Impact of BRAF mutations on prognosis and immunotherapy response in microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3557-3557
Author(s):  
Robin Park ◽  
Laércio Lopes da Silva ◽  
Sunggon Lee ◽  
Anwaar Saeed
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
The Impact

3557 Background: Mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability high (dMMR/MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC) defines a molecular subtype with distinct clinicopathologic characteristics including an excellent response to immunotherapy. Although BRAF mutations are established as a negative prognostic marker in CRC, whether they retain their negative prognostic impact in or alter the response to immunotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H CRC remains unknown. Herein, we present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of BRAF mutations on the overall survival (OS) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response in dMMR/MSI-H CRC. Methods: Studies published from inception to 26 January 2021 were searched in PubMed, Embase, and major conference proceedings (AACR, ASCO, and ESMO). Eligible studies included the following: 1) observational studies reporting outcomes based on BRAF mutation status in dMMR/MSI-H CRC patients and 2) experimental studies of ICI reporting outcomes based on BRAF mutation status in dMMR/MSI-H CRC patients. A summary hazard ratio (HR) was calculated for OS in BRAF mutated ( BRAFmut) vs. BRAF wild type ( BRAFwt) patients (pts) with the random effects meta-analysis (REM). A summary odds ratio (OR) was calculated for objective response rate (ORR) in BRAFmut vs. BRAFwt pts treated with ICI with the REM. Results: Database search conducted according to PRISMA guidelines found 4221 studies in total. Initial screening identified 30 studies and after full-text review, 9 studies (N = 4158 pts) were included for the meta-analysis of prognosis (analysis A) and 3 studies (N = 178 pts) were included for the meta-analysis of ICI response (analysis B). The outcome measures are summarized in the table below. Analysis A showed that in stage I-IV dMMR/MSI-H CRC pts, BRAFmut was associated with worse OS than BRAFwt (HR 1.57, 1.23-1.99). The heterogeneity was low (I2 = 21%). Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in the prognostic impact of BRAF mutation status between stage IV only and stage I-IV CRC pts. Analysis B showed no difference in ORR (OR 1.04, 0.48-2.25) between BRAFmut vs. BRAFwt dMMR/MSI-H pts who received ICI. The heterogeneity was low (I2 = 0%). Conclusions: BRAF mutations retain their negative prognostic impact in dMMR/MSI-H stage I-IV and stage IV CRC but are not associated with differential ICI response. Limitations include the following: analysis A was based on retrospective studies; also, the impact of BRAF status on the survival outcome of ICI could not be assessed due to limited number of studies.[Table: see text]

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on stage at diagnosis of breast and colorectal cancers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6501-6501
Author(s):  
Jade Zhou ◽  
Shelly Kane ◽  
Celia Ramsey ◽  
Melody Ann Akhondzadeh ◽  
Ananya Banerjee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Late Stage ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Stage Distribution ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Impact

6501 Background: Effective cancer screening leads to a substantial increase in the detection of earlier stages of cancer, while decreasing the incidence of later stage cancer diagnoses. Timely screening programs are critical in reducing cancer-related mortality in both breast and colorectal cancer by detecting tumors at an early, curable stage. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the postponement or cancellation of many screening procedures, due to both patient fears of exposures within the healthcare system as well as the cancellation of some elective procedures. We sought to identify how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the incidence of early and late stage breast and colorectal cancer diagnoses at our institution. Methods: We examined staging for all patients presenting to UCSD at first presentation for a new diagnosis of malignancy or second opinion in 2019 and 2020. Treating clinicians determined the stage at presentation for all patients using an AJCC staging module (8th edition) in the electronic medical record (Epic). We compared stage distribution at presentation in 2019 vs 2020, both for cancers overall and for colorectal and breast cancer, because these cancers are frequently detected by screening. Results: Total numbers of new patient visits for malignancy were similar in 2019 and 2020 (1894 vs 1915 pts), and stage distribution for all cancer patients was similar (stage I 32% in 2019 vs 29% in 2020; stage IV 26% in both 2019 and 2020). For patients with breast cancer, we saw a lower number of patients presenting with stage I disease (64% in 2019 vs 51% in 2020) and a higher number presenting with stage IV (2% vs 6%). Similar findings were seen in colorectal cancer (stage I: 22% vs 16%; stage IV: 6% vs 18%). Conclusions: Since the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an increase in incidence of late stage presentation of colorectal and breast cancer, corresponding with a decrease in early stage presentation of these cancers at our institution. Cancer screening is integral to cancer prevention and control, specifically in colorectal and breast cancers which are often detected by screening, and the disruption of screening services has had a significant impact on our patients. We plan to continue following these numbers closely, and will present data from the first half of 2021 as it becomes available.

scholarly journals Impact of Lymphadenectomy on the Oncologic Outcome of Patients with Adrenocortical Carcinoma—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 291
Author(s):  
Anne Hendricks ◽  
Sophie Müller ◽  
Martin Fassnacht ◽  
Christoph-Thomas Germer ◽  
Verena A. Wiegering ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adrenocortical Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Oncologic Outcome ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Tumor Stages ◽  
The Impact

(1) Background: Locoregional lymphadenectomy (LND) in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) may impact oncological outcome, but the findings from individual studies are conflicting. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the oncological value of LND in ACC by summarizing the available literature. (2) Methods: A systematic search on studies published until December 2020 was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The primary outcome was the impact of lymphadenectomy on overall survival (OS). Two separate meta-analyses were performed for studies including patients with localized ACC (stage I–III) and those including all tumor stages (I–IV). Secondary endpoints included postoperative mortality and length of hospital stay (LOS). (3) Results: 11 publications were identified for inclusion. All studies were retrospective studies, published between 2001–2020, and 5 were included in the meta-analysis. Three studies (N = 807 patients) reported the impact of LND on disease-specific survival in patients with stage I–III ACC and revealed a survival benefit of LND (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.42, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.26–0.68). Based on results of studies including patients with ACC stage I–IV (2 studies, N = 3934 patients), LND was not associated with a survival benefit (HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.70–1.42). None of the included studies showed an association between LND and postoperative mortality or LOS. (4) Conclusion: Locoregional lymphadenectomy seems to offer an oncologic benefit in patients undergoing curative-intended surgery for localized ACC (stage I–III).

