 45-92). 24% of patients (14/59) had grade 3 or higher fatigue, diarrhea, or HFS (95% CI: 13.6%, 36.6%). This is similar to the average of the 4 week on, 2 week off schedule of 25%-30%, and the lower bound of the confidence interval is in the center of our target rate of 10%-15%. Among events that are at least possibly related to study drug, patients were most likely to experience the expected events of diarrhea (75% with 5 grade 3 events), fatigue (71% with 6 grade 3 events), and HFS (54% with 3 grade 3 events). 22 (37%) patients responded (25.0%, 50.9%). Among patients with secondary endpoint data available, median PFS was 19.3 months (95% CI: 8.2, NR) and 33/56 (59%) of patients underwent dose reduction. Conclusions: Sunitinib administered in a 2/1 schedule in this study did not result in a lower rate of grade 3 or higher fatigue, diarrhea, or HFS when compared to historical data from trials employing a 4/2 schedule. Efficacy data were comparable to studies employing a 4/2 schedule. Clinical trial information: NCT02060370.

scholarly journals Experience of using 1st line combination immunotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 47-63
Author(s):  
A. S. Kalpinskiy ◽  
I. V. Myslevtsev ◽  
A. N. Andrianov ◽  
K. M. Nyushko ◽  
M. P. Golovashchenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Combination Immunotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Best Response

The study objective is to evaluate effectiveness and tolerability of 1st line combination immuno-oncological therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in clinical practice.Materials and methods. The study included 38 patients with mRCC who received combination immunotherapy between July of 2019 and September of 2021. Median follow-up duration was 8 (2-25) months. Mean age of the patients was 58.3 (20-85) years. Previously 22 (57.9 %) patients underwent surgical treatment. Unfavorable physical status 2-3 per the ECOG scale was observed in 10 (26.3 %) patients. Clear-cell type of renal cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 34 (89.6 %) patients, non-clear-cell types in 4 (10.4 %). Sarcomatoid component in the tumor was detected in 8 (21.0 %) patients. G3-4 mRCC variant was verified in 16 (42.1 %) patients. Poor prognosis per the IMDC (International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium) scale was identified in 16 (42.1 %) patients, intermediate -in 20 (52.6 %) patients. All 4 administrations of combination immunotherapy were received by 29 (76.3 %) patients.Results. For median follow-up duration of 8 (2-25) months, 23 (60.5 %) patients continue treatment, 15 (39.5 %) completed therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab due to various reasons including progression in 11 (28.9 %), death in 2 (5.3 %), intolerable toxicity in 2 (5.3 %) cases. Median duration of combination immunotherapy was 9 (2-24) months. Subsequent antitumor therapy was administered to 3 (7.9 %) patients. During induction course immune-mediated adverse event (grade III-IV hepatitis) developed in 3 (7.9 %) patients. Adverse events were observed in 81.6 % of patients, including grade III-IV in 23.7 % of patients. Objective response was observed in 44.8 % of cases, complete response in 5.3 % of cases, partial response in 39.5 % of cases; controlled disease was achieved in 84.3 % of patients. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8 months.Conclusion. In our study despite large number of patients with poor prognosis and poorly differentiated tumors, 64.0 % of patients are alive and 60.5 % of patients continue treatment without disease progression after 18 months of combination immunotherapy. Progression-free survival was significantly affected by sarcomatoid component in the tumor, number of unfavorable factors per the IMDC scale, best response per RECIST 1.1; overall survival was significantly affected by sarcomatoid component in the tumor, sum of measurable lesions, number of unfavorable factors per the IMDC scale, best response per RECIST 1.1, and presence of symptomatic metastases in the brain.

scholarly journals Phase III Trial of Bevacizumab Plus Interferon Alfa Versus Interferon Alfa Monotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Final Results of CALGB 90206

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (13) ◽  
pp. 2137-2143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Susan Halabi ◽  
Jonathan E. Rosenberg ◽  
Walter M. Stadler ◽  
Daniel A. Vaena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Interferon Alfa ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Bevacizumab is an antibody that binds vascular endothelial growth factor and has activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Interferon alfa (IFN-α) is the historic standard initial treatment for RCC. A prospective, randomized, phase III trial of bevacizumab plus IFN-α versus IFN-α monotherapy was conducted. Patients and Methods Patients with previously untreated, metastatic clear cell RCC were randomly assigned to receive either bevacizumab (10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks) plus IFN-α (9 million units subcutaneously three times weekly) or the same dose and schedule of IFN-α monotherapy in a multicenter phase III trial. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and safety. Results Seven hundred thirty-two patients were enrolled. The median OS time was 18.3 months (95% CI, 16.5 to 22.5 months) for bevacizumab plus IFN-α and 17.4 months (95% CI, 14.4 to 20.0 months) for IFN-α monotherapy (unstratified log-rank P = .097). Adjusting on stratification factors, the hazard ratio was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.01; stratified log-rank P = .069) favoring bevacizumab plus IFN-α. There was significantly more grade 3 to 4 hypertension (HTN), anorexia, fatigue, and proteinuria for bevacizumab plus IFN-α. Patients who developed HTN on bevacizumab plus IFN-α had a significantly improved PFS and OS versus patients without HTN. Conclusion OS favored the bevacizumab plus IFN-α arm but did not meet the predefined criteria for significance. HTN may be a biomarker of outcome with bevacizumab plus IFN-α.

Activity of single-agent bevacizumab (B) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) previously treated with VEGF- and mTOR-based therapies.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 435-435
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Armstrong ◽  
James D. Turnbull ◽  
Julien Cobert ◽  
Tracy Jaffe ◽  
Michael Roger Harrison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Mtor Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Mtor Inhibition ◽  
Grade 3

435 Background: Given a lack of clinical information on therapeutic efficacy of agents following progression after vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) tyrosine kinase inhibition (TKI) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), we investigated the activity of single agent bevacizumab (B) in this setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of single agent B-treated patients with mRCC in the second/third line setting, and identified 21 subjects who met inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Baseline characteristics, survival, response efficacy outcomes, and toxicities were assessed and summarized. Results: 21 patients (15 women/6 men) were treated with B at a dose of 5 mg/kg/week, dosed q2-3 weeks. Median age was 63, 80% were white, 14% black; 80% had clear cell histology. Median time from diagnosis to B therapy was 3 years (range 1-18); 100% had prior VEGF TKI therapy; 43% had prior mTOR inhibitor; 43% had prior IFN and 19% prior IL-2; median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1-7); 100% were considered Motzer intermediate risk. Median PFS on B for all subjects was 4.4 mo (95% CI 2.8-9.6) and median OS was 19.4 mo (95% CI 9.9-NR) from start of B therapy. ORR was 2 CR/PR (9.5%), 11 SD (52%), 5 PD, 3 NE. For subjects treated with prior VEGF and mTOR inhibitors, median PFS and OS were 4.4/13.2 mo. Toxicities were as expected and severe adverse events included grade 3-4 fatigue (6), grade 3-4 dehydration (5), and grade 4 failure to thrive (2), grade 4 constipation (2), and grade 3 muscle weakness (2). Conclusions: Single agent B therapy has acceptable toxicity and moderate disease stabilizing activity in selected patients with mRCC who have failed prior VEGF TKI and mTOR inhibitor therapy, and suggests a benefit to continued ongoing VEGF inhibition. Further prospective study of B alone, in combination with mTOR inhibition, or with alternative targeted agents is warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document