Tolerance of aromatase inhibitors in post-menopausal patients with early-stage hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer: A real-world retrospective analysis in a large oncotype database.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12532-e12532
Author(s):  
Shana Berwick ◽  
Brittney Shulman Zimmerman ◽  
Sara Malin Hovstadius ◽  
Julia Blanter ◽  
Erin Moshier ◽  
...  

e12532 Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) compose the backbone of adjuvant endocrine therapy for early-stage HR+ breast cancer. Prior studies have demonstrated equivalence in efficacy between aromatase inhibitors in current clinical use. Thus choice of aromatase inhibitors is initially influenced by provider patterns and tailored based on adverse side effects. This study retrospectively evaluates the prevalence of intolerance to AIs warranting a change in therapy. Methods: We identified 181 post-menopausal patients with early-stage, HR+ breast cancer within a database of women who underwent oncotype testing at a large, urban medical center, with 167 (92%) receiving an AI. Patients were excluded if they had received chemotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median duration of endocrine therapy (ET). The Fisher’s exact test was used to compare proportions of patients requiring a switch in adjuvant AI and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare age distributions. Results: Of the patients identified, 153 (90%) had stage IA disease with a median oncotype RS of 19. 167 (92%) patients received an AI as adjuvant therapy. Median duration of endocrine therapy (ET) was 83.5 months, with over 90% of patients on ET more than 5 years. Among the 152 patients with available data on ET interruptions, 52 (34%) patients had a change or interruption in their ET of these 40 (77%) were attributed to a medication side effect. The AI prescribed most frequently as initial therapy was anastrozole 138/165 (84%). 33 (24%) of patients who received anastrozole required a drug switch within the class, (no sig difference based on initial adjuvant therapy; p=0.4281). 12 (7%) patients required a switch from an AI to tamoxifen at some point during therapy. Changes in AI adjuvant therapy were most commonly attributed to joint pains 24 (46%), followed by hot flashes 2 (4%) and weight gain, 2 (4%). There was no statistically significant difference in median age between patients who interrupted ET due to medication side effect or other reason; p=0.2906. Conclusions: This study enforces previous findings that a significant proportion of women require a change in their adjuvant ET, most commonly due to adverse medication effects such as joint pain. The majority of the women in this database were initiated on anastrozole as initial adjuvant ET of whom 24% required a drug switch.[Table: see text]

10.2196/27576 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. e27576
Author(s):  
Jing Yu ◽  
Jiayi Wu ◽  
Ou Huang ◽  
Xiaosong Chen ◽  
Kunwei Shen

Background Multidisciplinary treatment (MDT) and adjuvant therapy are associated with improved survival rates in breast cancer. However, nonadherence to MDT decisions is common in patients. We developed a smartphone-based app that can facilitate the full-course management of patients after surgery. Objective This study aims to investigate the influence factors of treatment nonadherence and to determine whether this smartphone-based app can improve the compliance rate with MDTs. Methods Patients who had received a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer and had undergone MDT between March 2013 and May 2019 were included. Patients were classified into 3 groups: Pre-App cohort (November 2017, before the launch of the app); App nonused, cohort (after November 2017 but not using the app); and App used cohort (after November 2017 and using the app). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the factors related to MDT adherence. Compliance with specific adjuvant treatments, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted therapy, was also evaluated. Results A total of 4475 patients were included, with Pre-App, App nonused, and App used cohorts comprising 2966 (66.28%), 861 (19.24%), and 648 (14.48%) patients, respectively. Overall, 15.53% (695/4475) patients did not receive MDT recommendations; the noncompliance rate ranged from 27.4% (75/273) in 2013 to 8.8% (44/500) in 2019. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that app use was independently associated with adherence to adjuvant treatment. Compared with the patients in the Pre-App cohort, patients in the App used cohort were less likely to deviate from MDT recommendations (odds ratio [OR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.87; P=.007); no significant difference was found in the App nonused cohort (P=.77). Moreover, app use decreased the noncompliance rate for adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.65; P<.001) and radiotherapy (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25-0.96; P=.04), but not for anti-HER2 therapy (P=.76) or endocrine therapy (P=.39). Conclusions This smartphone-based app can increase MDT adherence in patients undergoing adjuvant therapy; this was more obvious for adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1132-1137
Author(s):  
Phillip S. Blanchette ◽  
Melody Lam ◽  
Britney Le ◽  
Lucie Richard ◽  
Salimah Z. Shariff ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Stephen R. Johnston