The Effect of Celiac Neurolysis and Splanchnicectomy on Survival in Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Linhan Ye ◽  
Stephan Schorn ◽  
Ilaria Pergolini ◽  
Okan Safak ◽  
Elke Demir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Relevant Effect ◽  
The Impact

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Intractable pancreatic pain is one of the most common symptoms of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Celiac neurolysis (CN) and splanchnicectomy were already described as effective methods to manage abdominal pain in unresectable PDAC, but their impact on overall survival (OS) has not yet been established. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> We aimed to investigate the impact of CN and splanchnicectomy on the survival of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A systematic review of PubMed and Cochrane Library according to predefined searching terms was conducted in March 2020. Hazard ratios (HR) of OS data were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel model for random effects or fixed effects. <b><i>Result:</i></b> Four randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) and 2 non-RCTs with a total of 2,507 patients were identified. The overall pooled HR did not reveal any relevant effect of CN and splanchnicectomy on OS (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.81–1.32), which was also underlined by the sensitivity analysis of RCTs (HR: 1.0; 95% CI: 0.72–1.39) and non-RCTs (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.71–1.63). However, subgroup analyses depending on tumor stage revealed that CN or splanchnicectomy was associated with a worsened OS in AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) stage III patients with unresectable PDAC (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.03–1.45), but nor for AJCC stage IV patients (HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.9–1.80). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Although only few data are currently available, this systematic review with meta-analysis showed that in unresectable PDAC, CN or splanchnicectomy is associated with a worsened survival in stage III PDAC patients, with no effect on stage IV PDAC patients. These data call for caution in the usage of CN or splanchnicectomy in stage III PDAC and for further studies addressing this observation.

RAS heterogeneity as a prognostic marker in metastatic colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 586-586
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Loree ◽  
Michael Lam ◽  
Jeffrey Morris ◽  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Allele Frequency ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Intratumor Heterogeneity ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Stage At Diagnosis ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
The Impact

586 Background: The impact of intratumor heterogeneity on prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is unclear, however relative variant allele frequency (rVAF) of key mutations within a tumor may impact outcomes. Therefore, we sought to determine whether rVAF of RAS ( KRAS & NRAS) mutant (mt) clones impacts overall survival (OS) in mCRC patients (pts). Methods: Using a next generation sequencing panel of 201 cancer related genes, we tested 200 mCRC tumors / matched normals. Mutations, indels, and copy number variant (CNV) information were obtained. An rVAF of RAS clones was determined by dividing RAS mt VAF by the VAF of the mutated gene with the highest allele frequency. This truncal gene served as a marker of the total malignant population in a specimen. Pts were stratified at an rVAF of 50%. OS was compared with Kaplan-Meier curves, the log-rank test, and Cox regression. We assessed the impact of CNV on our findings by correcting the rVAF for CNVs in RASand truncal mutations. Results: Of 200 pts, 15% had RAS mt rVAF < 50%, 40.5% had rVAF ≥ 50%, and 44.5% were RAS wild type (WT). Age, gender, MSI status, histology, and stage at diagnosis were similar between groups. More RAS WT pts had BRAF mutations (19.1% vs 1.2% and 3.3%, P< 0.0001), left sided (78.7% vs 56.8% and 60%, P= 0.02), or poorly differentiated tumors (27.3% vs 8.6% and 13.3%, P= 0.003) compared to pts with rVAF ≥ 50% or rVAF < 50%, respectively. Mean coverage was 807x for RAS and 602x for truncal mutations. OS was better in pts with an rVAF < 50% compared to pts with rVAF ≥ 50% regardless of whether rVAF was corrected for CNV (HR 0.6; 95% CI 0.39-0.93, P =0.029) or not (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.31-0.82, P= 0.010). mOS for pts with WT, rVAF < 50% and rVAF ≥ 50% tumors were 65.8, 55.7, and 38.6 months ( P= 0.0025). In multivariate models controlling for stage at diagnosis and BRAF mutation, pts with rVAF < 50% (HR 1.75; 95% CI 1.03-2.97, P = 0.04) and rVAF ≥ 50% (HR 2.46; 95% CI 1.66-3.65, P< 0.0001) had worse OS compared to WT pts. When rVAF was used as a continuous variable, every 1% increase in rVAF RAS mt resulted in a 1% increased hazard of death ( P <0.0001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that clonal proportion of a tumor with a RAS mutation may impact OS and suggest the prognostic impact of RAS mutations is not an “all or none” phenomenon.

scholarly journals Prevalence of RAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer patients by tumor sidedness: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1044-1057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren C. Bylsma ◽  
Christina Gillezeau ◽  
Tamer A. Garawin ◽  
Michael A. Kelsh ◽  
Jon P. Fryzek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document