Overview: Adjuvant endocrine therapy for early-stage breast cancer has had the single biggest impact on improving survival from the disease—with tamoxifen alone contributing to saving many thousands of lives. In postmenopausal women, additional progress has been made by the incorporation of aromatase inhibitors into the treatment of early-stage, estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer, as several large well-conducted trials have established either “up-front” or “switch” strategies that are now widely used. To date, both have been shown to be beneficial when compared with tamoxifen alone, although controversy exists as to which approach is superior. Increasingly, extended adjuvant therapy is being considered, as “longer may be better” for some women who have an ongoing risk of recurrence beyond 5 years. However, controversy remains as to how long adjuvant endocrine therapy should be given for; in clinical practice, clinicians balance the level of risk for individual patients versus any ongoing toxicity concerns. For premenopausal women, with ER-positive breast cancer, tamoxifen remains the gold standard with uncertainty in the added overall benefit of ovarian suppression. Important clinical trials have recently been completed that may help answers this question, including whether complete estrogen deprivation using a luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist plus aromatase inhibitors (AIs) is of added benefit. In recent years, molecular profiling of ER-positive breast cancer has started to distinguish those women with a low risk of recurrence on endocrine therapy who may not need chemotherapy. Thus, with more therapy options and greater tumour stratification, modern, adjuvant endocrine therapy is becoming increasingly personalised to suit each individual patient's risk.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
Danielle Lindsay LaMorte ◽  
Katherine E. Hartmann ◽  
Vandana Gupta Abramson ◽  
Ingrid A. Mayer ◽  
Nancy Walker Peacock ◽  
...  

11 Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are standard of care for adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) to prevent recurrence of early stage breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Previous AET adherence research has focused on the 25-96% adherence observed with, but more information is needed about AI adherence, especially regarding the role of arthralgia (joint pain or stiffness) in AET changes. Our objective was to understand AET changes within a year of AI initiation. Methods: We examined AET switching (either to another AI or to tamoxifen), overall changes in AET (including switching and temporary or permanent discontinuation), and physician- and patient-reported arthralgia, using data abstracted from medical records and self-administered surveys among 93 patients initiating AI. We conducted Chi-square and Wilcoxon univariate analyses. Results: Anastrazole was initially prescribed to 64 patients (69%), letrozole to 28 patients (30%), and exemestane to 1 patient. A year after AI initiation, 64 patients (69%) had no change in AET. Among the 29 patients (31%) who had an AET change, 14 switched to at least one other AI, 11 switched to tamoxifen, 9 temporarily discontinued AET, and 7 entirely discontinued AET (categories not mutually exclusive). Average time to first AET switch was 182.7 days. Average number of AET switches was 1.4. Arthralgia was the most common reason for AET changes, noted in the records of 19 patients (66% of those who changed AET). Patients who changed AET reported more severe arthralgia (median pain from 0-10 among 8 joint groups =1.4, interquartile range [IQR]=0.3-2.6) at week 12 than those who did not (median=0.3, IQR=0-1.1), p=0.03. A higher proportion (46%) of the 28 patients who initiated with letrozole changed AET due to arthralgia, compared with 20% of the 64 patients who initiated with anastrazole (p=0.01). Conclusions: A substantial proportion of women initiating AI change AET over one year. Arthralgia appears to play a key role in AET changes, particularly for letrozole as compared with anastrazole. More longitudinal patient-reported arthralgia data are needed to guide clinical decision making about AI initiation and AET changes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document